View source for Lately there has been some misunderstanding amongst our devotees about our Krishna Consciousness philosophy. Particularly there has been some confusion about the relationship between the Spiritual Master and Krishna

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"there has been some confusion about the relationship between the Spiritual Master and Krishna"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Labangalatika}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|25Apr11}}
{{last|25Apr11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Have Been]]
[[Category:Some]]
[[Category:Confusion]]
[[Category:About]]
[[Category:Relationships]]
[[Category:Between]]
[[Category:Spiritual Master]]
[[Category:Krsna]]
</div>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
</div>
<div id="1970_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="5" parent="Correspondence" text="1970 Correspondence"><h3>1970 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoIsanaVibhavatiCalcutta21September1970_0" class="quote" parent="1970_Correspondence" book="Let" index="522" link="Letter to Isana, Vibhavati -- Calcutta 21 September, 1970" link_text="Letter to Isana, Vibhavati -- Calcutta 21 September, 1970">
<div class="heading">Lately there has been some misunderstanding amongst our devotees about our Krishna Consciousness philosophy. Particularly there has been some confusion about the relationship between the Spiritual Master and Krishna.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Isana, Vibhavati -- Calcutta 21 September, 1970|Letter to Isana, Vibhavati -- Calcutta 21 September, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Lately there has been some misunderstanding amongst our devotees about our Krishna Consciousness philosophy. Particularly there has been some confusion about the relationship between the Spiritual Master and Krishna. The Vedas say that there is a Master Krishna. This Servant Krishna is the Spiritual Master and this is the conclusion. The Spiritual Master is the Mercy Representative of the Supreme Lord and as such He is given honor as good as Krishna, but He is never identical with Krishna. Perhaps you know the picture of Madhvacarya, one of the great Acaryas in our line, who is holding two fingers up to indicate Krishna and jiva. The impersonalists hold up one finger because their idea is that everything is one. So if we make the Spiritual Master identical with Krishna, then we will also become impersonalists. If we say that our Spiritual Master is Krishna, then the conclusion is that if we become Spiritual Master some day, then we will also become Krishna. Please try to understand how dangerous this kind of reasoning is.</p>
<p>In my books I have tried to explain clearly this simultaneously one and different philosophy acinta beda beda tattva propounded by Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu. But sometimes it happens that this philosophy is given a self-interested interpretation. As soon as personal motivation comes in it is not possible for one to understand our Krishna Consciousness philosophy.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>