View source for Regarding your questions...(Letters - 1973 thru 1977)

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Question fourth"|"Question the fifth"|"Question the sixth"|"all these questions will automatically be answered by Krsna as Supersoul"|"answer your questions"|"fifth question"|"first question"|"four questions"|"fourth question"|"important questions"|"in regard to"|"last question"|"nest question"|"next question"|"one question"|"other question"|"other questions"|"regarding the question"|"regarding the questions"|"regarding the third point"|"regarding your question"|"regarding your questions"|"regarding your second point"|"second question"|"several questions"|"third question"|"two questions"|"you have inquired"|"your question"|"your questions"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|10Dec09}}
{{last|10Dec09}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=101}}
{{total|101}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Regarding|1]]
[[Category:Our (Disciples of SP)]]
[[Category:Our Questions (Disciples of SP)|1]]
[[Category:Compilations from Letters]]
[[Category:Questions asked to Srila Prabhupada|1]]

[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1973|1]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1974|1]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1975|1]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1976|1]]
[[Category:Questions asked to SP... 1977|1]]
</div>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
</div>
<div id="1973_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Correspondence" text="1973 Correspondence"><h3>1973 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDhruvanandaBombay4January1973_0" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="7" link="Letter to Dhruvananda -- Bombay 4 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Dhruvananda -- Bombay 4 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dhruvananda -- Bombay 4 January, 1973|Letter to Dhruvananda -- Bombay 4 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You have asked me several questions about the deity worship in Los Angeles, so I shall answer them one after another: Your first question, shall Srimati Radharani's feet be showing, the answer is no, they should never be seen. Krsna's feet, however, should be showing.</p>
<p>I do not know when I have said to anyone that Krsna should not wear anything black color, nor I know where I have given any permission to wear black color, but there is no harm if sometimes Krsna dresses something black. Sometimes in Vrndavana they dress Him in black.</p>
<p>Yes, the leaves of Srimati Tulasi Devi may be offered to all Visnu-tattva expansions of Krsna, including Nityananda and Balarama.</p>
<p>You may dress Lord Caitanya in the standard way, main things is do it nicely, don't make it funny. In your Western countries Lord Caitanya should be entirely covered, He should not appear bare-chested.</p>
<p>Why you are pouring water over the head of Radha and Krsna deities? Big deities should not be bathed in this way, using water or other things. Rather they are bathed daily by mantra, do you not know these things? Under no circumstances shall we bathe the Jagannatha deities with anything water or liquid, they should be bathed with mantra also. Now you are asking if Lord Jagannatha carries flute? Why this nonsense question? You are asking me so many concoctions and manufactured nonsense. Don't bother my head in this way any more. From now on unless I order you do something change or in addition, go on with the usual standard way. You manufacture ideas and then I have to waste my time. I have given you everything already, there is no need for you to add anything or change anything. Why you are asking these things? Who has given you such freedom? Pujari should operate entirely under the supervision of temple president and GBC, not independently. The greatest danger to our movement will come when we manufacture and create our own process for worshiping the deities. So don't ask any more new questions, whatever is going on, follow it just to the exact standard as I have given you, that's all.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJaduraniBombay4January1973_1" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="10" link="Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973|Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">To answer your questions, "self-deception" means that I know I should have done something, I have knowledge of what I ought to do, and still I don't do it. Just like some of our devotees, we have got certain prohibitions, and everyone knows they will be harmful to me to violate, still they do it, despite everything. It is not like running after a mirage in the desert, thinking something water, that is ignorance, not self-deceit. So I cannot think of any example for your illustration just at this moment, but you have got the idea now what is self-deceit, I think you will be able to draw something nice.</p>
<p>The depiction of Brahma and the destruction of the material worlds is very nice. When Brahma enters into the body of Visnu, that is ultimately, at the ultimate destruction, not in the partial destruction which you are illustrating. So it is all right as you have done it.</p>
<p>So far the picture of three-headed Brahma in the assembly of other Brahmas, I have not seen, so what can I say? Whatever is palatable to everyone, you can do it that way. There is no mention otherwise, so the all Brahmas can be shown four arms. So far the question of all Brahmas riding on swans, at least when they came to offer respects they did not come with swan, they are all standing, they have walked into Krsna's palace. Yes, you may show all Brahmas very big in comparison with three-headed Brahma, otherwise how you can compare the elephant and the mosquito? The picture of my Guru Maharaja is nice.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJaduraniBombay4January1973_2" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="10" link="Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973|Letter to Jadurani -- Bombay 4 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So far your questions about Lord Jagannatha and Ratha-yatra Festival, the first Ratha-yatra Festival was 5,000 years before, when Krsna and Balarama and Subhadra came from Dvaraka to Kuruksetra. So far the festival at Puri, there is no such history, but it must be more than 3,000 years. At least there is recorded history 2,000 years old, because we see in the Aquarian Gospel that Lord Jesus Christ was attending the Ratha-yatra Festival at Puri. Yes, there was attempt by Radharani to take back Krsna from Kuruksetra to Vrndavana.</p>
<p>I think that answers your questions, so if you have got any more in connection with your work you may feel free to always write to me.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRavindraSvarupaBombay5January1973_3" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="20" link="Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Bombay 5 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Bombay 5 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Bombay 5 January, 1973|Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Bombay 5 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question is it all right to assign the entire sankirtana party for distributing books so that no one will be free for street chanting? Of course we should not understanding the meaning of sankirtana very narrowly, that only chanting and dancing and playing instruments, no, sankirtana means to glorify the Lord in a congregational manner. So if many devotees are going out daily on the streets and public places for distributing our literature, that is also sankirtana, even if there is no one chanting. Hearing and chanting are essential processes for sankirtana. So if someone is hearing us singing on the street, or if he is purchasing one book and if he reads sincerely, these two activities are the same. So if there is any occasion of necessity, if there are not very many men available or if there is prohibition by the municipal authorities, something like that, we may assign everyone for distributing our literatures, there is no loss for that. But it is always better if there are also some devotees chanting loudly on the street. If there is even one man to two men or a small party who are chanting Hare Krishna, that will increase also the book sales. So if there are sufficient men, and if we have got sanction by the authorities, it is always better to have at least a small party chanting along with as many distributers of books as possible.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBhaktadasaCalcutta26January1973_4" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="34" link="Letter to Bhakta dasa -- Calcutta 26 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Bhakta dasa -- Calcutta 26 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bhakta dasa -- Calcutta 26 January, 1973|Letter to Bhakta dasa -- Calcutta 26 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">As far as your questions on management, you may please consult with Karandhara, who is my GBC man for the Western Zone, and work out some practical program for seeing that temple management and outside preaching work both go on nicely, not that I shall leave the temple and let all nonsense go on, nor shall we sit down all day in the temple and stop our preaching. Please continue in your sincere attitude and Krsna shall bless you more and more along with the others who are assisting. Always consult with your GBC man and manage things very nicely.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGunagrahiCalcutta31January1973_5" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="52" link="Letter to Gunagrahi -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Gunagrahi -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gunagrahi -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973|Letter to Gunagrahi -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Krsna Consciousness means always increasing, so I am glad to see that you are remaining enthusiastic to push on this Krsna Consciousness movement more and more. Your request for initiation is approved by me, and I have sent a letter in this regard. You are president of Buffalo temple, so in consultation with your GBC man you may discuss how to push on the spreading of this Krsna Consciousness movement through street sankirtana, book distribution, etc., whatever is practical for you to follow. In regard to preaching the glories of the Lord there are no hard and fast rules, we must simply always remain ourself fixed in Krsna Consciousness and then Krsna will give us the good guidance how to push things on. So since Rupanuga Maharaja is coming there you may discuss with him. I am desiring now to turn over the management of the society to my disciples, the temple presidents and GBC men especially, so cooperatively you may work out the management details.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRajiblocanCalcutta31January1973_6" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="53" link="Letter to Rajiblocan -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973" link_text="Letter to Rajiblocan -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rajiblocan -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973|Letter to Rajiblocan -- Calcutta 31 January, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding the question of your wife's initiation, that is certainly approved by me. You may arrange with Kirtanananda Maharaja for receiving beads duly chanted upon by him. Now both of you cooperate for pushing on this Krsna Consciousness movement as this is our only business in this human form of life.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSatsvarupaMelbourne10February1973_7" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="60" link="Letter to Satsvarupa -- Melbourne 10 February, 1973" link_text="Letter to Satsvarupa -- Melbourne 10 February, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Satsvarupa -- Melbourne 10 February, 1973|Letter to Satsvarupa -- Melbourne 10 February, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Your question in regard to marriage, we must impress upon the parties involved that Krishna Conscious marriage is not some cheap thing that may be embraced whimsically and at any time thrown off. The boy and girl must be willing to accept each other for life and be prepared to get a job if need be and live in an outside apartment and raise children. These points should be emphasized.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRupanugaSydney14February1973_8" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="66" link="Letter to Rupanuga -- Sydney 14 February, 1973" link_text="Letter to Rupanuga -- Sydney 14 February, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rupanuga -- Sydney 14 February, 1973|Letter to Rupanuga -- Sydney 14 February, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about taking Gaura-Nitai Deities with you on travelling Kirtana, this is not so important. When Caitanya Mahaprabhu was touring India He did not bring His Deity with Him. But if you can make proper arrangement then you may take them, but if you say you have no Brahmins then I think for the time being you may postpone this program.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoKirtikaSydney19February1973_9" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="78" link="Letter to Kirtika -- Sydney 19 February, 1973" link_text="Letter to Kirtika -- Sydney 19 February, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtika -- Sydney 19 February, 1973|Letter to Kirtika -- Sydney 19 February, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions. If your prayers are sincere then Krishna will accept them and if Krishna accepts them then automatically I accept them, and if I accept them then automatically Krishna accepts them. So like this Krishna is everywhere. He is even between the atoms. So therefore wherever you are He will accept your prayers, and therefore I automatically accept. But the most important part again, the prayer must be sincere.</p>
<p>The proper method of dressing Jagannatha is as a Ksatriya king and there is no limit to the opulence you can give Him.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoCaturbhujaLosAngeles9May1973_10" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="173" link="Letter to Caturbhuja -- Los Angeles 9 May, 1973" link_text="Letter to Caturbhuja -- Los Angeles 9 May, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Caturbhuja -- Los Angeles 9 May, 1973|Letter to Caturbhuja -- Los Angeles 9 May, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In answer to your several questions, first; what is meant by conditioned sould? Conditioned soul means one who has accepted something illusion as reality. Conditioned means that due to imperfect desires the spirit soul becomes dependent on material conditions for his satisfaction.</p>
