View source for Bhagavata is natural commentary on Vedanta-sutra, and Lord Caitanya therefore gives evidence from the Bhagavata generally, and Puranas also, Mahabharata and Upanisad. They are all authorities

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Bhāgavata is natural commentary on Vedānta-sūtra, and Lord Caitanya therefore gives evidence from the Bhāgavata generally, and Purāṇas also, Mahābhārata and anyway, I mean to say, Upaniṣad. They are all authorities"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2023-04-29T06:19:53Z}}
{{last|2023-04-29T06:19:53Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Srimad-Bhagavatam (Bhagavata Purana)]]
[[Category:Natural Commentaries]]
[[Category:Commentary on the Vedanta-sutra]]
[[Category:Therefore Caitanya]]
[[Category:Caitanya's Giving]]
[[Category:Caitanya's Evidence]]
[[Category:Gives Evidence From]]
[[Category:Generally]]
[[Category:Puranas]]
[[Category:Mahabharata]]
[[Category:Upanisads]]
[[Category:They Are]]
[[Category:Authority]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SOHAM]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>Sri Caitanya-caritamrta Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
Caitanya Mahāprabhu's sampradāya, they did not make any commentary on the Vedānta-sūtra because they belonged to the disciplic succession of Vyāsadeva. So Vyāsadeva is the spiritual master. So the later ācārya, they did not think it proper that whatever the . . . Because their spiritual master has had already made a commentary on the Vedānta-sūtra, "Oh, that is sufficient. Why should we do again?" These are some of the etiquettes. Anyway, the Vedānta-sūtra . . . and Bhāgavata is natural commentary on Vedānta-sūtra, and Lord Caitanya therefore gives evidence from the Bhāgavata generally, and Purāṇas also, Mahābhārata and anyway, I mean to say, Upaniṣad. They are all authorities. But especially He gives evidences from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:670111 - Lecture CC Madhya 22.21-28 - New York|670111 - Lecture CC Madhya 22.21-28 - New York]]
</div>
<div class="text">
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, although the Vaiṣṇavas, they have got their commentaries on Vedānta-sūtra, but this Caitanya Mahāprabhu's sampradāya, they did not make any commentary on the Vedānta-sūtra because they belonged to the disciplic succession of Vyāsadeva. So Vyāsadeva is the spiritual master. So the later ācārya, they did not think it proper that whatever the . . .

Because their spiritual master has had already made a commentary on the Vedānta-sūtra, "Oh, that is sufficient. Why should we do again?" These are some of the etiquettes. Anyway, the Vedānta-sūtra . . . and Bhāgavata is natural commentary on Vedānta-sūtra, and Lord Caitanya therefore gives evidence from the Bhāgavata generally, and Purāṇas also, Mahābhārata and anyway, I mean to say, Upaniṣad. They are all authorities. But especially He gives evidences from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam.

Now, so far in confirmation of this statement that knowledge, cultivation of knowledge, is not sufficient to give one liberation—one must take to devotional service. Devotional service plus knowledge is just like gold with flavor. Yes. So, of course, those who are engaged in devotional service, their knowledge automatically comes. They are not fools. Those who are actually, seriously in devotional service, in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, they will not lack in knowledge, because you'll find in the Bhagavad-gītā that the Lord says that:

<div class="quote_verse">
:teṣāṁ satata-yuktānāṁ
:bhajatāṁ prīti-pūrvakam
:dadāmi buddhi-yogaṁ taṁ
:yena mām upayānti te 
:([[Vanisource:BG 10.10 (1972)|BG 10.10]])
</div>

Those who are engaged in transcendental loving service of Kṛṣṇa, for them knowledge automatically comes from within, because Kṛṣṇa is within us. So a sincere soul in Kṛṣṇa consciousness will not lack in knowledge.
</div>
</div>
</div>