Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-20T14:52:19Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 20 May 2018
Line 125:		Line 125:
	<div class="heading">Cārvāka Muni says that there is no life, but what is the proof? But there are many proofs that there is next life. So who will accept Cārvāka Muni's theory? Nobody.		<div class="heading">Cārvāka Muni says that there is no life, but what is the proof? But there are many proofs that there is next life. So who will accept Cārvāka Muni's theory? Nobody.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture -- Seattle, October 9, 1968\|Lecture -- Seattle, October 9, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You have to accept knowledge from the authority. Therefore the Vedic system has rejected the Cārvāka Muni. He has no authority. He is authority himself. He says that there is no life, but what is the proof? But there are many proofs that there is next life. So who will accept Cārvāka Muni's theory? Nobody. No sane man will accept. And suppose if there is life. There are two philosophers: one says that there is no life, other says there is life. Now we have to study both, if there is life and if there is no life. But if there is life, the next answer to Cārvāka theory, if there is life, then if I'm working irresponsibly, then I am becoming victim to my next life. So there are... But we have to take from the authority. Just like the Bhagavad-gītā says that na jāyate na mriyate vā kadācin: "The soul is never born and never dies." Na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre: ([[Vanisource:BG 2.20\|BG 2.20]]) "Even after the annihilation of this body there is no destruction of the soul." And soul is migrating in different species of life. So we have to take Kṛṣṇa the authority, Veda-Vyāsa the authority. There are many such authorities. So there is next life. There is no doubt. The practical proof there is... And Kṛṣṇa has given many proof. I have spoken in this meeting many times.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Lecture -- Seattle, October 9, 1968\|Lecture -- Seattle, October 9, 1968]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">You have to accept knowledge from the authority. Therefore the Vedic system has rejected the Cārvāka Muni. He has no authority. He is authority himself. He says that there is no life, but what is the proof? But there are many proofs that there is next life. So who will accept Cārvāka Muni's theory? Nobody. No sane man will accept. And suppose if there is life. There are two philosophers: one says that there is no life, other says there is life. Now we have to study both, if there is life and if there is no life. But if there is life, the next answer to Cārvāka theory, if there is life, then if I'm working irresponsibly, then I am becoming victim to my next life. So there are... But we have to take from the authority. Just like the Bhagavad-gītā says that na jāyate na mriyate vā kadācin: "The soul is never born and never dies." Na hanyate hanyamāne śarīre: ([[Vanisource:BG 2.20 (1972)\|BG 2.20]]) "Even after the annihilation of this body there is no destruction of the soul." And soul is migrating in different species of life. So we have to take Kṛṣṇa the authority, Veda-Vyāsa the authority. There are many such authorities. So there is next life. There is no doubt. The practical proof there is... And Kṛṣṇa has given many proof. I have spoken in this meeting many times.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 131:		Line 131:
	<div class="heading">There are many, so many theories for avoiding God consciousness. But that's not very practical.		<div class="heading">There are many, so many theories for avoiding God consciousness. But that's not very practical.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Rotary Club Lecture -- Ahmedabad, December 8, 1972 'The Present Need of Human Society'\|Rotary Club Lecture -- Ahmedabad, December 8, 1972 'The Present Need of Human Society']]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So if you are going to challenge, "There is no existence of God," then you can do it. Why don't you do it? Why you are so much in scarcity of water? I do not think any scientist can very boldly answer that "Yes, we can do, and we can defy the existence of God, or the mercy of God." That is not possible. Raso 'ham apsu kaunteya prabhāsmi śaśi-sūryayoḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 7.8\|BG 7.8]]). Kṛṣṇa says that "I am the shining of the sun and the moon." Now, there, there are so many great scientists, and expert in chemical composition, making chemical composition. Why not make a small sun on the head of the Ahmedabad City so that you save so much expenditure of electric light? They will say, "Oh, the composition of the sun is like this, that"—so many theories. But why not prepare one? If you know the composition, make it, a sample sun, and see that it is shining. So they, there are many, so many theories for avoiding God consciousness. But that's not very practical.