Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

2018-05-21T02:45:58Z

Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 21 May 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{terms\|Vaisnava ~~philosophy~~"\|"Vaisnava philosophers"\|"Vaisnava ~~philosopher~~"\|"philosophy of Vaisnava "\|"philosophy of ~~vaisnavas~~"\|"philosophy of ~~vaisnavism~~"\|"philosophy of ~~the Vaisnavas~~"\|"vaisnava philosophies~~" \|"Vaisnava philosophic doctrine~~"}}		<div id="compilation">
			<div id="facts">
	~~{{goal\|80}}~~		{{terms\|"Vaisnava philosopher"\|"Vaisnava philosophers"\|"Vaisnava philosophic doctrine"\|"Vaisnava philosophy"\|"philosophy of Vaisnava"\|"philosophy of the Vaisnavas"\|"philosophy of vaisnavas"\|"philosophy of vaisnavism"\|"vaisnava philosophies"}}

	{{notes\|}}		{{notes\|}}
			{{compiler\|Visnu Murti\|Labangalatika}}
	{{compiler\|Visnu Murti}}		{{complete\|ALL}}

	{{complete\|}}

	{{first\|11Oct08}}		{{first\|11Oct08}}
			{{last\|12Jan10}}
	{{last\|~~11Oct08~~}}		{{totals_by_section\|BG=1\|SB=28\|CC=32\|OB=18\|Lec=0\|Con=0\|Let=0}}
			{{total\|79}}
	{{totals_by_section\|BG=1\|SB=28\|CC=0\|OB=0\|Lec=0\|Con=0\|Let=0}}

	{{total\|29}}

	{{toc right}}		{{toc right}}

	[[Category:Vaisnava Philosophy\|1]]		[[Category:Vaisnava Philosophy\|1]]
	[[Category:Compilations from Books]]		[[Category:Compilations from Books]]
	~~== Bhagavad-gita As It Is ==~~		</div>
			<div id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" class="section" sec_index="0" parent="compilation" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As It Is</h2>
	~~=== BG Preface and Introduction ===~~		</div>
			<div id="BG_Preface_and_Introduction" class="sub_section" sec_index="0" parent="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" text="BG Preface and Introduction"><h3>BG Preface and Introduction</h3>
	<span class="BG-statistics">'''[[Vanisource:BG Introduction\|BG Introduction]]:''' Some philosophers say that the manifestation of material nature is false, but according to the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā or according to the philosophy of the		</div>
			<div id="BGIntroduction_0" class="quote" parent="BG_Preface_and_Introduction" book="BG" index="3" link="BG Introduction" link_text="BG Introduction">
			<span class="link">[[Vanisource:BG (1972) Introduction\|BG Introduction]]: </span><div style="display: inline;" class="text"><p style="display: inline;">Some philosophers say that the manifestation of material nature is false, but according to the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā or according to the philosophy of the Vaiṣṇavas, this is not so.</p>
			</div>
			</div>
			<div id="Srimad-Bhagavatam" class="section" sec_index="1" parent="compilation" text="Srimad-Bhagavatam"><h2>Srimad-Bhagavatam</h2>
			</div>
			<div id="SB_Canto_3" class="sub_section" sec_index="3" parent="Srimad-Bhagavatam" text="SB Canto 3"><h3>SB Canto 3</h3>
			</div>
			<div id="SB32841_0" class="quote" parent="SB_Canto_3" book

Visnu Murti at 06:18, 11 October 2008

2008-10-11T06:18:23Z

New page

{{terms|Vaisnava philosophy"|"Vaisnava philosophers"|"Vaisnava philosopher"|"philosophy of Vaisnava "|"philosophy of vaisnavas"|"philosophy of vaisnavism"|"philosophy of the Vaisnavas"|"vaisnava philosophies" |"Vaisnava philosophic doctrine"}}

{{goal|80}}

{{notes|}}

{{compiler|Visnu Murti}}

{{complete|}}

{{first|11Oct08}}

{{last|11Oct08}}

{{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=28|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}}

{{total|29}}

{{toc right}}

[[Category:Vaisnava Philosophy|1]]
[[Category:Compilations from Books]]
== Bhagavad-gita As It Is ==

=== BG Preface and Introduction ===

'''[[Vanisource:BG Introduction|BG Introduction]]:''' Some philosophers say that the manifestation of material nature is false, but according to the philosophy of Bhagavad-gītā or according to the philosophy of the Vaiṣṇavas, this is not so.

== Srimad-Bhagavatam ==

=== SB Canto 3 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 3.28.41|SB 3.28.41, Purport]]:''' The four principles of the Vaiṣṇava philosophic doctrine are śuddha-advaita (purified oneness), dvaita-advaita (simultaneous oneness and difference), viśiṣṭa-advaita and dvaita. All four principles of Vaiṣṇava philosophy are based on the thesis of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam explained in these two verses.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 3.28.41|SB 3.28.41, Purport]]:''' The four principles of the Vaiṣṇava philosophic doctrine are śuddha-advaita (purified oneness), dvaita-advaita (simultaneous oneness and difference), viśiṣṭa-advaita and dvaita. All four principles of Vaiṣṇava philosophy are based on the thesis of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam explained in these two verses.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 3.29.18|SB 3.29.18, Purport]]:''' Lord Caitanya advised, asat-saṅga-tyāga: one should avoid persons who are attached to the temporary. Asat is one who is too materially attached, who is not a devotee of the Lord and who is too attached to women or enjoyable material things. Such a person, according to Vaiṣṇava philosophy, is a persona non grata.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 3.32.11|SB 3.32.11, Purport]]:''' The oneness of the Māyāvādī philosophers and the oneness of Vaiṣṇava philosophers are different. The Māyāvādī and Vaiṣṇava philosophers both want to merge into the Supreme, but the Vaiṣṇavas do not lose their identities. They want to keep the identity of lover, parent, friend or servant.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 3.32.28|SB 3.32.28, Purport]]:''' Māyāvādī philosophers declare this diversity to be false. But Vaiṣṇava philosophers do not accept the different manifestations as false; they accept them as nondifferent from the Supreme Personality of Godhead because they are a display of His diverse energies.
The philosophy that the Absolute is true and this creation is false (brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā) is not accepted by Vaiṣṇava philosophers.

=== SB Canto 4 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.8.69|SB 4.8.69, Purport]]:''' Sometimes the spiritual master is addressed as Prabhupāda. Prabhu means "the Supreme Personality of Godhead," and pāda means "post." According to Vaiṣṇava philosophy, the spiritual master occupies the post of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, or in other words he is the bona fide representative of the Supreme Lord.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.9.29|SB 4.9.29, Purport]]:''' There are many instances of such falldowns, even for great sannyāsīs in the Māyāvāda school.
Therefore Vaiṣṇava philosophers do not accept sāyujya-mukti to be within the category of mukti. According to them, mukti means transferal to the loving service of the Lord from one's position of serving māyā. Lord Caitanya also says in this connection that the constitutional position of a living entity is to render service to the Lord. That is real mukti.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.9.31|SB 4.9.31, Purport]]:''' The Vaiṣṇava philosophy in the process of Kṛṣṇa consciousness prohibits the devotee from all kinds of material aspirations. A Vaiṣṇava devotee should always be anyābhilāṣitā-śūnya, free from all material aspirations for the results of fruitive activities or empiric philosophical speculation.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.11.15|SB 4.11.15, Purport]]:''' When Svāyambhuva Manu saw that Dhruva Mahārāja understood the philosophy of Vaiṣṇavism and yet was still dissatisfied because of his brother's death, he gave him an explanation of how this material body is created by the five elements of material nature.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.22.17|SB 4.22.17, Purport]]:''' According to the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, a devotee is as good as Nārāyaṇa not by becoming Nārāyaṇa but by becoming the most confidential servant of Nārāyaṇa. Such great personalities act as spiritual masters for the benefit of the people in general, and as such, a spiritual master who is preaching the glories of Nārāyaṇa should be accepted as Nārāyaṇa and be given all respects due Him.
SB 4.22.17

