The King can do no wrong - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-20T06:09:32Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 20 May 2018
Line 10:		Line 10:
	{{total\|7}}		{{total\|7}}
	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}
	[[Category:King]]		[[Category:King\|2]]
	[[Category:Wrong]]		[[Category:Can Do\|2]]
			[[Category:Wrong\|2]]
			[[Category:Proverbs Quoted by Srila Prabhupada]]
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>		<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>
Line 20:		Line 22:
	<div class="heading">As there are constitutional laws in the material world stating that the king can do no wrong, or that the king is not subject to the state laws, similarly the Lord, although He is the creator of this material world, is not affected by the activities of the material world.		<div class="heading">As there are constitutional laws in the material world stating that the king can do no wrong, or that the king is not subject to the state laws, similarly the Lord, although He is the creator of this material world, is not affected by the activities of the material world.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 4.14\|BG 4.14, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">There is no work that affects Me; nor do I aspire for the fruits of action. One who understands this truth about Me also does not become entangled in the fruitive reactions of work.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 4.14 (1972)\|BG 4.14, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">There is no work that affects Me; nor do I aspire for the fruits of action. One who understands this truth about Me also does not become entangled in the fruitive reactions of work.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	<div class="purport text"><p>As there are constitutional laws in the material world stating that the king can do no wrong, or that the king is not subject to the state laws, similarly the Lord, although He is the creator of this material world, is not affected by the activities of the material world. He creates and remains aloof from the creation, whereas the living entities are entangled in the fruitive results of material activities because of their propensity for lording it over material resources. The proprietor of an establishment is not responsible for the right and wrong activities of the workers, but the workers are themselves responsible. The living entities are engaged in their respective activities of sense gratification, and these activities are not ordained by the Lord. For advancement of sense gratification, the living entities are engaged in the work of this world, and they aspire to heavenly happiness after death. The Lord, being full in Himself, has no attraction for so-called heavenly happiness. The heavenly demigods are only His engaged servants. The proprietor never desires the low-grade happiness such as the workers may desire. He is aloof from the material actions and reactions. For example, the rains are not responsible for different types of vegetation that appear on the earth, although without such rains there is no possibility of vegetative growth.</p>		<div class="purport text"><p>As there are constitutional laws in the material world stating that the king can do no wrong, or that the king is not subject to the state laws, similarly the Lord, although He is the creator of this material world, is not affected by the activities of the material world. He creates and remains aloof from the creation, whereas the living entities are entangled in the fruitive results of material activities because of their propensity for lording it over material resources. The proprietor of an establishment is not responsible for the right and wrong activities of the workers, but the workers are themselves responsible. The living entities are engaged in their respective activities of sense gratification, and these activities are not ordained by the Lord. For advancement of sense gratification, the living entities are engaged in the work of this world, and they aspire to heavenly happiness after death. The Lord, being full in Himself, has no attraction for so-called heavenly happiness. The heavenly demigods are only His engaged servants. The proprietor never desires the low-grade happiness such as the workers may desire. He is aloof from the material actions and reactions. For example, the rains are not responsible for different types of vegetation that appear on the earth, although without such rains there is no possibility of vegetative growth.</p>
Line 65:		Line 67:
	</div>		</div>
	<div id="MorningWalkNovember71975Bombay_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="234" link="Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay" link_text="Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay">		<div id="MorningWalkNovember71975Bombay_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="234" link="Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay" link_text="Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay">
