View source for There are so many editions of Bhagavad-gita. So our Krsna consciousness movement is to request you to read this BG as it is. Do not try to comment upon it whimsically. Therefore we are publishing Bhagavad-gita as it is, without any imperfect comment

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"There are so many editions of Bhagavad-gītā– perhaps you know. So our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is to request you to read this Bhagavad-gītā as it is. Do not try to comment upon it whimsically. Therefore we are publishing Bhagavad-gītā as it is, without any imperfect comment"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SharmisthaK}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2024-03-07T07:55:55.000Z}}
{{last|2024-03-07T07:55:55.000Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:There Are Many]]
[[Category:So Many]]
[[Category:Edition]]
[[Category:Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:Our Krsna Consciousness (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Krsna Consciousness Movement Is...]]
[[Category:I Request (Prabhupada)]]
[[Category:Reading the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Do Not Try To]]
[[Category:Commentaries on the Bhagavad-gita]]
[[Category:Whimsically]]
[[Category:Therefore]]
[[Category:We Are (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Publishing Bhagavad-gita As It Is]]
[[Category:Without Any]]
[[Category:Imperfect]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SHARMISTHA]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>General Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
There are so many editions of Bhagavad-gītā– perhaps you know. So our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is to request you to read this Bhagavad-gītā as it is. Do not try to comment upon it whimsically. Therefore we are publishing Bhagavad-gītā as it is, without any imperfect comment. As it is.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:760506 - Lecture - Honolulu|760506 - Lecture - Honolulu]]
</div>
<div class="text">
The dehi, the spirit soul, is within this body. Now you apply your logic and reason, and you will see, "Yes. It is all right." So any . . . that is the system of Vedic civilization: that anything which is described in the Vedas, that is real proof; that is real knowledge. So our propaganda, this Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement, is that you take knowledge from Kṛṣṇa directly, who is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Even if you do not accept Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the Kṛṣṇa's book, Bhagavad-gītā, is very, very widely read all over the world by philosophers, by scholars, by religionists, by general public. There are so many editions of Bhagavad-gītā– perhaps you know. So our Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is to request you to read this Bhagavad-gītā as it is. Do not try to comment upon it whimsically. Therefore we are publishing Bhagavad-gītā as it is, without any imperfect comment. As it is. Just like Kṛṣṇa says here:

<div class="quote_verse">
:dehino 'smin yathā dehe
:kaumāraṁ yauvanaṁ jarā
:tathā dehāntara-prāptir
:dhīras tatra na muhyati 
:([[Vanisource:BG 2.13 (1972)|BG 2.13]])
</div>

The soul is within this body. He is transmigrating from one type of body to another. This is fact. If we ponder over this, we shall find it is fact. So we take it as it is. That is our method of knowledge—very simple. We simplify the matter. Now if you want to research scientifically . . . actually they are researching, but they could not find, the medical science. They are . . . a dead man, a man who is going to die, he is giving all kinds of injections and all types of jabs, and taking all care. In spite of all that, everything, oh, the man is dead. Finished. Now ask them what is finished, they cannot say. They say, "Yes. We do not know." But you should know. You cannot say that the blood has turned from redness to whiteness; therefore he is dead. No. You are scientifically advanced; you can turn the blood into red. Not that . . . the redness is not life, because there are so many red, natural. Just like a flower, red flower; it is not living. It has no life. So redness, you cannot put this logic that redness, red corpuscles, is the source of life. You cannot say that this dead body is dead because some chemical is missing. That is, that also you cannot say because that chemical . . . if you say that there is chemical which is giving life, that chemical is already there, because after two minutes you will find that as soon as the body is decomposed many living entities are coming out. So the life-giving chemical is there. You cannot say the chemical is wanting. Or if you say the chemical is wanting, then bring that chemical, put it into it and make it alive. That is not possible.
</div>
</div>
</div>