View source for I am thinking more in terms of the question, it is perhaps more suitable to make the question a question, not affirmation. "Who am I?" perhaps, is the best of the mantrams instead of affirming, "I am," because we cannot realize who I am

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"But I am thinking more in terms of the question, it is perhaps more suitable to make the question a question, not affirmation"|"because we cannot realize who"|"perhaps, is the best of the mantrams instead of affirming"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Mangalavati}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|10Mar11}}
{{last|10Mar11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:I Am]]
[[Category:Thinking]]
[[Category:More]]
[[Category:In Terms Of]]
[[Category:Question]]
[[Category:It Is]]
[[Category:Perhaps]]
[[Category:More]]
[[Category:Suitable]]
[[Category:Make]]
[[Category:Affirm]]
[[Category:Who]]
[[Category:Perhaps]]
[[Category:Best Of All]]
[[Category:Mantra]]
[[Category:Instead Of]]
[[Category:Because]]
[[Category:Cannot]]
[[Category:Realize]]
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="RoomConversationwithMetaphysicsSocietyFebruary211975Caracas_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="10" link="Room Conversation with Metaphysics Society -- February 21, 1975, Caracas" link_text="Room Conversation with Metaphysics Society -- February 21, 1975, Caracas">
<div class="heading">That's all right. But you are basing your knowledge, "Perhaps." Therefore you are imperfect. "Perhaps." That means you are imperfect. Your statement will not be accepted. Because you are imperfect, you say, "Perhaps, maybe." So this is not knowledge. This is not knowledge. This is ignorance. As soon as you say, "Perhaps, maybe," that means you do not know what is, the actual thing is. Knowledge must be perfect. There is no question of "Perhaps, it may be." No, that is not knowledge. That is speculation. That is speculation. That is not knowledge. Because you are sitting, "Perhaps," therefore your knowledge cannot be accepted.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Metaphysics Society -- February 21, 1975, Caracas|Room Conversation with Metaphysics Society -- February 21, 1975, Caracas]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Guest: May I ask a question, please? Master, perhaps... It seems to me we have sort of misunderstood. These people is trying to inquire whether or not a sort of a mantram I would say invented here in the western hemisphere or a so-called master is or is not good for realization of the self. But I am thinking more in terms of the question, it is perhaps more suitable to make the question a question, not affirmation. "Who am I?" perhaps, is the best of the mantrams instead of affirming, "I am," because we cannot realize who I am.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That's all right. But you are basing your knowledge, "Perhaps." Therefore you are imperfect. "Perhaps." That means you are imperfect. Your statement will not be accepted. Because you are imperfect, you say, "Perhaps, maybe." So this is not knowledge. This is not knowledge. This is ignorance. As soon as you say, "Perhaps, maybe," that means you do not know what is, the actual thing is. Knowledge must be perfect. There is no question of "Perhaps, it may be." No, that is not knowledge. That is speculation. That is speculation. That is not knowledge. Because you are sitting, "Perhaps," therefore your knowledge cannot be accepted.</p>
<p>Guest: No, no, I'm just asking the question whether or not the right question could be: "Who am I?"</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes, that's nice. That's nice. Therefore I say when you say, "I am," and when I say, "I am," I must understand who I am, you must understand who you are. That I am saying, that simply saying "I am," is not the final. Is not the final. Everyone is "I am," but he must know what I am, what that "I am." That is knowledge. If you blindly say, "I am," and you do not know what you are, then what is the use of using "I am"? Therefore I ask, "What you are?"</p>
<p>Lady (Hṛdayānanda): She says that everyone has to decide.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. That decision is required, that is knowledge. Simply saying, "I am," everyone can say, "I am." What is that? You must know what you are. That is required. Therefore I am asking, "What you are?"</p>
<p>Lady: I agree. I am just mentioning that "I am" is the name of God, and then you add the adjective, and He will be established unto you.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, no, no. "I am" is not the name of God. That is identification. That is the identification. God can say, "I am," you can say, "I am," but that does not mean you are God.</p>
<p>Lady: Jesus Christ said that if you establish what you are after you say "I am"...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That's all right, everyone is saying, "I am." Everyone is saying in ordinary dealing, "I am." That is there. But that does (not) mean different "I am" is the same.</p>
<p>Lady: You decree it. You decree what you are. You decree. With "I am," you decree. You make a decree.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, that decree is already there. Just like in the Bible, "God is great." You are not great. Therefore you "I am" and God "I am" different.</p>
<p>Girl: Is it possible to sing the mahā-mantra for someone else who has died, and will it have the same effect?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: If you say, "I am servant," and God says, "I am master," then it is perfect.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>