View source for Scriptural injunction means

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Scriptural injunction means"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Rishab}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|29Feb12}}
{{last|29Feb12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Scriptural|3]]
[[Category:Injunction|3]]
[[Category:Vaniquotes English Dictionary A to Z]]
[[Category:Vaniquotes English Dictionary G-H-I]]
[[Category:Vaniquotes English Dictionary S-T-U]]

</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1974_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="7" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1974 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1974 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkApril221974Hyderabad_0" class="quote" parent="1974_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="70" link="Morning Walk -- April 22, 1974, Hyderabad" link_text="Morning Walk -- April 22, 1974, Hyderabad">
<div class="heading">Scriptural injunction means you cannot change. Just like we accept the Vedic scripture but don't change it. That example I have given many times.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- April 22, 1974, Hyderabad|Morning Walk -- April 22, 1974, Hyderabad]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: The question is the Old Testament, you say that there was the word "murder." Why you have changed? You accept Old Testament or reject?</p>
<p>Satsvarūpa: Accept the statement should be "murder."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: But why it is "kill"?</p>
<p>Pañcadraviḍa: Wrong translation.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Wrong translation.</p>
<p>Pañcadraviḍa: Yes.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: They are fools, all set of fools. Useless. See one thing and write one thing. Then you are not perfect. Bhrama pramāda. You commit mistake. Therefore your instruction is useless, useless. Because you commit mistake, therefore your instruction is useless. And that actually they are doing. As it is suitable, they are changing the words of Bible. They are useless. Things which are changeable, that cannot be accepted as scripture. Scriptural injunction means you cannot change. Just like we accept the Vedic scripture but don't change it. That example I have given many times. Because Lord Buddha wanted to change Vedic literature, therefore he is rejected. Although Lord Buddha is so... We worship him as incarnation of..., but he was rejected. You cannot change. Immediately you are rejected. (break)</p>
<p>Pañcadraviḍa: ...Christians, they were arguing with me they said, "God has given us the pig to eat."</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: It is said in the Bible?</p>
<p>Pañcadraviḍa: No.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Then where is this nonsense? How he can say? Actually, Christians cannot eat any meat because the word is "Thou shalt not kill." (break)</p>
<p>Pañcadraviḍa: Christ Himself was distributing fish, to the hungry, to the poor. He gave out so much fish.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: That was not killing fish. That is my support.</p>
<p>Pañcadraviḍa: We do not kill the fish either. We simply purchase it in the supermarket.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. Directly, fish, as soon as taken from the water, he dies. And Christ... Then how can you support Christ that if he has done killing business himself and he instructs others not to kill?</p>
<p>Akṣayānanda: Does that mean you are calling Jesus Christ a hypocrite?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Hypocrite.</p>
<p>Akṣayānanda: Who is calling him a hypocrite, us or you?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: You want to support your sinful activities by proving Christ as hypocrite. This is your business. You are such a Christian. And your love for Christ is such. (break)</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>