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.22.24|SB 4.22.24, Purport]]:''' Kṛṣṇa claims in Bhagavad-gītā to be the father of all species of living entities; consequently the devotee of Kṛṣṇa is always a friend of all. This is called ahiṁsā. Such nonviolence can be practiced only when we follow in the footsteps of great ācāryas. Therefore, according to our Vaiṣṇava philosophy, we have to follow the great ācāryas of the four sampradāyas, or disciplic successions.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.22.38|SB 4.22.38, Purport]]:''' The Lord is always transcendental to the material manifestation, even though it appears that the Lord and the material manifestation are one and the same. According to the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, He is one and different simultaneously. The material energy is a manifestation of His external potency, and since the potency is identical with the potent, it appears that the Lord and individual soul are one; but actually the individual soul is under the influence of material energy, and the Lord is always transcendental to it.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.24.18|SB 4.24.18, Purport]]:''' The current Brahma-sampradāya is known as the Madhva-Gauḍīya-sampradāya. Even though Lord Śiva appeared to preach Māyāvāda philosophy, at the end of his pastime in the form of Śaṅkarācārya, he preached the Vaiṣṇava philosophy: bhaja govindaṁ bhaja govindaṁ bhaja govindaṁ mūḍha-mate. He stressed worshiping Lord Kṛṣṇa, or Govinda, three times in this verse and especially warned his followers that they could not possibly achieve deliverance, or mukti, simply by word jugglery and grammatical puzzles. If one is actually serious to attain mukti, he must worship Lord Kṛṣṇa. That is Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya's last instruction.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.24.61|SB 4.24.61, Purport]]:''' The Supreme Lord is always independent, but because the living entities are not independent—due to their false idea of becoming independently happy—the material energy is troublesome. Consequently the material energy creates differentiation. Because the Māyāvādī philosophers cannot understand this, they want to be relieved from the material energy. However, because a Vaiṣṇava philosopher is in full knowledge of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he finds no disturbance even in the material energy. This is because he knows how to utilize the material energy for the service of the Lord.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.28.40|SB 4.28.40, Purport]]:''' The followers of Buddha do not recognize that there is anything beyond the body; the followers of Śaṅkara conclude that there is no separate existence of the Paramātmā, the Supersoul. The Śaṅkarites believe that the individual soul is identical with the Paramātmā in the ultimate analysis. But the Vaiṣṇava philosopher, who is perfect in knowledge, knows that the body is made of the external energy and that the Supersoul, the Paramātmā, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is sitting with the individual soul and is distinct from him.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 4.28.63|SB 4.28.63, Purport]]:''' Vaiṣṇava philosophers conclude that the living entity is simply a small sample of the original Supreme Personality of Godhead. Qualitatively, God and the living entities are one, but quantitatively the living entities are small fragments of the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

=== SB Canto 5 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 5.10.21|SB 5.10.21, Purport]]:''' This is a discussion on impersonal Māyāvāda philosophy and the practical philosophy of Vaiṣṇavas. The Māyāvāda philosophy explains this phenomenal world to be false, but Vaiṣṇava philosophers do not agree. They know that the phenomenal world is a temporary manifestation, but it is not false. A dream that we see at night is certainly false, but a horrible dream certainly affects the person seeing it. The soul's fatigue is not factual, but as long as one is immersed in the illusory bodily conception, one is affected by such false dreams.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 5.15.4|SB 5.15.4, Purport]]:''' A real preacher cannot be bogus; he must first of all realize Lord Viṣṇu as He is. As confirmed in Bhagavad-gītā (4.34), upadekṣyanti te jñānaṁ jñāninas tattva-darśinaḥ: "one who has seen the truth can impart knowledge." The word tattva-darśī refers to one who has perfectly realized the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Such a person can become a guru and propound Vaiṣṇava philosophy all over the world. The paragon of bona fide preachers and guru is King Pratīha.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 5.24.25|SB 5.24.25, Purport]]:''' Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu has instructed that an unalloyed devotee should consider himself a servant of the servant of the servant of the Supreme Lord (gopī-bhartuḥ pāda-kamalayor dāsa-dāsānudāsaḥ [Cc. Madhya 13.80]). In Vaiṣṇava philosophy, one should not even become a direct servant. Prahlāda Mahārāja was offered all the blessings of an opulent position in the material world and even the liberation of merging into Brahman, but he refused all this. He simply wanted to engage in the service of the servant of the servant of the Lord.

=== SB Canto 6 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 6.15.5|SB 6.15.5, Purport]]:''' The Māyāvādī philosophers say, brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā: Brahman, the living being, is factual, but his present bodily situation is false. According to the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, however, the present situation is not false but temporary. It is like a dream. A dream does not exist before one falls asleep, nor does it continue after one awakens. The period for dreaming exists only between these two, and therefore it is false in the sense that it is impermanent.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 7.5.10|SB 7.5.10, Purport]]:''' Prahlāda Mahārāja's teachers were astonished that a small boy could speak such exalted Vaiṣṇava philosophy. Therefore they inquired about the Vaiṣṇavas who stealthily taught it to him, in order that these Vaiṣṇavas might be arrested and killed in the presence of Prahlāda's father, Hiraṇyakaśipu.

