Jump to content

       

Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia

Vaniquotes - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge

We should not falsely claim that, "I am as great as the Supreme God." No. We should understand this, animanam. I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire: Difference between revisions

From Vaniquotes
Soham (talk | contribs)
Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"we should not falsely claim that, "I am as great as the Supreme God." No. We should understand this, aṇimānam. Svayaṁ-jyo . . . etad jyotiḥ, I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2023-10-18T18:09:39.000Z}} {{last|2023-10-18T18:09:39.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|L..."
 
Navakishora Mukunda (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="compilation">
<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"we should not falsely claim that, "I am as great as the Supreme God." No. We should understand this, aṇimānam. Svayaṁ-jyo . . . etad jyotiḥ, I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire"}}
{{terms|"we should not falsely claim that," | "I am as great as the Supreme God." | "No. We should understand this, aṇimānam. Svayaṁ-jyo . . . etad jyotiḥ, I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire"}}
{{notes|}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
Line 15: Line 15:
[[Category:God's Greatness]]
[[Category:God's Greatness]]
[[Category:Supreme God]]
[[Category:Supreme God]]
[[Category:Should Understand]]
[[Category:One Should Understand]]
[[Category:Effulgence]]
[[Category:Effulgence]]
[[Category:Just Like]]
[[Category:Just Like]]

Latest revision as of 11:14, 8 December 2025

Expressions researched:
"we should not falsely claim that," |"I am as great as the Supreme God." |"No. We should understand this, aṇimānam. Svayaṁ-jyo . . . etad jyotiḥ, I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire"

Lectures

Srimad-Bhagavatam Lectures

We should not falsely claim that, "I am as great as the Supreme God." No. We should understand this, aṇimānam. Svayaṁ-jyo . . . etad jyotiḥ, I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire. The original fire—phat! phat!—there are some sparks. You have got experience. The spark is also jyoti. If a spark falls on your cloth, it will immediately burn. The burning capacity is there. But it is not as good as the original fire. Svayaṁ-jyotiḥ. Here it is said, nirantaram. So nirantaram means there is, so far jyoti is concerned, there is no difference, but the small, very small. Aṇimānam akhaṇḍitam. This is self-realization. Don't falsely claim that "Because I am qualitatively one with God, therefore I am God." No. You may be god. God means controller. But you are not the Supreme God.

We should not falsely claim that, "I am as great as the Supreme God." No. We should understand this, aṇimānam. Svayaṁ-jyo . . . etad jyotiḥ, I am as effulgent. Just like spark. Spark is jyoti, but not as brilliant, effulgent, as the original fire. The original fire—phat! phat!—there are some sparks. You have got experience. The spark is also jyoti. If a spark falls on your cloth, it will immediately burn. The burning capacity is there. But it is not as good as the original fire. Svayaṁ-jyotiḥ. Here it is said, nirantaram. So nirantaram means there is, so far jyoti is concerned, there is no difference, but the small, very small. Aṇimānam akhaṇḍitam. This is self-realization. Don't falsely claim that "Because I am qualitatively one with God, therefore I am God." No. You may be god. God means controller. But you are not the Supreme God. The Supreme God is Kṛṣṇa. Īśvaraḥ paramaḥ. Parama means Supreme. We are īśvara; we may be īśvara. I may be īśvara for few persons, another may be for a big nation, another may be for the . . . you can go on increasing. But you cannot reach the, I mean to say, position of God. That is aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ.

Therefore śāstra says, ye 'nye 'ravindākṣa vimukta-māninas tvayy asta-bhāvād aviśuddha-buddhayaḥ (SB 10.2.32). One who has advanced very much in spiritual knowledge, but he is thinking himself, "Now I have become liberated . . ." Sometimes they claim, "I have become Nārāyaṇa." Therefore Māyāvādīs, they address one another, "Namo nārāyaṇāya," "Everyone has become Nārāyaṇa." So how everyone can become Nārāyaṇa? So many Nārāyaṇas? No. Nārāyaṇa is one. God is one, Nārāyaṇa. Therefore śāstra warns:

yas tu nārāyaṇaṁ devaṁ
brahma-rudrādi-daivataiḥ
samatvenaiva vīkṣeta
sa pāṣaṇḍī bhaved dhruvam
(CC Madhya 18.116)

He's pāṣaṇḍī. If one compares Nārāyaṇa with other demigods . . .

Now, unfortunately, it has come to so downtrodden position, the intelligence, that they are talking of "daridra-nārāyaṇa." What is this? This is farce. Nārāyaṇa is the exalted Supreme Personality of Godhead. Even Śaṅkarācārya, he says, nārāyaṇaḥ paraḥ avyaktāt: "Nārāyaṇa is beyond this universe." Paraḥ avyaktāt. Avyaktāt anya-sambhavaḥ. And the whole universe is product of this avyakta. So we should not compare Nārāyaṇa with anyone else, what to speak of daridra. That is a foolishness. Nārāyaṇa is Lakṣmī-pati, the husband, the controller of the goddess of fortune, and how He can be daridra? This is misunderstanding. Therefore śāstra warns: