View source for There are different duties, but the real duty is samsiddhir hari-tosanam (SB 1.2.13), whether you have satisfied Krsna. Then you'll have done all duties

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"There are different duties, but the real duty is saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam"|"whether you have satisfied Kṛṣṇa. Then you'll have done all duties"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2023-03-06T09:24:53Z}}
{{last|2023-03-06T09:24:53Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:There Are]]
[[Category:Different]]
[[Category:Real Duty]]
[[Category:Whether]]
[[Category:Satisfying Krsna]]
[[Category:You Will]]
[[Category:Have Done]]
[[Category:You Have]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SOHAM]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>1976 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Indian man (1): Śrīla Prabhupāda, is it right that if you come to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, all the duties are automatically taken care of? Prabhupāda: All the duties, the summarization of duty— ataḥ pumbhir dvija-śreṣṭhā varṇāśrama-vibhāgaśaḥ (SB 1.2.13). There are different duties, but the real duty is saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam (SB 1.2.13), whether you have satisfied Kṛṣṇa. Then you'll have done all duties. Ataḥ pumbhiḥ. Because there are different types of duties. But whatever you do, the success is whether by your duty you have satisfied Kṛṣṇa. Then it is successful.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:760621 - Morning Walk - Toronto|760621 - Morning Walk - Toronto]]
</div>
<div class="text">
Indian man (1): Śrīla Prabhupāda, is it right that if you come to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, all the duties are automatically taken care of?

Prabhupāda: All the duties, the summarization of duty— ataḥ pumbhir dvija-śreṣṭhā varṇāśrama-vibhāgaśaḥ ([[Vanisource:SB 1.2.13|SB 1.2.13]]). There are different duties, but the real duty is saṁsiddhir hari-toṣaṇam ([[Vanisource:SB 1.2.13|SB 1.2.13]]), whether you have satisfied Kṛṣṇa. Then you'll have done all duties. Ataḥ pumbhiḥ. Because there are different types of duties. But whatever you do, the success is whether by your duty you have satisfied Kṛṣṇa. Then it is successful.

Indian man (4): Prabhu, how do you regard the detachment idea?

Prabhupāda: There is no question of detachment. These are all bogus propaganda. You cannot be detached. Duty does not mean detachment. You have to do your duty. There is attachment. Where is the detachment? These are simply bogus propaganda. There cannot be detachment. Detachment means . . . real detachment means that everything belongs to Kṛṣṇa. So you have no proprietorship. That is detachment. If you falsely claim, "It is mine," that is attachment, unnecessary. It is not yours.

Indian man (4): Should we not move from attachment to detachment gradually, and try to . . .

Prabhupāda: No. You cannot do that. Your attachment has to be purified. Just like this land. The Canadians think, "This is my land." But this, when it is purified, it is this land God's land. Then it is purified. And so long you falsely claim "It is my land," that is cause of all trouble.

<div class="quote_verse">
:īśāvāsyam idaṁ sarvaṁ
:yat kiñca jagatyāṁ jagat
:tena tyaktena bhuñjīthā
:mā gṛdhaḥ kasya svid dhanam 
:([[Vanisource:ISO 1|ISO 1]])
</div>

Just a minute ago we were talking that in Canada there is so much land, and you told me there is so many fertile land. Huh? You told me? But they'll not allow anybody to come. This is wrong position. Why? China or India, there are so many countries overcongested. Let them come. But he's thinking, "It my land."

Indian man (1): They pay the money to a farmer not to grow the wheat here.

Prabhupāda: Just see. This rascaldom is going on in the name of civilization. Īśāvāsyam idaṁ sarvam ([[Vanisource:ISO 1|ISO 1]]), they do not know. Everything belongs to God, and are all sons of God. So by God's arrangement there is enough land to live, enough land to produce food. They're misusing. Therefore the whole trouble.
</div>
</div>
</div>