Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-19T01:22:20Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 {{terms|"pet"|"pets"}}
 {{notes|}}
-{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
+{{compiler|Visnu Murti|Tugomera}}
-{{complete|}}
+{{complete|ALL}}
 {{first|25Aug11}}
-{{last|25Aug11}}
+{{last|07Dec11}}
-{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}
+{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=11}}
-{{total|1}}
+{{total|11}}
 {{toc right}}
 [[Category:pet|1]]
@@ Line 20: / Line 19: @@
 <div id="LettertoRupanugaSeattle15October1968_0" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="367" link="Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968" link_text="Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968">
 <span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968|Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding Mr. Fugate in Florida: I have read the letter, the copy of which you have sent to me, and I am forwarding it to Nandarani. Because she is also very much surprised at the behavior of Mr. Fugate in connection with Mahapurusa. After all, this class of men, they are falsely puffed up that they know something about mysticism, but actually they want to be flattered by somebody. So they are keeping some spiritual master or instructor, means to keep them as pet dog and cat. I think Mahapurusa may not have spoken anything which is very offensive, but he was so intolerant that he could not give him shelter even for one day. So he was so angry. That is not the sign of a mystic. Anyway, please try to deal with him softly because he has got some tendency for spiritual upliftment of his life, but he is misguided or without any knowledge in the line. Neither he is ready to accept any bona fide instructor, this is his position so far I can understand. There is a proverb in Sanskrit that you speak truth but don't speak unpalatable truth. When you speak the truth it must be very palatable. So this social convention is not applicable to a person who is preaching the Absolute Truth.</p>
 </div>
 </div>
 </div>

Visnu Murti: Created page with '

{{terms|"pet"|"pets"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Visnu Murti}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|25Aug11}} {{last|25Aug11}} {{totals_by_section…'

2011-08-25T10:09:06Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"pet"|"pets"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Visnu Murti}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|25Aug11}} {{last|25Aug11}} {{totals_by_section…'

New page

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"pet"|"pets"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}
{{complete|}}
{{goal|0}}
{{first|25Aug11}}
{{last|25Aug11}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=1}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:pet|1]]
[[Category:Compilations from Letters]]
</div>
<div id="Correspondence" class="section" sec_index="6" parent="compilation" text="Correspondence"><h2>Correspondence</h2>
</div>
<div id="1968_Correspondence" class="sub_section" sec_index="3" parent="Correspondence" text="1968 Correspondence"><h3>1968 Correspondence</h3>
</div>
<div id="LettertoRupanugaSeattle15October1968_0" class="quote" parent="1968_Correspondence" book="Let" index="367" link="Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968" link_text="Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968">
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968|Letter to Rupanuga -- Seattle 15 October, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Regarding Mr. Fugate in Florida: I have read the letter, the copy of which you have sent to me, and I am forwarding it to Nandarani. Because she is also very much surprised at the behavior of Mr. Fugate in connection with Mahapurusa. After all, this class of men, they are falsely puffed up that they know something about mysticism, but actually they want to be flattered by somebody. So they are keeping some spiritual master or instructor, means to keep them as pet dog and cat. I think Mahapurusa may not have spoken anything which is very offensive, but he was so intolerant that he could not give him shelter even for one day. So he was so angry. That is not the sign of a mystic. Anyway, please try to deal with him softly because he has got some tendency for spiritual upliftment of his life, but he is misguided or without any knowledge in the line. Neither he is ready to accept any bona fide instructor, this is his position so far I can understand. There is a proverb in Sanskrit that you speak truth but don't speak unpalatable truth. When you speak the truth it must be very palatable. So this social convention is not applicable to a person who is preaching the Absolute Truth.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Pet (Letters) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Visnu Murti: Created page with ' {{terms|"pet"|"pets"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Visnu Murti}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|25Aug11}} {{last|25Aug11}} {{totals_by_section…'

Visnu Murti: Created page with '

{{terms|"pet"|"pets"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Visnu Murti}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|25Aug11}} {{last|25Aug11}} {{totals_by_section…'