	<div class="heading">"~~the~~ king can do no wrong." Yes, that is the Vedic system. Suppose a king beheads somebody by his own sword, as it was being done. Nobody can charge him that "Without any trial he has killed this man." No.		<div class="heading">"The king can do no wrong." Yes, that is the Vedic system. Suppose a king beheads somebody by his own sword, as it was being done. Nobody can charge him that "Without any trial he has killed this man." No.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay\|Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: (break) ...king. Their constitution, first word is "the king can do no wrong." Yes, that is the Vedic system. Suppose a king beheads somebody by his own sword, as it was being done. Nobody can charge him that "Without any trial he has killed this man." No. Whatever is done... Just like we take Kṛṣṇa, apāpa viddham. Kṛṣṇa is never touched with any sinful activities. Apāpa-viddham. Tejiyasam na doṣaya ([[Vanisource:SB 10.33.29\|SB 10.33.29]]). Just as the sun, because it is very, very powerful, nothing can infect it. These are the dangers. (Hindi?) Of course, if you want to keep one in very exalted post, at the same time, if you want to find fault with him, then that is not good. That is not good. That is also stated, that arcye viṣṇau śilā-dhir guruṣu nara-matiḥ. If somebody thinks that the Deity is made of stone and he criticizes, that is not allowed. If one thinks spiritual master as ordinary human being, that is not allowed. Arcye viṣṇau śilā-dhir guruṣu nara-matiḥ. So those who are in highly exalted post of the state, you cannot find out fault with him. That is real Vedic way. Otherwise, if he is taken as ordinary citizen, then he is... What is the meaning of his exalted post?</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay\|Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: (break) ...king. Their constitution, first word is "the king can do no wrong." Yes, that is the Vedic system. Suppose a king beheads somebody by his own sword, as it was being done. Nobody can charge him that "Without any trial he has killed this man." No. Whatever is done... Just like we take Kṛṣṇa, apāpa viddham. Kṛṣṇa is never touched with any sinful activities. Apāpa-viddham. Tejiyasam na doṣaya ([[Vanisource:SB 10.33.29\|SB 10.33.29]]). Just as the sun, because it is very, very powerful, nothing can infect it. These are the dangers. (Hindi?) Of course, if you want to keep one in very exalted post, at the same time, if you want to find fault with him, then that is not good. That is not good. That is also stated, that arcye viṣṇau śilā-dhir guruṣu nara-matiḥ. If somebody thinks that the Deity is made of stone and he criticizes, that is not allowed. If one thinks spiritual master as ordinary human being, that is not allowed. Arcye viṣṇau śilā-dhir guruṣu nara-matiḥ. So those who are in highly exalted post of the state, you cannot find out fault with him. That is real Vedic way. Otherwise, if he is taken as ordinary citizen, then he is... What is the meaning of his exalted post?</p>
Line 78:		Line 80:
	<p>Prabhupāda: No, no. Nothing is made by māyā. māyā is made by God.</p>		<p>Prabhupāda: No, no. Nothing is made by māyā. māyā is made by God.</p>
	<p>Dr. Patel: And material is, nothing but the transformation of māyā, is it not?</p>		<p>Dr. Patel: And material is, nothing but the transformation of māyā, is it not?</p>
	<p>Prabhupāda: No. No. māyā means something false. Nobody makes anything. Everything is made by... Ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 10.8\|BG 10.8]]). Kṛṣṇa is the creator of everything. māyā is also created by Kṛṣṇa. So just like government creates police department. But police department is made for that person who violates the laws of God. The police department is creation of government. Similarly, māyā's business is to capture, arrest the criminal who has gone against God, capture him. Mūḍha janmani janmani ([[Vanisource:BG 16.20\|BG 16.20]]). Mam aprapyaiva. This is the arrangement. Nobody is independent. Everything. Therefore it is called sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. So māyā is also Brahman. māyā is also Brahman. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. Why māyā is different from God? It is creation of God. Mama māyā, Kṛṣṇa says. Mama māyā. So how māyā can be... The difference is police cannot arrest the president. Now it has been proved in the law. The president, the prime minister, they cannot be interfered by the police or law. That is good judgment. If the head of the estate is also interfered by police, that does not look well. So this judgment is very nice. Therefore in English constitution the first word is "The king can do no wrong." You cannot accuse king of doing wrong. Whatever he does, it is all right.</p>		<p>Prabhupāda: No. No. māyā means something false. Nobody makes anything. Everything is made by... Ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 10.8 (1972)\|BG 10.8]]). Kṛṣṇa is the creator of everything. māyā is also created by Kṛṣṇa. So just like government creates police department. But police department is made for that person who violates the laws of God. The police department is creation of government. Similarly, māyā's business is to capture, arrest the criminal who has gone against God, capture him. Mūḍha janmani janmani ([[Vanisource:BG 16.20 (1972)\|BG 16.20]]). Mam aprapyaiva. This is the arrangement. Nobody is independent. Everything. Therefore it is called sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. So māyā is also Brahman. māyā is also Brahman. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. Why māyā is different from God? It is creation of God. Mama māyā, Kṛṣṇa says. Mama māyā. So how māyā can be... The difference is police cannot arrest the president. Now it has been proved in the law. The president, the prime minister, they cannot be interfered by the police or law. That is good judgment. If the head of the estate is also interfered by police, that does not look well. So this judgment is very nice. Therefore in English constitution the first word is "The king can do no wrong." You cannot accuse king of doing wrong. Whatever he does, it is all right.</p>
	<p>Dr. Patel: :That is when there was Rāma-rajya, sir. These modern fellows will talk all these things...</p>		<p>Dr. Patel: That is when there was Rāma-rajya, sir. These modern fellows will talk all these things...</p>
	<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, no. No, no. Rāma-rajya should be there as far as possible.</p>		<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, no. No, no. Rāma-rajya should be there as far as possible.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>

