View source for Lord Krishna killed his own dynasty under His personal supervision. So certainly Krishna didn't like the idea that future dynasties would be able to identify having Krishna's blood. Krishna has no material blood; neither He is different from His body

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Lord Krishna killed his own dynasty under His personal supervision. So certainly Krishna didn't like the idea that future dynasties would be able to identify having Krishna's blood. Krishna has no material blood; neither He is different from His body"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Matea}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|21Jan11}}
{{last|21Jan11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Krsna]]
[[Category:Kill]]
[[Category:Own]]
[[Category:Yadu Dynasty]]
[[Category:Under]]
[[Category:Personal]]
[[Category:Supervision]]
[[Category:Certainly]]
[[Category:Did Not]]
[[Category:Like (verb, to like)]]
[[Category:Idea]]
[[Category:Future]]
[[Category:Would]]
[[Category:Able To]]
[[Category:Identification]]
[[Category:Blood]]
[[Category:Material Body]]
[[Category:Neither]]
[[Category:Not Different From]]
</div>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
</div>
<div id="1971_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="6" parent="Correspondence" text="1971 Correspondence"><h3>1971 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoNayanabhiramaLondon22August1971_0" class="quote" parent="1971_Correspondence" book="Let" index="407" link="Letter to Nayanabhirama -- London 22 August, 1971" link_text="Letter to Nayanabhirama -- London 22 August, 1971">
<div class="heading">Because there is some similarity of the word Jew and Yadu so some historian or scholar, so called, created this notion. I have read it also in some paper. But even it is true, we have nothing to do with it. Lord Krishna killed his own dynasty under His personal supervision. So certainly Krishna didn't like the idea that future dynasties would be able to identify having Krishna's blood. Krishna has no material blood; neither He is different from His body.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Nayanabhirama -- London 22 August, 1971|Letter to Nayanabhirama -- London 22 August, 1971]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Also I have received your check for $25.00 and I thank you very much for the same. Yes, if it is approved by the GBC then I have no objection if you and your wife go to Israel to help out there. Philadelphia temple has improved nicely under your supervision. So for the time being continue to develop it nicely. Nothing should be done hastily or haphazardly. Then when the temple is very firmly situated I have no objection for your going. So do the needful and ask Krishna to help you.</p>
<p>Because there is some similarity of the word Jew and Yadu so some historian or scholar, so called, created this notion. I have read it also in some paper. But even it is true, we have nothing to do with it. Lord Krishna killed his own dynasty under His personal supervision. So certainly Krishna didn't like the idea that future dynasties would be able to identify having Krishna's blood. Krishna has no material blood; neither He is different from His body. The example is given that Malayan sandalwood is famous as grown in Malaya but the fact is that sandalwood can grow anywhere. Nowadays in Malaya there are only rubber trees but still in the market the sandalwood is known as Malayan sandalwood. Similarly a family may become famous for Krishna taking birth in that family but Krishna is independent and can appear anywhere and everywhere, where His devotees are.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>