Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-17T13:52:51Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 17 May 2018
Line 27:		Line 27:
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="LectureonBG414VrndavanaAugust61974_0" class="quote" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" book="Lec" index="172" link="Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974" link_text="Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974">		<div id="LectureonBG414VrndavanaAugust61974_0" class="quote" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" book="Lec" index="172" link="Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974" link_text="Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974">
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974\|Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So in another place Kṛṣṇa says, janma karma me divyaṁ yo jānāti tattvataḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 4.9\|BG 4.9]]). Karma, every living entity is bound up by the resultant action of his own karma, but Kṛṣṇa is not like that.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974\|Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So in another place Kṛṣṇa says, janma karma me divyaṁ yo jānāti tattvataḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 4.9 (1972)\|BG 4.9]]). Karma, every living entity is bound up by the resultant action of his own karma, but Kṛṣṇa is not like that.</p>
	<p>The, in the English constitutional law it is said that "The King can no, king can do no wrong." King can order punishment for the criminal, but the king is never criminal. King cannot be punished. Your President Nixon is fighting on this point. Although people wants to impeach him, he's fighting on this point, that "I am not wrong." Actually, that much facilities must be given to the head executive. If he becomes under the laws, then his position is not exalted. The... That is the principle of accepting in the highest order of life.</p>		<p>The, in the English constitutional law it is said that "The King can no, king can do no wrong." King can order punishment for the criminal, but the king is never criminal. King cannot be punished. Your President Nixon is fighting on this point. Although people wants to impeach him, he's fighting on this point, that "I am not wrong." Actually, that much facilities must be given to the head executive. If he becomes under the laws, then his position is not exalted. The... That is the principle of accepting in the highest order of life.</p>
	<p>So in the material condition, that is not applicable perfectly, but so far spiritual condition is concerned, God must be given full freedom. Otherwise there is no meaning of God. If God is also under the, under your laws... Sometimes: "Why God has done like this?" They inquire like that. This question sometimes put. "Why God has put us into this condition?" These are foolish questions. But the real conception of God is that He is free to do anything, whatever He likes. You cannot say, "Why God can... Will... God will do this, will do not that." No. That is not the conception of God.</p>		<p>So in the material condition, that is not applicable perfectly, but so far spiritual condition is concerned, God must be given full freedom. Otherwise there is no meaning of God. If God is also under the, under your laws... Sometimes: "Why God has done like this?" They inquire like that. This question sometimes put. "Why God has put us into this condition?" These are foolish questions. But the real conception of God is that He is free to do anything, whatever He likes. You cannot say, "Why God can... Will... God will do this, will do not that." No. That is not the conception of God.</p>

Labangalatika: Created page with '

{{terms|"impeach"|"impeachable"|"impeached"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Labangalatika}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|31Jul12}} {{last|31Jul12}} {{…'

2012-07-31T16:15:53Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"impeach"|"impeachable"|"impeached"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Labangalatika}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|31Jul12}} {{last|31Jul12}} {{…'