MadhuGopaldas: Created page with '

{{terms|"the king can do no wrong"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|24Mar10}} {{last|24Mar10}} {{totals_by…'

2010-03-24T11:47:22Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the king can do no wrong"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|24Mar10}} {{last|24Mar10}} {{totals_by…'

New page

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"the king can do no wrong"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|24Mar10}}
{{last|24Mar10}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=2|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=2|Con=2|Let=0}}
{{total|7}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:King]]
[[Category:Wrong]]
</div>
<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>
</div>
<div id="BG_Chapters_1_-_6" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" text="BG Chapters 1 - 6"><h3>BG Chapters 1 - 6</h3>
</div>
<div id="BG414_0" class="quote" parent="BG_Chapters_1_-_6" book="BG" index="167" link="BG 4.14" link_text="BG 4.14">
<div class="heading">As there are constitutional laws in the material world stating that the king can do no wrong, or that the king is not subject to the state laws, similarly the Lord, although He is the creator of this material world, is not affected by the activities of the material world.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG 4.14|BG 4.14, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">There is no work that affects Me; nor do I aspire for the fruits of action. One who understands this truth about Me also does not become entangled in the fruitive reactions of work.</p>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>As there are constitutional laws in the material world stating that the king can do no wrong, or that the king is not subject to the state laws, similarly the Lord, although He is the creator of this material world, is not affected by the activities of the material world. He creates and remains aloof from the creation, whereas the living entities are entangled in the fruitive results of material activities because of their propensity for lording it over material resources. The proprietor of an establishment is not responsible for the right and wrong activities of the workers, but the workers are themselves responsible. The living entities are engaged in their respective activities of sense gratification, and these activities are not ordained by the Lord. For advancement of sense gratification, the living entities are engaged in the work of this world, and they aspire to heavenly happiness after death. The Lord, being full in Himself, has no attraction for so-called heavenly happiness. The heavenly demigods are only His engaged servants. The proprietor never desires the low-grade happiness such as the workers may desire. He is aloof from the material actions and reactions. For example, the rains are not responsible for different types of vegetation that appear on the earth, although without such rains there is no possibility of vegetative growth.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
</div>
<div id="SB_Canto_1" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 1"><h3>SB Canto 1</h3>
</div>
<div id="SB11841_0" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_1" book="SB" index="731" link="SB 1.18.41" link_text="SB 1.18.41">
<div class="heading">The king is the best of all human beings. He is the representative of God, and he is never to be condemned for any of his actions. In other words, the king can do no wrong.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 1.18.41|SB 1.18.41, Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="purport text"><p style="display: inline;">The king is the best of all human beings. He is the representative of God, and he is never to be condemned for any of his actions. In other words, the king can do no wrong. The king may order hanging of a culprit son of a brāhmaṇa, but he does not become sinful for killing a brāhmaṇa. Even if there is something wrong with the king, he is never to be condemned. A medical practitioner may kill a patient by mistaken treatment, but such a killer is never condemned to death. So what to speak of a good and pious king like Mahārāja Parīkṣit? In the Vedic way of life, the king is trained to become a rājarṣi, or a great saint, although he is ruling as king. It is the king only by whose good government the citizens can live peacefully and without any fear. The rājarṣis would manage their kingdoms so nicely and piously that their subjects would respect them as if they were the Lord. That is the instruction of the Vedas. The king is called narendra, or the best amongst the human beings.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="SB11846_1" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_1" book="SB" index="736" link="SB 1.18.46" link_text="SB 1.18.46">
<div class="heading">The king can do no wrong and therefore is never to be condemned.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:SB 1.18.46|SB 1.18.46, Translation and Purport]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="trans text"><p style="display: inline;">The Emperor Parīkṣit is a pious king. He is highly celebrated and is a first-class devotee of the Personality of Godhead. He is a saint amongst royalty, and he has performed many horse sacrifices. When such a king is tired and fatigued, being stricken with hunger and thirst, he does not at all deserve to be cursed.</p>
