Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-20T04:23:17Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 20 May 2018
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Category:Vaniquotes Sanskrit Dictionary S-T-U]]		[[Category:Vaniquotes Sanskrit Dictionary S-T-U]]
	[[Category:Children\|3]]		[[Category:Children\|3]]
	~~[[Category:Prostitute\|3]]~~
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>		<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
Line 22:		Line 21:
	<div class="heading">The tat-sutān means the children were of the prostitute. Because she was not married, therefore that woman did not belong to him.		<div class="heading">The tat-sutān means the children were of the prostitute. Because she was not married, therefore that woman did not belong to him.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970\|Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So there was one Ajāmila at that time, but you will find many Ajāmilas like that at the present moment because it is the age of Kali. There was one Rāvaṇa. In the dress of a sannyāsī he kidnapped Lord Rāmacandra's wife, and nowadays you will find many Rāvaṇas like that. You see? The so-called sannyāsīs, their business is to... This tendency is always there, but according to the age, sometimes it is very prominent and sometimes not so prominent. But this material world is so contaminated. In the days of Rāmacandra people were hankering after the kingdom of Rāma, even there was Rāvaṇa in the days of Rāmacandra. And what to speak of all these nonsense debauchees? Rāmacandra was so strict, and God Himself was ruling, and still, there was Rāvaṇa. But because Rāmacandra was there he was also killed. Paritrāṇāya sādhūnām ([[Vanisource:BG 4.8\|BG 4.8]]). God's business is to protect the faithful and kill the demons. That is always. Therefore we find Lord Viṣṇu, the four symbolic representation: for killing, the club and the cakra; and for protecting, the lotus flower and conchshell.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970\|Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So there was one Ajāmila at that time, but you will find many Ajāmilas like that at the present moment because it is the age of Kali. There was one Rāvaṇa. In the dress of a sannyāsī he kidnapped Lord Rāmacandra's wife, and nowadays you will find many Rāvaṇas like that. You see? The so-called sannyāsīs, their business is to... This tendency is always there, but according to the age, sometimes it is very prominent and sometimes not so prominent. But this material world is so contaminated. In the days of Rāmacandra people were hankering after the kingdom of Rāma, even there was Rāvaṇa in the days of Rāmacandra. And what to speak of all these nonsense debauchees? Rāmacandra was so strict, and God Himself was ruling, and still, there was Rāvaṇa. But because Rāmacandra was there he was also killed. Paritrāṇāya sādhūnām ([[Vanisource:BG 4.8 (1972)\|BG 4.8]]). God's business is to protect the faithful and kill the demons. That is always. Therefore we find Lord Viṣṇu, the four symbolic representation: for killing, the club and the cakra; and for protecting, the lotus flower and conchshell.</p>
	:evaṁ nivasatas tasya		:evaṁ nivasatas tasya
	:lālayānasya tat-sutān		:lālayānasya tat-sutān

Vaishnavi: Created page with '

{{terms|"tat-sutan means"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Vaishnavi}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|25Nov12}} {{last|25Nov12}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0…'

2012-11-25T08:58:40Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"tat-sutan means"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Vaishnavi}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|25Nov12}} {{last|25Nov12}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0…'

New page

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"tat-sutan means"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Vaishnavi}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|25Nov12}}
{{last|25Nov12}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Vaniquotes Sanskrit Dictionary A to Z]]
[[Category:Vaniquotes Sanskrit Dictionary S-T-U]]
[[Category:Children|3]]
[[Category:Prostitute|3]]
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Lectures" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures"><h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB6122IndoreDecember131970_0" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="631" link="Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970" link_text="Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970">
<div class="heading">The tat-sutān means the children were of the prostitute. Because she was not married, therefore that woman did not belong to him.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970|Lecture on SB 6.1.22 -- Indore, December 13, 1970]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So there was one Ajāmila at that time, but you will find many Ajāmilas like that at the present moment because it is the age of Kali. There was one Rāvaṇa. In the dress of a sannyāsī he kidnapped Lord Rāmacandra's wife, and nowadays you will find many Rāvaṇas like that. You see? The so-called sannyāsīs, their business is to... This tendency is always there, but according to the age, sometimes it is very prominent and sometimes not so prominent. But this material world is so contaminated. In the days of Rāmacandra people were hankering after the kingdom of Rāma, even there was Rāvaṇa in the days of Rāmacandra. And what to speak of all these nonsense debauchees? Rāmacandra was so strict, and God Himself was ruling, and still, there was Rāvaṇa. But because Rāmacandra was there he was also killed. Paritrāṇāya sādhūnām ([[Vanisource:BG 4.8|BG 4.8]]). God's business is to protect the faithful and kill the demons. That is always. Therefore we find Lord Viṣṇu, the four symbolic representation: for killing, the club and the cakra; and for protecting, the lotus flower and conchshell.</p>
:evaṁ nivasatas tasya
:lālayānasya tat-sutān
:kālo 'tyāgan mahān rājann
:aṣṭāśītyāyuṣaḥ samāḥ
<p>In this way he was living with his prostitute wife, and many children he got because he was attracted to the prostitute, say, at the age of twenty, very young man. And as such... (aside:) Aiye. He begot many children. He begot many children. Evaṁ nivasatas tasya lālayānasya tat-sutān. Tat-sutān. Here it is not stated that it is Ajāmila's son. The tat-sutān means the children were of the prostitute. Because she was not married, therefore that woman did not belong to him. Just like a land you possess. The production goes to the possessor of the land, not to others. Therefore, because the prostitute was not married to Ajāmila, her sons were not Ajāmila's sons. They were all sons of the prostitute. Therefore, at least still in India, a prostitute's son has no position in the society.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

Tat-sutan means - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Vaishnavi: Created page with ' {{terms|"tat-sutan means"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Vaishnavi}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|25Nov12}} {{last|25Nov12}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0…'

Vaishnavi: Created page with '

{{terms|"tat-sutan means"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Vaishnavi}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|25Nov12}} {{last|25Nov12}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0…'