=== SB Canto 7 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 7.5.11|SB 7.5.11, Purport]]:''' As long as one adheres to the philosophy of duality, thinking one person a friend and another an enemy, he should be understood to be in the clutches of māyā. The Māyāvādī philosopher who thinks that all living entities are God and are therefore one is also mistaken. No one is equal to God. The servant cannot be equal to the master. According to the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, the master is one, and the servants are also one, but the distinction between the master and servant must continue even in the liberated stage. In the conditioned stage we think that some living beings are our friends whereas others are enemies, and thus we are in duality. In the liberated stage, however, the conception is that God is the master and that all living entities, being servants of God, are one.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 7.6.20-23|SB 7.6.20-23, Purport]]:''' The Absolute, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is most intimately related to all living entities. Therefore if one understands the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, which explains how He is present everywhere and how He acts everywhere, to worship the Supreme Lord or to realize Him is not at all difficult. Realization of the Lord, however, is possible only in the association of devotees.

'''[[Vanisource:SB 7.10.65-66|SB 7.10.65-66, Purport]]:''' As stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (12.13.16): vaiṣṇavānāṁ yathā śambhuḥ: Lord Śiva is the best of the Vaiṣṇavas, the devotees of Lord Kṛṣṇa. Indeed, he is one of the mahājanas, the twelve authorities on Vaiṣṇava philosophy (svayambhūr nāradaḥ śambhuḥ kumāraḥ kapilo manuḥ, etc. [SB 6.3.20]). Lord Kṛṣṇa is always prepared to help all the mahājanas and devotees in every respect (kaunteya pratijānīhi na me bhaktaḥ praṇaśyati [Bg. 9.31]).

'''[[Vanisource:SB 7.13.27|SB 7.13.27, Purport]]:''' The Māyāvādī philosophers, therefore, adhering to the slogan brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā, want to refrain from false, materialistic activities. They want to stop all activities and merge in the Supreme Brahman. According to the Vaiṣṇava philosophy, however, if one simply ceases from materialistic activity one cannot remain inactive for very long, and therefore everyone should engage himself in spiritual activities, which will solve the problem of suffering in this material world.

=== SB Canto 8 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 8.12.8|SB 8.12.8, Purport]]:''' Śrīmad Vīrarāghava Ācārya, in his Bhāgavata-candra-candrikā, describes the Vaiṣṇava philosophy as follows. The cosmic manifestation is described as sat and asat, as cit and acit. Matter is acit, and the living force is cit, but their origin is the Supreme Personality of Godhead, in whom there is no difference between matter and spirit. According to this conception, the cosmic manifestation, consisting of both matter and spirit, is not different from the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Idaṁ hi viśvaṁ bhagavān ivetaraḥ: "This cosmic manifestation is also the Supreme Personality of Godhead, although it appears different from Him."

'''[[Vanisource:SB 8.19.39|SB 8.19.39, Purport]]:''' This śloka explains that in relation to the material body even the factual truth cannot exist without a touch of untruth. The Māyāvādīs say, brahma satyaṁ jagan mithyā: "The spirit soul is truth, and the external energy is untruth." The Vaiṣṇava philosophers, however, do not agree with the Māyāvāda philosophy. Even if for the sake of argument the material world is accepted as untruth, the living entity entangled in the illusory energy cannot come out of it without the help of the body. Without the help of the body, one cannot follow a system of religion, nor can one speculate on philosophical perfection. Therefore, the flower and fruit (puṣpa-phalam) have to be obtained as a result of the body. Without the help of the body, that fruit cannot be gained. The Vaiṣṇava philosophy therefore recommends yukta-vairāgya. It is not that all attention should be diverted for the maintenance of the body, but at the same time one's bodily maintenance should not be neglected. As long as the body exists one can thoroughly study the Vedic instructions, and thus at the end of life one can achieve perfection.

=== SB Canto 10.1 to 10.13 ===

'''[[Vanisource:SB 10.13.39|SB 10.13.39, Purport]]:''' We should be careful to note that although the supreme source is one, the emanations from this source should be separately regarded as inferior and superior. The difference between the Māyāvāda and Vaiṣṇava philosophies is that the Vaiṣṇava philosophy recognizes this fact. Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu's philosophy, therefore, is called acintya-bhedābheda—simultaneous oneness and difference. For example, fire and heat cannot be separated, for where there is fire there is heat and where there is heat there is fire. Nonetheless, although we cannot touch fire, heat we can tolerate. Therefore, although they are one, they are different.

Vaisnava philosophy (Books) - Revision history

Vanibot: Vanibot #0019: LinkReviser - Revised links and redirected them to the de facto address when redirect exists

Visnu Murti at 06:18, 11 October 2008