Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Chapter 08 Purports - Ramacandra Puri Criticizes the Lord: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila 20 Chapters Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Purports ..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila 20 Chapters]] | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila 20 Chapters]] | ||
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters]] | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters|U]] | ||
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Purports]] | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Purports]] | ||
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila - Purports for all | [[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila - Purports for all 20 Chapters]] | ||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | [[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:12, 13 May 2021
Pages in category "Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Antya-lila Chapter 08 Purports - Ramacandra Puri Criticizes the Lord"
The following 38 pages are in this category, out of 38 total.
A
- A Brahman realized person is always happy. Na socati na kanksati: he neither laments nor aspires for anything
- A person without devotional service who simply wants to know things (kevala-bodha-labdhaye) gains only dry speculative knowledge but no spiritual profit - SB 10.14.4
- According to smrti-sastra, a sannyasi does not offer obeisances or blessings to anyone
- Although Ramacandra Puri was naturally very envious and although he was against the principles of Vaisnavism - or, in other words, against the principles of the Supreme PG and His devotees - common people nevertheless addressed him as Gosvami or Gosani
- Ants are generally found everywhere, but when Ramacandra Puri saw ants crawling in the abode of the Lord, he took it for granted that they must have been there because Caitanya Mahaprabhu had been eating sweetmeats. He thus discovered imaginary faults
B
- Because Paramananda Puri was a sannyasi, he was called Puri Gosvami. By careful scrutiny, therefore, one will find that gosvami is not the title for a certain caste; rather, it is properly the title for a person in the renounced order
- Because Ramacandra Puri was a disciple of Madhavendra Puri, both Paramananda Puri and Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu offered him respectful obeisances
E
- Even if one is liberated in this life, he becomes addicted to material desires because of offenses to the Supreme Personality of Godhead
- Even liberated souls sometimes fall down to material desires, but those who fully engage in devotional service to the Supreme Personality of Godhead are not affected by such desires. These are references from authoritative revealed scriptures
- Even though one is liberated in this life, if one offends the Supreme Personality of Godhead he falls down in the midst of material desires, of which dry speculation about spiritual realization is one
H
I
- If one becomes an offender to his spiritual master or the Supreme Personality of Godhead, he falls down to the material platform to merely speculate
- Impersonalist Mayavadis, who have no relationship with Krsna, who cannot take to devotional service, and who simply engage in material arguments to understand Brahman, regard devotional service to Krsna as karma-kanda, or fruitive activities
- In the modern age the title gosvami is used by a caste of grhasthas, but formerly it was not. Rupa Gosvami and Sanatana Gosvami, for example, were called gosvami because they were in the renounced order
- It is said, sannyasi nirasir nirnamaskriyah: a sannyasi should not offer anyone blessings or obeisances
- It is the duty of a sannyasi to remember Krsna
R
- Ramacandra Puri could find no faults in the character of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, for He is situated in a transcendental position as the Supreme Personality of Godhead
- Ramacandra Puri could not understand that his spiritual master, Madhavendra Puri, was feeling transcendental separation. His lamentation was not material. Rather, it proceeded from the highest stage of ecstatic love of Krsna
- Ramacandra Puri was not sufficiently expert to understand the feelings of Madhavendra Puri, but nevertheless he thought himself very advanced
- Regarding Madhavendra Puri’s expressions as ordinary material lamentation, he (Ramacandra Puri) advised him to remember Brahman because he was latently an impersonalist
S
- Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu offered obeisances to Ramacandra Puri in consideration of his being a disciple of Srila Madhavendra Puri, the spiritual master of His own spiritual master, Isvara Puri
- Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura has explained in his Anubhasya that the word nirbandha indicates that Ramacandra Puri had a steady desire to criticize others
T
- The above-mentioned verse (of CC Antya 8.79) from Srimad-Bhagavatam gives two injunctions. The first, called purva-vidhi, is that one should not praise, and the second, para-vidhi, is that one should not criticize
- The actual injunction is that one may praise but should not criticize
- The injunction against praise is less important than the injunction against blasphemy
- The word vasana (“material desires”) refers to dry speculative knowledge. Such speculative knowledge is only material
- They (Impersonalist Mayavadis) think that devotional service is maya and that Krsna or Visnu is also maya. Therefore they are called Mayavadis. Such a mentality awakens in a person who is an offender to Krsna and His devotees
- This is a quotation (of CC Antya 8.67-68) from the Bhagavad-gita - BG 6.16-17
- This is a verse (of CC Antya 8.80) from the nyaya literatures
- This is called slesokti, or a statement having two meanings
- This verse (of CC Antya 8.78) from Srimad-Bhagavatam (SB 11.28.1) was spoken by Lord Krsna to Uddhava
W
- When a Vaisnava sannyasi meets another Vaisnava sannyasi, they both remember Krsna. Even Mayavadi sannyasis generally remember Narayana, who is also Krsna, by saying om namo bhagavate narayanaya or namo narayanaya
- When he (Madhavendra Puri) was crying in separation, “I could not achieve Krsna! I could not reach Mathura!” this was not ordinary material lamentation