View source for Krsna comes in His original form... Original form is two-handed. It is also accepted in the Bible: "Man is made after the image of God." So God has got two-handed. Even the four-handed Visnu form is not the original

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Krsna comes in His original form... Original form is two-handed. It is also accepted in the Bible"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Krsnadas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|15May13}}
{{last|15May13}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Krsna Comes]]
[[Category:Form of Krsna]]
[[Category:original]]
[[Category:Two Hands]]
[[Category:it Is]]
[[Category:also]]
[[Category:accept]]
[[Category:Bible]]
[[Category:man]]
[[Category:Made]]
[[Category:after]]
[[Category:image]]
[[Category:god]]
[[Category:have Got]]
[[Category:even]]
[[Category:Four Hands]]
[[Category:visnu]]
[[Category:is Not]]
[[Category:KD Pages Needing Audio 03|4e]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="0" parent="Lectures" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures"><h3>Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonBG228LondonAugust301973_0" class="quote" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" book="Lec" index="95" link="Lecture on BG 2.28 -- London, August 30, 1973" link_text="Lecture on BG 2.28 -- London, August 30, 1973">
<div class="heading">Kṛṣṇa comes in His original form... Original form is two-handed. It is also accepted in the Bible: "Man is made after the image of God." So God has got two-handed. Even the four-handed Viṣṇu form is not the original form. Viṣṇu form is secondary manifestation of Saṅkarṣaṇa. So Kṛṣṇa is never affected by māyā. This is point.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 2.28 -- London, August 30, 1973|Lecture on BG 2.28 -- London, August 30, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Kṛṣṇa is compared with the sun. Kṛṣṇa—sūrya-sama, māyā haya andhakāra. Now when there is cloud, māyā, the sun is not affected. But the small particles, sunshine, they are affected. Just try to understand. Here is sun, and below, many millions of miles below, the cloud. And the cloud is covering part of the sunshine which is combination of illuminating particles. So the māyā or the cloud cannot cover the sun, but it can cover the minute shining particles. So we are affected. Kṛṣṇa is not affected.</p>
<p>Therefore, Vyāsadeva saw, apaśyat puruṣaṁ pūrṇam. He saw... Just like in airplane, you go above the cloud. The sun is not affected at all by the cloud. Although below the airplane you'll see vast mass of cloud. Similarly, māyā cannot affect Kṛṣṇa. Therefore, Bhagavad-gītā says daivī hy eṣā guṇamayī mama māyā. Mama māyā ([[Vanisource:BG 7.14|BG 7.14]]), Kṛṣṇa says, "My illusory energy." Kṛṣṇa is never affected by the illusory energy. Exactly like the cloud. But the Māyāvādī philosophers, they say that when impersonal Absolute Truth comes, appears, they also accept the incarnation, but their philosophy is that ultimately the Absolute Truth is impersonal. When He appears as a person, He accepts the māyā body. This is Māyāvāda. Kṛṣṇa may be accepted as the Supreme God, but He has accepted a material body. That means they want to compare Kṛṣṇa with ordinary living entity, and that is condemned in the Bhagavad-gītā. It is said that avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam ([[Vanisource:BG 9.11|BG 9.11]]). Because Kṛṣṇa comes in His original form... Original form is two-handed. It is also accepted in the Bible: "Man is made after the image of God." So God has got two-handed. Even the four-handed Viṣṇu form is not the original form. Viṣṇu form is secondary manifestation of Saṅkarṣaṇa. So Kṛṣṇa is never affected by māyā. This is point.</p>
<p>You can read the next...</p>
<p>Devotee:</p>
:āścaryavat paśyati kaścit enam
:āścaryavad vadati tathaiva cānyaḥ
:āścaryavac cainam anyaḥ śṛṇoti
:śrutvāpy enaṁ veda na caiva kaścit
<p>"Some look on the soul as amazing, some describe him as amazing, and some hear of him as amazing, while others, even after hearing about him, cannot understand him at all."</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>