View source for We have to become swans, raja-hamsa , paramahamsa , paramahamsa . Paramo nirmatsaranam. Then you can understand Krsna consciousness. If you remain crows, then you cannot, that is not possible

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"We have to become swans, raja-hamsa , paramahamsa , paramahamsa . Paramo nirmatsaranam"|"Then you can understand Krsna consciousness. If you remain crows, then you cannot, that is not possible"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|SriSundari}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2014-10-17T11:32:24Z}}
{{last|2014-10-17T11:32:24Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:We Have To (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Have To Become]]
[[Category:Swan]]
[[Category:Paramahamsa]]
[[Category:Nirmatsaranam]]
[[Category:Then]]
[[Category:You Can (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Our Understanding (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Understanding the Krsna Consciousness Movement]]
[[Category:If You (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Remain]]
[[Category:Crow]]
[[Category:You Cannot (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Cannot Understand]]
[[Category:That Is Not Possible]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>1972 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
We have to become swans, rāja-haṁsa , paramahaṁsa , paramahaṁsa . Paramo nirmatsarāṇām SB 1.1.2. Then you can understand Kṛṣṇa consciousness. If you remain crows, then you cannot, that is not possible. By nature's example we have to see if crows-like and swans-like, pigeons-like, birds of the same feather. Birds of the same feather flock together, is it not?.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:720119 - Conversation - Jaipur|720119 - Conversation - Jaipur]]
</div>
<div class="text">
Prabhupāda: Caitanya Mahāprabhu speaking āpani ācari prabhu jīvere śikhāya , He behaves Himself perfectly and then teaches how to become a devotee. He is mad after Kṛṣṇa, He is falling down in the sea. You see? So that is wanted. And the Bhāgavata also says, sa vai puṁsāṁ paro dharmo yato bhaktir [[Vanisource:SB 1.5.11|SB 1.5.11]], how one has increased his devotion and love for Kṛṣṇa, that is the test of it. Not these formalities. Another place Kṛṣṇa says, api cet su-durācāro bhajate mām ananya-bhāk . Even sudurācāraḥ , even not well behaved but unflinching faith in Kṛṣṇa, sādhur eva sa mantavyaḥ [[Vanisource:SB 1.5.11|SB 1.5.11]], he is sādhu . Don't consider about his misbehaviors. That is not consideration. That will be corrected. Because he has taken to Kṛṣṇa consciousness, gradually those things, those defects will be corrected. kṣipraṁ bhavati dharmātmā śaśvac-chāntiṁ nigacchati , he will become very soon a great religious soul because he has taken to Kṛṣṇa. So in the beginning if there is some defect, we should not consider that. We have to see how much his love for Kṛṣṇa has increased, that is the test. Not the formalities. That is the test, how much he has sacrificed for Kṛṣṇa, how much he is prepared to sacrifice for Kṛṣṇa. If one takes Kṛṣṇa for making business, that is different thing, that is not devotion. Śālagrāma , my Guru Maharaja used to say śālagrām bir badam hoy (?). Just like you have seen śālagrāma . So if somebody takes that and breaks peanuts, so there is no devotion. It is a show during, attracting the visitors, it is nicely decorated, but in their absence, take it and you will have stone. So all this mostly the temple show is going on like that. They have made it a show of business. The devotees will come and pay something and I may have devotion or not devotion, it doesn't matter. One should be baccha bankaram suci (?), inside and outside perfect.

<div class="quote_verse">
:tad-vāg-visargo janatāgha-viplavo
:yasmin prati-ślokam abaddhavaty api
:nāmany anantasya yaśo 'ṅkitāni yat
:śṛṇvanti gāyanti gṛṇanti sādhavaḥ
:[[Vanisource:SB 1.5.11|SB 1.5.11]]
</div>

And then against this,

<div class="quote_verse">
:na yad vacaś citra-padaṁ harer yaśo
:(jagat-pavitraṁ) pragṛṇīta karhicit
:tad vāyasaṁ tīrtham uśanti mānasā
:na yatra haṁsā niramanty uśik-kṣayāḥ
:[[Vanisource:SB 1.5.10|SB 1.5.10]]
</div>