<p>Your second question; how does he become conditioned when the jivatma is eternal full of bliss and knowledge? The answer is that it is not the soul itself that becomes mixed with matter but it is his consciousness that becomes absorbed in trying to enjoy the matter. Out of desire to lord it over, the jiva soul forgets that he is eternal, full of knowledge and full of bliss and identifies with the material energy. So it is the consciousness of the conditioned soul that is affected.</p>
<p>Your third question is: does the soul ever become weak or strong on account of its association and contact with material nature? It is not the spirit soul that becomes weak or strong but it is his determination to become Krsna Conscious that me become weak or strong. By the influence of the modes of passion and ignorance he becomes weak and by the influence of the mode of goodness he becomes strong. But by the association with the pure devotee he becomes strongest.</p>
<p>Your fourth question: "Whether or not it is possible for the soul to exist without having this external gross and subtle body covering it? So if the bird is existing within the cage and someone takes away the cage does that mean that the bird can no longer exist? No. This body is illusion. It is only because of out attachment for this body that we have to remain within it. But as soon as one transfers his attachment to Krsna then no more is there any need for this body.</p>
<p>Your fifth question is, "Bhagavad-gita says that the conditioned soul is subjected to four defects. Does that refer to the body or the soul?" The defects are there in the living being when he is acting on the material platform. As stated in Bhagavad-gita chapter 15 verse 17: "dvavimau purusau loke, ksaras caksara eva ca, ksarah sarvani bhutani, kutastho 'ksara ucyate:" "There are two classes of beings, the fallible and the infallible. In the material world every entity is fallible, and in the spiritual world every entity is called infallible." So the defects are there only on the material platform. One who is acting in Krsna Consciousness is beyond those defects.</p>
<p>Your nest question: "The Bhagavad-gita says that Lord Brahma is a</p>
<p>conditioned soul. Then how was it possible for him to impart the Vedas to a</p>
<p>non-conditioned soul—Narada Muni?" So, Lord Brahma is a conditioned soul means that due to his desire to become the creator of the material manifestation he had to take birth within the material world. But although he was conditioned by such desire, still he is a great devotee of Lord Krsna. He has written Brahma-samhita which is pure Vaisnava literature describing the Supreme Personality of godhead. Lord Brahma was the first created being within the universe and the first spiritual master, as he received knowledge from within his heart from Lord Krsna. Narada appeared as the son of Brahma and therefore he had to accept Lord Brahma as his spiritual master.</p>
<p>Your last question, "How is the sould degraded (by lust, anger and greed) when it is transcendental to the body? Doesn't that imply that the sould has changed?" No. The soul never changes, but due to his tinyness he may become forgetful of his relationship with Krsna. The spiritual quality of the spiritual spark has not changed but he has forgotten his spiritual nature, bewildered by the imperfect desire to become equal or greater than Krsna.</p>
<p>I hope you are able to understand all these points. As you know, I am translating so many books into English from the Sanskrit, therefore, I am very busy. Now, I have representatives, the GBC and the temple presidents who are qualifies to answer your questions. Of course if you ask me I am obligated to reply because I am your spiritual master. So please direct your question to my representatives.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJaduraniLosAngeles12May1973_11" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="179" link="Letter to Jadurani -- Los Angeles 12 May, 1973" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- Los Angeles 12 May, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Los Angeles 12 May, 1973|Letter to Jadurani -- Los Angeles 12 May, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In regards to your questions in the letter of May 8, Caitanya Mahaprabhu was going to see the temple of Visesvar and hundreds and thousands of people were following Him. He was chanting Hari! Hari! It was not on the bank of the Ganges. It was on a road. It was not a high road but very narrow. Lord Caitanya was a sannyasa should be depicted with shaven head and wearing a short dhoti with folded part in front.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoEricDallas20May1973_12" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="193" link="Letter to Eric -- Dallas 20 May, 1973" link_text="Letter to Eric -- Dallas 20 May, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Eric -- Dallas 20 May, 1973|Letter to Eric -- Dallas 20 May, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Your question as to why we use light bulbs, is answered as follows: light bulbs are also a part of Krsna's energy. Just as we use automobiles, adding machines, typewriters, dictaphone etc. Whatever is there should be employed in service of Krsna. Without using matter in service of Krsna it becomes the cause of bondage, but by using it in the service of Krsna it helps us to become Krsna conscious.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGunagrahiMayapur20June1973_13" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="214" link="Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 20 June, 1973" link_text="Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 20 June, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 20 June, 1973|Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 20 June, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions about Gaura Nitai Deity worship: Yes, it is all right Gaura Nitai may wear turbans as well as crowns. You ask what they may wear in the evening—they can wear different dresses or night clothing just as Krsna is dressed. Make a small symbolical bed and give Them rest in that way. Bathe the Deities mentally by mantra and not by pouring upon them.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJaduraniCalcutta28June1973_14" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="221" link="Letter to Jadurani -- Calcutta 28 June, 1973" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- Calcutta 28 June, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Calcutta 28 June, 1973|Letter to Jadurani -- Calcutta 28 June, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Re your questions:</p>
<p>During Krsnadasa' time there was no Radharani deity, Madan Mohan was alone. Radharani was later introduced. The temple of Madan Mohan was formerly on high level, that is, the original old temple. It is still existent and can be seen side by side with the new Madan Mohan temple. You can write to Gurudasa in Vrndabana to send you two photos of the old and new temple. I will also write him requesting he send such pictures.</p>
<p>No, Haridasa Pandit is not the namacarya Haridasa Thakura. Haridasa Pandit was the pujari of the temple. As far as the old Govindaji temple is concerned, that is now rejected. It is now newly situated. Both the old Govindaji and Madan Mohan temples were desecrated by the Mohammedans and partly destroyed, but Govindaji deity was removed. The old temples are rejected and these temples are both now newly situated as you will see in the photos. No, there was no Radharani in the temple of Govindaji then; she was later introduced. Yes the deities can be painted similar to the way they are dressed now.</p>
<p>There is not much difference in the robes of mayavadis and Vaisnavas, but they generally use a deeper color and we use lighter saffron. Lord Caitanya did not necessarily wear the mayavadi robes. He carried ekadanda, but that is covered by the cloth, they have one rod, we have four rods. But they look the same. Yes, Lord Caitanya carries a water pot. If you sincerely pray to Krsna, He will help you to paint quicker and better.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVamanadevaBhaktivedantaManor17August1973_15" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="284" link="Letter to Vamanadeva -- Bhaktivedanta Manor 17 August, 1973" link_text="Letter to Vamanadeva -- Bhaktivedanta Manor 17 August, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vamanadeva -- Bhaktivedanta Manor 17 August, 1973|Letter to Vamanadeva -- Bhaktivedanta Manor 17 August, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am referring your letter to Satsvarupa Goswami since he is the GBC Secretary for your zone. I have made him in charge of Gurukula so he is competent to answer your question, please write to him in matters of management</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRupanugaBombay13October1973_16" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="336" link="Letter to Rupanuga -- Bombay 13 October, 1973" link_text="Letter to Rupanuga -- Bombay 13 October, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rupanuga -- Bombay 13 October, 1973|Letter to Rupanuga -- Bombay 13 October, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am very glad to learn of the book distribution. You keep the paperbook editions. Why people should pay unnecessarily? Regarding your question about the spiritual world and the material world, there may be maya, but one who is Krsna conscious has nothing to do with it, exactly like there is the police department but the law abiding citizen has nothing to do with it. In the Bhagavad-gita it is stated: daivi hy esa gunamayi/ mama maya duratyaya/ mam eva ye prapadyante/ mayam etam taranti te.  ([[Vanisource:BG 7.14 (1972)|BG 7.14]]). In answer to your other question, yes, the heat is bodily temperature.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDhrstaketuBombay14October1973_17" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="338" link="Letter to Dhrstaketu -- Bombay 14 October, 1973" link_text="Letter to Dhrstaketu -- Bombay 14 October, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dhrstaketu -- Bombay 14 October, 1973|Letter to Dhrstaketu -- Bombay 14 October, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about instruction, spiritual life is different from material life. The instruction given in my books is supposed to be personal instruction. When we read the Bhagavad-gita As It Is, it is understood that we are receiving personal instructions of Krsna. No physical barrier is there in the case of spiritual affairs.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAcyutanandaNewDelhi1November1973_18" class="quote" parent="1973_Correspondence" book="Let" index="366" link="Letter to Acyutananda -- New Delhi 1 November, 1973" link_text="Letter to Acyutananda -- New Delhi 1 November, 1973">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Acyutananda -- New Delhi 1 November, 1973|Letter to Acyutananda -- New Delhi 1 November, 1973]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your two questions addressed through Tamala Krsna, the reply to your question about Arjuna's relationship with Krsna, is that Arjuna is an eternal devotee, so on the higher platform the devotee is so intimately related that he forgets Krsna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. But, in the lower stage of devotional service Krsna is looked upon with awe and veneration. When Arjuna saw the virata murti of Krsna, actually he came down one step below his position. Therefore he asked for forgiveness from Krsna. So this is a teaching to the common man that we should not take Krsna immediately as intimately as the gopis, cowherds boys, and other advanced devotees treated Him. In the beginning we must treat the Lord with awe and veneration. Later one when we are perfectly on the spiritual platform, we treat Krsna more intimately, and therefore we forget the exalted position of Krsna. But, we never imitate the Brijbasis from the beginning as do the sahajiyas. In the beginning a devotee must follow strictly viddhi-marga or regulated principles. When one is on the swarupa siddha stage, the devotee can treat Krsna on an equal level or sometimes he becomes even higher than Krsna. Just like Mother Yasoda treated Krsna a being completely dependent upon her. So these stages are appreciated in many advanced stages of devotional life.</p>
<p>As far as the results of one's good karma is concerned, good karma returns in that he is surrendering to Krsna. One comes to the point of surrender when one has actually amassed the result of multi pious activities. This is stated in the Caitanya Caritamrta as quoted from the Srimad-Bhagavatam as follows:</p>
:ittham satam brahma-sukhanubhutya
:dasyam gatanam para-daivatena
:mayasritanam naradarakena
:sardham vijahruh krta punya-punjah
:([[Vanisource:SB 10.12.7-11|SB 10.12.11]])
<p>This was the statement of Srila Sukdeva Goswami when he saw Krsna carrying the cowherds boys on His shoulders. To be in such a position could only be the result of the performance of many, many pious activities. They were putting their legs on the Supreme Personality of Godhead and were forgetting who He is, and Krsna is taking the feet of His devotee on Himself. Krsna is so nice. The mayavadis can never understand this exchange of devotional activities.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1974_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="9" parent="Correspondence" text="1974 Correspondence"><h3>1974 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoKirtananandaLosAngeles12January1974_0" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="26" link="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Los Angeles 12 January, 1974" link_text="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Los Angeles 12 January, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtanananda -- Los Angeles 12 January, 1974|Letter to Kirtanananda -- Los Angeles 12 January, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I have received your two questions which you conveyed to Satsvarupa on the telephone.</p>
<p>Regarding installing larger deities at the New Vrindaban farm temple, which is now exclusively for brahmacaris, yes, why not? Brahmin brahmacaris are very nice for deity worship. You have asked about Balarama Krsna deities. No, Balarama and Krsna are already there as Caitanya and Nitai: Vrajendranandana yei, saci suta hailas sei . . . The best thing is to establish Gaura Nitai deities. In Vrindaban we are establishing Balarama Krsna deities because most of the temples there have Radha Krsna and there is not Balarama-Krsna. That has a different purpose. We should not imitate that. Better to have Gaura-Nitai, Radha-Krsna, and Lord Jagannatha—that system must continue.</p>