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Rotary Club Lecture -- Ahmedabad, December 8, 1972 'The Present Need of Human Society'\|Rotary Club Lecture -- Ahmedabad, December 8, 1972 'The Present Need of Human Society']]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So if you are going to challenge, "There is no existence of God," then you can do it. Why don't you do it? Why you are so much in scarcity of water? I do not think any scientist can very boldly answer that "Yes, we can do, and we can defy the existence of God, or the mercy of God." That is not possible. Raso 'ham apsu kaunteya prabhāsmi śaśi-sūryayoḥ ([[Vanisource:BG 7.8 (1972)\|BG 7.8]]). Kṛṣṇa says that "I am the shining of the sun and the moon." Now, there, there are so many great scientists, and expert in chemical composition, making chemical composition. Why not make a small sun on the head of the Ahmedabad City so that you save so much expenditure of electric light? They will say, "Oh, the composition of the sun is like this, that"—so many theories. But why not prepare one? If you know the composition, make it, a sample sun, and see that it is shining. So they, there are many, so many theories for avoiding God consciousness. But that's not very practical.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>
Line 137:		Line 137:
	<div class="heading">Suppose if I know some special cooking, then I know all the details how to do it. That is the origin. So that origin is Kṛṣṇa.		<div class="heading">Suppose if I know some special cooking, then I know all the details how to do it. That is the origin. So that origin is Kṛṣṇa.
	</div>		</div>
	<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Tenth Anniversary Address -- Washington, D.C., July 6, 1976\|Tenth Anniversary Address -- Washington, D.C., July 6, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So the next sūtra immediately says that Absolute Truth is that who is the source of everything. And what is that everything? Two things we find: animate and inanimate. Practical experience. Some of them are animate and some of them are inanimate. Two things. Now we can expand the varieties. That is another thing. But two things are there. So these two things, we see there is a controller above these two things, the animate and inanimate. So we have to inquire now whether the source of two things, animate and inanimate, what is the position? The position is explained in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, janmādy asya yato 'nvayād itarataś cārtheṣv abhijñaḥ ([[Vanisource:SB 1.1.1\|SB 1.1.1]]). The original source of everything is abhijñaḥ. How? Anvayād itarataś cārtheṣu. If I have created something, I know everything, all details, anvayād, directly or indirectly, I know. If I manufacture something... Suppose if I know some special cooking, then I know all the details how to do it. That is the origin. So that origin is Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa says, vedāhaṁ samatītāni: ([[Vanisource:BG 7.26\|BG 7.26]]) "I know everything—past, present and future." Mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate. Aham ādir hi devānām (Bg 10.2). According to creation theory... Not theory, fact.</p>		<span class="link">[[Vanisource:Tenth Anniversary Address -- Washington, D.C., July 6, 1976\|Tenth Anniversary Address -- Washington, D.C., July 6, 1976]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">So the next sūtra immediately says that Absolute Truth is that who is the source of everything. And what is that everything? Two things we find: animate and inanimate. Practical experience. Some of them are animate and some of them are inanimate. Two things. Now we can expand the varieties. That is another thing. But two things are there. So these two things, we see there is a controller above these two things, the animate and inanimate. So we have to inquire now whether the source of two things, animate and inanimate, what is the position? The position is explained in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, janmādy asya yato 'nvayād itarataś cārtheṣv abhijñaḥ ([[Vanisource:SB 1.1.1\|SB 1.1.1]]). The original source of everything is abhijñaḥ. How? Anvayād itarataś cārtheṣu. If I have created something, I know everything, all details, anvayād, directly or indirectly, I know. If I manufacture something... Suppose if I know some special cooking, then I know all the details how to do it. That is the origin. So that origin is Kṛṣṇa. Kṛṣṇa says, vedāhaṁ samatītāni: ([[Vanisource:BG 7.26 (1972)\|BG 7.26]]) "I know everything—past, present and future." Mattaḥ sarvaṁ pravartate. Aham ādir hi devānām (Bg 10.2). According to creation theory... Not theory, fact.</p>
	</div>		</div>
	</div>		</div>

Labangalatika: Created page with '

{{terms|"practical"|"theories"|"theory"}} {{notes|This page contains quotes which relate practical application or experience with various …'

2010-01-06T11:58:28Z

Created page with '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"practical"|"theories"|"theory"}} {{notes|This page contains quotes which relate practical application or experience with various …'

Show changes

Theory and practicality (Lectures) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Labangalatika: Created page with ' {{terms|"practical"|"theories"|"theory"}} {{notes|This page contains quotes which relate practical application or experience with various …'

Labangalatika: Created page with '

{{terms|"practical"|"theories"|"theory"}} {{notes|This page contains quotes which relate practical application or experience with various …'