View source for One who is married, responsible man, he has got some responsibility to see that..., provided he has got affection for the family. Otherwise, practically, so-called family life, there is no affection

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"one who is married, responsible man, he has got some responsibility to see that . . . provided he has got affection for the family. Otherwise, practically, so-called family life there is no affection"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Anurag}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2022-11-02T06:43:38Z}}
{{last|2022-11-02T06:43:38Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:One Who Is]]
[[Category:Married Men]]
[[Category:Responsible]]
[[Category:Man]]
[[Category:He Has]]
[[Category:Got]]
[[Category:Some]]
[[Category:Responsibility]]
[[Category:See]]
[[Category:Provide]]
[[Category:Family Affection]]
[[Category:Otherwise]]
[[Category:Practically]]
[[Category:So-called Family]]
[[Category:Family Life]]
[[Category:There Is No]]
[[Category:Affection]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - ANURAG]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>Nectar of Devotion Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
These hippies, they have no family affection. They are not married, and therefore there is no economic impetus. They can live in any way, any wretched condition of life. And one who is married, responsible man, he has got some responsibility to see that . . . provided he has got affection for the family. Otherwise, practically, so-called family life there is no affection.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:730106 - Lecture NOD - Bombay|730106 - Lecture NOD - Bombay]]
</div>
<div class="text">
So people are misled. They are thinking that by material comfort they will be happy. And practically we are seeing, this competition of material comfort . . . the capitalist and the labor class, worker class, they are fighting—strike. Actually, the propensity is that . . . that is explained in Marshall's theory of economics. We were student of economics. So in that book, Mr. Marshall explained that the family affection is the origin of economic impetus. That's a fact.

These hippies, they have no family affection. They are not married, and therefore there is no economic impetus. They can live in any way, any wretched condition of life. And one who is married, responsible man, he has got some responsibility to see that . . . provided he has got affection for the family. Otherwise, practically, so-called family life there is no affection.

So this is a fact. The family affection . . . puṁsaḥ striyā mithunī-bhāvam etat. There is a propensity of men, association with woman, mithunī-bhāvam etat. Everyone is trying to find out a man or woman. And when they unite, that attraction becomes tightly knot. Tayor mitho hṛdaya-granthim āhuḥ ([[Vanisource:SB 5.5.8|SB 5.5.8]]). Hṛdaya-granthim. And then the economic impetus starts. Ataḥ gṛha-kṣetra-sutāpta-vittaiḥ. Gṛha, home; kṣetra, land, or the office for earning money; gṛha-kṣetra-suta, children; friends, āpta; and vitta, money—in this way one becomes entangled in the so-called economic development. Dharma-artha-kāma-mokṣa ([[Vanisource:SB 4.8.41|SB 4.8.41]], [[Vanisource:CC Adi 1.90|CC Ādi 1.90]]). People take to religion mostly for economic development. People go to temple, church, for economic development. "O God, give us our daily bread," in the church they pray. This is economic development.
</div>
</div>
</div>