<p>Regarding what to do with the skim milk after the ghee has been produced. So far I have experience in India, after churning the butter the remnant is called gohle this gohle is called sour milk. Sour milk can be taken by the members of New Vrindaban along with food. In India in villages they have enough milk and sour milk is taken in place of water or in dahl with salt and pepper. So sour milk should be taken by the devotees and ghee used. Cheese is very valuable. Sometimes it is used by sweet meat shops in India and it is called khurcha. If you like you can make cheese but we require much quantity of ghee. My idea is that in India there is a great scarcity of ghee, but I don't think it is practical to send ghee from New Vrindaban to India. Anyway, go on developing New Vrindaban into an ideal community, and I shall be pleased to see the new additions when I come there.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBrianMarvinVrindaban15March1974_1" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="74" link="Letter to Brian Marvin -- Vrindaban 15 March, 1974" link_text="Letter to Brian Marvin -- Vrindaban 15 March, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Brian Marvin -- Vrindaban 15 March, 1974|Letter to Brian Marvin -- Vrindaban 15 March, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Your first question is, how can the Vedas be considered eternal since they contain many historical references? But history is also eternal. For example, six months ago there was summer now there is a new season, and in another six months summer again. This calculation of one year is history but the summer and winter seasons are also eternal. There is a saying, "History repeats itself." Why make a distinction between history and eternity. Things are happening eternally; this is history.</p>
<p>You have asked why the four Vedas are written in a different type of sanskrit from classical. This is not extraordinary. In India, sanskrit pronunciation is different in the North and South, and there are many different dialects. So the Vedas may also be presented with some differences within.</p>
<p>You have further questioned how the Vedas can be 3,000 B. C. in age. Modern historians cannot pick up when the Vedas came into existence. From our historical references, however, we understand the Vedic knowledge has been current since the time of creation but the knowledge was originally accepted in disciplic succession from spiritual master to disciple. Later, when Vyasadeva found the peoples' memories decreasing he wrote it into language. Otherwise it was existing by sruti, or hearing. So when this hearing began there is no history. He simply recorded the sruti, and there is no question of change. We have to understand Vedic knowledge on the authority of the disciplic succession not from mental speculators who are simply rascals and have no entrance into the Vedic knowledge. You mention Sankara, but Sankara hid so many things, so it is no wonder he did not mention Bhagavatam. There are great authorities of Bhagavatam and it is they we have to follow.</p>
<p>Similarly, the Bhagavatam is mentioned in an earlier Purana means that the whole language is sruti. Although the Bhagavatam may not have been written the tradition was there. It is written by Sridhara Swami quoting the Puranas, that the practice was to write out the Bhagavatam by hand and present it to a learned man.</p>
<p>The Bhagavatam we have is the same Bhagavatam. It was originally spoken in four slokas by the Supreme Personality of Godhead to Lord Brahma. All these descriptions are in my books and I request you to read them very carefully as you are a learned scholar. I appreciate your humble attitude, and I have a good report of your activities from Jagadisa prabhu. Please go on increasing in Krsna Consciousness and you will find all spiritual understanding and happiness not only for you, but for whomever you meet.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoLilavatiBombay13May1974_2" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="201" link="Letter to Lilavati -- Bombay 13 May, 1974" link_text="Letter to Lilavati -- Bombay 13 May, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Lilavati -- Bombay 13 May, 1974|Letter to Lilavati -- Bombay 13 May, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">As for your questions you have asked for clarification in the KRSNA Book when Maha Visnu says to Krsna and Arjuna that you are my incarnations in my appearance as Nara-Narayana. So you are asking how this can be so. The answer is when Krsna comes all the incarnations are within him. Actually this is a very intricate question. So not be so concerned about it now. When you become more advanced you will be able to realize these things.</p>
<p>You have asked if the Yadu dynasty has continued beyond Satasena. Yes, there are ksatriyas who claim to belong to the Yadu dynasty today especially in Mathura and nearby places.</p>
<p>How to acquire the quality of patience. Caitanya Mahaprabhu has already given us that answer: One can chant the Holy Name of the Lord in a humble state of mind, thinking himself lower than the straw in the street, more tolerant than the tree, devoid of all sense of false prestige, and ready to offer all respects to others. In such a state of mind one can chant the Holy Name of the Lord constantly. So there will be, that in our preaching we will meet with many tribulations, that is patience.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMuralidharaJaduraniArtistsRome25May1974_3" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="210" link="Letter to Muralidhara, Jadurani, Artists -- Rome 25 May, 1974" link_text="Letter to Muralidhara, Jadurani, Artists -- Rome 25 May, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Muralidhara, Jadurani, Artists -- Rome 25 May, 1974|Letter to Muralidhara, Jadurani, Artists -- Rome 25 May, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">As far as your questions which information you urgently need for completion of the paintings, the answers are as follows.</p>
<p>It is correct to show Prthu Maharaja giving a speech to the Kumaras inside his home.</p>
<p>For Lord Visnu's appearing at Prthu Maharaja's sacrifice, the sketch you have enclosed is all right.</p>
<p>Lord Visnu should rest His left hand on Garuda.</p>
<p>As for the wooden sacrificial instrument mentioned during Daksa's sacrifice, yes you can use it in Maharaja Prthu's sacrifice.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMuralidharaParis9June1974_4" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="235" link="Letter to Muralidhara -- Paris 9 June, 1974" link_text="Letter to Muralidhara -- Paris 9 June, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Muralidhara -- Paris 9 June, 1974|Letter to Muralidhara -- Paris 9 June, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions for painting: The enclosed sketch of Lord Visnu visiting the sacrificial arena of Maharaja Prthu is all right as it is, the architecture is nice. Visnu should rest His left hand on Garuda's shoulder. But in the picture of the four kumaras visiting Prthu Maharaja, why are the Kumaras seen as if coming through the ceiling from above? I think it would be better if they were coming inside through the doorway.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAlfredFordLosAngeles16July1974_5" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="271" link="Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974" link_text="Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974|Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So far as your questions are concerned, in India a sannyasi or a person in the renounced order of life is always honored. Even in this fallen down condition of India a sannyasi is honored everywhere, and he has no problem for his living condition. So you are correct that a person in the renounced order of life is honored. Unfortunately some unscrupulous men take advantage of this renounced order dress and being filled up with all material desires they commit so many wrongful things, and the people in general take note of it and gradually the honor for the sannyasi is dwindling. Exactly like a person having received some counterfeit money is always afraid of being cheated, but this does not mean there is no good money. So unscrupulous men on account of this age of Kali yuga are taking advantage of sannyasi dress and are exploiting the people. So there is very awkward, and even a genuine sannyasi is sometimes in trouble. In the sastras therefore it is stated that unless one is perfectly detached from material things he should not be allowed to accept sannyasa order.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAlfredFordLosAngeles16July1974_6" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="271" link="Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974" link_text="Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974|Letter to Alfred Ford -- Los Angeles 16 July, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">If you read all our books, Bhagavad- gita, Srimad-Bhagavatam, and others, you will get all the answers to your questions. Still I shall be very glad to answer besides that.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSridharaVrindaban19August1974_7" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="339" link="Letter to Sridhara -- Vrindaban 19 August, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sridhara -- Vrindaban 19 August, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sridhara -- Vrindaban 19 August, 1974|Letter to Sridhara -- Vrindaban 19 August, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about eternal spiritual and temporary spiritual, the temporary spiritual is the impersonal brahmajyoti. The impersonalists by severe austerities and penances arise to the Brahman effulgence. But it is only temporary. Eternally we cannot remain aloof. As living entities, we want pleasure in association; therefore we see in the material world where for sense gratification the karmis take so much responsibility. First of all they accept one wife. The more he enjoys the wife, the more he becomes implicated. So, this means that we must have pleasure even at the risk of gross implication. Therefore our Krishna Consciousness movement is that we want pleasure but without any implication. This is happening actually. All of our Krishna Consciousness students they are enjoying life without any implication.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSarvabhaumaPutanaraGandharviVrindaban8September1974_8" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="390" link="Letter to Sarvabhauma, Putanara, Gandharvi -- Vrindaban 8 September, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sarvabhauma, Putanara, Gandharvi -- Vrindaban 8 September, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sarvabhauma, Putanara, Gandharvi -- Vrindaban 8 September, 1974|Letter to Sarvabhauma, Putanara, Gandharvi -- Vrindaban 8 September, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Anyway I am expecting to arrive in Calcutta some time this month and at that time I will be glad to see you and answer all of your questions. In the meantime you may please consult with Gargamuni Swami, the in-charge of the Calcutta Temple. He will also be able to help you with your questions.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMrMajumdarVrindaban18September1974_9" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="416" link="Letter to Mr. Majumdar -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1974" link_text="Letter to Mr. Majumdar -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. Majumdar -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1974|Letter to Mr. Majumdar -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The subject matter you have inquired from me is very grave and cannot be replied haphazardly. It appears you have no deep study in the matter, and if you are serious about it you have to live with us for some time to understand.</p>
<p>As a summary study I may inform you that human life must lead to God realization. Without God realization there is no difference between human life and animal life. All the Vedic literature is aimed at making human life a success by God realization. In this age that God realization is made very easy by chanting the holy names, Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare/Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSukadevaCalcutta25September1974_10" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="436" link="Letter to Sukadeva -- Calcutta 25 September, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sukadeva -- Calcutta 25 September, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sukadeva -- Calcutta 25 September, 1974|Letter to Sukadeva -- Calcutta 25 September, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question that if I have ever said that the Society authorities must suffer for the devotees under their protection, no, I never said that.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJaduraniMayapur9October1974_11" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="468" link="Letter to Jadurani -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974|Letter to Jadurani -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The answers to your questions are as follows:</p>
<p>1. For the portraits of Gaura Kisora and Jagannatha das Babaji, yes you can use the mangalarcana prayers, and also the same for Bhaktivinode Thakura.</p>
<p>2. You can sign your paintings with your personal names.</p>
<p>3. Regarding Devahuti's painting for Ādi lila, yes you can use it. I think it is nice. You can also use the painting you had suggested previously. Both can be used.</p>
<p>4. Yes, it is understood that your paintings are offered to the Deities when they appear in books or on the temple walls. It is understood like that.</p>
<p>5. Regarding asking me questions, yes you can ask, but unless it is sanctioned by me, you cannot act on it.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoPariksitMayapur9October1974_12" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="470" link="Letter to Pariksit -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974" link_text="Letter to Pariksit -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Pariksit -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974|Letter to Pariksit -- Mayapur 9 October, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The answers to your questions are as follows:</p>
<p>1. Regarding Krsna das Kaviraja, there is no such information, but as far as possible, he was brahmacari.</p>
<p>2. Lord Nityananda and the associates appeared in the room.</p>
<p>3. The stick held by Lord Nityananda is like your sketch.</p>
<p>4. The bodily hues of the devotees of Lord Nityananda, why green? But, it can be done, there is no harm.</p>
