SharmisthaK at 09:33, 17 April 2020

2020-04-17T09:33:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:33, 17 April 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div id="compilation">
			<div id="facts">
	{{terms\|"favor of the acarya"}}		{{terms\|"favor of the acarya"}}

Line 19:		Line 21:
	[[Category:Favor]]		[[Category:Favor]]

	[[Category:Acarya]]		[[Category:Acarya - Devotees of God]]
			</div>

	== Sri Caitanya-caritamrta ==		<div class="section" id="Sri_Caitanya-caritamrta" text="Sri Caitanya-caritamrta"><h2>Sri Caitanya-caritamrta</h2></div>

	=== CC Madhya-lila ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="CC_Madhya-lila" text="CC Madhya-lila"><h3>CC Madhya-lila</h3></div>

	~~'''~~One who has the favor of the ācārya knows everything~~'''~~		<div class="quote" book="CC" link="CC Madhya 8.312" link_text="CC Madhya 8.312, Tanslation and Purport">
			<div class="heading">One who has the favor of the ācārya knows everything</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~CC-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:CC Madhya 8.312\|CC Madhya 8.312, Tanslation and Purport]]: I have tried to preach the pastimes of Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu's meeting with Ramananda Raya in accordance with the notebooks of Sri Svarupa Damodara.'''		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:CC Madhya 8.312\|CC Madhya 8.312, Tanslation and Purport]]: I have tried to preach the pastimes of Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu's meeting with Ramananda Raya in accordance with the notebooks of Sri Svarupa Damodara.'''

	At the end of every chapter, the author admits the value of the disciplic succession. He never claims to have written this transcendental literature by carrying out research work. He simply admits his indebtedness to the notes taken by Svarupa Damodara, Raghunatha dasa Gosvami and other authoritative persons. This is the way of writing transcendental literatures, which are never meant for so-called scholars and research workers. The process is maha-jano yena gatah sa panthah: one has to strictly follow great personalities and acaryas. Acarya-van puruso veda: one who has the favor of the acarya knows everything. This statement made by Kaviraja Gosvami is very valuable for all pure devotees. Sometimes the prakrta sahajiyas claim that they have heard the truth from their guru. But one cannot have transcendental knowledge simply by hearing from a guru who is not bona fide. The guru must be bona fide, and he must have heard from his own bona fide guru. Only then will his message be accepted as bona fide.		At the end of every chapter, the author admits the value of the disciplic succession. He never claims to have written this transcendental literature by carrying out research work. He simply admits his indebtedness to the notes taken by Svarupa Damodara, Raghunatha dasa Gosvami and other authoritative persons. This is the way of writing transcendental literatures, which are never meant for so-called scholars and research workers. The process is maha-jano yena gatah sa panthah: one has to strictly follow great personalities and acaryas. Acarya-van puruso veda: one who has the favor of the acarya knows everything. This statement made by Kaviraja Gosvami is very valuable for all pure devotees. Sometimes the prakrta sahajiyas claim that they have heard the truth from their guru. But one cannot have transcendental knowledge simply by hearing from a guru who is not bona fide. The guru must be bona fide, and he must have heard from his own bona fide guru. Only then will his message be accepted as bona fide.</div>
			</div>
			</div>

Visnu Murti at 14:45, 23 November 2008

2008-11-23T14:45:23Z

New page

{{terms|"favor of the acarya"}}

{{notes|}}

{{compiler|Syamananda| Visnu Murti}}

{{complete|ALL}}

{{first|20jan08}}

{{last|23Nov08}}

{{total|1}}

{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=1|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}

{{toc right}}

[[Category:Favor]]

[[Category:Acarya]]

== Sri Caitanya-caritamrta ==

=== CC Madhya-lila ===

'''One who has the favor of the ācārya knows everything'''

<span class="CC-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:CC Madhya 8.312|CC Madhya 8.312, Tanslation and Purport]]: I have tried to preach the pastimes of Lord Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu's meeting with Ramananda Raya in accordance with the notebooks of Sri Svarupa Damodara.'''

At the end of every chapter, the author admits the value of the disciplic succession. He never claims to have written this transcendental literature by carrying out research work. He simply admits his indebtedness to the notes taken by Svarupa Damodara, Raghunatha dasa Gosvami and other authoritative persons. This is the way of writing transcendental literatures, which are never meant for so-called scholars and research workers. The process is maha-jano yena gatah sa panthah: one has to strictly follow great personalities and acaryas. Acarya-van puruso veda: one who has the favor of the acarya knows everything. This statement made by Kaviraja Gosvami is very valuable for all pure devotees. Sometimes the prakrta sahajiyas claim that they have heard the truth from their guru. But one cannot have transcendental knowledge simply by hearing from a guru who is not bona fide. The guru must be bona fide, and he must have heard from his own bona fide guru. Only then will his message be accepted as bona fide.

Favor of the acarya - Revision history

SharmisthaK at 09:33, 17 April 2020

Visnu Murti at 14:45, 23 November 2008