Not approved by me - Revision history

Visnu Murti at 08:40, 7 May 2022

2022-05-07T08:40:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:40, 7 May 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div id="compilation">
			<div id="facts">
	{{terms\|"not approved by me"}}		{{terms\|"not approved by me"}}

Line 17:		Line 19:
	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}

	~~[[Category:Approval]]~~

	[[Category:Prabhupada]]		[[Category:Not Approved By Me (Prabhupada)\|2]]
			</div>

	~~[[Category:Disapprove]]~~		<div class="section" id="Correspondence" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2></div>

	== Correspondence ==		<div class="sub_section" id="1973_Correspondence" text="1973 Correspondence"><h3>1973 Correspondence</h3></div>

	=== 1973 ~~Correspondence =~~==		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Tamala Krsna -- Paris 11 August, 1973" link_text="Letter to Tamala Krsna -- Paris 11 August, 1973">
			<div class="heading">One draft which was sent by Mahamsa was not approved by me.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">'''One draft which was sent by Mahamsa was not approved by me.~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Tamala Krsna -- Paris 11 August, 1973\|Letter to Tamala Krsna -- Paris 11 August, 1973]]:''' Regarding your telegram worded as follows: "Sending draft Hyderabad deed in your name. Send me Bombay your power of attorney for Hyderabad transaction. Urgent." I have not as yet received the draft. One draft which was sent by Mahamsa was not approved by me. I have already sent you a copy of a letter addressed to Mahamsa. So when I receive the deed sent by you and it is approved by me, I will send you the power of attorney.</div>
			</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~LET-statistics~~"~~>'''[[Vanisource:~~Letter to ~~Tamala Krsna~~ -- ~~Paris 11 August~~, 1973\|Letter to ~~Tamala Krsna~~ -- ~~Paris 11 August~~, 1973~~]]:''' Regarding your telegram worded as follows:~~ "~~Sending draft Hyderabad deed in your name. Send me Bombay your power~~ of ~~attorney for Hyderabad transaction. Urgent.~~" ~~I have not as yet received the draft. One draft~~ which ~~was sent by Mahamsa was~~ not approved by me. ~~I have already sent you a copy of a letter addressed to Mahamsa. So when I receive the deed sent by you and it~~ is ~~approved by me, I will send you the power of attorney~~.</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Beharilal -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973" link_text="Letter to Beharilal -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973">
			<div class="heading">The "communal form of Krsna Consciousness" which you mention is not approved by me. It is all concoction.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">'''The "communal form of Krsna Consciousness" which you mention is not approved by me. It is all concoction.'''</~~span~~>		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Beharilal -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973\|Letter to Beharilal -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973]]:''' I have not received any reply from Tusta Krsna Swami to my letters. I do not know why he has left New Zealand. In Hawaii a great wrong doing has been done by Gaurasundara and Siddha-svarupa. They sold the temple and went away with all the money without taking any permission from me. It is a fall down on their parts. They have done the wrong thing. You should not go to Hawaii to join them. Stay in New Zealand and work cooperatively with Madhudvisa Swami. The "communal form of Krsna Consciousness" which you mention is not approved by me. It is all concoction. My Guru Maharaja condemned this practice. We must stay together and vigorously preach the Krsna Consciousness philosophy to the world. That is the real spirit of Lord Caitanya's Movement. Do not fall victim to this sentimental idea of peaceful life in seclusion. That is not our dharma.</div>
			</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~LET-statistics~~"~~>'''[[Vanisource:~~Letter to ~~Beharilal~~ -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973\|Letter to ~~Beharilal~~ -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973~~]]:'''~~ I ~~have not received any reply from Tusta Krsna Swami to my letters. I do not know why he has left New Zealand. In Hawaii a great wrong doing has been done by Gaurasundara and Siddha-svarupa. They sold~~ the ~~temple~~ and ~~went away with all the money without taking any permission from me. It is a fall down on their parts. They have done the wrong thing. You should not go~~ to ~~Hawaii~~ to ~~join them~~. ~~Stay in New Zealand and work cooperatively with Madhudvisa Swami. The "communal form of Krsna Consciousness" which you mention~~ is not approved by me~~. It is all concoction. My Guru Maharaja condemned this practice. We must stay together~~ and ~~vigorously preach the Krsna Consciousness philosophy~~ to ~~the world. That is the real spirit of Lord Caitanya's Movement. Do not fall victim~~ to ~~this sentimental idea of peaceful life in seclusion. That is not our dharma~~.</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973" link_text="Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973">
			<div class="heading">One thing is I understand that in the past you were visiting Lalita Prasadji and that you may also be planning to continue to visit him when you return to India. This is not approved by me and I request you not to go to see him any more.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">'''~~One~~ thing is I understand that in the past you were visiting Lalita Prasadji and that you may also be planning to continue to visit him when you return to India. This is not approved by me and I request you not to go to see him any more. ~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973\|Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973]]:''' Now, one thing is I understand that in the past you were visiting Lalita Prasadji and that you may also be planning to continue to visit him when you return to India. This is not approved by me and I request you not to go to see him any more. He holds a grudge against my Guru Maharaja and even if it is transcendental it will gradually appear mundane in our eyes. Whatever is to be learned of the teachings of Srila Bhaktivinode Thakura can be learned from our books. There is no need whatsoever for any outside instruction. So I hope that you have understood these matters and I pray to Krsna always for your protection and advancement in Krsna consciousness.</div>
			</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~LET-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973\|Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973]]:''' Now, one thing is I understand that in the past you were visiting Lalita Prasadji and that you may also be planning to continue to visit him when you return to India. This is not approved by me and I request you not to go to see him any more. He holds a grudge against my Guru Maharaja and even if it is transcendental it will gradually appear mundane in our eyes. Whatever is to be learned of the teachings of Srila Bhaktivinode Thakura can be learned from our books. There is no need whatsoever for any outside instruction. So I hope that you have understood these matters and I pray to Krsna always for your protection and advancement in Krsna consciousness.</~~span~~>		<div class="sub_section" id="1974_Correspondence" text="1974 Correspondence"><h3>1974 Correspondence</h3></div>

