Navakishora Mukunda at 14:44, 27 May 2022

2022-05-27T14:44:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 27 May 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:
	{{total\|46}}		{{total\|46}}
	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}
	[[Category:Quality]]		[[Category:One in Quality\|1]]
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>		<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>
Line 19:		Line 19:
	<div class="heading">Knowledge that one is one in quality yet different in quantity is correct transcendental knowledge leading one to become full in himself, having nothing to aspire to or lament over.		<div class="heading">Knowledge that one is one in quality yet different in quantity is correct transcendental knowledge leading one to become full in himself, having nothing to aspire to or lament over.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 5.3\|BG 5.3, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">One who is fully in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is always a renouncer because he feels neither hatred nor desire for the results of his actions. Such a renouncer, dedicated to the transcendental loving service of the Lord, is fully qualified in knowledge because he knows his constitutional position in his relationship with Kṛṣṇa. He knows fully well that Kṛṣṇa is the whole and that he is part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. Such knowledge is perfect because it is qualitatively and quantitatively correct. The concept of oneness with Kṛṣṇa is incorrect because the part cannot be equal to the whole. Knowledge that one is one in quality yet different in quantity is correct transcendental knowledge leading one to become full in himself, having nothing to aspire to or lament over. There is no duality in his mind because whatever he does, he does for Kṛṣṇa. Being thus freed from the platform of dualities, he is liberated—even in this material world.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 5.3 (1972)\|BG 5.3, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">One who is fully in Kṛṣṇa consciousness is always a renouncer because he feels neither hatred nor desire for the results of his actions. Such a renouncer, dedicated to the transcendental loving service of the Lord, is fully qualified in knowledge because he knows his constitutional position in his relationship with Kṛṣṇa. He knows fully well that Kṛṣṇa is the whole and that he is part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa. Such knowledge is perfect because it is qualitatively and quantitatively correct. The concept of oneness with Kṛṣṇa is incorrect because the part cannot be equal to the whole. Knowledge that one is one in quality yet different in quantity is correct transcendental knowledge leading one to become full in himself, having nothing to aspire to or lament over. There is no duality in his mind because whatever he does, he does for Kṛṣṇa. Being thus freed from the platform of dualities, he is liberated—even in this material world.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 197:		Line 197:
	<div class="heading">The Māyāvādī thinks like that, that "We are one, Kṛṣṇa and we. We are one." Yes, we are one—in quality. The same thing: just like the fire and the spark, one in burning capacity.		<div class="heading">The Māyāvādī thinks like that, that "We are one, Kṛṣṇa and we. We are one." Yes, we are one—in quality. The same thing: just like the fire and the spark, one in burning capacity.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 3.26.4 -- Bombay, December 16, 1974\|Lecture on SB 3.26.4 -- Bombay, December 16, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">If one surrenders to Kṛṣṇa, then he becomes free from the clutches of māyā. So how Kṛṣṇa can be caught by māyā? This is contradictory. If anyone surrenders to Kṛṣṇa, he becomes free from the influence of māyā, simply by surrendering. Then how Kṛṣṇa can be influenced by māyā? It is common sense. By surrendering to Kṛṣṇa, by becoming a devotee of Kṛṣṇa, you become free from the clutches of māyā. Mām eva ye prapadyante. Simply by surrendering. Māyām etāṁ taranti te ([[Vanisource:BG 7.14\|BG 7.14]]). So never think that Kṛṣṇa... The Māyāvādī thinks like that, that "We are one, Kṛṣṇa and we. We are one." Yes, we are one—in quality. The same thing: just like the fire and the spark, one in burning capacity. Even a small spark of the fire, it can burn. So we are one in the spiritual quality, but in quantity, we are different. Same example: vibhu and aṇu. This is very nice verse in the Bhagavad-gītā, mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te ([[Vanisource:BG 7.14\|BG 7.14]]).</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 3.26.4 -- Bombay, December 16, 1974\|Lecture on SB 3.26.4 -- Bombay, December 16, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">If one surrenders to Kṛṣṇa, then he becomes free from the clutches of māyā. So how Kṛṣṇa can be caught by māyā? This is contradictory. If anyone surrenders to Kṛṣṇa, he becomes free from the influence of māyā, simply by surrendering. Then how Kṛṣṇa can be influenced by māyā? It is common sense. By surrendering to Kṛṣṇa, by becoming a devotee of Kṛṣṇa, you become free from the clutches of māyā. Mām eva ye prapadyante. Simply by surrendering. Māyām etāṁ taranti te ([[Vanisource:BG 7.14 (1972)\|BG 7.14]]). So never think that Kṛṣṇa... The Māyāvādī thinks like that, that "We are one, Kṛṣṇa and we. We are one." Yes, we are one—in quality. The same thing: just like the fire and the spark, one in burning capacity. Even a small spark of the fire, it can burn. So we are one in the spiritual quality, but in quantity, we are different. Same example: vibhu and aṇu. This is very nice verse in the Bhagavad-gītā, mām eva ye prapadyante māyām etāṁ taranti te ([[Vanisource:BG 7.14 (1972)\|BG 7.14]]).</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 225:		Line 225:
	:eko bahūnāṁ vidadhāti kāmān		:eko bahūnāṁ vidadhāti kāmān
	:(Kaṭha Upaniṣad 2.2.13)		:(Kaṭha Upaniṣad 2.2.13)
	<p>So Kṛṣṇa is the supreme nitya, eternal, and we are also eternal. Kṛṣṇa says in the Bhagavad-gītā, mamaivāṁśa jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 15.7\|BG 15.7]]). We are eternal, and Kṛṣṇa is also eternal. That is qualitatively one. Kṛṣṇa is cetana, living force. We are also living force. So in that way, we are one in quality. But His living force and our living force, different in quality. His creative power, my creative power, your creative power, they are different.</p>		<p>So Kṛṣṇa is the supreme nitya, eternal, and we are also eternal. Kṛṣṇa says in the Bhagavad-gītā, mamaivāṁśa jīva-loke jīva-bhūtaḥ sanātanaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 15.7 (1972)\|BG 15.7]]). We are eternal, and Kṛṣṇa is also eternal. That is qualitatively one. Kṛṣṇa is cetana, living force. We are also living force. So in that way, we are one in quality. But His living force and our living force, different in quality. His creative power, my creative power, your creative power, they are different.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 334:		Line 334:
	:samaḥ sarveṣu bhūteṣu		:samaḥ sarveṣu bhūteṣu
	:mad-bhaktiṁ labhate parām		:mad-bhaktiṁ labhate parām
	:([[Vanisource:BG 18.54\|BG 18.54]])		:([[Vanisource:BG 18.54 (1972)\|BG 18.54]])
	<p>Then he enters into Vaikuṇṭha, after Brahman realization. So Lord Buddha's finished?</p>		<p>Then he enters into Vaikuṇṭha, after Brahman realization. So Lord Buddha's finished?</p>
	<p>Dhṛṣṭadyumna: No.</p>		<p>Dhṛṣṭadyumna: No.</p>
Line 342:		Line 342:
	<div class="heading">As soul they are one in quality, but in consciousness they're different. He knows everyone's pleasure and pains; I know my pleasure and pain.		<div class="heading">As soul they are one in quality, but in consciousness they're different. He knows everyone's pleasure and pains; I know my pleasure and pain.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Garden Conversation -- October 14, 1976, Chandigarh\|Garden Conversation -- October 14, 1976, Chandigarh]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: Therefore you are individual. You know the pleasure and pains of your body. I know the pleasure and pains of my body. But there is another soul; that is Supersoul. Sarva-kṣetreṣu bhārata. He knows your pleasure, pains. He knows my pleasure and pains. He knows everyone's pleasure and pains. Īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe 'rjuna tiṣṭhati ([[Vanisource:BG 18.61\|BG 18.61]]). Therefore, as soul they are one in quality, but in consciousness they're different. He knows everyone's pleasure and pains; I know my pleasure and pain.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Garden Conversation -- October 14, 1976, Chandigarh\|Garden Conversation -- October 14, 1976, Chandigarh]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: Therefore you are individual. You know the pleasure and pains of your body. I know the pleasure and pains of my body. But there is another soul; that is Supersoul. Sarva-kṣetreṣu bhārata. He knows your pleasure, pains. He knows my pleasure and pains. He knows everyone's pleasure and pains. Īśvaraḥ sarva-bhūtānāṁ hṛd-deśe 'rjuna tiṣṭhati ([[Vanisource:BG 18.61 (1972)\|BG 18.61]]). Therefore, as soul they are one in quality, but in consciousness they're different. He knows everyone's pleasure and pains; I know my pleasure and pain.</p>
	<p>Indian man (2): My humble prayer was that by doing japa, by doing meditation, by doing bhakti-mārga, need we go to jñāna-mārga also, or bhakti-mārga is enough by itself? That was my humble supplication.</p>		<p>Indian man (2): My humble prayer was that by doing japa, by doing meditation, by doing bhakti-mārga, need we go to jñāna-mārga also, or bhakti-mārga is enough by itself? That was my humble supplication.</p>
	<p>Prabhupāda: Bhakti-mārga is enough. Bhakti-mārga means it includes everything. Without jñāna, there is no bhakti. The jñāna is called brahma-bhūta ([[Vanisource:SB 4.30.20\|SB 4.30.20]]); that is real jñāna. If you... Aiye. If you understand your position, then it is jñāna.</p>		<p>Prabhupāda: Bhakti-mārga is enough. Bhakti-mārga means it includes everything. Without jñāna, there is no bhakti. The jñāna is called brahma-bhūta ([[Vanisource:SB 4.30.20\|SB 4.30.20]]); that is real jñāna. If you... Aiye. If you understand your position, then it is jñāna.</p>

Matea: Created page with '

{{terms|"In quality we are one"|"in quality, we are one"|"one in quality"|"one—in quality"|"same in quality"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Mat…'

2010-06-07T04:12:18Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In quality we are one"|"in quality, we are one"|"one in quality"|"one—in quality"|"same in quality"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Mat…'

Show changes

One in quality - Revision history

Navakishora Mukunda at 14:44, 27 May 2022

Matea: Created page with ' {{terms|"In quality we are one"|"in quality, we are one"|"one in quality"|"one—in quality"|"same in quality"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Mat…'

Matea: Created page with '

{{terms|"In quality we are one"|"in quality, we are one"|"one in quality"|"one—in quality"|"same in quality"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Mat…'