New page

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"impeach"|"impeachable"|"impeached"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Labangalatika}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|31Jul12}}
{{last|31Jul12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=3|Let=0}}
{{total|5}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Impeach|1]]
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
</div>
<div id="SB_Canto_1" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 1"><h3>SB Canto 1</h3>
</div>
<div id="SB11442_0" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_1" book="SB" index="569" link="SB 1.14.42" link_text="SB 1.14.42">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 1.14.42|SB 1.14.42, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">Have you contacted a woman of impeachable character, or have you not properly treated a deserving woman? Or have you been defeated on the way by someone who is inferior or equal to you?</p>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>It appears from this verse that during the time of the Pāṇḍavas free contact between man and woman was allowed in certain conditions only. The higher-caste men, namely the brāhmaṇas and kṣatriyas, could accept a woman of the vaiśya or the śūdra community, but a man from the lower castes could not contact a woman of the higher caste. Even a kṣatriya could not contact a woman of the brāhmaṇa caste. The wife of a brāhmaṇa is considered one of the seven mothers (namely one's own mother, the wife of the spiritual master or teacher, the wife of a brāhmaṇa, the wife of a king, the cow, the nurse, and the earth). Such contact between man and woman was known as uttama and adhama. Contact of a brāhmaṇa with a kṣatriya woman is uttama, but the contact of a kṣatriya with a brāhmaṇa woman is adhama and therefore condemned. A woman approaching a man for contact should never be refused, but at the same time the discretion as above mentioned may also be considered. Bhīma was approached by Hiḍimbī from a community lower than the śūdras, and Yayāti refused to marry the daughter of Śukrācārya because of Śukrācārya's being a brāhmaṇa. Vyāsadeva, a brāhmaṇa, was called to beget Pāṇḍu and Dhṛtarāṣṭra. Satyavatī belonged to a family of fishermen, but Parāśara, a great brāhmaṇa, begot in her Vyāsadeva. So there are so many examples of contacts with woman, but in all cases the contacts were not abominable nor were the results of such contacts bad. Contact between man and woman is natural, but that also must be carried out under regulative principles so that social consecration may not be disturbed or unwanted worthless population be increased for the unrest of the world.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="0" parent="Lectures" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures"><h3>Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonBG414VrndavanaAugust61974_0" class="quote" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is_Lectures" book="Lec" index="172" link="Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974" link_text="Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974|Lecture on BG 4.14 -- Vrndavana, August 6, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So in another place Kṛṣṇa says, janma karma me divyaṁ yo jānāti tattvataḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 4.9|BG 4.9]]). Karma, every living entity is bound up by the resultant action of his own karma, but Kṛṣṇa is not like that.</p>
<p>The, in the English constitutional law it is said that "The King can no, king can do no wrong." King can order punishment for the criminal, but the king is never criminal. King cannot be punished. Your President Nixon is fighting on this point. Although people wants to impeach him, he's fighting on this point, that "I am not wrong." Actually, that much facilities must be given to the head executive. If he becomes under the laws, then his position is not exalted. The... That is the principle of accepting in the highest order of life.</p>
<p>So in the material condition, that is not applicable perfectly, but so far spiritual condition is concerned, God must be given full freedom. Otherwise there is no meaning of God. If God is also under the, under your laws... Sometimes: "Why God has done like this?" They inquire like that. This question sometimes put. "Why God has put us into this condition?" These are foolish questions. But the real conception of God is that He is free to do anything, whatever He likes. You cannot say, "Why God can... Will... God will do this, will do not that." No. That is not the conception of God.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1973_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="6" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1973 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1973 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="RoomConversationWithDavidWynneJuly91973London_0" class="quote" parent="1973_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="34" link="Room Conversation With David Wynne -- July 9, 1973, London" link_text="Room Conversation With David Wynne -- July 9, 1973, London">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Room Conversation With David Wynne -- July 9, 1973, London|Room Conversation With David Wynne -- July 9, 1973, London]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: When there is real, righteous fight, for good cause, that fighting is all right. Just like the state gives punishment one person, "This man should be hanged. Kill him." So who is blaming the state, "Oh, the state is killing this man?" That is right. It is good for him. In Manu-saṁhitā there is good background. So similarly, everything is good when it is done for the good. And God is good. That is Kṛṣṇa conscious move... And everything is bad when it is done for māyā. That's all. So these wars are declared not for Kṛṣṇa's sake; by the politicians' whims. So they must be responsible for this war.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: Like the Vietnam, you mean?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Any, any war. They create whimsical... Anything you do whimsically, you are responsible. Anything you do. Why fighting? Anything.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: Yeah. It's funny that that John F. Kennedy, he started that Vietnam war, and he was shot down later.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: He started that war?</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: Yeah.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: What is the position now? Nixon? He's going to be impeached? Yes.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: Practically, he is, without...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: He's cornered now.</p>
<p>Śyāmasundara: Yeah. He's lost all respect.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Prestige. Still if he sticks to his position, that is his foolishness. He should have resigned. If, if... Upright man: "All right, you do not like me. I resign." Then whole thing would have been quashed off. But he's a foolish man. He's sticking to his position.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkOctober61975Durban_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="203" link="Morning Walk -- October 6, 1975, Durban" link_text="Morning Walk -- October 6, 1975, Durban">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- October 6, 1975, Durban|Morning Walk -- October 6, 1975, Durban]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: They committed so many sinful activities, yes, for maintaining their empire. To sell their Manchester-made cloth they ruined the cloth industry of India and cut this finger.</p>
<p>Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: Cut the thumb off.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes. Thumbs of the weavers so that they cannot manufacture anymore.</p>
<p>Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: Very bad.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: There are so many other things.</p>
<p>Harikeśa: They cut the thumbs of the weavers?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Yes.</p>
<p>Puṣṭa Kṛṣṇa: Yes. They were making finer cloth by hand than the British were making by machines. So in order to discourage, they would cut off the thumb so they couldn't weave.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: So many things. And to make a show, the Lord Hasting was impeached in the Parliament.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkNovember121975Bombay_1" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="238" link="Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay" link_text="Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay|Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: So māyā is also Brahman. māyā is also Brahman. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. Why māyā is different from God? It is creation of God. Mama māyā, Kṛṣṇa says. Mama māyā. So how māyā can be... The difference is police cannot arrest the president. Now it has been proved in the law. The president, the prime minister, they cannot be interfered by the police or law. That is good judgment. If the head of the estate is also interfered by police, that does not look well. So this judgment is very nice. Therefore in English constitution the first word is "The king can do no wrong." You cannot accuse king of doing wrong. Whatever he does, it is all right.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: That is when there was Rāma-rajya, sir. These modern fellows will talk all these things...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, no. No, no. Rāma-rajya should be there as far as possible.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: They are roguish fellows. Just like Nixon. What did he do? Was it in the place of king?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, he... Nixon, Nixon...</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: Most powerful nation of the world having a leader of the type of Nixon.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: So that is... Of course, in American constitution the president is also impeached. Is it the law?</p>
<p>Brahmānanda: Yes.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: This is the first president who was impeached, during all the times.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: But that is not very good law. That is not very good law. If the president also can be impeached, that is not very good law.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: Sir, if the government is made according to the rule and regulations established by our religions, then that president or the king is above law. Otherwise these fools must be within law. But the way they have been ruling the countries and ransacking the people's morals and material...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no. Anyone, anyone who is within law, he cannot be president.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: But these are within the law, president. These are the artificial constitutions made up, not the constitution as given by Vedas and Vedic religions. Then king or president is above law—to my mind. I may be wrong. I am open to correction.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: Therefore we want rājarṣi. We don't want ordinary king. Rājarṣi.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: Then it is all right.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Impeach - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Labangalatika: Created page with ' {{terms|"impeach"|"impeachable"|"impeached"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Labangalatika}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|31Jul12}} {{last|31Jul12}} {{…'

Labangalatika: Created page with '

{{terms|"impeach"|"impeachable"|"impeached"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Labangalatika}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|31Jul12}} {{last|31Jul12}} {{…'