<p>5. You can continue not showing Srimati Radharani's feet.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSankaMayapur16October1974_13" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="493" link="Letter to Sanka -- Mayapur 16 October, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sanka -- Mayapur 16 October, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sanka -- Mayapur 16 October, 1974|Letter to Sanka -- Mayapur 16 October, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am in due receipt of your letter undated. I understand from Bhavananda Maharaja that you are invited here to plant a garden. So when you come your questions can be discussed.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoKsirodakasayiMayapur18October1974_14" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="501" link="Letter to Ksirodakasayi -- Mayapur 18 October, 1974" link_text="Letter to Ksirodakasayi -- Mayapur 18 October, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Ksirodakasayi -- Mayapur 18 October, 1974|Letter to Ksirodakasayi -- Mayapur 18 October, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question on demigod worship, there are so many demigods, and the qualities may be overlapping. Demigod worship is meant for materialistic men whether in goodness, passion, or ignorance. Those in the transcendental position above the qualities of the material world worship Visnu. Most people do not know that Visnu is the ultimate aim of worship. The varna-asrama system is organized with this purpose, to worship Visnu. So far we are concerned, we never recommend to worship any demigod either in goodness, passion or ignorance.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoTejiyasBombay15November1974_15" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="572" link="Letter to Tejiyas -- Bombay 15 November, 1974" link_text="Letter to Tejiyas -- Bombay 15 November, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Tejiyas -- Bombay 15 November, 1974|Letter to Tejiyas -- Bombay 15 November, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about collecting, whatever money sent it is all the hand of Krishna. When Krishna gives, you get. Don't be disappointed if you do not get any collection after working. Always depend on Krishna, and everything will be all right. Fight and depend on the results on Krishna. yudhyasva vigata-jvarah, fight without being lethargic, Krishna says in the Bhagavad-gita.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoHugoSalemonBombay22November1974_16" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="604" link="Letter to Hugo Salemon -- Bombay 22 November, 1974" link_text="Letter to Hugo Salemon -- Bombay 22 November, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Hugo Salemon -- Bombay 22 November, 1974|Letter to Hugo Salemon -- Bombay 22 November, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Our process is something universal. It cannot be checked by any means. Anyone in any place, in any country can chant Hare Krishna. If it is possible to go to the temple, then take advantage of the temple. A temple is a place where by one is given the opportunity to render direct devotional service to the Supreme Lord Sri Krishna. In conjunction with this you should always read my books daily and all your questions will be answered and you will have a firm basis of Krishna Consciousness. In this way your life will be perfect.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSukadevaBombay24November1974_17" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="618" link="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 24 November, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 24 November, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 24 November, 1974|Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 24 November, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your fifth question, that I shall think over. Regarding the sannyasi, therefore I have stopped sannyasa. No Vaisnava says that he is advanced. Please send me the name of the sannyasi, and I shall do the needful. Regarding the cooking, a non-brahmana may assist but he cannot cook.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSriGovindaBombay6December1974_18" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="655" link="Letter to Sri Govinda -- Bombay 6 December, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sri Govinda -- Bombay 6 December, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sri Govinda -- Bombay 6 December, 1974|Letter to Sri Govinda -- Bombay 6 December, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, actually it is a fact that ultimately everyone should preach and distribute books if they want to please me in the best way. Book distribution must be given stress always. He has spoken the right thing. If you do this sincerely, it is a fact that Krishna will supply everything else required. So you say that your men are like the four Kumaras disobeying Lord Brahma. Does it mean you are Brahma? But, it is a fact. Here in India we are not arranging for publishing Hindi books and other languages for profuse distribution in India. That is my immediate program. I blindly follow my guru maharaj. I do not know what is the result. So I am stressing on this point of book distribution. He told me this personally.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGopijanavallabhaBombay21December1974_19" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="695" link="Letter to Gopijanavallabha -- Bombay 21 December, 1974" link_text="Letter to Gopijanavallabha -- Bombay 21 December, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gopijanavallabha -- Bombay 21 December, 1974|Letter to Gopijanavallabha -- Bombay 21 December, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I think by this time all of your questions in your letter have been answered. I am very anxious to get that building in New York City. Rupanuga has given photographs as well as floor plans in his most recent letter. I like it very much, so I want you to immediately take it. As far as the $300,000 down payment I don't think there will be any difficulty with that. Keep me informed on this matter as the negotiation has already begun. So you along with Rupanuga keep the atmosphere there very pure by holding regular classes, having morning and evening arati and kirtana programs and ensuring that everyone chants their 16 rounds and follows the four regulative principles without fail. And try to increase my book distribution as much as possible.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJagadisaBombay28December1974_20" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="717" link="Letter to Jagadisa -- Bombay 28 December, 1974" link_text="Letter to Jagadisa -- Bombay 28 December, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jagadisa -- Bombay 28 December, 1974|Letter to Jagadisa -- Bombay 28 December, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your first question, you have not committee. such a serious offense. My request is that you atone for your actions by engaging in devotional service with great enthusiasm. Wherever your health is good, you should remain there and serve.</p>
<p>Regarding Gurukula I am very happy to hear that the financial crisis has passed. That is very good. This is real management. As far as the children are concerned, people are accusing us sometimes that our children are undernourished, underfed and note cared for properly. So it is good that you are seeing that they are happy and healthy. They should be given milk at least 8 ounces a day if possible 16 ounces a day. Dahl, capati, rice, vegetable this will keep them fit. If possible a little bit of fruit also. As for fixing up the Deity house in Dallas with marble altars, this is not necessary for now. We shall see later on. For the time being organize the health, education and care of the children and continue the Deity worship as it is going nicely now. Deities are satisfied with bhakti not marble. Therefore try to increase the bhakti.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSukadevaBombay28December1974_21" class="quote" parent="1974_Correspondence" book="Let" index="720" link="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 28 December, 1974" link_text="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 28 December, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 28 December, 1974|Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 28 December, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In regards to your question about how the relationship between a sannyasi and the temple president should be, my hope is that you will all be able to cooperate together. The temple president is in charge and the sannyasi should not contradict the instructions. Although if he does see something wrong or if he sees a fault or defect he should bring it out directly to the temple president. And then work it out in a Krsna Conscious way. Not that he will try to over-ride the temple president's authority. I want that you all work together cooperatively. Please continue your programs there with great enthusiasm and try to strictly follow all of my regulations without any deviation. Keep yourself always fixed in Krsna's service. Don't let even a spit moment go by being engaged in the service of maya.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1975_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="10" parent="Correspondence" text="1975 Correspondence"><h3>1975 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVisaliniBombay1January1975_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="7" link="Letter to Visalini -- Bombay 1 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Visalini -- Bombay 1 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Visalini -- Bombay 1 January, 1975|Letter to Visalini -- Bombay 1 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I am in due receipt of your letter dated Dec. 12, 1974 and have noted the contents. You can work on the hair sets while the Deities are taking rest. Regarding your other questions, they can be answered by your temple president or GBC man.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoYasomatisutaBombay4January1975_1" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="20" link="Letter to Yasomatisuta -- Bombay 4 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Yasomatisuta -- Bombay 4 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Yasomatisuta -- Bombay 4 January, 1975|Letter to Yasomatisuta -- Bombay 4 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, you can always use some equivalent to the words Supreme Personality of Godhead. That will save the situation. The real thing is that you are trying to serve Krishna, He will give you all intelligence.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDevamayaBombay9January1975_2" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="33" link="Letter to Devamaya -- Bombay 9 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Devamaya -- Bombay 9 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Devamaya -- Bombay 9 January, 1975|Letter to Devamaya -- Bombay 9 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, there is no special planet for the Lord in His form of Lord Jagannatha. This particular lila was performed with His brother and sister when They were on this planet. If you are attracted to worshiping this form of the Lord, then you will go to Krishna. Lord Jagannatha is Krishna. You ask about what kind of food He likes to eat most. That you cannot prepare. If you sometimes come to Jagannatha Puri, then you can see. You should not give them any clubs to hold. It is not necessary.</p>
<p>Regarding astrology, you should not listen to any of these so-called astrologers—strictly avoid. Don't even see them. What is the use of seeing them? Astrology is meant for the materialist, but a spiritualist does not care for the future. Everything is dependent upon Krishna. So where is the necessity of astrology? The devotees' principle is, let there happen anything as Krishna desires. Let me remain sincere devotee, that's all. Pure devotee is never interested in this astrology.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAdikesavaBombay16January1975_3" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="53" link="Letter to Adi-kesava -- Bombay 16 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Adi-kesava -- Bombay 16 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Adi-kesava -- Bombay 16 January, 1975|Letter to Adi-kesava -- Bombay 16 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your proper engagement, you should first discuss that with your GBC and try to work something out together. Regarding your questions. I have already answered the most important question. "How to please Krishna?"—by following all the regulative principle that I have given you, chanting 16 rounds and reading my books scrutinizingly. Everyone must do these things, otherwise they cannot understand Krishna Consciousness.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAksayanandaBombay16January1975_4" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="54" link="Letter to Aksayananda -- Bombay 16 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Aksayananda -- Bombay 16 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Aksayananda -- Bombay 16 January, 1975|Letter to Aksayananda -- Bombay 16 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Stridish das was just here and he has brought you the answers to your questions I hope. Your program sounds very nice there.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMVSitaRamalaiBombay16January1975_5" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="65" link="Letter to M. V. Sita Ramalai -- Bombay 16 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to M. V. Sita Ramalai -- Bombay 16 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to M. V. Sita Ramalai -- Bombay 16 January, 1975|Letter to M. V. Sita Ramalai -- Bombay 16 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In regards to your question, we are accepting the Srimad-Bhagavatam as it is without interpretation and in that book in the 3rd chapter of the 1st canto all the incarnations of Godhead are listed. (at least the major ones are there). It is stated there that Lord Ramacandra advented and also disappeared many many 100's of thousands of years ago. This is all I can say on this matter. I cannot go beyond what the sastra says.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSatsvarupaBombay19January1975_6" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="78" link="Letter to Satsvarupa -- Bombay 19 January, 1975" link_text="Letter to Satsvarupa -- Bombay 19 January, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Satsvarupa -- Bombay 19 January, 1975|Letter to Satsvarupa -- Bombay 19 January, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about the controversial talks going on, this kind of talk is not befitting my advanced students. This is childish. In Krishna's service, there is no inferior and superior. Deity worship is just as important as book distribution. It is not material. As mentioned in the Bhagavatam.</p>
:sravanam kirtanam visno smaranam pada-sevanam
:arcanam vandanam dasyam sakhyam atma-nivedanam
<p>Sravanam kirtanam is the beginning—to chant and hear. Book distribution is under this category of sravanam kirtanam. The next item is smaranam. If somebody simply remembers the Supreme Lord, that is also as good as sravanam kirtanam. Then there is arcanam. That is also as good as the others, but one who simply becomes engaged in arcanam and does nothing of sravanam kirtanam, his position becomes in the material field. Any one of the nine processes is as good as the other. There is no question of inferior or superior. But out of all of them sravanam kirtanam is very important. Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu while instructing Srila Rupa Gosvami, has said how the seed of devotional service sprouts and increases by watering the root by the process of sravanam kirtanam. So, these two items are very important in devotional service, but that does not mean that the other items are inferior. Srila Jiva Gosvami has stressed kirtanam especially in the age of Kali. Even if there is arcanam for sanctifying the contaminated mind, it must be accompanied by sravanam kirtanam.</p>
