View source for To give protection to women. That is not actually worshiping, but maintaining her comfortably, that is the duty of the man. But to worship woman as God, that is not very good proposal. Then he will be henpecked

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"to give protection to women. That is not actually worshiping, but maintaining her comfortably, that is the duty of the man. But to worship woman as God, that is not very good proposal. Then he will be henpecked"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Krsnadas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|23Oct12}}
{{last|23Oct12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Giving Protection]]
[[Category:women]]
[[Category:That Is Not]]
[[Category:Not Actually]]
[[Category:worship]]
[[Category:but]]
[[Category:maintain]]
[[Category:her]]
[[Category:Comfortable]]
[[Category:Duty Of...]]
[[Category:man]]
[[Category:woman]]
[[Category:god]]
[[Category:Not Very Good]]
[[Category:Proposal]]
[[Category:then]]
[[Category:He Will]]
[[Category:will Be]]
[[Category:Henpecked]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Philosophy_Discussions" class="sub_section" sec_index="13" parent="Lectures" text="Philosophy Discussions"><h3>Philosophy Discussions</h3>
</div>
<div id="PhilosophyDiscussiononAugusteComte_0" class="quote" parent="Philosophy_Discussions" book="Lec" index="50" link="Philosophy Discussion on Auguste Comte" link_text="Philosophy Discussion on Auguste Comte">
<div class="heading">To give protection to women. That is not actually worshiping, but maintaining her comfortably, that is the duty of the man. But to worship woman as God, that is not very good proposal. Then he will be henpecked. Worship of God is reserved for God only, not for anyone else.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on Auguste Comte|Philosophy Discussion on Auguste Comte]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: Worship of man, woman.</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: Yes.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes, to give protection to women. That is not actually worshiping, but maintaining her comfortably, that is the duty of the man. But to worship woman as God, that is not very good proposal. Then he will be henpecked. Worship of God is reserved for God only, not for anyone else. But the exchange, cooperation, between men and women for worshiping God, that is essential. Not that woman should be worshiped like God, or man should be worshiped like God. But the affection sometimes is stressed that you see him as God or see, see her as God. That is sentimental. But God is different either from man or from the woman. Both of them are living entities, both of them meant for worshiping God. Just like sometimes in the Vedic conception the wife is considered as dharma-patnī, religious wife. Means wife helps the husband in the matter of his religious life. That is found in, still in Hindu family: the man is worshiping the Deity and the woman is helping about the paraphernalia Deity worship, helping the husband so that he can immediately come into the Deity room and begin worshiping comfortably. So woman should always be engaged to assist the man in every respect in his religious life, in his social life, in his family life. That is real benefit of conjugal life. But if the woman does not agree with the man, and the man treats the woman as his servant, that is not good. The man should give the woman all protection and the woman should give all service to the man. That is ideal life, family life, conceived in the Vedic way of life.</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: Comte conceives the worship of woman as preparatory for the worship of mankind at large. He says, "The worship of woman begun in private and afterwards publicly celebrated is necessary in man's case to prepare him for any effectual worship of humanity," and that "Only man is the supreme being. It must not, however, be supposes that the new supreme being is like the old, merely a subjective result of our powers of abstraction. Existence in the true sense can only be predicated of humanity."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: What is the idea?</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: That man is all there is.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Huh? Can you explain what is the idea expressed in this sentence?</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: He wants to do away with the Catholic religion and institute the worship of humanity, or the worship of man. He says that everything else is abstraction, is speculation, and that only man is the..., man is the only existence in the true sense. Atheism.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Man is existence?</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: Man is the only existence.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Then? There is nobody else? What about the animals? Man is the only existence, and what about the animals? They are also...</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: He doesn't seem to consider the animals.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: So what, what is the position of the animals? They are also living being.</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: The animals would be subservient to man.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Therefore...</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: Man is the..., if humanity is the supreme being...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: We cannot understand what does he mean, "supreme  being" and "humanity." The supreme being is God. The human being is also God? Or what does he mean, "humanity"? What is the clear meaning of humanity?</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: Mankind, all mankind.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: All mankind? There are millions and millions of mankind. So instead of worshiping God you can worship millions of millions of men. Is it possible?</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: He must mean mankind in a generalized sense.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That's all right, but how you can serve the mankind? Suppose if I serve one man, does it..., is it worshiping the mankind? If not, then how you can worship millions of men at a time, or in your life? How it is possible?</p>
<p>Hayagrīva: Well he felt, um, that the worship of humanity could be systematized, just like the worship of God, and he even devised a calendar devoted to the worship of famous dead men, and he felt that the churches could serve for a while as places to carry out these ceremonies. He says, "The buildings erected for the service of God may for a time suffice for the worship of humanity in the same way that Christian worship was carried on at first in pagan temples as they were gradually vacated."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes, unless one has got full sense of God, they cannot stick to the worshiping method. And we have got practical experience in Los Angeles that we purchased that church because it was not going on at all. They made plans for Sunday school and so on, so on, but somehow or other it failed. Nobody was coming to the church. At last it was sold to us. Now this same church is there, and the same Americans are there, but at the present moment in our Rādhā-Kṛṣṇa Temple it is always packed up. So what is the reason? The same church is there and the same men are there, but formerly nobody was coming, so that the church was sold to us. Now it is all packed up. What is the reason? The reason is that simply religious sentiment, assembly in the church, will not help us unless there is spiritual life and based on philosophy and full understanding of the goal of life. That will make religion perfect; otherwise no.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>