Category:Voidism: Difference between revisions
Created page with "Category:Void Category:This Ism or That Ism Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Theme Analysis''' | |||
Śrīla Prabhupāda explains that voidism (śūnyavāda) and impersonalism are born out of extreme material frustration. When conditioned souls are overwhelmed by the miseries and complexities of the material world, they desperately attempt to negate their own existence, concluding that making everything "zero" is the ultimate relief. However, because the living entity is an eternal part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, existing in a state of absolute void is constitutionally impossible. Artificially suppressing the soul's natural desire for active, blissful engagement only leads to a temporary, imaginative state, followed inevitably by a falldown into material activities. The pure Vaiṣṇava philosophy completely defeats voidism by establishing that true relief is found not in negating existence, but in reviving our eternal, loving relationship with the Supreme Person, Śrī Kṛṣṇa. | |||
* '''Born from Material Disgust:''' The philosophy of voidism is not a sign of spiritual advancement; it is a desperate, artificial reaction to the unbearable miseries of materialistic life. | |||
* '''The Futility of Negation:''' Attempting to cure material suffering by becoming "zero" is compared to cutting off one's head to cure a headache. It destroys the opportunity for real spiritual life. | |||
* '''The Danger of Voidist Speculation:''' Philosophical speculation that concludes in voidism is highly dangerous because it kills the dormant aptitude for pure devotional service within the heart. | |||
* '''Real Deliverance Through Bhakti:''' The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is specifically designed to rescue humanity from the atheistic voidist and impersonalist philosophies by presenting the Absolute Truth as a Supreme Person. | |||
* Explore the synthesized essence of this category in this Vanipedia article: [[Vanipedia:Voidism - The Illusion of Becoming Zero|Voidism - The Illusion of Becoming Zero.]] | |||
---- | |||
[[Category:Categories - First Stage Theme Analysis Pending Proofreading|A]] | |||
[[Category:Void]] | [[Category:Void]] | ||
[[Category:This Ism or That Ism]] | [[Category:This Ism or That Ism]] | ||
[[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | [[Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes]] | ||
Revision as of 17:51, 5 April 2026
Theme Analysis
Śrīla Prabhupāda explains that voidism (śūnyavāda) and impersonalism are born out of extreme material frustration. When conditioned souls are overwhelmed by the miseries and complexities of the material world, they desperately attempt to negate their own existence, concluding that making everything "zero" is the ultimate relief. However, because the living entity is an eternal part and parcel of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, existing in a state of absolute void is constitutionally impossible. Artificially suppressing the soul's natural desire for active, blissful engagement only leads to a temporary, imaginative state, followed inevitably by a falldown into material activities. The pure Vaiṣṇava philosophy completely defeats voidism by establishing that true relief is found not in negating existence, but in reviving our eternal, loving relationship with the Supreme Person, Śrī Kṛṣṇa.
- Born from Material Disgust: The philosophy of voidism is not a sign of spiritual advancement; it is a desperate, artificial reaction to the unbearable miseries of materialistic life.
- The Futility of Negation: Attempting to cure material suffering by becoming "zero" is compared to cutting off one's head to cure a headache. It destroys the opportunity for real spiritual life.
- The Danger of Voidist Speculation: Philosophical speculation that concludes in voidism is highly dangerous because it kills the dormant aptitude for pure devotional service within the heart.
- Real Deliverance Through Bhakti: The Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement is specifically designed to rescue humanity from the atheistic voidist and impersonalist philosophies by presenting the Absolute Truth as a Supreme Person.
- Explore the synthesized essence of this category in this Vanipedia article: Voidism - The Illusion of Becoming Zero.
Subcategories
This category has only the following subcategory.
Pages in category "Voidism"
The following 77 pages are in this category, out of 77 total.