<p>So, you are all advanced students. You should understand the importance of each and every item of devotional service. Do not make any misunderstanding by devaluating any of the spiritual activities. You are one of the advanced students. One who distinguishes a particular type of service as inferior or superior, he does not know the value of devotional service. It is all transcendental. Whatever item is suitable, that is accepted as very elevated. Just like Maharaja Pariksit. He simply listened to Sukadeva Gosvami. That is sravanam. And Sukadeva Gosvami simply narrated Srimad-Bhagavatam. This is kirtanam. Prahlada Maharaja simply contemplated—smaranam. Prthu Maharaja simply did deity worship—arcanam. Arjuna only remained as friend of Krishna—sakhyam. Hanuman remained only engaged in carrying out the order of Lord Ramacandra—dasyam. And Bali Maharaja surrendered everything to Krishna—atma-nivedanam. So, any devotee executing any one of the nine is transcendentally glorious. One devotee may be proud that his process of service is the best. That is not inglorious. This is called transcendental competition. Everyone should feel proud of his particular type of devotional service, but that does not mean that other types of service are inferior. Everyone should feel proud of becoming sincere servant of Krishna, but the pure devotee never minimizes the importance of other devotees. Krishna is the enjoyer of varieties of service. It is not stuck up with any particular type of service. Krishna takes pleasure with devotees even by fighting service. When Grandfather Bhisma was trying to injure the body of Krishna by sharpened arrows, in full devotion in the mellow of chivalry, Krishna was feeling the piercing of the arrows as good as worshiping him with soft rose flowers. The conclusion is that everyone should be very very sincere. There is no more the question of inferior or superior.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRavindraSvarupaHonolulu2February1975_7" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="106" link="Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Honolulu 2 February, 1975" link_text="Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Honolulu 2 February, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Honolulu 2 February, 1975|Letter to Ravindra Svarupa -- Honolulu 2 February, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about the loan for the building, Ramesvara and Jayatirtha have suggested that you be given a 4,000 dollar loan from the BBT. So, I think that will be nice.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoPrabhavisnuHonolulu3February1975_8" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="118" link="Letter to Prabhavisnu -- Honolulu 3 February, 1975" link_text="Letter to Prabhavisnu -- Honolulu 3 February, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Prabhavisnu -- Honolulu 3 February, 1975|Letter to Prabhavisnu -- Honolulu 3 February, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding the question about selling records there, I have already told Hamsaduta that it may continue temporarily until the stock is finished, but you must give a book with each record.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDrSantoshKumarMexicoCity16February1975_9" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="143" link="Letter to Dr. Santosh Kumar -- Mexico City 16 February, 1975" link_text="Letter to Dr. Santosh Kumar -- Mexico City 16 February, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dr. Santosh Kumar -- Mexico City 16 February, 1975|Letter to Dr. Santosh Kumar -- Mexico City 16 February, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, the Supreme Personality of Godhead is recognized through the sastras not otherwise. For instance, in the Srimad-Bhagavatam, first canto, third chapter, all the major incarnations of Godhead are listed. Many times the scheduled time of appearance and family, etc. are also mentioned. The incarnation of Godhead must be indicated in the scriptures, otherwise we cannot accept him as being incarnation. Today, there are so many bogus incarnations, but we do not accept them. The Supreme Lord can appear in this world at any time, but he does so according to the regular scheduled appearances mentioned in the sastras. According to the sastras, the last most recent incarnation was Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu who appeared in West Bengal about 500 years ago. We are following in direct line of disciplic teaching from Him.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoTirthangaTehran14March1975_10" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="168" link="Letter to Tirthanga -- Tehran 14 March, 1975" link_text="Letter to Tirthanga -- Tehran 14 March, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Tirthanga -- Tehran 14 March, 1975|Letter to Tirthanga -- Tehran 14 March, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, the main things is that whatever is required by you and your family to live nicely in Krishna Consciousness, that much you should accept. Do not take more than what you actually need. And you should give what ever you can to the temple as donation. Nothing is compulsory. Whatever you kindly pay, that will be accepted.</p>
<p>Regarding sending children to Gurukula, that is also optional, not compulsory. The most important things are that you follow very carefully all of the rules and regulations such as rising early, and having mangala arati and classes, etc. and that you chant at least 16 rounds daily without fail. These things are most essential for your spiritual advancement and then everything will be alright.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMrVincentKarlMayapur6April1975_11" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="193" link="Letter to Mr. Vincent Karl -- Mayapur 6 April, 1975" link_text="Letter to Mr. Vincent Karl -- Mayapur 6 April, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. Vincent Karl -- Mayapur 6 April, 1975|Letter to Mr. Vincent Karl -- Mayapur 6 April, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, you may refer to Ādi-lila, Chapter 6, Text 79 along with the purport, (Caitanya-caritamrta). The answer is there. The basic understanding is that Sada-Siva is an expansion of Maha-Visnu and that same Sada-Siva incarnates as Advaitacarya. Therefore, since Advaitacarya is an incarnation of Sada-Siva who is non-different from Maha-Visnu, we can say that Advaitacarya is an incarnation of Maha-Visnu. It can be said both ways, that He is an incarnation of Sada-Siva or Maha-Visnu.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDrWHWolfRottkayHonolulu8June1975_12" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="312" link="Letter to Dr. W.H. Wolf-Rottkay -- Honolulu 8 June, 1975" link_text="Letter to Dr. W.H. Wolf-Rottkay -- Honolulu 8 June, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dr. W.H. Wolf-Rottkay -- Honolulu 8 June, 1975|Letter to Dr. W.H. Wolf-Rottkay -- Honolulu 8 June, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question at the end, yes, the soul is eternal and it is transmigrating from one body to another. Therefore the body is undergoing evolution, not the soul. Just like if I come to the USA from India, I have to change my residence. I personally do not have to change, but my residence changes. So, the soul travels from one body to another and always remains the same. I shall be looking forward to your elaboration of the word MATTER.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSvarupaDamodaraLosAngeles23June1975_13" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="357" link="Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975" link_text="Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975|Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about the jiva soul in the heart and the jiva soul within the cells, they are separate. Both are jiva atmas, but a particular jiva belongs to a particular body. There is the jiva in this body, but there are also jivas within the cells. Just like I am living within this apartment, but does it mean that no other living entity can live here. There are so many ants, flies, bugs, they are also living within the apartment. Even in my stool there are thousands of living entities.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSvarupaDamodaraLosAngeles23June1975_14" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="357" link="Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975" link_text="Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975|Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Los Angeles 23 June, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Your second question is not very clear what you want to ask, but the fact is that each and every living entity is covered by two kinds of bodies, one subtle and one gross. So the subtle body causes the living entity to take another gross body. We have got experience that in dreaming the gross body is inactive while the subtle body is continuing activities; and again in deep sleep the subtle body is continuing activities. The living entity after being carried by the subtle body to another gross body, it sometimes remains in deep sleep in the womb of the mother. Then gradually the subtle body begins to act within another gross body. When this gross body is fully developed befitting to come out of the mother's body, that is called another birth. Again he changes to another gross body imperceptibly. Just like in the film thousands of pictures are moved imperceptibly. It looks that the body in the picture is moving, but the audience cannot understand that there are so many pictures in the spool. They think that the picture is moving. Similarly every second every moment we are changing the body.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAcyutanandaDenver27June1974_15" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="360" link="Letter to Acyutananda -- Denver 27 June, 1974" link_text="Letter to Acyutananda -- Denver 27 June, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Acyutananda -- Denver 27 June, 1974|Letter to Acyutananda -- Denver 27 June, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding the question of New Vrindaban that should be referred to Kirtanananda Swami who can deal with it directly.</p>
<p>I am glad to hear that your Bangalore program was a success. Your question of how did Sukdev Goswami hear Srimad-Bhagavatam, it was in the womb of his mother.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoCyavanaLosAngeles23July1975_16" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="421" link="Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 23 July, 1975" link_text="Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 23 July, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 23 July, 1975|Letter to Cyavana -- Los Angeles 23 July, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, you have to decide amongst yourselves if Jagad-guru is to come, but if you require his assistance since Brahmananda Swami is not there, that is different thing. Yes, there can be a separate bank account for Spiritual Sky. The idea of the travelling ship seems a bit utopian, but at the next GBC Mayapur meeting it can be thoroughly discussed.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVedavyasaDetroit4August1975_17" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="451" link="Letter to Vedavyasa -- Detroit 4 August, 1975" link_text="Letter to Vedavyasa -- Detroit 4 August, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vedavyasa -- Detroit 4 August, 1975|Letter to Vedavyasa -- Detroit 4 August, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, you may not be so advanced that you will take the karmi remnants as prasada. The karmis should not be given so much that there is waste. You can give them a little, and then if they like you can give them more. This system should be introduced everywhere. I have seen myself that so much prasada is being left. This is not good. Regarding the attitude for taking prasada, if you think it is something palatable, so let me take more and more, then that is sense gratification. But, still it is prasadam so it will act. Prasad is transcendental, but one should not take too much. Sannyasis may take the maha-prasada but not to overeat. Caitanya Mahaprabhu was taking, but on principle he was avoiding.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGurudasaNewDelhi21August1975_18" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="468" link="Letter to Gurudasa -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975" link_text="Letter to Gurudasa -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gurudasa -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975|Letter to Gurudasa -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, we need not bother about these things now.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRupanugaNewDelhi21August1975_19" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="472" link="Letter to Rupanuga -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975" link_text="Letter to Rupanuga -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rupanuga -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975|Letter to Rupanuga -- New Delhi 21 August, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, no, the large Deity can never be moved, not at all. Regarding remarriage, no, remarriage should be always discouraged. Remarriage means encouraging sense gratification. Our mission is to curtail sense gratification. Three times marrying in a year, this is not good, and they are doing this.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSvarupaDamodaraVrindaban31August1975_20" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="486" link="Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Vrindaban 31 August, 1975" link_text="Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Vrindaban 31 August, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Vrindaban 31 August, 1975|Letter to Svarupa Damodara -- Vrindaban 31 August, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, so long they are not getting the human form by natural elevation, they are under the laws of nature. "prakrteh kriyamanani, gunaih karmani sarvasah ([[Vanisource:BG 3.27 (1972)|BG 3.27]]), "Material nature is helping to bring him to the human body, or human species. When a human being is civilized he can take knowledge from Vedic literature. So in Kali Yuga the Srimad-Bhagavatam is the essence of Vedic literatures: nigama kalpa taror galitam phalam ([[Vanisource:SB 1.1.3|SB 1.1.3]]).</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAcyutanandaVrindaban3September1975_21" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="497" link="Letter to Acyutananda -- Vrindaban 3 September, 1975" link_text="Letter to Acyutananda -- Vrindaban 3 September, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Acyutananda -- Vrindaban 3 September, 1975|Letter to Acyutananda -- Vrindaban 3 September, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, Sukdev and Vilvamangal Thakura developed the conjugal ecstacies later on.</p>
<p>Regarding your difficulty in rendering Caitanya Bhagavata, yes you are right that you are overstepping your position. Better to stop it.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBhagavanVrindaban7September1975_22" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="514" link="Letter to Bhagavan -- Vrindaban 7 September, 1975" link_text="Letter to Bhagavan -- Vrindaban 7 September, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bhagavan -- Vrindaban 7 September, 1975|Letter to Bhagavan -- Vrindaban 7 September, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding the question of second marriage, it cannot be done. Neither the law will allow it and neither we can encourage it. If they want to marry more than one wife, they must live outside our temples in their own arrangements. We have no objection if he does it, but it must be done outside the temple. It cannot be done inside the temple jurisdiction. Outside he can work, earn money, and if he wants he can maintain 16,000 wives. But he must go outside the Society. Within the Society only one marriage can be allowed.</p>
<p>I thought these boys and girls will be married and be happy. But, I see that they are not satisfied. In the Western countries they are trained up in a different way. Jumping from one to another. Another wife, another husband. This is the disease all over the world. Simply by agreement, then cancelled, then another agreement.</p>
<p>Everyone wants more than one wife. That is human nature. This means their mind is not being diverted to Krishna. Because they are not madan mohan, they are madan dahan, they are in the Cupid's fire. You want them to have more wives under GBC supervision. You will supply the maintenance? What is this nonsense? They must go outside the Society to do it. And, the sort of marriage where they are not satisfied cannot be allowed. Nor can women with child strictly she cannot marry again.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoEdGilbertVrindaban9September1975_23" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="524" link="Letter to Ed Gilbert -- Vrindaban 9 September, 1975" link_text="Letter to Ed Gilbert -- Vrindaban 9 September, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Ed Gilbert -- Vrindaban 9 September, 1975|Letter to Ed Gilbert -- Vrindaban 9 September, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, God does not discriminate, but so long as we have got forms we have to discriminate. Without God consciousness the discrimination is there. Why should think that you are American or that he is an Indian? Upon this platform of discrimination the whole philosophy of nationalism, communism, this ism and that ism is going on. When one learns how to see individual persons without discrimination, then he becomes perfect. That is described in the Bhagavad-gita: vidya vinyaya sampanne/ brahmane gavi hastini/ suni caiva svapake ca/ panditah sama darsinah ([[Vanisource:BG 5.18 (1972)|BG 5.18]]). "The humble sage by virtue of true knowledge, sees with equal vision a learned and gentle brahmana, a cow, an elephant, a dog, and a dog-eater (outcaste.)"  It is only on the spiritual platform or Krishna consciousness or God consciousness platform that there is no such discrimination. So if you remain on the material platform and artificially desire no discrimination it is not possible.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoPremJBatraAhmedabad28September1975_24" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="571" link="Letter to Prem J. Batra -- Ahmedabad 28 September, 1975" link_text="Letter to Prem J. Batra -- Ahmedabad 28 September, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Prem J. Batra -- Ahmedabad 28 September, 1975|Letter to Prem J. Batra -- Ahmedabad 28 September, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about the difference between the mind and the soul, in the Bhagavad-gita it is directly said that the mind is inferior energy in a subtle form, and soul, jiva, is superior energy. So they are completely distinct. Mind is not spiritual, but mind is a subtle material form. When the soul becomes captivated for enjoying the material world instead of rendering service to Krishna, that is the beginning of his falldown. When the living being thinks himself to be the enjoyer, that is called false ego. His constitutional position is to serve Krishna. So this false egotism degrades him to pollute the intelligence and the mind.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoHamsadutaJohannesburg16October1975_25" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="591" link="Letter to Hamsaduta -- Johannesburg 16 October, 1975" link_text="Letter to Hamsaduta -- Johannesburg 16 October, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Hamsaduta -- Johannesburg 16 October, 1975|Letter to Hamsaduta -- Johannesburg 16 October, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The Spiritual Sky questions and all other questions of this nature will simply have to wait until we discuss it in Mayapur.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSukadevaBombay9November1975_26" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="652" link="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 9 November, 1975" link_text="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 9 November, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 9 November, 1975|Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 9 November, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about prosecuting Manasvi, this is a local management problem. Do I have to say on this matter? So Gurukrpa has given you the instruction. So therefore you should issue some warrant. But why has Gurukrpa advised you if you are unable to do it? Why are you asking me this question? Stop this business.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoKirtananandaBombay10November1975_27" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="661" link="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 10 November, 1975" link_text="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 10 November, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 10 November, 1975|Letter to Kirtanananda -- Bombay 10 November, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about the dancing, the dancing should be done enthusiastically by raising the hands like Panca-Tattva. You can also dance enthusiastically by raising hands. All of Lord Caitanya's followers used to dance with raised hands. If someone dances with ecstasy, that is all right, but it is better to dance with raised hands.</p>
<p>Regarding the topics of the Krsna book, this is Istagosthi. Istagosthi means discussion between ourselves but that should not be taken as a competition. It is not the subject matter for competition. It can be discussed in a small group of devotees. That is Istagosthi. This is better than competition.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMadhudvisaBombay10November1975_28" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="662" link="Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975" link_text="Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975|Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, the first question, when a soul reincarnates, does he associate with the souls he associated with in his lives, that is not necessarily so. Even if he associates, how can he recognize them because everyone changes his body. Regarding your question about karmic debt, yes, it is generally that the debtor is obliged to take birth and also the creditor. Sometimes the creditor takes birth as the son of the debtor and after being a very affectionate son for a few days, he dies and thus the debtor becomes aggrieved very much. This is the punishment. In this way in every transaction the participants are becoming involved in their resultant action of karma. This is karma-bandhana, in Bhagavad-gita, or the bondage of different fruitive activity. It is advised that one should act only for Krsna, otherwise he will be involved in karma-bandhana.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMadhudvisaBombay10November1975_29" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="662" link="Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975" link_text="Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975|Letter to Madhudvisa -- Bombay 10 November, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your second question, whether a person who is a Negro, Chinese, Indian, etc. are they different species of life making up the 400,000 species. Yes, so far their body is concerned. </p>
<p>Your question whether woman in each one of these species is another separate species, no, the species means both man and woman of the same type. Of course, strictly speaking the woman is taken differently, otherwise how would Krsna say striyo vaisyas tatha sudras.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBharadrajaBombay18November1975_30" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="693" link="Letter to Bharadraja -- Bombay 18 November, 1975" link_text="Letter to Bharadraja -- Bombay 18 November, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Bharadraja -- Bombay 18 November, 1975|Letter to Bharadraja -- Bombay 18 November, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding the Nrsimhadeva Deity, yes, that can be done, however to worship Nrsimhadeva requires a separate temple structure, not that Lord Nrsimhadeva can be worshiped in the same temple as Radha-Krsna. Regarding your question about offering aroti to the form of Damodara, no, the Deity worship that you are now doing is sufficient during the Damodara-vrata.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoTikandasJBatraNewDelhi30November1975_31" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="715" link="Letter to Tikandas J. Batra -- New Delhi 30 November, 1975" link_text="Letter to Tikandas J. Batra -- New Delhi 30 November, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Tikandas J. Batra -- New Delhi 30 November, 1975|Letter to Tikandas J. Batra -- New Delhi 30 November, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about Brahma Samhita, it was found by Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu in a temple on his travels thru south India. There are supposed to be 100 chapters, but this is the only chapter which is known to date.</p>
<p>Regarding your question about Vaikuntha; the example is The King and the bed bug, both of them are sitting on the same throne, but the business of the King is to rule and the bed bug's business is to bite. The place is the same, but the consciousness is different. It is said the Lord is situated in everyone's heart, so that means Krishna is also in the heart of a hog, and he is also in the heart of a demigod, but that does not mean that God has become a hog, or a demigod, God is always in Vaikuntha. Similarly, those who are God conscious, Pure devotees of the Lord, they are always in Vaikuntha, there is nothing like material for them.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJayKrishnaThakuraVrindaban6December1975_32" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="732" link="Letter to Jay Krishna Thakura -- Vrindaban 6 December, 1975" link_text="Letter to Jay Krishna Thakura -- Vrindaban 6 December, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jay Krishna Thakura -- Vrindaban 6 December, 1975|Letter to Jay Krishna Thakura -- Vrindaban 6 December, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about my birth. I was born September 1, 1896, Tuesday at about 4:00 in the afternoon. My rasi is Metthuna.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSriTikandasJBatraVrindaban9December1975_33" class="quote" parent="1975_Correspondence" book="Let" index="745" link="Letter to Sri Tikandas J. Batra -- Vrindaban 9 December, 1975" link_text="Letter to Sri Tikandas J. Batra -- Vrindaban 9 December, 1975">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sri Tikandas J. Batra -- Vrindaban 9 December, 1975|Letter to Sri Tikandas J. Batra -- Vrindaban 9 December, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, There is really a place as Vaikuntha, beyond this dark material universe. In the material world if our consciousness is changed to Krishna then even here is vaikuntha consciousness. This is very easy to understand. Suppose one is a foreigner in India, but still he can continue his European or American consciousness. The process for doing this is bhakti yoga and the beginning of that process is hearing and chanting the Holy Name of Krishna, Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare, Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare. Please chant Hare Krishna and be always in Krishna consciousness.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1976_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="11" parent="Correspondence" text="1976 Correspondence"><h3>1976 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoUpendraNellore7January1976_0" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="17" link="Letter to Upendra -- Nellore 7 January, 1976" link_text="Letter to Upendra -- Nellore 7 January, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Upendra -- Nellore 7 January, 1976|Letter to Upendra -- Nellore 7 January, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">As to your question concerning whether relationships between devotees are eternal, the answer is "yes." This is confirmed by Sri Narottama dasa Thakura: "cakhudana dilo yei, janme janme prabhu sei", he is my Lord birth after birth. In this way you have to understand, by studying carefully the philosophy. We have got so many books now and I want all of my disciples to read them carefully. Soon we shall be instituting Bhakti-sastri examinations and all brahmanas will have to pass. So utilize whatever time you find to make a thorough study of my books. Then all your questions will be answered.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoJayatirthaMayapur22January1976_1" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="60" link="Letter to Jayatirtha -- Mayapur 22 January, 1976" link_text="Letter to Jayatirtha -- Mayapur 22 January, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jayatirtha -- Mayapur 22 January, 1976|Letter to Jayatirtha -- Mayapur 22 January, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about having a Gurukula in Santa Cruz, I have replied this in a separate letter enclosed, a copy of which I have also sent to Jagadisa. You may consider carefully the points and do the needful.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBrahmanandaMayapur14February1976_2" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="134" link="Letter to Brahmananda -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976" link_text="Letter to Brahmananda -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Brahmananda -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976|Letter to Brahmananda -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions about the problems in your zone and your question about why are you there, these should be taken up with the GBC.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGunagrahiMayapur14February1976_3" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="136" link="Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976" link_text="Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976|Letter to Gunagrahi -- Mayapur 14 February, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question about the brahmacaris, you may consult the GBC regarding this matter. Tamala Krishna Maharaja especially is qualified to give you good answer.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGadiMayapur16February1976_4" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="143" link="Letter to Gadi -- Mayapur 16 February, 1976" link_text="Letter to Gadi -- Mayapur 16 February, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gadi -- Mayapur 16 February, 1976|Letter to Gadi -- Mayapur 16 February, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions; Arjuna, Yudhisthira Maharaja, and Draupadi were not killed in the battle. They are always personal associates of Krishna. Wherever Krishna goes, they go. The Bhagavad-gita says: bahuni me vyatitani janmani tava carjuna. "Both you and I have passed many lives; I remember, but you do not."</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMadhavaMayapur17February1976_5" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="146" link="Letter to Madhava -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976" link_text="Letter to Madhava -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Madhava -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976|Letter to Madhava -- Mayapur 17 February, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, matter originally is spirit and when spirit is not distinctly understood, that is matter. Just like a tree is also a manifestation of spirit soul, but the consciousness is covered. When the tree is cut, it does not protest. But the moving entity has stronger consciousness than the tree. There is consciousness in the tree though. Also consciousness in a dormant state is matter; consciousness in a completely developed state is spirit. Matter is the symbol of undeveloped consciousness.</p>
