Jump to content

       

Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia

Vaniquotes - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge

Inform my daughter Sathi to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls down, it is the wife's duty to relinquish the relationship: Difference between revisions

From Vaniquotes
HanumanIC (talk | contribs)
Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Inform my daughter Ṣāṭhī to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls..."
 
ManiGopal (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 19: Line 19:
[[Category:Fall Down]]
[[Category:Fall Down]]
[[Category:When]]
[[Category:When]]
[[Category:It Is]]
[[Category:Duty of a Wife]]
[[Category:Wife]]
[[Category:Duty]]
[[Category:Relinquish]]
[[Category:Relinquish]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Madhya-lila Chapter 15 - The Lord Accepts Prasadam at the House of Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Madhya-lila Chapter 15 - The Lord Accepts Prasadam at the House of Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta - 62 Chapters]]
[[Category:Sri Caitanya-caritamrta, Madhya-lila 25 Chapters]]
</div>
</div>
<div id="section">
<div id="section">
Line 33: Line 33:
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
<div class="quote_heading">
"Inform my daughter Ṣāṭhī to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls down, it is the wife’s duty to relinquish the relationship.".
"Inform my daughter Ṣāṭhī to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls down, it is the wife’s duty to relinquish the relationship."
</div>
</div>


Line 45: Line 45:
Śrīla Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya considered that if Amogha were killed, the killer would suffer sinful reactions for killing the body of a brāhmaṇa. For the same reason, it would have been undesirable for the Bhaṭṭācārya to commit suicide because he also was a brāhmaṇa. Since neither course could be accepted, the Bhaṭṭācārya decided to give up his relationship with Amogha and never see his face.
Śrīla Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya considered that if Amogha were killed, the killer would suffer sinful reactions for killing the body of a brāhmaṇa. For the same reason, it would have been undesirable for the Bhaṭṭācārya to commit suicide because he also was a brāhmaṇa. Since neither course could be accepted, the Bhaṭṭācārya decided to give up his relationship with Amogha and never see his face.


As far as killing the body of a brāhmaṇa is concerned, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[Vanisource:SB 1.7.53|SB 1.7.53]]) gives the following injunction concerning a brahma-bandhu, a person born of a brāhmaṇa father but devoid of brahminical qualities:
As far as killing the body of a brāhmaṇa is concerned, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam ([[Vanisource:SB 1.7.53-54|SB 1.7.53]]) gives the following injunction concerning a brahma-bandhu, a person born of a brāhmaṇa father but devoid of brahminical qualities:


<div class="quote_verse">
<div class="quote_verse">
:śrī-bhagavān uvāca</dd><dd>brahma-bandhur na hantavya</dd><dd>ātatāyī vadhār-haṇaḥ
:śrī-bhagavān uvāca  
:brahma-bandhur na hantavya  
:ātatāyī vadhār-haṇaḥ
</div>
</div>


Line 56: Line 58:


<div class="quote_verse">
<div class="quote_verse">
:ātatāyinam āyāntam api vedānta-pāragam</dd><dd>jighāṁ santaṁ jighāṁsīyān na tena brahma-hā bhavet
:ātatāyinam āyāntam api vedānta-pāragam  
:jighāṁ santaṁ jighāṁsīyān na tena brahma-hā bhavet
</div>
</div>


Line 64: Line 67:


<div class="quote_verse">
<div class="quote_verse">
:vapanaṁ draviṇādānaṁ sthānān niryāpaṇaṁ tathā</dd><dd>eṣa hi brahma-bandhūnāṁ vadho nānyo ’sti daihikaḥ
:vapanaṁ draviṇādānaṁ sthānān niryāpaṇaṁ tathā  
:eṣa hi brahma-bandhūnāṁ vadho nānyo ’sti daihikaḥ
</div>
</div>



Latest revision as of 13:56, 1 May 2022

Expressions researched:
"Inform my daughter Ṣāṭhī to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls down, it is the wife’s duty to relinquish the relationship"

Sri Caitanya-caritamrta

CC Madhya-lila

"Inform my daughter Ṣāṭhī to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls down, it is the wife’s duty to relinquish the relationship."

"Inform my daughter Ṣāṭhī to abandon her relationship with her husband because he has fallen down. When the husband falls down, it is the wife’s duty to relinquish the relationship."

Śrīla Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya considered that if Amogha were killed, the killer would suffer sinful reactions for killing the body of a brāhmaṇa. For the same reason, it would have been undesirable for the Bhaṭṭācārya to commit suicide because he also was a brāhmaṇa. Since neither course could be accepted, the Bhaṭṭācārya decided to give up his relationship with Amogha and never see his face.

As far as killing the body of a brāhmaṇa is concerned, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (SB 1.7.53) gives the following injunction concerning a brahma-bandhu, a person born of a brāhmaṇa father but devoid of brahminical qualities:

śrī-bhagavān uvāca
brahma-bandhur na hantavya
ātatāyī vadhār-haṇaḥ

“The Personality of Godhead Śrī Kṛṣṇa said, ‘A brahma-bandhu is not to be killed, but if he is an aggressor, he must be killed.’”

Quoting from the smṛti, Śrīla Śrīdhara Svāmī comments on this quotation from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam:

ātatāyinam āyāntam api vedānta-pāragam
jighāṁ santaṁ jighāṁsīyān na tena brahma-hā bhavet

“‘An aggressor intent on killing may be a very learned scholar of Vedānta, yet he should be killed because of his envy in killing others. In such a case, it is not sinful to kill a brāhmaṇa.’”

It is also stated in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (SB 1.7.57):

vapanaṁ draviṇādānaṁ sthānān niryāpaṇaṁ tathā
eṣa hi brahma-bandhūnāṁ vadho nānyo ’sti daihikaḥ

“Cutting the hair from his head, depriving him of his wealth and driving him from his residence are the prescribed punishments for a brahma-bandhu. There is no injunction for killing the body.”

As far as Ṣāṭhī, the daughter of Sārvabhauma Bhaṭṭācārya, was concerned, she was advised to give up her relationship with her husband. Concerning this, Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam (SB 5.5.18) states, na patiś ca sa syān na mocayed yaḥ samupeta-mṛtyum: “One cannot be a husband if he cannot liberate his dependents from inevitable death.” If a person is not in Kṛṣṇa consciousness and is bereft of spiritual power, he cannot protect his wife from the path of repeated birth and death. Consequently such a person cannot be accepted as a husband. A wife should dedicate her life and everything to Kṛṣṇa for further advancement in Kṛṣṇa consciousness. If her husband abandons Kṛṣṇa consciousness and she gives up her connection with him, she follows in the footsteps of the dvija-patnīs, the wives of the brāhmaṇas who were engaged in performing sacrifices. The wife is not to be condemned for cutting off such a relationship.