1
2
A
- A devotee does not want even salvation. Why Lord Caitanya says: "birth after birth"? The salvationists, they want to stop; the voidists, they want to stop this material way of life
- According to the Vedic version, before the creation this world had no existence, and after dissolution the world will no longer be manifested. Voidists also take advantage of this Vedic version and conclude that the cause of this material world is void
- All of them (voidists and impersonalists) again fall down because they neglect the lotus feet of the Lord
- Any desire except for the service of the Lord is called material desire. And philosophical speculation refers to the sort of speculation which ultimately arrives at a conclusion of voidism or impersonalism
- As far as jnanis are concerned, generally they fall down without taking shelter of the lotus feet of the Lord. The impersonalists or the voidists can simply avoid the positive material association
- As long as a philosopher, salvationist or voidist has some desire to be supreme, to be everything, or to deny the existence of God, the cause remains, and there is no question of his liberation
- As stated in BG (12.5), kleso 'dhikataras tesam avyaktasakta-cetasam. Persons who do not ultimately accept the SPG and take to devotional service, but who instead are attached to impersonalism and voidism, must undergo great labor to achieve their goals
- Aside from common men, even men who are elevated in terms of spiritual understanding are at the utmost engaged in the service of the virat-rupa, or, unable to understand the ultimate form of the Lord, they worship voidism by meditation
- Aside from devotees, there are many others, nondevotees, known as karmis, jnanis or yogis, philanthropists, altruists, politicians, impersonalists and voidists
F
G
- Generally people are of the opinion that we are all here accidentally and that as soon as these bodies are finished all our dramatic activities will be finished and we will become zero. Such scientists and philosophers are impersonalists and voidists
- Generally we conceive impersonalism, voidism, voidism, compared with the sky. Sky is called zero, void, but sky has also a form. We see daily, a big round form. So there cannot be anything without form. That is not possible
I
- I have talked with many big, big professors. They are under the impression: atheism, voidism, that after death there is nothing; everything is void, finished. Atheism
- If one gets something superior, he naturally gives up all inferior things. We want enjoyment, but impersonalism and voidism have created such an atmosphere that we have become addicted to material enjoyment
- If the conclusion of philosophical speculation is voidism or impersonalism, that is not bhakti
- Impersonalism and voidism kills the natural aptitude of devotion which is lying dormant in everyone's heart
- Impersonalists and the voidists, they are of the same group, denying the existence of God
- In desperate condition sometimes the philosophy of voidism, impersonalism is followed. To make the things zero
- In desperate condition sometimes the philosophy of voidism, impersonalism is followed. To make the things zero. Because this life is so much troublesome, sometimes even one commits suicide to get out of this
- In the Padma Purana this Buddhist theory, voidism, and the Sankara's theory, impersonalism, they are taken as one and the same. Pracchannam bauddham ucyate. Pracchannam bauddham
- It is advised here (in SB 3.28.23) that the yogi always keep this picture in his heart. The devotee always thinks of this relationship between Laksmi and Narayana; therefore he does not meditate on the mental plane as impersonalists and voidists do
- It is said, therefore, that the voidists and the impersonalists are not very intelligent because they do not take shelter under the lotus feet of the Lord
L
O
- Obeisances are therefore offered to the spiritual master as sarasvata-deva, or a member of the Sarasvata family, whose mission is to broadcast the cult of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and to fight with impersonalists and voidists
- One who sees the greatness of Krsna in neutrality will certainly never again seek the so-called relief of impersonalist or voidist philosophy
S
- Sastra says that simply by understanding that "This is false, and I'll have to become away from these false engagements," so without knowledge of Krsna, such elevators, they become impersonalists and voidists, to make negative this material enjoyment
- Since the ultimate cause in the material world is mahat-tattva, everything was wound up and amalgamated with the mahat-tattva. This may be compared to sunya-vada, or voidism, but this is the process for cleansing the real spiritual mind, or consciousness
- So the Krsna consciousness people, they should not be misled by so-called Vedantists or impersonalists, or voidists. They should stick to the principle, as it is described in the Bhagavad-gita
- So the philosophy of voidism, impersonalism is like that. Means they cannot, shudder, to think of another life, again eating, again sleeping, again working. Because he thinks eating, sleeping, means on the bed. That's all
- So-called yoga practices of voidism and impersonalism are not recommended in any standard yoga-sastra
- So-called yoga practices of voidism and impersonalism are not recommended in any standard yoga-sastra. The real yogi is the devotee because his mind is always concentrated on pastimes of Lord Krsna. Therefore Krsna consciousness is the topmost yoga system
- Spiritual activity in devotional service is unintelligible to the voidist philosophers and impersonalists
T
- The Buddha philosophy, sunyavadi. Because they are disgusted with these material varieties, therefore they want something opposite. That opposite is voidism, sunyavada
- The first liberation, as the jnanis or the speculators want, it is another side of voidism, to merge into the existence of the Absolute. They don't want varieties
- The impersonal conception recommends merging into the existence of the Supreme, and the voidist philosophy recommends making all material varieties void. Both these philosophies are known as Mayavada
