Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-15T23:42:56Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:42, 15 May 2018
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<div id="facts">		<div id="facts">
	{{terms\|"Buddha"\|"Buddha's"\|"Buddhadeva"\|"Buddhism"\|"Buddhist"\|"Buddhists"\|"Sankara"\|"Sankaracarya"\|"Sankaracarya's"}}		{{terms\|"Buddha"\|"Buddha's"\|"Buddhadeva"\|"Buddhism"\|"Buddhist"\|"Buddhists"\|"Sankara"\|"Sankaracarya"\|"Sankaracarya's"}}
	{{notes\|}}		{{notes\|VedaBase query: "buddh* sankara*"@40}}
	{{compiler\|Labangalatika}}		{{compiler\|Labangalatika}}
	{{complete\|ALL}}		{{complete\|ALL}}
	{{first\|07Jan11}}		{{first\|07Jan11}}
	{{last\|~~07Jan11~~}}		{{last\|10Jan11}}
	{{totals_by_section\|BG=0\|SB=0\|CC=0\|OB=0\|Lec=0\|Con=10\|Let=7}}		{{totals_by_section\|BG=0\|SB=0\|CC=0\|OB=0\|Lec=0\|Con=10\|Let=7}}
	{{total\|17}}		{{total\|17}}
Line 47:		Line 47:
	<div class="heading">Nobody has preached that "You become happy here," either Lord Buddha or Lord Christ or Kṛṣṇa or anybody, Śaṅkara. Nobody. But modern materialistic people, they are thinking that "We can become happy by adjustment of our material condition."		<div class="heading">Nobody has preached that "You become happy here," either Lord Buddha or Lord Christ or Kṛṣṇa or anybody, Śaṅkara. Nobody. But modern materialistic people, they are thinking that "We can become happy by adjustment of our material condition."
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Two Buddhist Monks -- July 12, 1973, London\|Room Conversation with Two Buddhist Monks -- July 12, 1973, London]]: </span><div class="text">Prabhupāda: So you cannot go to Kṛṣṇa unless you have your spiritual body. Because the spiritual world and Kṛṣṇa, they are all spiritual. So you cannot enter into fire unless you are fire. So you have to revive your spiritual body, spiritual consciousness. Then, after giving up this body, you enter the spiritual world. So Lord Buddha did not speak anything about the spiritual world, but his philosophy said that "Dismantle this material existence." Nirvāṇa. Nobody has preached that "You become happy here," either Lord Buddha or Lord Christ or Kṛṣṇa or anybody, Śaṅkara. Nobody. But modern materialistic people, they are thinking that "We can become happy by adjustment of our material condition." That is not possible.		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Two Buddhist Monks -- July 12, 1973, London\|Room Conversation with Two Buddhist Monks -- July 12, 1973, London]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: So you cannot go to Kṛṣṇa unless you have your spiritual body. Because the spiritual world and Kṛṣṇa, they are all spiritual. So you cannot enter into fire unless you are fire. So you have to revive your spiritual body, spiritual consciousness. Then, after giving up this body, you enter the spiritual world. So Lord Buddha did not speak anything about the spiritual world, but his philosophy said that "Dismantle this material existence." Nirvāṇa. Nobody has preached that "You become happy here," either Lord Buddha or Lord Christ or Kṛṣṇa or anybody, Śaṅkara. Nobody. But modern materialistic people, they are thinking that "We can become happy by adjustment of our material condition." That is not possible.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 53:		Line 53:
	<div class="heading">All the ācāryas, they're all vairāgīs, either Śaṅkarācārya, Madhvācārya, Rāmānujācārya, they're all sannyāsīs. Caitanya Mahāprabhu. All vairāgīs. Even Jesus Christ, he was a vairāgī. Even Lord Buddha, vairāgī.		<div class="heading">All the ācāryas, they're all vairāgīs, either Śaṅkarācārya, Madhvācārya, Rāmānujācārya, they're all sannyāsīs. Caitanya Mahāprabhu. All vairāgīs. Even Jesus Christ, he was a vairāgī. Even Lord Buddha, vairāgī.