</div>
<div class="purport text"><p>After explaining the general codes relating to the royal position and asserting that the king can do no wrong and therefore is never to be condemned, the sage Śamīka wanted to say something about Emperor Parīkṣit specifically. The specific qualification of Mahārāja Parīkṣit is summarized herein. The King, even calculated as a king only, was most celebrated as a ruler who administered the religious principles of the royal order. In the śāstras the duties of all castes and orders of society are prescribed. All the qualities of a kṣatriya mentioned in the Bhagavad-gītā (18.43) were present in the person of the Emperor. He was also a great devotee of the Lord and a self-realized soul. Cursing such a king, when he was tired and fatigued with hunger and thirst, was not at all proper. Śamīka Ṛṣi thus admitted from all sides that Mahārāja Parīkṣit was cursed most unjustly. Although all the brāhmaṇas were aloof from the incident, still for the childish action of a brāhmaṇa boy the whole world situation was changed. Thus Ṛṣi Śamīka, a brāhmaṇa, took responsibility for all deterioration of the good orders of the world.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Lectures" class="section" sec_index="4" parent="compilation" text="Lectures"><h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" class="sub_section" sec_index="1" parent="Lectures" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures"><h3>Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB32615BombayDecember241974_0" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="476" link="Lecture on SB 3.26.15 -- Bombay, December 24, 1974" link_text="Lecture on SB 3.26.15 -- Bombay, December 24, 1974">
<div class="heading">In the English Constitution it is said that "The king can do no wrong." So you cannot bring king under any law. Others will come—even if he is minister, he will come under the law—but the king cannot come under the law.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 3.26.15 -- Bombay, December 24, 1974|Lecture on SB 3.26.15 -- Bombay, December 24, 1974]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Kṛṣṇa is not māyā's, but māyā is Kṛṣṇa's. We have to understand that way, not that Kṛṣṇa becomes enveloped or overpowered by māyā. That is wrong theory. The Māyāvādī theory is like that, that "I am Kṛṣṇa. I am God. Now I am overpowered by māyā, and as soon as I become free from māyā, again I become Kṛṣṇa." But the question is that "If you are Kṛṣṇa, if you are God, then why you became under the control of māyā? What kind of God you are?" Just like in the English Constitution it is said that "The king can do no wrong." So you cannot bring king under any law. Others will come—even if he is minister, he will come under the law—but the king cannot come under the law. This is the English Constitution. Similarly, God cannot be under māyā.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="LectureonSB6145LosAngelesJune111976_1" class="quote" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam_Lectures" book="Lec" index="677" link="Lecture on SB 6.1.45 -- Los Angeles, June 11, 1976" link_text="Lecture on SB 6.1.45 -- Los Angeles, June 11, 1976">
<div class="heading">In England, the constitution says, "The king can do no wrong." King cannot be subject to any law. Similarly, when Kṛṣṇa danced with the gopīs, it has got a deep meaning.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture on SB 6.1.45 -- Los Angeles, June 11, 1976|Lecture on SB 6.1.45 -- Los Angeles, June 11, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Tejīyasāṁ na doṣāya ([[Vanisource:SB 10.33.29|SB 10.33.29]]).</p>
<p>The Parīkṣit Mahārāja inquired that "Śukadeva Gosvāmī, Kṛṣṇa, He came to establish dharma, but it appears that He danced with other's wife or other's daughter." According to Vedic civilization you cannot mix with any other woman except your wife. That is not allowed. So, according to the Vedic conception of life, it was not right thing that Kṛṣṇa danced with other's wife or other's daughter. This question was put. Parīkṣit Mahārāja said that Kṛṣṇa, because He is God, He cannot do anything wrong. Just like in England, the constitution says, "The king can do no wrong." King cannot be subject to any law. Similarly, when Kṛṣṇa danced with the gopīs, it has got a deep meaning. Because they are all devotees, they did not know except Kṛṣṇa, and they prayed to the Kātyāyanī, although they are married, they prayed to Kātyāyanī before they were married, that "Let Kṛṣṇa become our husband."</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="section" sec_index="5" parent="compilation" text="Conversations and Morning Walks"><h2>Conversations and Morning Walks</h2>
</div>
<div id="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" class="sub_section" sec_index="8" parent="Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" text="1975 Conversations and Morning Walks"><h3>1975 Conversations and Morning Walks</h3>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkNovember71975Bombay_0" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="234" link="Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay" link_text="Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay">