- The impersonalists and the voidists also have to see the form of the Absolute. In Buddhist temples there are forms of Lord Buddha in meditation, but these are not worshiped like the forms of the Lord in Vaisnava temples
- The impersonalists and the voidists are recommended to meditate upon the universal form of the Lord, whereas the devotees are recommended to meditate on the Deity worship in the temple
- The impersonalists discuss the philosophy of voidism while trying as much as possible to enjoy this material life. One may enjoy speculation in this way, but there is no spiritual benefit
- The impersonalists or the voidists can simply avoid the positive material association; they cannot remain fixed in transcendence without being engaged in devotional service
- The Mayavada philosophy is veiled Buddhism. (In other words, the voidist philosophy of Buddha is more or less repeated in the Mayavada philosophy of impersonalism, although the Mayavadiphilosophers claim to be directed by the Vedic conclusions)
- The Mayavadi philosophers come to the conclusion of impersonalism or voidism
- The Mayavadi philosophy is veiled Buddhism. In other words, the voidist philosophy of Buddha is more or less repeated in the Mayavadi philosophy of impersonalism
- The Mayavadis, there are two kinds of Mayavadis: the impersonalists and the voidists. They are all Mayavadi. So their philosophy is good so far, because a foolish man cannot understand more than this
- The philosophy of monism is an adjustment of the Buddhist philosophy of voidism. In a mock fight with Sri Advaita Acarya, Sri Nityananda Prabhu was refuting this type of monistic philosophy
- The philosophy of voidism, impersonalism is like that. Mean they cannot, shudder, to think of another life, again eating, again sleeping, again working. Because he thinks eating, sleeping, means on the bed. That's all
- The Sankhya philosophers are in favor of voidism, but the actual fact is that the original cause is the Supreme Personality of Godhead and that this cosmic manifestation is the temporary manifestation of His material energy
- The voidist philosophers want to establish that ultimately everything is senseless, and the impersonalists want to establish that in the next world there is simply knowledge devoid of activity
- The voidists say that consciousness is a product of a combination of matter and that as soon as the consciousness is gone, the material combination dissolves, and therefore there is ultimately nothing but voidness
- The voidists, they say sunyavadi. They say, "There is no God." And the impersonalists, they say that there is God, but there is no head, there is no leg, there is no hand, there is no mouth, there is no, no, no... Ultimately, what is their God?
- The whole world is now corrupted with these two kinds of philosophies: nirvisesa-sunyavada, impersonalism and voidism. But Vaisnava philosophy is not voidism, not impersonalism. Vaisnava philosophy means to know the Absolute Truth as person
- The world is suffering on account of atheistic conviction of life, so our theistic proposition presenting Krishna, the Supreme Lord, is certainly a great relief to the agnostics, atheists, impersonalists and voidists
- There is very little difference between impersonalism and voidism. Voidism can be directly understood, but the impersonalism enunciated by Mayavadi philosophers is not very easily understandable
- These voidists and impersonalists take to different types of austerities, either to attain the stage of nirvana, which means finishing the material conditions of life, or to attain oneness by merging into the body of the Lord
- They gave up this, but that does not mean he became zero. Zero is sunyavadi, voidism. No, you cannot remain in zero. That is not possible. If you accept this void philosophy, to make everything zero, that is artificial. Then again you'll fall down
- This another theory, that voidism, that before our this manifested life there was void, and after this manifestation is over, still there will be void. Because according to voidism, everything is manifested originally void
- This conclusion (voidism or impersonalism) is useless for a Krsna conscious person. Only rarely by philosophical speculation can one reach the conclusion of worshiping Vasudeva, Krsna. This is confirmed in the Bhagavad-gita itself
- This is another explanation of nirvana, voidism - Finish everything. You are suffering from fever. All right, I cut your throat. So your fever is gone? You also gone, finished
- This Mayavada philosophy, voidism, impersonal philosophy, is not very good. You cannot remain impersonal or in void, because your position is . . . because you are living entity, because you are part and parcel of the supreme living entity, Krsna
- This question (does material nature ever give release to the spirit soul?) asked by Devahuti of Kapiladeva is more or less impelled by the philosophy of voidism
- This seeking for solitude is simply a reaction on our past nonsense activities, or it is negation, voidism. Our sound position is always being engaged in service of Krishna, that is the positive standing
- This voidism, impersonalism, they are artificial ways of negating the perplexing variegatedness of this material existence
- This was also the occupational duty of Sanatana Gosvami, Rupa Gosvami and Anupama Gosvami - to broadcast the cult of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu and to fight with impersonalists and voidists
W
- We are fighting impersonalism and voidism with pure devotional service
- We are manufacturing so many religious system on these two platforms. One platform is how to enjoy to the fullest extent, and another platform is how to become zero, voidism. But actually, neither you are enjoyer, nor you are zero
- We should strictly follow this injunction and never try to hear from Mayavadis, impersonalists, voidists, politicians or so-called scholars. Strictly avoiding such inauspicious association, we should simply hear from pure devotees