Visnu Murti at 16:04, 6 January 2012

2012-01-06T16:04:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 6 January 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div id="compilation">
			<div id="facts">
	{{terms\|"culture of Hollywood cinemas"}}		{{terms\|"culture of Hollywood cinemas"}}

Line 18:		Line 20:

	[[Category:Culture]]		[[Category:Culture]]
			[[category:Hollywood]]
	[[Category:Cinema]]		[[Category:Cinema]]
			</div>

	== Correspondence ==		<div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div>

	=== 1947 to 1965 Correspondence ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="1947_to_1965_Correspondence" text="1947 to 1965 Correspondence"><h3>1947 to 1965 Correspondence</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~If I remember rightly, you have been criticizing in the meeting of the 16th instant about the culture of Hollywood cinemas. ~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957" link_text="Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957">
			<div class="heading">If I remember rightly, you have been criticizing in the meeting of the 16th instant about the culture of Hollywood cinemas.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~LET-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957\|Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957]]:''' If I remember rightly, you have been criticizing in the meeting of the 16th instant about the culture of Hollywood cinemas. The Mayavadi philosophy having killed the spiritual variegatedness of the Supreme Being—the people are generally attracted in the variegatedness of material existence. In the vedanta sutras, we have direct information of how a spiritual entity is joyful—full of spiritual bliss. This idea of enjoyment is focussed through a material _ and as such the spiritual focus is reflected in a perverted manner. The attention of the people in general is attracted by the cinemas in place of temples, because the Mayavadi philosophy—impersonality of Godhead has created a void in the spiritual realm. But in fact the spiritual realm is not at all void. It is full of variegatedness of spiritual mellows. If you create a void in the Spirit unnecessarily, you have to create necessarily a fill-up in the material existence and that is the cause why temples are being replaced by vulgar cinemas.		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957\|Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957]]:''' If I remember rightly, you have been criticizing in the meeting of the 16th instant about the culture of Hollywood cinemas. The Mayavadi philosophy having killed the spiritual variegatedness of the Supreme Being—the people are generally attracted in the variegatedness of material existence. In the vedanta sutras, we have direct information of how a spiritual entity is joyful—full of spiritual bliss. This idea of enjoyment is focussed through a material _ and as such the spiritual focus is reflected in a perverted manner. The attention of the people in general is attracted by the cinemas in place of temples, because the Mayavadi philosophy—impersonality of Godhead has created a void in the spiritual realm. But in fact the spiritual realm is not at all void. It is full of variegatedness of spiritual mellows. If you create a void in the Spirit unnecessarily, you have to create necessarily a fill-up in the material existence and that is the cause why temples are being replaced by vulgar cinemas.
	So simple criticism of cinema houses will not fulfill the purpose. We have to create tangible interest in the temples for spiritual advancement of knowledge. With that purpose in view, it is necessary that the priests and pujaris must be enlightened men both in Theism and Sanskrit language also. They shall be primary teachers of the Bhagavad-gita in different temples. Both these temples and their management have to be reformed in the present context. We shall have to accommodate the process of temple entry by all classes of people but they may be so admitted for proper qualification and not for the purpose of a mere show.</~~span~~>		So simple criticism of cinema houses will not fulfill the purpose. We have to create tangible interest in the temples for spiritual advancement of knowledge. With that purpose in view, it is necessary that the priests and pujaris must be enlightened men both in Theism and Sanskrit language also. They shall be primary teachers of the Bhagavad-gita in different temples. Both these temples and their management have to be reformed in the present context. We shall have to accommodate the process of temple entry by all classes of people but they may be so admitted for proper qualification and not for the purpose of a mere show.</div>
			</div>
			</div>

Laksmipriya at 17:02, 8 December 2008

2008-12-08T17:02:24Z

New page

{{terms|"culture of Hollywood cinemas"}}

{{notes|}}

{{compiler|Laksmipriya}}

{{complete|ALL}}

{{first|08Dec08}}

{{last|08Dec08}}

{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}

{{total|1}}

{{toc right}}

[[Category:Culture]]

[[Category:Cinema]]

== Correspondence ==

=== 1947 to 1965 Correspondence ===

<span class="q_heading">'''If I remember rightly, you have been criticizing in the meeting of the 16th instant about the culture of Hollywood cinemas. '''</span>

<span class="LET-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957|Letter to K. M. Munshi -- Bombay 21 February, 1957]]:''' If I remember rightly, you have been criticizing in the meeting of the 16th instant about the culture of Hollywood cinemas. The Mayavadi philosophy having killed the spiritual variegatedness of the Supreme Being—the people are generally attracted in the variegatedness of material existence. In the vedanta sutras, we have direct information of how a spiritual entity is joyful—full of spiritual bliss. This idea of enjoyment is focussed through a material _ and as such the spiritual focus is reflected in a perverted manner. The attention of the people in general is attracted by the cinemas in place of temples, because the Mayavadi philosophy—impersonality of Godhead has created a void in the spiritual realm. But in fact the spiritual realm is not at all void. It is full of variegatedness of spiritual mellows. If you create a void in the Spirit unnecessarily, you have to create necessarily a fill-up in the material existence and that is the cause why temples are being replaced by vulgar cinemas.
So simple criticism of cinema houses will not fulfill the purpose. We have to create tangible interest in the temples for spiritual advancement of knowledge. With that purpose in view, it is necessary that the priests and pujaris must be enlightened men both in Theism and Sanskrit language also. They shall be primary teachers of the Bhagavad-gita in different temples. Both these temples and their management have to be reformed in the present context. We shall have to accommodate the process of temple entry by all classes of people but they may be so admitted for proper qualification and not for the purpose of a mere show.</span>

Culture of Hollywood cinemas - Revision history

Visnu Murti at 16:04, 6 January 2012

Laksmipriya at 17:02, 8 December 2008