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Reporter from Researchers Magazine -- July 24, 1973, London\|Room Conversation with Reporter from Researchers Magazine -- July 24, 1973, London]]: </span><div ~~style="display: inline;"~~ class="text"><p style="display: inline;">All the ācāryas, they're all vairāgīs, either Śaṅkarācārya, Madhvācārya, Rāmānujācārya, they're all sannyāsīs. Caitanya Mahāprabhu. All vairāgīs. Even Jesus Christ, he was a vairāgī. Even Lord Buddha, vairāgī. This is required, but where is the vairāgya? They're simply attached to these material activities, and they're talking of high, high things. Their preliminary things is not finished, vairāgya. This is the first stage, vairāgya, bhaktiḥ pareśānubhavo viraktir anyatra ([[Vanisource:SB 11.2.42\|SB 11.2.42]]).</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation with Reporter from Researchers Magazine -- July 24, 1973, London\|Room Conversation with Reporter from Researchers Magazine -- July 24, 1973, London]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: All the ācāryas, they're all vairāgīs, either Śaṅkarācārya, Madhvācārya, Rāmānujācārya, they're all sannyāsīs. Caitanya Mahāprabhu. All vairāgīs. Even Jesus Christ, he was a vairāgī. Even Lord Buddha, vairāgī. This is required, but where is the vairāgya? They're simply attached to these material activities, and they're talking of high, high things. Their preliminary things is not finished, vairāgya. This is the first stage, vairāgya, bhaktiḥ pareśānubhavo viraktir anyatra ([[Vanisource:SB 11.2.42\|SB 11.2.42]]).</p>
	:anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ		:anyābhilāṣitā-śūnyaṁ
	:jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam		:jñāna-karmādy-anāvṛtam
Line 78:		Line 78:
	<div class="heading">The Buddhists, they think God is zero. And others, they think God has no form. So, two classes. The Hindus, they think God has no particular form. And you can imagine any of them. That is Śaṅkara. The pañcopāsanā. But still, Śaṅkara is very careful.		<div class="heading">The Buddhists, they think God is zero. And others, they think God has no form. So, two classes. The Hindus, they think God has no particular form. And you can imagine any of them. That is Śaṅkara. The pañcopāsanā. But still, Śaṅkara is very careful.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- June 20, 1974, Germany\|Room Conversation -- June 20, 1974, Germany]]: </span><div class="text">Guest: The process of change of consciousness which is actually taking place in you under many influences, I think.		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- June 20, 1974, Germany\|Room Conversation -- June 20, 1974, Germany]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Guest: The process of change of consciousness which is actually taking place in you under many influences, I think.</p>
	Prabhupāda: Huh?		<p>Prabhupāda: Huh?</p>
	Guest: Under many influences.		<p>Guest: Under many influences.</p>
	Prabhupāda: No, influence should be only Kṛṣṇa or God. Kṛṣṇa, when we speak of Kṛṣṇa, God, but they have no clear idea what is God. How does He speak, how does He act. Where does He live. What is His form. What is his color. Nobody knows. Ask any religious people, "Do you know about all these?" (tape too faint to hear) (indistinct) If they think about it at all. First of all, generally they think of something impersonal or void. The Buddhists they think God is zero. And others they think God has no form. So, two classes. The Hindus they think God has not particular form, (indistinct). And you can imagine any of them(?) That is Śaṅkara. The pañcopāsanā. But still Śaṅkara is very careful. He has given five particular forms—the Goddess Durgā, Lord Viṣṇu, Lord Siva, the sun. Therefore there are sections—the sun worshipers, the fire worshipers. Originally, (indistinct). That is Vedic culture. Their Vedic culture means many demigods. But the original God is accepted, Viṣṇu. And original to Viṣṇu is Kṛṣṇa.		<p>Prabhupāda: No, influence should be only Kṛṣṇa or God. Kṛṣṇa, when we speak of Kṛṣṇa, God, but they have no clear idea what is God. How does He speak, how does He act. Where does He live. What is His form. What is his color. Nobody knows. Ask any religious people, "Do you know about all these?" (tape too faint to hear) (indistinct) If they think about it at all. First of all, generally they think of something impersonal or void. The Buddhists they think God is zero. And others they think God has no form. So, two classes. The Hindus they think God has not particular form, (indistinct). And you can imagine any of them(?) That is Śaṅkara. The pañcopāsanā. But still Śaṅkara is very careful. He has given five particular forms—the Goddess Durgā, Lord Viṣṇu, Lord Siva, the sun. Therefore there are sections—the sun worshipers, the fire worshipers. Originally, (indistinct). That is Vedic culture. Their Vedic culture means many demigods. But the original God is accepted, Viṣṇu. And original to Viṣṇu is Kṛṣṇa.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 89:		Line 89:
	<div class="heading">Śaṅkara forced the Buddhists out of India by argument, by teaching.		<div class="heading">Śaṅkara forced the Buddhists out of India by argument, by teaching.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- May 18, 1975, Perth\|Morning Walk -- May 18, 1975, Perth]]: </span><div class="text">Amogha: When Buddha came, did most people follow Him?		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- May 18, 1975, Perth\|Morning Walk -- May 18, 1975, Perth]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Amogha: When Buddha came, did most people follow Him?</p>
	Prabhupāda: Yes.		<p>Prabhupāda: Yes.</p>
	Amogha: And they stopped their (indistinct).		<p>Amogha: And they stopped their (indistinct).</p>
	Prabhupāda: Yes. In their religion animal-killing is strictly forbidden.		<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. In their religion animal-killing is strictly forbidden.</p>
	Amogha: Did Śaṅkara, did he physically force the Buddhists out of India, by force?		<p>Amogha: Did Śaṅkara, did he physically force the Buddhists out of India, by force?</p>
	Prabhupāda: No.		<p>Prabhupāda: No.</p>
	Amogha: Or just teaching.		<p>Amogha: Or just teaching.</p>
	Prabhupāda: By argument, by teaching.		<p>Prabhupāda: By argument, by teaching.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 128:		Line 128:
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- January 27, 1977, Bhuvanesvara\|Room Conversation -- January 27, 1977, Bhuvanesvara]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: You read Bhagavad-gītā. Everything is there.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- January 27, 1977, Bhuvanesvara\|Room Conversation -- January 27, 1977, Bhuvanesvara]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: You read Bhagavad-gītā. Everything is there.</p>
	<p>Guest (4): But they do not take it in such a...</p>		<p>Guest (4): But they do not take it in such a...</p>
	<p>Prabhupāda: They may be rascal. Why you should become rascal? There it is written, the document. They may be rascals, but why you become rascal, following the rascals? You are following not Kṛṣṇa. You are following another rascal. Why? That is your misfortune. Kṛṣṇa says, imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam ([[Vanisource:BG 4.1\|BG 4.1]]). He says. You do not take Kṛṣṇa, you take another rascal. Then how you can be helped? Kṛṣṇa says, the speaker of Bhagavad-gītā, that "I told him," and you do not take it. You take another rascal. Then who will guide you? You remain rascal. What can be done? Śaṅkarācārya may be seventeen hundred years. Buddha is two hundred and fifty. And Bhagavad-gītā, five thousand years ago, this Bhagavad-gītā... And before that, puruṣa, forty millions of years ago... If you don't believe Bhagavad-gītā, then don't talk of Bhagavad-gītā. You talk of Śaṅkarācārya, Sunātha,(?) this... That is another thing. But if you talk of Bhagavad-gītā, it is stated there. People have misguided people in such a way that we are finding very difficult to reform them. But things are there. We have no difficulty.