Visnu Murti at 04:42, 21 August 2016

2016-08-21T04:42:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:42, 21 August 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div id="compilation">
			<div id="facts">
	{{terms\|"never authorized"}}		{{terms\|"never authorized"}}

Line 17:		Line 19:
	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}

	[[Category:Never]]		[[Category:Never\|2]]

	[[Category:Authorized]]		[[Category:Authorized\|2]]

	[[Category:Unauthorized]]		[[Category:Unauthorized\|2]]
			</div>

	== Sri Caitanya-caritamrta ==		<div class="section" id="Sri_Caitanya-caritamrta" text="Sri Caitanya-caritamrta"><h2>Sri Caitanya-caritamrta</h2></div>

	=== CC Adi-lila ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="CC_Adi-lila" text="CC Adi-lila"><h3>CC Adi-lila</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~A disciple should always respect the spiritual master as a manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but at the same time one should always remember that a spiritual master is never authorized to imitate the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. ~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="CC" link="CC Adi 1.46" link_text="CC Adi 1.46, Purport">
			<div class="heading">A disciple should always respect the spiritual master as a manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but at the same time one should always remember that a spiritual master is never authorized to imitate the transcendental pastimes of the Lord.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~CC-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:CC Adi 1.46\|CC Adi 1.46, Purport]]:''' If one poses himself as an ācārya but does not have an attitude of servitorship to the Lord, he must be considered an offender, and this offensive attitude disqualifies him from being an ācārya. The bona fide spiritual master always engages in unalloyed devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. By this test he is known to be a direct manifestation of the Lord and a genuine representative of Śrī Nityānanda Prabhu. Such a spiritual master is known as ācāryadeva. Influenced by an envious temperament and dissatisfied because of an attitude of sense gratification, mundaners criticize a real ācārya. In fact, however, a bona fide ācārya is nondifferent from the Personality of Godhead, and therefore to envy such an ācārya is to envy the Personality of Godhead Himself. This will produce an effect subversive of transcendental realization.		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:CC Adi 1.46\|CC Adi 1.46, Purport]]:''' If one poses himself as an ācārya but does not have an attitude of servitorship to the Lord, he must be considered an offender, and this offensive attitude disqualifies him from being an ācārya. The bona fide spiritual master always engages in unalloyed devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. By this test he is known to be a direct manifestation of the Lord and a genuine representative of Śrī Nityānanda Prabhu. Such a spiritual master is known as ācāryadeva. Influenced by an envious temperament and dissatisfied because of an attitude of sense gratification, mundaners criticize a real ācārya. In fact, however, a bona fide ācārya is nondifferent from the Personality of Godhead, and therefore to envy such an ācārya is to envy the Personality of Godhead Himself. This will produce an effect subversive of transcendental realization.
	As mentioned previously, a disciple should always respect the spiritual master as a manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but at the same time one should always remember that a spiritual master is never authorized to imitate the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. False spiritual masters pose themselves as identical with Śrī Kṛṣṇa in every respect to exploit the sentiments of their disciples, but such impersonalists can only mislead their disciples, for their ultimate aim is to become one with the Lord. This is against the principles of the devotional cult.</~~span~~>		As mentioned previously, a disciple should always respect the spiritual master as a manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but at the same time one should always remember that a spiritual master is never authorized to imitate the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. False spiritual masters pose themselves as identical with Śrī Kṛṣṇa in every respect to exploit the sentiments of their disciples, but such impersonalists can only mislead their disciples, for their ultimate aim is to become one with the Lord. This is against the principles of the devotional cult.</div>
			</div>

	== Correspondence ==		<div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div>

	=== 1974 Correspondence ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="1974_Correspondence" text="1974 Correspondence"><h3>1974 Correspondence</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~Syamasundara was never authorized to do the business at the risk of the society's money. ~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974" link_text="Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974">
			<div class="heading">Syamasundara was never authorized to do the business at the risk of the society's money.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~LET-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974\|Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974]]:''' From Puranjana's letter, Hamsaduta is ready to pay back the dues owed to the landlord at Bury Place. Under the circumstances, Hamsaduta must continue to act as GBC until Syamasundara settles up all monetary dues to the society and others.		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974\|Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974]]:''' From Puranjana's letter, Hamsaduta is ready to pay back the dues owed to the landlord at Bury Place. Under the circumstances, Hamsaduta must continue to act as GBC until Syamasundara settles up all monetary dues to the society and others.
	The center has become cumbersome on account of mismanagement. Things must be settled before Shayamasundar can take charge again. These bills presented by different creditors on account of jewelry business must not be paid by ISKCON. Syamasundara was never authorized to do the business at the risk of the society's money. Everyone was expecting me to arrive there by the first week of May, but this was dependent on Syamasundara sending tickets. He has now refused to send tickets. This is not very happy news. Either he has no money to purchase them or he has withdrawn his promise. In both cases the dealing is not very happy.</~~span~~>		The center has become cumbersome on account of mismanagement. Things must be settled before Shayamasundar can take charge again. These bills presented by different creditors on account of jewelry business must not be paid by ISKCON. Syamasundara was never authorized to do the business at the risk of the society's money. Everyone was expecting me to arrive there by the first week of May, but this was dependent on Syamasundara sending tickets. He has now refused to send tickets. This is not very happy news. Either he has no money to purchase them or he has withdrawn his promise. In both cases the dealing is not very happy.</div>
			</div>

	=== 1976 Correspondence ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="1976_Correspondence" text="1976 Correspondence"><h3>1976 Correspondence</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~A film showing illegal techniques of distributing my books (Money shuffle) was never authorized by me. If it is actually a fact what you say, then stop it immediately.~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976" link_text="Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976">
			<div class="heading">A film showing illegal techniques of distributing my books (Money shuffle) was never authorized by me. If it is actually a fact what you say, then stop it immediately.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~LET-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976\|Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976]]:''' A film showing illegal techniques of distributing my books (Money shuffle) was never authorized by me. If it is actually a fact what you say, then stop it immediately. In all our dealings we should be above suspicion. They say first impressions are lasting. If someone feels cheated by our men because they are using dubious methods of distribution and collecting money our purity may be doubted and reputation spoiled. So please do not allow such film showing to take place until I have seen the film personally.</~~span~~>		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976\|Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976]]:''' A film showing illegal techniques of distributing my books (Money shuffle) was never authorized by me. If it is actually a fact what you say, then stop it immediately. In all our dealings we should be above suspicion. They say first impressions are lasting. If someone feels cheated by our men because they are using dubious methods of distribution and collecting money our purity may be doubted and reputation spoiled. So please do not allow such film showing to take place until I have seen the film personally.</div>
			</div>
			</div>

Visnu Murti at 16:58, 22 November 2008

2008-11-22T16:58:18Z

New page

{{terms|"never authorized"}}

{{notes|}}

{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}

{{complete|ALL}}

{{first|22Nov08}}

{{last|22Nov08}}

{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=1|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=2}}

{{total|3}}

{{toc right}}

[[Category:Never]]

[[Category:Authorized]]

[[Category:Unauthorized]]

== Sri Caitanya-caritamrta ==

=== CC Adi-lila ===

'''A disciple should always respect the spiritual master as a manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but at the same time one should always remember that a spiritual master is never authorized to imitate the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. '''

'''[[Vanisource:CC Adi 1.46|CC Adi 1.46, Purport]]:''' If one poses himself as an ācārya but does not have an attitude of servitorship to the Lord, he must be considered an offender, and this offensive attitude disqualifies him from being an ācārya. The bona fide spiritual master always engages in unalloyed devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead. By this test he is known to be a direct manifestation of the Lord and a genuine representative of Śrī Nityānanda Prabhu. Such a spiritual master is known as ācāryadeva. Influenced by an envious temperament and dissatisfied because of an attitude of sense gratification, mundaners criticize a real ācārya. In fact, however, a bona fide ācārya is nondifferent from the Personality of Godhead, and therefore to envy such an ācārya is to envy the Personality of Godhead Himself. This will produce an effect subversive of transcendental realization.
As mentioned previously, a disciple should always respect the spiritual master as a manifestation of Śrī Kṛṣṇa, but at the same time one should always remember that a spiritual master is never authorized to imitate the transcendental pastimes of the Lord. False spiritual masters pose themselves as identical with Śrī Kṛṣṇa in every respect to exploit the sentiments of their disciples, but such impersonalists can only mislead their disciples, for their ultimate aim is to become one with the Lord. This is against the principles of the devotional cult.

== Correspondence ==

=== 1974 Correspondence ===

'''Syamasundara was never authorized to do the business at the risk of the society's money. '''

'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974|Letter to Mukunda -- Bombay 2 May, 1974]]:''' From Puranjana's letter, Hamsaduta is ready to pay back the dues owed to the landlord at Bury Place. Under the circumstances, Hamsaduta must continue to act as GBC until Syamasundara settles up all monetary dues to the society and others.
The center has become cumbersome on account of mismanagement. Things must be settled before Shayamasundar can take charge again. These bills presented by different creditors on account of jewelry business must not be paid by ISKCON. Syamasundara was never authorized to do the business at the risk of the society's money. Everyone was expecting me to arrive there by the first week of May, but this was dependent on Syamasundara sending tickets. He has now refused to send tickets. This is not very happy news. Either he has no money to purchase them or he has withdrawn his promise. In both cases the dealing is not very happy.

=== 1976 Correspondence ===

'''A film showing illegal techniques of distributing my books (Money shuffle) was never authorized by me. If it is actually a fact what you say, then stop it immediately.'''

'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976|Letter to Kirtanananda -- Chandigarh 15 October, 1976]]:''' A film showing illegal techniques of distributing my books (Money shuffle) was never authorized by me. If it is actually a fact what you say, then stop it immediately. In all our dealings we should be above suspicion. They say first impressions are lasting. If someone feels cheated by our men because they are using dubious methods of distribution and collecting money our purity may be doubted and reputation spoiled. So please do not allow such film showing to take place until I have seen the film personally.

Never authorized - Revision history

Visnu Murti at 04:42, 21 August 2016

Visnu Murti at 16:58, 22 November 2008