MadhuGopaldas at 14:44, 14 March 2010

2010-03-14T14:44:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 14 March 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	<div class="heading">Narada Muni's body appears to be very sensuous. He was a first class Brahmacari. He cannot have such a sensuous body.		<div class="heading">Narada Muni's body appears to be very sensuous. He was a first class Brahmacari. He cannot have such a sensuous body.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968\|Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You are already a great artist. You don't want to become a great artist to satisfy the senses of the public. If your present paintings are not acceptable to the general public, I do not mind; they are fools. You continue trying your best to make your pictures as far they can be nice looking, but not to satisfy the senses of the rascal public. Yesterday I have been in a Unitarian Church and there I saw two pictures of only logs and bamboos, and I was explained by our great artist Govinda dasi that these are modern abstract arts. Anyway I couldn't see in them nothing but combination of logs and bamboos. There was nothing to impel my Krishna Consciousness. So, if you want to be a great artist in that way, I will pray that Krishna may save you. Anyway, if the public doesn't buy, we don't mind. Why you are anxious for selling? We shall distribute them to devotees without any price. If our things have no market in the sense gratification society that does not mean we are going to change our principles. We are meant for satisfying Krishna, not anybody's senses. That should be the principle of our life. In this connection I may remark that you have sent one picture of Narada Muni which I understand was copied from some so-called great artist, but Narada Muni's body appears to be very sensuous. He was a first class Brahmacari. He cannot have such a sensuous body. So you will do well not to work from the so-called well known artists. But you should follow exactly the descriptions of the scriptures. The picture of Narada Muni which you painted in N.Y. in my presence was very nice and good looking, but this picture here doesn't appeal to me. Better not to worry about this sort of technique and style. Anyway whenever I come there to N.Y. we can discuss all this as you suggested.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968\|Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;"> We are meant for satisfying Krishna, not anybody's senses. That should be the principle of our life. In this connection I may remark that you have sent one picture of Narada Muni which I understand was copied from some so-called great artist, but Narada Muni's body appears to be very sensuous. He was a first class Brahmacari. He cannot have such a sensuous body. So you will do well not to work from the so-called well known artists. But you should follow exactly the descriptions of the scriptures. The picture of Narada Muni which you painted in N.Y. in my presence was very nice and good looking, but this picture here doesn't appeal to me. Better not to worry about this sort of technique and style. Anyway whenever I come there to N.Y. we can discuss all this as you suggested.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>

MadhuGopaldas: Created page with '

{{terms|"Narada Muni's body"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|14Mar10}} {{last|14Mar10}} {{totals_by_secti…'

2010-03-14T14:41:55Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Narada Muni's body"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|14Mar10}} {{last|14Mar10}} {{totals_by_secti…'

New page

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Narada Muni's body"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|14Mar10}}
{{last|14Mar10}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Narada Muni]]
[[Category:Body]]
</div>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
</div>
<div id="1968_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="3" parent="Correspondence" text="1968 Correspondence"><h3>1968 Correspondence</h3>
</div><div id="LettertoJaduraniSanFrancisco8April1968_0" class="quote qod_candidate" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="138" link="Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968" link_text="Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968">
<div class="heading">Narada Muni's body appears to be very sensuous. He was a first class Brahmacari. He cannot have such a sensuous body.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968|Letter to Jadurani -- San Francisco 8 April, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You are already a great artist. You don't want to become a great artist to satisfy the senses of the public. If your present paintings are not acceptable to the general public, I do not mind; they are fools. You continue trying your best to make your pictures as far they can be nice looking, but not to satisfy the senses of the rascal public. Yesterday I have been in a Unitarian Church and there I saw two pictures of only logs and bamboos, and I was explained by our great artist Govinda dasi that these are modern abstract arts. Anyway I couldn't see in them nothing but combination of logs and bamboos. There was nothing to impel my Krishna Consciousness. So, if you want to be a great artist in that way, I will pray that Krishna may save you. Anyway, if the public doesn't buy, we don't mind. Why you are anxious for selling? We shall distribute them to devotees without any price. If our things have no market in the sense gratification society that does not mean we are going to change our principles. We are meant for satisfying Krishna, not anybody's senses. That should be the principle of our life. In this connection I may remark that you have sent one picture of Narada Muni which I understand was copied from some so-called great artist, but Narada Muni's body appears to be very sensuous. He was a first class Brahmacari. He cannot have such a sensuous body. So you will do well not to work from the so-called well known artists. But you should follow exactly the descriptions of the scriptures. The picture of Narada Muni which you painted in N.Y. in my presence was very nice and good looking, but this picture here doesn't appeal to me. Better not to worry about this sort of technique and style. Anyway whenever I come there to N.Y. we can discuss all this as you suggested.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Narada Muni's body - Revision history

MadhuGopaldas at 14:44, 14 March 2010

MadhuGopaldas: Created page with ' {{terms|"Narada Muni's body"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|14Mar10}} {{last|14Mar10}} {{totals_by_secti…'

MadhuGopaldas: Created page with '

{{terms|"Narada Muni's body"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|14Mar10}} {{last|14Mar10}} {{totals_by_secti…'