View source for That democracy is the ruination of civilization... So we want to remain in the minority. We don't want to be ruled by the majority

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"That democracy is the ruination of civilization... So we want to remain in the minority. We don't want to be ruled by the majority"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|11Jun13}}
{{last|11Jun13}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Democracy]]
[[Category:Ruination]]
[[Category:Civilization]]
[[Category:We Want To (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Remain]]
[[Category:Minority]]
[[Category:We Do Not Want (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:To Be]]
[[Category:Rules]]
[[Category:By]]
[[Category:Majoriy]]
[[Category:MG Pages Needing Audio]]
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkMay121975Perth_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="67" link="Morning Walk -- May 12, 1975, Perth" link_text="Morning Walk -- May 12, 1975, Perth">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- May 12, 1975, Perth|Morning Walk -- May 12, 1975, Perth]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Paramahaṁsa: Well, people say that they're not sure whether it's a symbolic meaning or an actual meaning.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That is your conjecture. But when you read book you should understand the wording of the book. You cannot conjecture in such...</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: Because they say some of the Vedic literatures...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That means willingly they want to become fool.</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: There are so many great symbolic literatures.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: You are seeing this green. If you interpret, "It is not green; it is white," what is this? Can you interpret like that? It is green, and "No, in my interpretation it is white. What you are seeing, it is not actual seeing." You can go on saying like that. But I am an ordinary man. Why shall I take it white? It is green. That's all.</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: But that is the way of great writing, to write in symbolism. That is...</p>
<p>Amogha: Great literary works are done in that way.</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: They call it "writing between the lines." There's some hidden meaning. Therefore it is very deep.</p>
<p>Amogha: And so if Kṛṣṇa was such a great philosopher, then naturally He would have also used those literary talents to write in between the lines.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: All right, you become very good bluffer. That's all. We don't accept you. All the ācāryas, they did not accept, those who are authorities. Vyāsadeva, he did not accept these foolish theories. Nārada never accepted. Recent ācāryas, Madhvācārya, Rāmānujācārya, Caitanya. Why shall I accept these third-class professors? Kick on their face. We have got authority to support this.</p>
<p>Gaṇeśa: I think they want to interpret Bhagavad-gītā because they do not want to surrender to Kṛṣṇa.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That is the idea. That is the real purpose. They want to kill Kṛṣṇa. That is the endeavor of Hiranyakasipu, Kamsa, that "We shall kill Kṛṣṇa." And ultimately they become killed. Their faith is like that.</p>
<p>Amogha: Their whole idea of Indian history, of Vedic history, is completely perverted. When we say five thousand years ago Vyāsadeva compiled this in writing, they say, "There was no civilization five thousand..." They said, "Only two thousand years ago there was some tribes, and they were not very moral," and things like this, all completely nonsense, because they misread the Bhāgavata and things like this. And then they teach some of the students these crazy ideas. Not all of them, but I talked to some who teach like this.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: The more you fight with these rascals, the more you advance in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. You are a fighting soldier. Kṛṣṇa very much appreciates. (long pause) So you take Bhagavad-gītā by your own interpretation, and I take Bhagavad-gītā as it is. So who is right? Who will decide this? You interpret in your own way. I don't interpret. I take it as it is. Now we are two parties. So who is correct?</p>
<p>Amogha: They say because so many others...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, there are two parties. That's all. Others means one who interprets, that is one party. And there is one party who does not interpret. So who is correct?</p>
<p>Amogha: They say, "We are right because we are more." They say, "We are many..."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Many asses means there is an opinion? Many asses give some opinion. Is that opinion?</p>
<p>Śrutakīrti: They say so.</p>
<p>Amogha: They say we are Ph.D., and there are so many swamis and things like this.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Oh, majority.</p>
<p>Śrutakīrti: Democratic method.</p>
<p>Amogha: Majority rules.</p>
<p>Gaṇeśa: The result will show.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. That democracy is the ruination of civilization.</p>
<p>Amogha: But actually many of them appreciate the actual translation because it's so much more clear. It's just that before, they didn't read it. Many of them, now they are reading it, they appreciate it very much</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: So we want to remain in the minority. We don't want to be ruled by the majority.</p>
<p>Paramahaṁsa: Actually, anybody who is serious about spiritual life can accept Bhagavad-gītā as it is, and the others take all the other spiritualists'...</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>