View source for Our difficulty is that when we want to convince another person about Krsna consciousness, he thinks that "I am Hindu, I am Christian, I am Mohammedan, so they are trying to proselytize me"

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"I am Hindu, I am Christian, I am Mohammedan, so they are trying to proselytize me"|"our difficulty is that when we want to convince another person about Krsna consciousness, he thinks that"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Labangalatika}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|31May11}}
{{last|31May11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Our]]
[[Category:The Difficulty Is...]]
[[Category:When]]
[[Category:We]]
[[Category:Want To]]
[[Category:Convince]]
[[Category:Another]]
[[Category:Person]]
[[Category:About Krsna Consciousness]]
[[Category:Think]]
[[Category:I Am]]
[[Category:Hindu]]
[[Category:Christianity]]
[[Category:Muslim]]
[[Category:Try To]]
[[Category:Proselytizing]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="RoomConversationwithCanadianAmbassadortoIranMarch131975Iran_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="29" link="Room Conversation with Canadian Ambassador to Iran -- March 13, 1975, Iran" link_text="Room Conversation with Canadian Ambassador to Iran -- March 13, 1975, Iran">
<div class="heading">"Give up all this type of false religion." Mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. That means come to Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Ekam, only one. So unless one becomes fully Kṛṣṇa conscious, he is in trouble of this material condition. And our difficulty is that when we want to convince another person about Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he thinks that "I am Hindu, I am Christian, I am Mohammedan, so they are trying to proselytize me."
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Canadian Ambassador to Iran -- March 13, 1975, Iran|Room Conversation with Canadian Ambassador to Iran -- March 13, 1975, Iran]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Ambassador: Well, this in one form or another is the aim of any true tradition.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Hmm? True?</p>
<p>Ambassador: Tradition.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Tradition?</p>
<p>Ambassador: Religion.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No. Tradition, religion, they are all material. They are also all designation. I am thinking I am Hindu, you are thinking you are Christian, he is thinking as Buddhist—these are all designation.</p>
<p>Ambassador: Within each of these there is the esoteric.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Whatever it may be, it is material. Therefore Kṛṣṇa says, sarva-dharmān parityajya ([[Vanisource:BG 18.66|BG 18.66]]). "Give up all this type of false religion." Mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja. That means come to Kṛṣṇa consciousness. Ekam, only one. So unless one becomes fully Kṛṣṇa conscious, he is in trouble of this material condition. And our difficulty is that when we want to convince another person about Kṛṣṇa consciousness, he thinks that "I am Hindu, I am Christian, I am Mohammedan, so they are trying to proselytize me." That is the difficulty.</p>
<p>Ambassador: No, it was not that I was really saying. Rather that what I have heard from others comes to the same thing as you are saying.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Others, if they try for the same thing, then it is all right, because that type of religion or that system of religion is first-class which teaches for this thing, that "Come to platform of God consciousness and love God." Then that is first-class system of religion. It doesn't matter what is the designation. But where is that happening?</p>
<p>Ambassador: The process of change of consciousness which is actually taking place in the world under many influences, I think...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No. The influence should be only Kṛṣṇa, or God. Kṛṣṇa, when we speak of "Kṛṣṇa"—God. But they have no clear idea what is God. How does He speak, how does He act, where does He live, what is His form, what is His qualities—nobody knows. Ask any religious people, "Do you know about all this, about God?" They do not know. What do you think, Atreya? Have they any clear conception of God? They imagine something. If they think of God at all...</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>