View source for If the state law is that you must drive your car left, can you create the law, "No, it should be driven on the right"? Will you be accepted? Similarly, if you cannot create the law of the state, how you can create the law of God? Common sense

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"If the state law is that you must drive your car left, can you create the law, "No, I create the law it should be driven on the right"? Will you be accepted? Similarly, if you cannot create the law of the state, how you can create the law of God? Common sense"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2024-09-27T12:38:06.000Z}}
{{last|2024-09-27T12:38:06.000Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:State - country]]
[[Category:Law]]
[[Category:Must]]
[[Category:Drive]]
[[Category:Car]]
[[Category:Left (side)]]
[[Category:Create]]
[[Category:Should Be]]
[[Category:Right (side)]]
[[Category:Will You Be]]
[[Category:Accept]]
[[Category:Similarly]]
[[Category:If You Cannot]]
[[Category:How Can]]
[[Category:Laws of God]]
[[Category:Common Sense]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SOHAM]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
If the state law is that you must drive your car left, can you create the law, "No, I create the law it should be driven on the right"? Will you be accepted? Similarly, if you cannot create the law of the state, how you can create the law of God? Common sense. But they are creating, "Oh, this is a new type of religion I have created." "What you are, sir, you can create?".
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:730221 - Lecture SB 06.01.13-15 - Auckland|730221 - Lecture SB 06.01.13-15 - Auckland]]
</div>
<div class="text">
One must know what is God; then one must know what is order. But there is. Just like Kṛṣṇa: Kṛṣṇa is accepted God by all the Vedic followers. In India there are ācāryas, ācārya-upāsanam: Rāmānuja Ācārya, Madhvācārya, Śaṅkarācārya, Nimbārditya. There are so many. There are different ācāryas, they are preaching about God, and they have accepted Kṛṣṇa as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, all of them. Indian Vedic civilization is guided by the ācāryas, not by the rascals and fools. ācāryas. Anyone who is not under the guidance of this ācārya, he is not accepted as bona fide follower of Veda. You cannot create.

Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ ([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 17.186|CC Madhya 17.186]]). You cannot create one religion. No. Nowadays there are so many rascals, they are creating religion. Religion . . . just like you cannot create law. Is it possible? If the state law is that you must drive your car left, can you create the law, "No, I create the law it should be driven on the right"? Will you be accepted? Similarly, if you cannot create the law of the state, how you can create the law of God? Common sense. But they are creating, "Oh, this is a new type of religion I have created." "What you are, sir, you can create?" No, religion means the order of God, and it can be created only . . . it can be given by God, and we should receive it through the ācāryas.

<div class="quote_verse">
:evaṁ paramparā-prāptam
:imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ 
:([[Vanisource:BG 4.2 (1972)|BG 4.2]])
</div>

Kṛṣṇa said by paramparā system, and that the law is executed through the state servant, paramparā.

Similarly, one should receive religion through the ācāryas. Not whimsically, anyone and everyone. "Anyone can become an avatāra; anyone can become God"—this is all rascaldom. We have to become dharmajñāḥ, knower of religion. How I shall know? Mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ ([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 17.186|CC Madhya 17.186]]).

<div class="quote_verse">
:dharmasya tattvaṁ nihitaṁ guhāyāṁ
:mahājano yena gataḥ sa panthāḥ 
:([[Vanisource:CC Madhya 17.186|CC Madhya 17.186]])
</div>

These are the indications, tarko ‘pratiṣṭhaḥ. You cannot establish religion by arguing.
</div>
</div>
</div>