</p>		<p>Prabhupāda: They may be rascal. Why you should become rascal? There it is written, the document. They may be rascals, but why you become rascal, following the rascals? You are following not Kṛṣṇa. You are following another rascal. Why? That is your misfortune. Kṛṣṇa says, imaṁ vivasvate yogaṁ proktavān aham avyayam ([[Vanisource:BG 4.1 (1972)\|BG 4.1]]). He says. You do not take Kṛṣṇa, you take another rascal. Then how you can be helped? Kṛṣṇa says, the speaker of Bhagavad-gītā, that "I told him," and you do not take it. You take another rascal. Then who will guide you? You remain rascal. What can be done? Śaṅkarācārya may be seventeen hundred years. Buddha is two hundred and fifty. And Bhagavad-gītā, five thousand years ago, this Bhagavad-gītā... And before that, puruṣa, forty millions of years ago... If you don't believe Bhagavad-gītā, then don't talk of Bhagavad-gītā. You talk of Śaṅkarācārya, Sunātha,(?) this... That is another thing. But if you talk of Bhagavad-gītā, it is stated there. People have misguided people in such a way that we are finding very difficult to reform them. But things are there. We have no difficulty.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 163:		Line 163:
	<div id="1969_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="4" parent="Correspondence" text="1969 Correspondence"><h3>1969 Correspondence</h3>		<div id="1969_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="4" parent="Correspondence" text="1969 Correspondence"><h3>1969 Correspondence</h3>
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="~~LettertoMadhusudanaHawaii10March1969_1~~" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="164" link="Letter to Madhusudana -- Hawaii 10 March, 1969" link_text="Letter to Madhusudana -- Hawaii 10 March, 1969">		<div id="LettertoMadhusudanaHawaii10March1969_0" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="164" link="Letter to Madhusudana -- Hawaii 10 March, 1969" link_text="Letter to Madhusudana -- Hawaii 10 March, 1969">
	<div class="heading">There are many Impersonalists and voidists—they renounced this material world very early in their life; just like Sankara Acarya. He took sannyasa at the age of 8 years. Lord Buddha left home just in the beginning of his youth. But we are not concerned with them.		<div class="heading">There are many Impersonalists and voidists—they renounced this material world very early in their life; just like Sankara Acarya. He took sannyasa at the age of 8 years. Lord Buddha left home just in the beginning of his youth. But we are not concerned with them.
	</div>		</div>
Line 169:		Line 169:
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="~~LettertoKapiladevTittenhurst24October1969_2~~" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="628" link="Letter to Kapiladev -- Tittenhurst 24 October, 1969" link_text="Letter to Kapiladev -- Tittenhurst 24 October, 1969">		<div id="LettertoKapiladevTittenhurst24October1969_1" class="quote" parent="1969_Correspondence" book="Let" index="628" link="Letter to Kapiladev -- Tittenhurst 24 October, 1969" link_text="Letter to Kapiladev -- Tittenhurst 24 October, 1969">
	<div class="heading">All the acaryas, beginning from Lord Buddha, Sankaracarya, Ramanuja, etc., all of them renounced this world. So renunciation is required, but when one makes further progress after renunciation towards spiritual life and enters into the Pastimes of Krishna, then things become perfect.		<div class="heading">All the acaryas, beginning from Lord Buddha, Sankaracarya, Ramanuja, etc., all of them renounced this world. So renunciation is required, but when one makes further progress after renunciation towards spiritual life and enters into the Pastimes of Krishna, then things become perfect.
	</div>		</div>

Labangalatika: Created page with '

{{terms|"Buddha"|"Buddha's"|"Buddhadeva"|"Buddhism"|"Buddhist"|"Buddhists"|"Sankara"|"Sankaracarya"|"Sankaracarya's"}} {{notes|}} {{compil…'

2011-01-07T20:35:17Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Buddha"|"Buddha's"|"Buddhadeva"|"Buddhism"|"Buddhist"|"Buddhists"|"Sankara"|"Sankaracarya"|"Sankaracarya's"}} {{notes|}} {{compil…'

Show changes

Buddha and Sankaracarya (Conv. and Letters) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Labangalatika: Created page with ' {{terms|"Buddha"|"Buddha's"|"Buddhadeva"|"Buddhism"|"Buddhist"|"Buddhists"|"Sankara"|"Sankaracarya"|"Sankaracarya's"}} {{notes|}} {{compil…'

Labangalatika: Created page with '

{{terms|"Buddha"|"Buddha's"|"Buddhadeva"|"Buddhism"|"Buddhist"|"Buddhists"|"Sankara"|"Sankaracarya"|"Sankaracarya's"}} {{notes|}} {{compil…'