	=== 1974 ~~Correspondence =~~==		<div class="quote" book="Let" link="Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974" link_text="Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974">
			<div class="heading">We cannot change the quality of printing for the matter of a little change in the price. This printing is not approved by me.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading">'''We cannot change the quality of printing for the matter of a little change in the price. This printing is not approved by me. '''</span>~~		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974\|Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974]]:'''

	~~<span class="LET-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974\|Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974]]:'''

	My Dear Radhavallabha Das		My Dear Radhavallabha Das
Line 61:		Line 68:
	ACBS/bs		ACBS/bs

	CC: Bali Mardan, N.Y.; Hamsaduta, London, Ramesvara, L.A.</~~span~~>		CC: Bali Mardan, N.Y.; Hamsaduta, London, Ramesvara, L.A.</div>
			</div>
			</div>

Laksmipriya at 07:14, 4 December 2008

2008-12-04T07:14:48Z

New page

{{terms|"not approved by me"}}

{{notes|}}

{{compiler|Laksmipriya}}

{{complete|ALL}}

{{first|04Dec08}}

{{last|04Dec08}}

{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=4}}

{{total|4}}

{{toc right}}

[[Category:Approval]]

[[Category:Prabhupada]]

[[Category:Disapprove]]

== Correspondence ==

=== 1973 Correspondence ===

'''One draft which was sent by Mahamsa was not approved by me.'''

'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Tamala Krsna -- Paris 11 August, 1973|Letter to Tamala Krsna -- Paris 11 August, 1973]]:''' Regarding your telegram worded as follows: "Sending draft Hyderabad deed in your name. Send me Bombay your power of attorney for Hyderabad transaction. Urgent." I have not as yet received the draft. One draft which was sent by Mahamsa was not approved by me. I have already sent you a copy of a letter addressed to Mahamsa. So when I receive the deed sent by you and it is approved by me, I will send you the power of attorney.

'''The "communal form of Krsna Consciousness" which you mention is not approved by me. It is all concoction.'''

'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Beharilal -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973|Letter to Beharilal -- Los Angeles 13 December, 1973]]:''' I have not received any reply from Tusta Krsna Swami to my letters. I do not know why he has left New Zealand. In Hawaii a great wrong doing has been done by Gaurasundara and Siddha-svarupa. They sold the temple and went away with all the money without taking any permission from me. It is a fall down on their parts. They have done the wrong thing. You should not go to Hawaii to join them. Stay in New Zealand and work cooperatively with Madhudvisa Swami. The "communal form of Krsna Consciousness" which you mention is not approved by me. It is all concoction. My Guru Maharaja condemned this practice. We must stay together and vigorously preach the Krsna Consciousness philosophy to the world. That is the real spirit of Lord Caitanya's Movement. Do not fall victim to this sentimental idea of peaceful life in seclusion. That is not our dharma.

'''One thing is I understand that in the past you were visiting Lalita Prasadji and that you may also be planning to continue to visit him when you return to India. This is not approved by me and I request you not to go to see him any more. '''

'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973|Letter to Gurukrpa , Yasodanandana -- Los Angeles 25 December, 1973]]:''' Now, one thing is I understand that in the past you were visiting Lalita Prasadji and that you may also be planning to continue to visit him when you return to India. This is not approved by me and I request you not to go to see him any more. He holds a grudge against my Guru Maharaja and even if it is transcendental it will gradually appear mundane in our eyes. Whatever is to be learned of the teachings of Srila Bhaktivinode Thakura can be learned from our books. There is no need whatsoever for any outside instruction. So I hope that you have understood these matters and I pray to Krsna always for your protection and advancement in Krsna consciousness.

=== 1974 Correspondence ===

'''We cannot change the quality of printing for the matter of a little change in the price. This printing is not approved by me. '''

'''[[Vanisource:Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974|Letter to Radhavallabha -- Calcutta 22 September, 1974]]:'''

My Dear Radhavallabha Das

Please accept my blessings. I am in due receipt of your letter dated 14/9/74 with enclosed advance copies of BTG No. 66. The color is not at all good. It is not attractive, and not as good as Dai Nippon.

Why is the printing being changed from Dai Nippon? This Los Angeles quality is not good. The standard quality of Dai Nippon must be maintained. On what consideration is the printer being changed? I do not know anything of the printer being changed. In my opinion no one can print better than Dai Nippon. Why is the plan changed without my consent?
Why there is need of supervising the Kingsport printer? There was no need of supervising in Japan, but here it requires supervising. That means there is some discrepancy. So why these things are changed?

We cannot change the quality of printing for the matter of a little change in the price. This printing is not approved by me. Repeatedly changing of printers is not at all good. We cannot approve any printing less than quality of printing of Dai Nippon.
I am sending copies of this letter to all BBT Trustees for necessary action.
I hope this meets you in good health.

Your ever well wisher,

A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami
ACBS/bs

CC: Bali Mardan, N.Y.; Hamsaduta, London, Ramesvara, L.A.