<p>Thinking is a subtle form of matter. Just like it says in Bhagavad-gita: "bhumir apo 'nalo vayuh . . . ([[Vanisource:BG 7.4 (1972)|BG 7.4]])." Like the ether is subtle, the mind is more subtle—subtle form of matter.</p>
<p>As for your third question is concerned everything is in the spiritual world. Krishna is the sum total of spirit and everything is coming from Him. Aham sarvasya prabhavo . . . ([[Vanisource:BG 10.8 (1972)|BG 10.8]]). Matter, spirit, everything comes from Him. He is the supreme life, the origin of spirit and life. Therefore matter emanates from life. Nityo nityanam . . . He is the Supreme Consciousness of all other consciousness.</p>
<p>The moon is situated 1,600,000 miles above the sun. You may refer to the fifth canto and read carefully.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoBatuGopalaMayapur18February1976_6" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="152" link="Letter to Batu Gopala -- Mayapur 18 February, 1976" link_text="Letter to Batu Gopala -- Mayapur 18 February, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Batu Gopala -- Mayapur 18 February, 1976|Letter to Batu Gopala -- Mayapur 18 February, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question regarding your household situation, that is not the spiritual master's business.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoDrChittaranjanMohapatraMayapur21March1976_7" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="197" link="Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976" link_text="Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976|Letter to Dr. Chittaranjan Mohapatra -- Mayapur 21 March, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In reply to your questions of your letter dated 16-3-76 addressed to my secretary, I beg to offer you the following on the basis of the sastras. Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The dictionary defines God as the Supreme Being, therefore, Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gita: Mattah parataram nanyat, kincid asti . . .  ([[Vanisource:BG 7.7 (1972)|BG 7.7]]) "There is no Truth superior to Me. Everything is resting upon Me, as pearls are strung on a thread." And in many other sastras Krishna is accepted as the Supreme Personality of Godhead. All the acaryas such as Ramanuja, Madhvacarya, Nimbarka, Lord Caitanya, and innumerable others have come to this conclusion: that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead.</p>
<p>Concerning your question as to why we should sacrifice everything to Him; because He is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, He is the Proprietor and Enjoyer of everything; Bhoktaram yajna tapasam sarva loka mahesvaram . . .  ([[Vanisource:BG 5.29 (1972)|BG 5.29]]). Everything belongs to Him. We have unlawfully encroached upon His property this is mine, that is mine . . . Krishna comes down to teach us real knowledge, therefore He tells you to give up encroaching on His property. Better to deliver it to Him. Therefore, perfection of life is when we deliver or return everything to Him, and He tells us this for our benefit! The sooner we return everything to Him, the better it is for us. Our Krishna Consciousness Movement is teaching this fact all over the world.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoPranadaDelhi27March1976_8" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="209" link="Letter to Pranada -- Delhi 27 March, 1976" link_text="Letter to Pranada -- Delhi 27 March, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Pranada -- Delhi 27 March, 1976|Letter to Pranada -- Delhi 27 March, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Concerning your questions about tantric sastras; the Vaisnava tantras are bona fide literatures, just like Narada-pancaratra, but not the atheistic tantra which have nothing to do with the Vedic literatures.</p>
:sat-karma-nipuno vipro, mantra-tantra visaradah,
:avaisnava guru na syad, vaisnavah sva paco guruh
:(Padma Purāṇa)
<p>"Even if a brahmana is very learned in Vedic literatures and knows the six occupational duties of a brahmana, he cannot become a guru or spiritual master unless he is a devotee of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. However, if one is born in a family of dog-eaters but is a pure devotee of the Lord, he can become a spiritual master."</p>
<p>The point is that Krishna is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and He is always purusa (male) not female (prakrti). "purusam sasvatam divyam, adi devam ajam vibhum." Worship of the mother aspect is prakrti, not recommended by Krishna for the intelligent class of men.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMrPremJBatraVrindaban2April1976_9" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="211" link="Letter to Mr. Prem J. Batra -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976" link_text="Letter to Mr. Prem J. Batra -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. Prem J. Batra -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976|Letter to Mr. Prem J. Batra -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Concerning your questions raised, the process is simply to hear from authority and accept it. From the Bhagavad-gita we can understand Krishna because He is explaining Himself. What is the difficulty to understand. There is somebody Superior in all aspects of material activities. The sun rises exactly on time, the seasons changing, fruits appearing, and flowers. There is no change in the law of nature. Don't you think that there is a Superior Being managing these things. Why not accept this proposal. It is no explanation that it is simply accident that all these things are going on so nicely. "Mayadhaksena prakrti suyatte sacara caram . . . This material world is working under my direction, O son of Kunti, and it is producing all moving and unmoving beings. By its rule this manifestation is created and annihilated again and again." ([[Vanisource:BG 9.10 (1972)|BG 9.10]]).</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMrDhawanVrindaban2April1976_10" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="214" link="Letter to Mr. Dhawan -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976" link_text="Letter to Mr. Dhawan -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Mr. Dhawan -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976|Letter to Mr. Dhawan -- Vrindaban 2 April, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">I have just come back from Delhi yesterday and I'm preparing for going to Australia by the 10th April, therefore, I am very sorry that I must inform you I will not be able to attend the function, however, I am sending herewith the answers to your questions, as far as I know. As we have received this knowledge from the greatest authority, Krishna, these answers will be acceptable in every sphere of spiritual activity.</p>
<p>First question: What is the true aim of human life?</p>
<p>Answer: The real aim of life is to go back to Home, back to Godhead. We all living entities in different forms of body numbering 8,400,000 forms beginning from the aquatics up to the best advanced form of human life, there is a regular evolution by the laws of nature. The real fact is that we living entities although part and parcel of God, on account of our own disobedience have come down to this material world under different circumstances. We have different types of material dresses to fulfill the tendency for sense gratification, and this by the laws of nature, by association with the 3 modes of material nature. We are transmigrating through different forms of life. So this human form of life is given to us as an opportunity to understand our position because in the human form of life we have more developed consciousness than the lower forms of life like the aquatics, insects, plants, birds, beasts and the civilized and uncivilized human beings. So the point is that a human being must know the aim of life is to go back to Home, back to Godhead.</p>
<p>Question #2: Which is the exact path to attain this aim?</p>
<p>Answer: God is great and we are all subordinate to God. In other words, God is the Supreme Master and we are all living entities, servants of God. Therefore, the path which teaches this fact, that a living entity is eternal servant of God, that is the only single path which leads one back to Home, back to Godhead.</p>
<p>Question #3: How many leaders have actually achieved this aim?</p>
<p>Answer: This aim is a fact, and the path is a fact, and anyone who takes this path, he can achieve the goal. According to our authorities who have achieved this goal, there are many, many acaryas. In the recent years, within 1500 years, the following acaryas are actually leaders of this goal of life. They are Ramanujacarya, Madhvacarya, Visnu svami, and Nimbarka, and latest within the last 500 years is Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. There are many such leaders who have achieved the goal of life and if you want to follow them, the path is very clearly mentioned.</p>
<p>Question #4: why all the present religions and spiritual systems came into existence, contradicting each other when humanity is meant to follow only one religion?</p>
<p>Answer: Religious system means the law given by God. In every system of religion the order is to follow the instruction given by God or His representative. Unfortunately, the so-called followers deviate from the orders of the master and sometimes create their own concocted religious system. Otherwise, there can't be different religions. We therefore accept only one religion which teaches one how to love God. Any religious system which doesn't teach this, how to love God is not religion, but is cheating system. The conditioned souls who have come to this world on account of forgetfulness of his eternal relationship with God is prone to be cheated, but a person who is sincere is not cheated, but he takes up the path which leads one to the perfection of life, how to love God. The present religious and spiritual systems in varieties come into existence on account of imperfect leaders who defied the authority of God. My suggestion is therefore that the leaders who actually agree as eternal servant of God may sit together and find out the ways and means of one religious system in this world. God is one. There cannot be many gods, otherwise there is no meaning of God. In the English dictionary, you find that God means the "Supreme Being." There are unlimited number of living beings, but God is one Supreme Being. Supreme Being must be one. Nobody can be equal to Him, and nobody can be greater than Him, otherwise there is no meaning of God. At the present moment it has become a fashion to become God very cheaply, therefore, such system being very cheap and not authorized, there are so many religious systems. Otherwise, God is one, all living entities are His eternal servants, and therefore, the real religious system is to learn how to serve God.</p>
<p>Question #5: What has Hasur Mohammed Sahib said about 14th Century and why?</p>
<p>Answer: I have not sufficient information about the instruction of Hazur Mohammed Sahib, but if you mean Mohammed, the inaugurator of Islam religion, I accept him as empowered servant of God because he preached God consciousness in those parts of the world and induced them to accept the authority of God. He is accepted as the servant of God and we have all respect for him. I do not know what he has said about the 14th Century, therefore, I cannot answer this point. You are mentioning the Holy Names of Nanak, Krishna, Kabir, Christ, Mohammed, etc. Out of all of these names we accept Krishna as the Lord and all others representative servant of God, Krishna. In the English dictionary, it is said God is the Supreme Being, and when Krishna appeared on this earth He proved to be the Supreme Being in all respects. We are spreading this Krishna Consciousness Movement all over the world and if all the leaders would accept this philosophy of the Bhagavad-gita As It Is, then I am sure that the world would be fortunate to follow one type of religion, and accept one God without any faulty conviction.</p>
