Visnu Murti at 09:19, 30 September 2021

2021-09-30T09:19:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:19, 30 September 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
			<div id="compilation">
			<div id="facts">
	{{terms\|"real knower"}}		{{terms\|"real knower"}}

Line 17:		Line 19:
	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}

	[[Category:Real]]		[[Category:Real\|2]]

	[[Category:Knower]]		[[Category:Knower\|2]]
			</div>

	== Bhagavad-gita As It Is ==		<div class="section" id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2></div>

	=== BG Chapters 13 - 18 ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="BG_Chapters_13_-_18" text="BG Chapters 13 - 18"><h3>BG Chapters 13 - 18</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~ Unless one has the association of a real knower of spiritual subjects, one cannot see these three things.~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="BG" link="BG 13.28" link_text="BG 13.28, Purport">
			<div class="heading">Unless one has the association of a real knower of spiritual subjects, one cannot see these three things.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~BG-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:BG 13.28\|BG 13.28, Purport]]:''' Anyone who by good association can see three things combined together—the body, the proprietor of the body, or individual soul, and the friend of the individual soul—is actually in knowledge. Unless one has the association of a real knower of spiritual subjects, one cannot see these three things. Those who do not have such association are ignorant; they simply see the body, and they think that when the body is destroyed everything is finished. But actually it is not so.</~~span~~>		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:BG 13.28 (1972)\|BG 13.28, Purport]]:''' Anyone who by good association can see three things combined together—the body, the proprietor of the body, or individual soul, and the friend of the individual soul—is actually in knowledge. Unless one has the association of a real knower of spiritual subjects, one cannot see these three things. Those who do not have such association are ignorant; they simply see the body, and they think that when the body is destroyed everything is finished. But actually it is not so.</div>
			</div>

	== Srimad-Bhagavatam ==		<div class="section" id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2></div>

	=== SB Canto 6 ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="SB_Canto_6" text="SB Canto 6"><h3>SB Canto 6</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā.~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="SB" link="SB 6.1.40" link_text="SB 6.1.40, Purport">
			<div class="heading">A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~SB-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:SB 6.1.40\|SB 6.1.40, Purport]]:''' The transcendental words of the Vedas emanated from the mouth of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore the Vedic principles should be understood to be Vaiṣṇava principles because Viṣṇu is the origin of the Vedas. The Vedas contain nothing besides the instructions of Viṣṇu, and one who follows the Vedic principles is a Vaiṣṇava. The Vaiṣṇava is not a member of a manufactured community of this material world. A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ [Bg. 15.15]).</~~span~~>		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:SB 6.1.40\|SB 6.1.40, Purport]]:''' The transcendental words of the Vedas emanated from the mouth of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore the Vedic principles should be understood to be Vaiṣṇava principles because Viṣṇu is the origin of the Vedas. The Vedas contain nothing besides the instructions of Viṣṇu, and one who follows the Vedic principles is a Vaiṣṇava. The Vaiṣṇava is not a member of a manufactured community of this material world. A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ [Bg. 15.15]).</div>
			</div>

	== Conversations and Morning Walks ==		<div class="section" id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2></div>

	=== 1973 Conversations and Morning Walks ~~===~~		<div class="sub_section" id="1973_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1973 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1973 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3></div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~q_heading~~">~~'''~~One who does, one who knows that "I am not this body," he's real knower.~~'''~~</~~span~~>		<div class="quote" book="Con" link="Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris" link_text="Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris">
			<div class="heading">One who does, one who knows that "I am not this body," he's real knower.</div>

	<~~span~~ class="~~CON-statistics~~">'''[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris\|Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris]]:'''		<div class="text">'''[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris\|Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris]]:'''

	Bhagavān: We can, we can write them, make that correction.		Bhagavān: We can, we can write them, make that correction.

	Prabhupāda: Yes. Write immediately. One must know that I am not this body. That is knowledge. That is knower. That is common sense. I say: "It is my body." I don't say: "I body." That I explained. One who does, one who knows that "I am not this body," he's real knower. And one who knows that: "I am this body," he does not know. He's in ignorance. Just like Danielou.</~~span~~>		Prabhupāda: Yes. Write immediately. One must know that I am not this body. That is knowledge. That is knower. That is common sense. I say: "It is my body." I don't say: "I body." That I explained. One who does, one who knows that "I am not this body," he's real knower. And one who knows that: "I am this body," he does not know. He's in ignorance. Just like Danielou.</div>
			</div>
			</div>

Rati at 14:59, 20 November 2008

2008-11-20T14:59:42Z

New page

{{terms|"real knower"}}

{{notes|}}

{{compiler|Rati}}

{{complete|ALL}}

{{first|20Nov08}}

{{last|20Nov08}}

{{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=1|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=1|Let=0}}

{{total|3}}

{{toc right}}

[[Category:Real]]

[[Category:Knower]]

== Bhagavad-gita As It Is ==

=== BG Chapters 13 - 18 ===

''' Unless one has the association of a real knower of spiritual subjects, one cannot see these three things.'''

'''[[Vanisource:BG 13.28|BG 13.28, Purport]]:''' Anyone who by good association can see three things combined together—the body, the proprietor of the body, or individual soul, and the friend of the individual soul—is actually in knowledge. Unless one has the association of a real knower of spiritual subjects, one cannot see these three things. Those who do not have such association are ignorant; they simply see the body, and they think that when the body is destroyed everything is finished. But actually it is not so.

== Srimad-Bhagavatam ==

=== SB Canto 6 ===

'''A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā.'''

'''[[Vanisource:SB 6.1.40|SB 6.1.40, Purport]]:''' The transcendental words of the Vedas emanated from the mouth of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Therefore the Vedic principles should be understood to be Vaiṣṇava principles because Viṣṇu is the origin of the Vedas. The Vedas contain nothing besides the instructions of Viṣṇu, and one who follows the Vedic principles is a Vaiṣṇava. The Vaiṣṇava is not a member of a manufactured community of this material world. A Vaiṣṇava is a real knower of the Vedas, as confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (vedaiś ca sarvair aham eva vedyaḥ [Bg. 15.15]).

== Conversations and Morning Walks ==

=== 1973 Conversations and Morning Walks ===

'''One who does, one who knows that "I am not this body," he's real knower.'''

'''[[Vanisource:Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris|Room Conversation -- August 11, 1973, Paris]]:'''

Bhagavān: We can, we can write them, make that correction.

Prabhupāda: Yes. Write immediately. One must know that I am not this body. That is knowledge. That is knower. That is common sense. I say: "It is my body." I don't say: "I body." That I explained. One who does, one who knows that "I am not this body," he's real knower. And one who knows that: "I am this body," he does not know. He's in ignorance. Just like Danielou.

Real knower - Revision history

Visnu Murti at 09:19, 30 September 2021

Rati at 14:59, 20 November 2008