Na yad vacaś citra-padaṁ harer yaśaḥ . You can present a literature very perfect from literary point of view, from metaphor and poetical, rhetorical, very perfectly written, citra-padam , attractive by language. Na yad vacaś citra-padam , such kind of literature, if there is no description of the glories of the Lord, na tad vacaś citra-padam . Just like there are so many sex literatures, very attractive, it is selling like anything. But we are not interested in those rascal literatures. Tad vāyasaṁ tīrtham , such literature is considered as the place of enjoyment of the crows. Vāyasam means crow. The crow take enjoyment in the garbage, you have seen? They won't go in a nice place. They will come all together. Just like vultures, they come together to take pleasure in a corpse, dead body. But a white swan, rāja-haṁsa , he goes to a place where there is nice water, lilies and lotus and nice trees. You have seen that St. James Park? They will find out such nice place. They won't go to imitate the crows. The crows-like people will take pleasure in such nonsense literature, sex literature, or any such literature. So many nonsense literatures nowadays they are having good sale. Because people are becoming crows-like, they have no high idea, they have no sense of Kṛṣṇa consciousness, naturally they will take. Just like hippies, they have become all bad taste, crows-like. So we have to become swans, rāja-haṁsa , paramahaṁsa , paramahaṁsa . Paramo nirmatsarāṇām [[Vanisource:SB 1.1.2|SB 1.1.2]]. Then you can understand Kṛṣṇa consciousness. If you remain crows, then you cannot, that is not possible. By nature's example we have to see if crows-like and swans-like, pigeons-like, birds of the same feather. Birds of the same feather flock together, is it not? So you have to change your feather, then he will be pleased. If you keep your feather crows-like, then you cannot mix with the swans, that is not possible. This is the test. There are classes of men like crows, and there are classes of men like swans. So we are preparing our devotee... (aside) What is that?

Devotee (1): Is anybody watching?

Devotee (2): No.

Prabhupāda: So Kṛṣṇa consciousness means swan-like, they should be like swans. Their behavior should be like swans. They should live in clean place, at refreshing place. So as soon as somebody will come to the temple, he will be... (aside) You have some papers I shall show?

Śyāmasundara: I just wanted to check and see if there's somebody here. It's Nanda-kumāra.

Prabhupāda: So keep this principle in view, that you have to become swan, not crows. They say that everyone, every religion is all the same. This is all nonsense. (indistinct) In Bhagavad-gītā there are different types of religion, sattvic, rajarsic, tamasic. And our this... If you take it as religion, this is transcendental. Sa vai puṁsām paro dharmo [[Vanisource:SB 1.2.6|SB 1.2.6]]. Paraḥ means transcendental, it is not ordinary, aparaḥ . In aparaḥ dharma , the materialistic dharma , there are ritualistic ceremonies how to make one perfect for accepting transcendental religion. But this Kṛṣṇa consciousness is directly putting oneself in the transcendental. That is the special (indistinct). Caitanya Mahāprabhu... (aside) Why don't you close it? Caitanya-caritāmṛta says, kṛṣṇe bhakti kaile sarva-karma kṛta haya . If you become Kṛṣṇa conscious, then it is to be supposed that you have finished all other types of religion. My Guru Maharaja used to cite one example that one's friend was sitting on the high-court judge's bench. So he was speaking to another, "Oh, that Panchu was playing with us naked. He is sitting on the high-court judge's bench. Oh, how he was playing with us naked, how he is seated in the high-court bench?" "Yes, I have seen, you have seen actually he is sitting." "Oh, then he must not be getting salary." He must not be getting salary. So this is the argument. Familiarity breeds contempt. So he cannot believe that he has become a high-court judge. He thinks that "I am a rascal fool and my friend, how he can become high-court judge? He must not be getting salary." But is that very good argument that the high-court judge is seated there without any salary? This argument is false(?). That is enviousness. Nirmatsarata . That is the habit of the conditioned soul.
</div>
</div>
</div>