<p>I thank you once more for your invitation and I regret very much that I will not be able to attend but it will be a great pleasure for me if the leaders of the conference will like to correspond with me regarding our conclusions as above mentioned.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoPunjabiPremanandBombay16April1976_11" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="231" link="Letter to Punjabi Premanand -- Bombay 16 April, 1976" link_text="Letter to Punjabi Premanand -- Bombay 16 April, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Punjabi Premanand -- Bombay 16 April, 1976|Letter to Punjabi Premanand -- Bombay 16 April, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Concerning your questions: Yes, it will help to read Bhagavad-gita but to have to hear from the realized person. Without the help of guru, if you read independently, you may be misguided. Therefore, so many politicians, scholars, etc. not being guided by the parampara system, have simply misled the public. The Bhagavad-gita is the standard book of knowledge in India and many eminent persons like Gandhi, Aurobindo, Dr. RadhaKrishnan, etc. they tried to understand the Bhagavad-gita, but could not do it. They were themselves misled and on account of their big position they misled so many followers. Our system, the Vedic system, is to approach the right person and hear from him exactly as Arjuna listened from Krishna. Mental speculation will not help. Hearing is the main point. In the Bhagavad-gita, it is written, dharmaksetre kuruksetre . . . when you hear from a realized soul, a person who knows things, he'll explain that Kuruksetra is a place where religious ritualistic ceremonies are performed from time immemorial, from the time before the Battle of Kuruksetra. But, if you read the books of some cunning politician, he'll mislead you and you'll learn that Kuruksetra means this body which is not actually the fact. That is the difference, hearing from devotees, the sound vibration coming from the realized person. Reading the book is the same thing . . . tattva-darsana—hearing from one who has seen the truth. Reading or hearing from the realized person there is no difference, but hearing the sound vibration from the realized soul is still more effective, better.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoTustaKrsnaToronto18June1976_12" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="354" link="Letter to Tusta Krsna -- Toronto 18 June, 1976" link_text="Letter to Tusta Krsna -- Toronto 18 June, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Tusta Krsna -- Toronto 18 June, 1976|Letter to Tusta Krsna -- Toronto 18 June, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Concerning your questions: First of all, no, you should not have the four symbols of Visnu on the four corners of the temple. Make the temple in our Vrindaban style. Three domes are there, over the Deities, and then you can have 2 domes or either side in the front. The idea is given in the sketch below:</p>
<p>(SKETCH)</p>
<p>On the inside veranda, you can have Gaura-lila carved. It will be a great attraction and I shall be very glad to have it. Either plaster or wood is alright, whichever is easier and cheaper to do, you can do. Of course, it would be very attractive in wood. But it is my fervent request that the devotees not make any "bombing-lila" as it was publicized recently.</p>
<p>Just like in our Vrindaban temple, you can have 3 Deity compartments. Facing the altar, Nrsimhadeva can be on the left, Guru-Gauranga in the center, and Jagannatha-Subhadra-Balarama on the right so that you can organize Rathayatra. You can begin the construction with cornerstone.</p>
<p>I would like to receive copies of the letters that you have written to the government officials there as you had mentioned, and also the copies of their replies.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSatsvarupaGoswamiNewVrndavana30June1976_13" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="374" link="Letter to Satsvarupa Goswami -- New Vrndavana 30 June, 1976" link_text="Letter to Satsvarupa Goswami -- New Vrndavana 30 June, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Satsvarupa Goswami -- New Vrndavana 30 June, 1976|Letter to Satsvarupa Goswami -- New Vrndavana 30 June, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">With regard to your question about Bengali style kirtana and mrdanga playing, one or two styles is best.  To introduce more styles is not good.  It will become an encumbrance.  Who is that Krsna das Babaji who is teaching?  If we introduce so much emphasis on style of kirtana, then simply imitation will go on.  Devotional emotion is the main thing.  If we give stress to instrument and style then attention will be diverted to the style.  That will be spiritual loss.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoGauraGovindaVrindaban18September1976_14" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="509" link="Letter to Gaura Govinda -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1976" link_text="Letter to Gaura Govinda -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Gaura Govinda -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1976|Letter to Gaura Govinda -- Vrindaban 18 September, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In answer to your question as to why the Indian population is so slack in spiritual life: during the British rule there was a secret policy by the British to cut down the Vedic civilization in India. There was a confidential policy by the British government to kill India's original culture and everything Indian was condemned. From the very beginning they took this position. In our childhood and boyhood we had to read some book by a Mr. Ghose called, "England's Work in India". The purport was that we are uncivilized and the British had come to make us civilized. Later on the policy became successful because in our childhood days any anglicised gentleman was considered to be advanced in civilization.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoMakhanlalVrindaban24October1976_15" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="585" link="Letter to Makhanlal -- Vrindaban 24 October, 1976" link_text="Letter to Makhanlal -- Vrindaban 24 October, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Makhanlal -- Vrindaban 24 October, 1976|Letter to Makhanlal -- Vrindaban 24 October, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So far your questions are concerned. Nityananda is the principle of the Guru. So, the Gurudeva is the incarnation of Nityananda. Anyone strictly following the instruction of the Guru is following Nityananda. The price one has to pay if he wants to become Krsna conscious is that he must dedicate himself to following the order of the spiritual master, mahat seva. If the Spiritual Master is pleased with disciple then the blessings of Guru will be there. That is the best way to become Krsna conscious, and Krsna is non-different from Nityananda. You may pray to Lord Nityananda to help you become dedicated in the service of your Guru. Krsna consciousness cannot be achieved artificially. You should approach Nityananda Prabhu through your Spiritual Master.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVidyaVrindaban25October1976_16" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="598" link="Letter to Vidya -- Vrindaban 25 October, 1976" link_text="Letter to Vidya -- Vrindaban 25 October, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vidya -- Vrindaban 25 October, 1976|Letter to Vidya -- Vrindaban 25 October, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In answer to your questions; 1) Tulasi is one devotee who appears wherever there is devotion to Krsna. 2) Tulasi's body is spiritual. 3) Yes, jewelry is alright. 4) If possible. 5) Tulasi leaves should be offered to the Deity. 6) If possible. 7) Yes. 8) Yes. 9) You may cut the dead branches, but what is the necessity. 10) I never said that. 11) No. 12) Yes. 13) Use the wood for beads as far as possible, the balance may be placed within the earth. 14) I said no chemical sprays. 15) Undisturbed means what? 16) Use common sense and if you have none then consult with others. 17) No. 18) Don't try to introduce something new. The most important thing is the love and devotion.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVegavanHyderabad17December1976_17" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="693" link="Letter to Vegavan -- Hyderabad 17 December, 1976" link_text="Letter to Vegavan -- Hyderabad 17 December, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Vegavan -- Hyderabad 17 December, 1976|Letter to Vegavan -- Hyderabad 17 December, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding the question you have asked, you can give a very straight answer. Bhagavad-gita says, "dehantara praptih ([[Vanisource:BG 2.13 (1972)|BG 2.13]])". The soul transmigrates, but there is no regular process. In the beginning of creation, when all the world was water, all living entities were aquatics. Then gradually from aquatics the soul passes into plant bodies, then insect bodies, then bird bodies, then animal bodies, then human beings. In the human form the soul can decide whether to go back to home, back to Godhead or return to birth and death, accepting material bodies according to his karma. Therefore, it is advised to take advantage of the human form of body to go back home, back to Godhead. Our movement is for this purpose, to offer all human beings a chance to go back home, back to Godhead.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoSukadevaBombay29December1976_18" class="quote" parent="1976_Correspondence" book="Let" index="720" link="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 29 December, 1976" link_text="Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 29 December, 1976">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 29 December, 1976|Letter to Sukadeva -- Bombay 29 December, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So far your question as to whether it is more important to organize the women's book distribution or to work on College preaching, the book distribution is more important.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1977_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="12" parent="Correspondence" text="1977 Correspondence"><h3>1977 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoAmarendraBombay3January1977_0" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="2" link="Letter to Amarendra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977" link_text="Letter to Amarendra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Amarendra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977|Letter to Amarendra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question as to when the soul leaves the body, it is when the heart stops beating. Even if the brain has stopped functioning, if the heart is beating that means the soul is present.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoTikandasBatraBombay3January1977_1" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="4" link="Letter to Tikandas Batra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977" link_text="Letter to Tikandas Batra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Tikandas Batra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977|Letter to Tikandas Batra -- Bombay 3 January, 1977]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">In answer to your questions, sastra says that only for progeny there should be sex, otherwise no sex, "dharmaviruddho bhutesu kamo 'smi." No "indriyartha," for sense gratification there should be no sex. But, this sterilization is for sense gratification. That is most sinful. The Indian government is becoming demonic because those who elect the government are becoming demonic.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoEmbarSampathKumaracharBombay5January1977_2" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="11" link="Letter to Embar Sampath Kumarachar -- Bombay 5 January, 1977" link_text="Letter to Embar Sampath Kumarachar -- Bombay 5 January, 1977">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Embar Sampath Kumarachar -- Bombay 5 January, 1977|Letter to Embar Sampath Kumarachar -- Bombay 5 January, 1977]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Whether you will be able to teach our boys Sanskrit in the standard way? That is the first question. Have you ever worked as a Sanskrit teacher anywhere? To teach these young boys requires special technique. Whether you know it? We have reports from the U.S.A. about you just to the contrary. Kindly reply this point.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVARIOUSUnknownPlaceUnknownDate_3" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="126" link="Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date" link_text="Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date|Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your questions, in the spiritual sky everything is spiritual, so Krsna has no need for living in the heart. They are seeing Krsna face to face always, so what is the use of being in the heart? Outside, inside they are always the same, even their heart that is also sat-cit-ananda. There is no mechanical arrangement like this material body for anyone in the spiritual, what to speak of Krsna.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoVARIOUSUnknownPlaceUnknownDate_4" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="126" link="Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date" link_text="Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date|Letter to VARIOUS -- Unknown Place Unknown Date]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your other questions, Lord Jagannatha does not have His own planet. The whole spiritual world is a manifestation of the spiritual energy of Krsna, so Subhadra or Radharani, they are spirit</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoArtistsUnknownPlaceUnknownDate_5" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="127" link="Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date" link_text="Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date|Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So all your questions are good sign. You are always welcome to question me. It is my duty to guide you also, and I am always prepared. How else you will do your work? And this is also utilization of my valuable time, to give you suggestions. So far as Mahabharata is concerned, there is a Hindi translation, but I do not know of any English translation. But never mind. You can go on asking me as you have done in the past.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LettertoArtistsUnknownPlaceUnknownDate_6" class="quote" parent="1977_Correspondence" book="Let" index="127" link="Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date" link_text="Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date|Letter to Artists -- Unknown Place Unknown Date]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding your question, how could Visnu appear from the nostril of Brahma? The answer is that Visnu being all pervading, He can appear from anyplace. He appeared as Nrsimhadeva from the pillar. So, one may question how Visnu may appear from pillar, but actually He appeared. He is all powerful with inconceivable potency, and therefore He can appear Himself from anywhere He likes. When Lord appeared as a small hog from the nostril of Brahma He began to expand Himself more and more and gradually He became a gigantic boar. So these are inconceivable energy of the Supreme Lord. It does not, however, mean that Brahma's nostril is the birthplace of Visnu. The sun rises from the eastern horizon. That does not mean that eastern horizon is the birthplace of the sun. I hope you will understand the transcendental appearance and disappearance of the transcendental Personality of Godhead as such. In the Bhagavad-gita therefore it is stated that anyone who understands the transcendental position of the appearance, disppearance, and activities of Krsna becomes liberated immediately after quitting the present body.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>