Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-18T15:05:21Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 18 May 2018
Line 3:		Line 3:
	{{terms\|"no legal obligation"\|"no longer has any obligations"\|"no longer obliged"\|"no material obligation"\|"no more any obligation"\|"no more material obligation"\|"no more obligation"\|"no more obligations"\|"no obligation"\|"no obligations"\|"no obligatory"\|"no reason or obligation"\|"no social obligation"\|"no such obligation"}}		{{terms\|"no legal obligation"\|"no longer has any obligations"\|"no longer obliged"\|"no material obligation"\|"no more any obligation"\|"no more material obligation"\|"no more obligation"\|"no more obligations"\|"no obligation"\|"no obligations"\|"no obligatory"\|"no reason or obligation"\|"no social obligation"\|"no such obligation"}}
	{{notes\|}}		{{notes\|}}
	{{compiler\|Matea}}		{{compiler\|Matea\|Labangalatika}}
	{{complete\|ALL}}		{{complete\|ALL}}
	{{first\|29Mar10}}		{{first\|29Mar10}}
	{{last\|~~29Mar10~~}}		{{last\|17Apr10}}
	{{totals_by_section\|BG=3\|SB=4\|CC=0\|OB=3\|Lec=13\|Con=3\|Let=2}}		{{totals_by_section\|BG=3\|SB=4\|CC=0\|OB=3\|Lec=13\|Con=3\|Let=2}}
	{{total\|28}}		{{total\|28}}
	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}
	[[Category:Obligation]]		[[Category:Obligation\|2]]
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>		<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>
Line 19:		Line 19:
	<div class="heading">One's duty thus becomes self-illuminated by the grace of the Lord, and therefore he no longer has any obligations to the Vedic injunctions.		<div class="heading">One's duty thus becomes self-illuminated by the grace of the Lord, and therefore he no longer has any obligations to the Vedic injunctions.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 3.17\|BG 3.17, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">A person who is fully Kṛṣṇa conscious, and is fully satisfied by his acts in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, no longer has any duty to perform. Due to his being Kṛṣṇa conscious, all impiety within is instantly cleansed, an effect of many, many thousands of yajña performances. By such clearing of consciousness, one becomes fully confident of his eternal position in relationship with the Supreme. His duty thus becomes self-illuminated by the grace of the Lord, and therefore he no longer has any obligations to the Vedic injunctions. Such a Kṛṣṇa conscious person is no longer interested in material activities and no longer takes pleasure in material arrangements like wine, women and similar infatuations.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 3.17 (1972)\|BG 3.17, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">A person who is fully Kṛṣṇa conscious, and is fully satisfied by his acts in Kṛṣṇa consciousness, no longer has any duty to perform. Due to his being Kṛṣṇa conscious, all impiety within is instantly cleansed, an effect of many, many thousands of yajña performances. By such clearing of consciousness, one becomes fully confident of his eternal position in relationship with the Supreme. His duty thus becomes self-illuminated by the grace of the Lord, and therefore he no longer has any obligations to the Vedic injunctions. Such a Kṛṣṇa conscious person is no longer interested in material activities and no longer takes pleasure in material arrangements like wine, women and similar infatuations.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 25:		Line 25:
	<div class="heading">Kings like Janaka were all self-realized souls; consequently they had no obligation to perform the prescribed duties in the Vedas.		<div class="heading">Kings like Janaka were all self-realized souls; consequently they had no obligation to perform the prescribed duties in the Vedas.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 3.20\|BG 3.20, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">Kings like Janaka were all self-realized souls; consequently they had no obligation to perform the prescribed duties in the Vedas. Nonetheless they performed all prescribed activities just to set examples for the people in general. Janaka was the father of Sītā and father-in-law of Lord Śrī Rāma. Being a great devotee of the Lord, he was transcendentally situated, but because he was the king of Mithilā (a subdivision of Bihar province in India), he had to teach his subjects how to perform prescribed duties. Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the Lord's eternal friend, had no need to fight in the Battle of Kurukṣetra, but they fought to teach people in general that violence is also necessary in a situation where good arguments fail. Before the Battle of Kurukṣetra, every effort was made to avoid the war, even by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but the other party was determined to fight.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 3.20 (1972)\|BG 3.20, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">Kings like Janaka were all self-realized souls; consequently they had no obligation to perform the prescribed duties in the Vedas. Nonetheless they performed all prescribed activities just to set examples for the people in general. Janaka was the father of Sītā and father-in-law of Lord Śrī Rāma. Being a great devotee of the Lord, he was transcendentally situated, but because he was the king of Mithilā (a subdivision of Bihar province in India), he had to teach his subjects how to perform prescribed duties. Lord Kṛṣṇa and Arjuna, the Lord's eternal friend, had no need to fight in the Battle of Kurukṣetra, but they fought to teach people in general that violence is also necessary in a situation where good arguments fail. Before the Battle of Kurukṣetra, every effort was made to avoid the war, even by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, but the other party was determined to fight.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 31:		Line 31:
	<div class="heading">Although the Lord appears on schedule, namely at the end of the Dvāpara-yuga of the twenty-eighth millennium of the seventh Manu in one day of Brahmā, He has no obligation to adhere to rules and regulations, because He is completely free to act in many ways at His will.		<div class="heading">Although the Lord appears on schedule, namely at the end of the Dvāpara-yuga of the twenty-eighth millennium of the seventh Manu in one day of Brahmā, He has no obligation to adhere to rules and regulations, because He is completely free to act in many ways at His will.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 4.7\|BG 4.7, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">The word sṛjāmi is significant herein. Sṛjāmi cannot be used in the sense of creation, because, according to the previous verse, there is no creation of the Lord's form or body, since all of the forms are eternally existent. Therefore, sṛjāmi means that the Lord manifests Himself as He is. Although the Lord appears on schedule, namely at the end of the Dvāpara-yuga of the twenty-eighth millennium of the seventh Manu in one day of Brahmā, He has no obligation to adhere to such rules and regulations, because He is completely free to act in many ways at His will. He therefore appears by His own will whenever there is a predominance of irreligiosity and a disappearance of true religion. Principles of religion are laid down in the Vedas, and any discrepancy in the matter of properly executing the rules of the Vedas makes one irreligious.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 4.7 (1972)\|BG 4.7, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">The word sṛjāmi is significant herein. Sṛjāmi cannot be used in the sense of creation, because, according to the previous verse, there is no creation of the Lord's form or body, since all of the forms are eternally existent. Therefore, sṛjāmi means that the Lord manifests Himself as He is. Although the Lord appears on schedule, namely at the end of the Dvāpara-yuga of the twenty-eighth millennium of the seventh Manu in one day of Brahmā, He has no obligation to adhere to such rules and regulations, because He is completely free to act in many ways at His will. He therefore appears by His own will whenever there is a predominance of irreligiosity and a disappearance of true religion. Principles of religion are laid down in the Vedas, and any discrepancy in the matter of properly executing the rules of the Vedas makes one irreligious.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 114:		Line 114:
	<div class="heading">People are thinking that "God is dead. We have no obligation to God. There is no God." This sort of thinking will never make the people happy.		<div class="heading">People are thinking that "God is dead. We have no obligation to God. There is no God." This sort of thinking will never make the people happy.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 4.7 -- Montreal, June 13, 1968\|Lecture on BG 4.7 -- Montreal, June 13, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The purpose of religion is to develop your love of Godhead. That is real religion. So here Kṛṣṇa says that yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati ([[Vanisource:BG 4.7\|BG 4.7]]). As soon as there is decadence of people's love of Godhead... That means when people become forgetful, almost forgetful. Because at least some people remember that there is God. But generally, in this age, they are forgetful. That is dharmasya glāniḥ. And by forgetting God the people cannot be happy. That is also another cause. People are thinking that "God is dead. We have no obligation to God. There is no God." This sort of thinking will never make the people happy. And actually, it is happening. They have become atheistic. The modern civilization is Godless, but people are not happy. Therefore God or His representative comes when people forget his relationship with God.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on BG 4.7 -- Montreal, June 13, 1968\|Lecture on BG 4.7 -- Montreal, June 13, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The purpose of religion is to develop your love of Godhead. That is real religion. So here Kṛṣṇa says that yadā yadā hi dharmasya glānir bhavati ([[Vanisource:BG 4.7 (1972)\|BG 4.7]]). As soon as there is decadence of people's love of Godhead... That means when people become forgetful, almost forgetful. Because at least some people remember that there is God. But generally, in this age, they are forgetful. That is dharmasya glāniḥ. And by forgetting God the people cannot be happy. That is also another cause. People are thinking that "God is dead. We have no obligation to God. There is no God." This sort of thinking will never make the people happy. And actually, it is happening. They have become atheistic. The modern civilization is Godless, but people are not happy. Therefore God or His representative comes when people forget his relationship with God.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 141:		Line 141:
	<div class="heading">By worshiping Kṛṣṇa, everyone is worshiped. You have no more obligation.		<div class="heading">By worshiping Kṛṣṇa, everyone is worshiped. You have no more obligation.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 3.26.25 -- Bombay, January 2, 1975\|Lecture on SB 3.26.25 -- Bombay, January 2, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Kṛṣṇa is so kind that He can accept the surrendering and service even of the poorest of the poorest. Ahaituky apratihatā. If you want to become devotee of God, Kṛṣṇa, no material things can check. Ahaituky apratihatā. Apratihatā means without any impediment. Any condition of life... Striyo vaiśyās tathā śūdrās te, pāpa-yonayaḥ, te 'pi yānti parāṁ gatim. Kṛṣṇa is open for everyone. Everyone can worship. Kṛṣṇa is not monopolized by any section or any religion or any nation, any country. No. Kṛṣṇa claims, sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya sambhavanti mūrtayo yāḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 14.4\|BG 14.4]]). All the species of life, as many forms of life as there are, Kṛṣṇa claims, ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā: "I am the original seed-giving father." So Kṛṣṇa is open for everyone. And by worshiping Kṛṣṇa, you worship everything. If you have got a mentality to worship different demigods, different incarnation, that is not possible. Therefore you can concen... Sarvārhaṇam acyutejyā, by worshiping Kṛṣṇa, everyone is worshiped. You have no more obligation.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 3.26.25 -- Bombay, January 2, 1975\|Lecture on SB 3.26.25 -- Bombay, January 2, 1975]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Kṛṣṇa is so kind that He can accept the surrendering and service even of the poorest of the poorest. Ahaituky apratihatā. If you want to become devotee of God, Kṛṣṇa, no material things can check. Ahaituky apratihatā. Apratihatā means without any impediment. Any condition of life... Striyo vaiśyās tathā śūdrās te, pāpa-yonayaḥ, te 'pi yānti parāṁ gatim. Kṛṣṇa is open for everyone. Everyone can worship. Kṛṣṇa is not monopolized by any section or any religion or any nation, any country. No. Kṛṣṇa claims, sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya sambhavanti mūrtayo yāḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 14.4 (1972)\|BG 14.4]]). All the species of life, as many forms of life as there are, Kṛṣṇa claims, ahaṁ bīja-pradaḥ pitā: "I am the original seed-giving father." So Kṛṣṇa is open for everyone. And by worshiping Kṛṣṇa, you worship everything. If you have got a mentality to worship different demigods, different incarnation, that is not possible. Therefore you can concen... Sarvārhaṇam acyutejyā, by worshiping Kṛṣṇa, everyone is worshiped. You have no more obligation.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 183:		Line 183:
	<div class="heading">They have no discrimination, whether mother or sister or daughter. That is hog life. So if sex life is final pleasure, then hog is in the greatest pleasure. He has no social obligation.		<div class="heading">They have no discrimination, whether mother or sister or daughter. That is hog life. So if sex life is final pleasure, then hog is in the greatest pleasure. He has no social obligation.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on Sigmund Freud\|Philosophy Discussion on Sigmund Freud]]: </span><div ~~style="display: inline;"~~ class="text"><p style="display: inline;">The life simply for sense gratification, and for that purpose working so hard, but that is the business of the pig. That is not the business of the human being. Human being is tapasya. Tapasya means stop sex life. That is tapasya. Tapasā brahmacaryeṇa ([[Vanisource:SB 6.1.13\|SB 6.1.13]]). So our philosophy is different from his philosophy. And actually we are suffering. The pig has got good facilities for sex. Does it mean that is ideal life, eating stool and having sex without discrimination? They have no discrimination, whether mother or sister or daughter. That is hog life. So if sex life is final pleasure, then hog is in the greatest pleasure. He has no social obligation. He has no discrimination. But our philosophy says "Don't become a hog, become a sane man." There, there, there is a difference between his philosophy and our philosophy.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Philosophy Discussion on Sigmund Freud\|Philosophy Discussion on Sigmund Freud]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: The life simply for sense gratification, and for that purpose working so hard, but that is the business of the pig. That is not the business of the human being. Human being is tapasya. Tapasya means stop sex life. That is tapasya. Tapasā brahmacaryeṇa ([[Vanisource:SB 6.1.13-14\|SB 6.1.13]]). So our philosophy is different from his philosophy. And actually we are suffering. The pig has got good facilities for sex. Does it mean that is ideal life, eating stool and having sex without discrimination? They have no discrimination, whether mother or sister or daughter. That is hog life. So if sex life is final pleasure, then hog is in the greatest pleasure. He has no social obligation. He has no discrimination. But our philosophy says "Don't become a hog, become a sane man." There, there, there is a difference between his philosophy and our philosophy.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>

Matea: Created page with '

{{terms|"no legal obligation"|"no longer has any obligations"|"no longer obliged"|"no material obligation"|"no more any obligation"|"no mo…'

2010-03-30T03:19:34Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"no legal obligation"|"no longer has any obligations"|"no longer obliged"|"no material obligation"|"no more any obligation"|"no mo…'

Show changes

No obligation - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Matea: Created page with ' {{terms|"no legal obligation"|"no longer has any obligations"|"no longer obliged"|"no material obligation"|"no more any obligation"|"no mo…'

Matea: Created page with '

{{terms|"no legal obligation"|"no longer has any obligations"|"no longer obliged"|"no material obligation"|"no more any obligation"|"no mo…'