<div class="heading">"the king can do no wrong." Yes, that is the Vedic system. Suppose a king beheads somebody by his own sword, as it was being done. Nobody can charge him that "Without any trial he has killed this man." No.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay|Morning Walk -- November 7, 1975, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Prabhupāda: (break) ...king. Their constitution, first word is "the king can do no wrong." Yes, that is the Vedic system. Suppose a king beheads somebody by his own sword, as it was being done. Nobody can charge him that "Without any trial he has killed this man." No. Whatever is done... Just like we take Kṛṣṇa, apāpa viddham. Kṛṣṇa is never touched with any sinful activities. Apāpa-viddham. Tejiyasam na doṣaya ([[Vanisource:SB 10.33.29|SB 10.33.29]]). Just as the sun, because it is very, very powerful, nothing can infect it. These are the dangers. (Hindi?) Of course, if you want to keep one in very exalted post, at the same time, if you want to find fault with him, then that is not good. That is not good. That is also stated, that arcye viṣṇau śilā-dhir guruṣu nara-matiḥ. If somebody thinks that the Deity is made of stone and he criticizes, that is not allowed. If one thinks spiritual master as ordinary human being, that is not allowed. Arcye viṣṇau śilā-dhir guruṣu nara-matiḥ. So those who are in highly exalted post of the state, you cannot find out fault with him. That is real Vedic way. Otherwise, if he is taken as ordinary citizen, then he is... What is the meaning of his exalted post?</p>
<p>Indian man: (Hindi)</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: (Hindi) You cannot find out fault with him. As like in the court, if you find out some fault with the judge, you will be punished immediately—"Contempt of court. You cannot do that." It will be punished, because while he is on the seat of the judge, if somebody finds out fault, then his position will be lower.</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="MorningWalkNovember121975Bombay_1" class="quote" parent="1975_Conversations_and_Morning_Walks" book="Con" index="238" link="Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay" link_text="Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay">
<div class="heading">If the head of the estate is also interfered by police, that does not look well. So this judgment is very nice. Therefore in English constitution the first word is "The king can do no wrong." You cannot accuse king of doing wrong. Whatever he does, it is all right. Rāma-rajya should be there as far as possible.
</div>
<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay|Morning Walk -- November 12, 1975, Bombay]]: </span><div class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Dr. Patel: But material, all material, is made up of māyā.</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no. Nothing is made by māyā. māyā is made by God.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: And material is, nothing but the transformation of māyā, is it not?</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No. No. māyā means something false. Nobody makes anything. Everything is made by... Ahaṁ sarvasya prabhavaḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 10.8|BG 10.8]]). Kṛṣṇa is the creator of everything. māyā is also created by Kṛṣṇa. So just like government creates police department. But police department is made for that person who violates the laws of God. The police department is creation of government. Similarly, māyā's business is to capture, arrest the criminal who has gone against God, capture him. Mūḍha janmani janmani ([[Vanisource:BG 16.20|BG 16.20]]). Mam aprapyaiva. This is the arrangement. Nobody is independent. Everything. Therefore it is called sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. So māyā is also Brahman. māyā is also Brahman. Sarvaṁ khalv idaṁ brahma. Why māyā is different from God? It is creation of God. Mama māyā, Kṛṣṇa says. Mama māyā. So how māyā can be... The difference is police cannot arrest the president. Now it has been proved in the law. The president, the prime minister, they cannot be interfered by the police or law. That is good judgment. If the head of the estate is also interfered by police, that does not look well. So this judgment is very nice. Therefore in English constitution the first word is "The king can do no wrong." You cannot accuse king of doing wrong. Whatever he does, it is all right.</p>
<p>Dr. Patel: :That is when there was Rāma-rajya, sir. These modern fellows will talk all these things...</p>
<p>Prabhupāda: No, no, no. No, no. Rāma-rajya should be there as far as possible.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>

The King can do no wrong - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

MadhuGopaldas: Created page with ' {{terms|"the king can do no wrong"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|24Mar10}} {{last|24Mar10}} {{totals_by…'

MadhuGopaldas: Created page with '

{{terms|"the king can do no wrong"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|MadhuGopaldas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|24Mar10}} {{last|24Mar10}} {{totals_by…'