Main public logs

Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).

• 15:34, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The designation of Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha as ‘jiva,’ ‘mind’ and ‘ego’ are never contradictory to the statements of the scriptures (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the designation of Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha as"|"jiva,’ ‘mind’ and ‘ego"|"are never contradictory to the st...")
• 15:32, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are, respectively, the predominating Deities of all living entities, the total mind and the total ego (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are, respectively, the predominating Deities of all living entities, the total mind and th...")
• 15:28, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page That the Lord can manifest Himself before His devotees by His inconceivable power is not against the teaching of the Pancaratras (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"That the Lord can manifest Himself before His devotees by His inconceivable power is not against the teaching of the Pañcarā...")
• 15:21, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are never born, but They can manifest Themselves in various incarnations before the eyes of pure devotees. This is the conclusion of all Vedic literature (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are never born, but They can manifest Themselves in various incarnations before the...")
• 15:16, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page It is to be accepted that Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are as good as Lord Vasudeva, for They all have inconceivable power and can accept transcendental forms like Vasudeva (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"It is to be accepted that Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are as good as Lord Vāsudeva, for They all have inconceiv...")
• 15:10, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In the Pauskara-samhita it is said, If one fully worships according to the regulative principles, one can attain the Supreme Personality of Godhead, Vasudeva (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In the Pauṣkara-saṁhitā it is said"|"If one fully worships according to the regulative principles, one can attain the Sup...")
• 15:07, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Worshiping the expansions for pastimes, such as Nrsimha, Rama, Sesa and Kurma, promotes one to the worship of the Sankarsana quadruple. From that position one is raised to the platform of worshiping Vasudeva, the Supreme Brahman (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Worshiping the expansions for pastimes, such as Nṛsiṁha, Rāma, Śeṣa and Kūrma, promotes one to the worship of the Sa...")
• 14:59, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Supreme Personality of Godhead Vasudeva can accept offerings from His devotees of the results of their prescribed duties (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"can accept offerings from His devotees of the results of their prescribed duties"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}} {{comp...")
• 14:54, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In all Vaisnava literature it is said that worshiping these quadruple forms (Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha) is as good as worshiping the Supreme Personality of Godhead Vasudeva, who in His different expansions, complete in six opulences (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In all Vaisnava literature it is said that worshiping these quadruple forms is as good as worshiping the Supreme Personality o...")
• 14:50, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Pauskara-samhita states, The scriptures that recommend that brahmanas worship the quadruple forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are called agamas - authorized Vedic literatures (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Pauṣkara-saṁhitā states"|"The scriptures that recommend that brāhmaṇas worship the quadruple forms of the Supreme...")
• 14:43, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page We must accept the verdict of SB, which says, The absolute Personality of Godhead, who is known as Vasudeva and who is very affectionate toward His surrendered devotees, expands Himself in quadruple forms who are subordinate to Him and identical with Him (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"we must accept the verdict of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam, which says, ‘The absolute Personality of Godhead, who is known as Vāsud...")
• 14:39, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The evidence of the Pancaratras cannot be neglected. Only untrained persons who have not genuinely studied the Pancaratras think that the Pancaratras contradict the srutis regarding the birth or beginning of the living entity (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The evidence of the Pañcarātras cannot be neglected. Only untrained persons who have not genuinely studied the Pañcarātras...")
• 14:32, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Each of these members (Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha) is identical with the Supreme Lord in knowledge, opulence, energy, influence, prowess and potencies (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"each is identical with the Supreme Lord in knowledge, opulence, energy, influence, prowess and potencies"}} {{notes|}} {{compi...")
• 14:29, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page These members (Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha) of the quadruple manifestation are never to be considered ordinary living beings. Each of Them is a plenary expansion of the Absolute Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"these members of the quadruple manifestation are never to be considered ordinary living beings. Each of Them is a plenary expa...")
• 14:23, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sankarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha have all the potent features of the absolute Personality of Godhead, according to the revealed scriptures, which contain undeniable facts that no one can refute (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha have all the potent features of the absolute Personality of Godhead, according to th...")
• 14:16, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page It is impossible for the mind to be produced by a living entity, for the Vedas state that everything comes from the Absolute Truth, the Supreme Lord (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"It is impossible for the mind to be produced by a living entity, for the Vedas state that everything comes from the Absolute T...")
• 14:13, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Vedic injunctions state that everything - including life, mind and the senses - comes from the Supreme Personality of Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Vedic injunctions state that everything"|"including life, mind and the senses"|"comes from the Supreme Personality of Godh...")
• 14:11, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page It has been said that Pradyumna, the mind, was produced from Sankarsana. But if Sankarsana were a living entity, this could not be accepted, because a living entity cannot be the cause of the mind (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"It has been said that Pradyumna, the mind, was produced from Saṅkarṣaṇa. But if Saṅkarṣaṇa were a living entity, t...")
• 13:49, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page When it is said that Sankarsana is jiva, this indicates that He is the predominating Deity of the living entities. Similarly, Pradyumna is the predominating Deity of the mind, and Aniruddha is the predominating Deity of the ego (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"when it is said that Saṅkarṣaṇa is jīva, this indicates that He is the predominating Deity of the living entities. Simi...")
• 13:46, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page As stated in the Katha Upanisad (2.18), living entities, as individual spiritual souls, can have neither birth nor death. All Vedic literature declares that the living entities are eternal (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"As stated in the Kaṭha Upaniṣad (2.18), living entities, as individual spiritual souls, can have neither birth nor death....")
• 13:26, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sripada Sankaracarya has tried to equate the Pancaratras with the philosophy of the atheist Kapila, and thus he has tried to prove that the Pancaratras contradict the Vedic injunctions (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Sripada Sankaracarya has tried to equate the Pancaratras with the philosophy of the atheist Kapila, and thus he has tried to p...")
• 13:24, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sripada Ramanujacarya has refuted the arguments of Sankara in his own commentary on the Vedanta-sutra, which is known as the Sri-bhasya (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Śrīpāda Rāmānujācārya has also refuted the arguments of Śaṅkara in his own commentary on the Vedānta-sūtra, which...")
• 12:51, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page O Dharma, protector of religious principles, all noble and sublime qualities are eternally manifested in the person of Krsna, & devotees & transcendentalists who aspire to become faithful also desire to possess such transcendental qualities - SB 1.16.29 (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In the First Canto of Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam"|"it is said"|"O Dharma, protector of religious principles, all noble and sublime q...")
• 12:42, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page This is confirmed in the Padma Purana that whenever the Supreme Lord is described as having no qualities, this should be understood to indicate that He is devoid of material qualities (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"whenever the Supreme Lord is described as having no qualities, this should be understood to indicate that He is devoid of mate...")
• 12:37, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In the Visnu Purana it is said that all the qualities attributed to the Supreme Lord, such as knowledge, opulence, beauty, strength and influence, are known to be nondifferent from Him. This is also confirmed in the Padma Purana (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In the same Viṣṇu Purāṇa it is also said that all the qualities attributed to the Supreme Lord, such as knowledge, opul...")
• 12:33, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In the Visnu Purana Lord Visnu is worshiped in the following words: Let the Supreme Personality of Godhead be merciful toward us. His existence is never infected by material qualities (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In the Viṣṇu Purāṇa Lord Viṣṇu is worshiped in the following words"|"Let the Supreme Personality of Godhead be merc...")
• 12:26, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The scripture known as Brahma-tarka states that the Supreme Lord Hari is qualified by Himself, and therefore Visnu and His pure devotees and their transcendental qualities cannot be different from their persons (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the scripture known as Brahma-tarka, which states that the Supreme Lord Hari is qualified by Himself, and therefore Viṣṇu...")
• 12:22, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Since the Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead, is the reservoir of all pleasure, all the transcendental qualities that expand from Him are also reservoirs of pleasure (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Since the Absolute Truth, the Personality of Godhead, is the reservoir of all pleasure, all the transcendental qualities that...")
• 12:14, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Every qualitative expansion of the absolute Personality of Godhead is identical with Him (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Every qualitative expansion of the absolute Personality of Godhead is identical with Him"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}...")
• 12:12, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Since the Supreme Personality of Godhead is absolute, His qualities are nondifferent from Him. His form, name, qualities and everything else pertaining to Him are as spiritual as He is (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Since the Supreme Personality of Godhead is absolute, His qualities are nondifferent from Him. His form, name, qualities and e...")
• 08:18, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Some say that transcendence must be void of all qualities because qualities are manifested only in matter. According to them, all qualities are like temporary, flickering mirages. But this is not acceptable (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Some say that transcendence must be void of all qualities because qualities are manifested only in matter. According to them,...")
• 08:15, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page To answer Sankaracarya’s commentary on Vedanta-sutra 2.2.45, the substance of the transcendental qualities and their spiritual nature is described in the Laghu-bhagavatamrta - Purva 5.208-214 (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"To answer Śaṅkarācārya's commentary on Vedānta-sūtra 2.2.45, the substance of the transcendental qualities and their sp...")
• 08:08, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page One should not try to compare the expansions of material nature to the catur-vyuha, the quadruple expansions of the Personality of Godhead, but unfortunately the Mayavadi school unreasonably attempts to do this (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"one should not try to compare the expansions of material nature to the catur-vyūha, the quadruple expansions of the Personali...")
• 08:05, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The cosmic manifestation of the illusory energy is material nature, and everything within material nature is made of matter (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The cosmic manifestation of the illusory energy is material nature, and everything within material nature is made of matter"}}...")
• 07:57, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The cosmic creation, which manifests life in forms from Brahma to the ant, is the external feature of the Supreme Lord. It comprises one fourth of the Lord's energy, as confirmed in the Bhagavad-gita - ekamsena sthito jagat - BG 10.42 (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The cosmic creation, which manifests life in forms from Brahmā to the ant, is the external feature of the Supreme Lord. It co...")
• 07:53, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Equating maya with spirit, or maya with the Lord, is a sign of atheism (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Equating māyā with spirit, or māyā with the Lord, is a sign of atheism"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}} {{complete|A...")
• 07:36, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page It is most apparent that nondevotees violate the rules and regulations of devotional service to equate the whole cosmic manifestation to It is most apparent that nondevotees violate the rules and regulations of devotional service to equate the whole cosmic manifestation, which is the external feature of Visnu, with the SPG, who is the controller of maya, or with His quadruple expansions
• 07:33, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Whatever is produced of the complete whole is also complete by itself. Because He (the Personality of Godhead) is the complete whole, even though so many complete units emanate from Him, He remains the complete balance - Brhad-aranyaka Upanisad 5.1 (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Whatever is produced of the complete whole is also complete by itself. Because He is the complete whole, even though so many c...")
• 07:30, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Personality of Godhead is perfect and complete, and because He is completely perfect, all emanations from Him, such as this phenomenal world, are perfectly equipped as complete wholes - Brhad-aranyaka Upanisad 5.1 (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Personality of Godhead is perfect and complete, and because He is completely perfect, all emanations from Him, such as thi...")
• 07:14, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page There is no such rule as cause and effect outside of the material world. Therefore the understanding of cause and effect cannot approach the full, transcendental, complete expansions of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. The Vedic literature proves this (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"There is no such rule as cause and effect outside of the material world. Therefore the understanding of cause and effect canno...")
• 07:04, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page They (all the forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead) are predominating figures on the transcendental platform. There is no trace of material contamination in Their expansions because material laws cannot influence Them (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"They are predominating figures on the transcendental platform. There is no trace of material contamination in Their expansions...")
• 06:26, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page On the spiritual platform there are none of the differences we find in cause and effect. Since all the forms of the Supreme Personality of Godhead are spiritually supreme, They are equally controllers of material nature (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"On the spiritual platform there are none of the differences we find in cause and effect. Since all the forms of the Supreme Pe...")
• 06:21, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Cause and effect are material. For example, it is seen that a father’s body is the cause of a son’s body, but the soul is neither cause nor effect (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Cause and effect are material. For example, it is seen that a father's body is the cause of a son's body, but the soul is neit...")
• 06:19, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Kurma Purana confirms, deha-dehi-vibhedo ’yam nesvare vidyate kvacit: There is no difference between body and soul in the Supreme Personality of Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"deha-dehi-vibhedo ’yam nesvare vidyate kvacit"|"There is no difference between body and soul in the Supreme Personality of G...")
• 06:11, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sankaracarya has tried to prove that Vasudeva, Sankarsana, Pradyumna & Aniruddha expand through cause & effect. He has compared Them with earth & earthen pots. That is completely ignorant, for there is no such thing as cause & effect in Their expansions (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Śaṅkarācārya has tried to prove that Vāsudeva, Saṅkarṣaṇa, Pradyumna and Aniruddha expand through cause and effect...")
• 05:59, 5 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page We recommend that scholars consult the Laghu-bhagavatamrta of Srila Rupa Gosvami, where these ideas (that Narayana is transcendental and has inconceivable proprietorship of various transcendental potencies) are explicitly stated (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"We therefore recommend that scholars consult the Laghu-bhāgavatāmṛta of Śrīla Rūpa Gosvāmī, where these ideas are exp...")
• 17:25, 4 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Mayavadi commentators make one statement in one place and a contradictory statement in another place as a tactic to refute the Bhagavata school. Thus Mayavadi commentators do not even follow regulative principles (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"make one statement in one place and a contradictory statement in another place as a tactic to refute the Bhāgavata school. Th...")
• 17:05, 4 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sankaracarya's commentary on the forty-second (that the Personality of Godhead can expand Himself variously) aphorism and his commentary on the forty-fourth (that all the expansions of Visnu are different identities) aphorism are contradictory (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"his commentary on the forty-second aphorism and his commentary on the forty-fourth aphorism are contradictory"}} {{notes|}} {{...")
• 16:56, 4 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sripada Sankaracarya, in his commentary on the forty-second aphorism, has accepted that the Personality of Godhead can automatically expand Himself variously (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Sripada Sankaracarya, in his commentary on the forty-second aphorism, has accepted that the Personality of Godhead can automat...")
• 16:51, 4 March 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In reply to the commentary of Sankaracarya on the forty-fourth aphorism, it may be said that no pure devotees strictly following the principles of the Pancaratra will ever accept the statement that all the expansions of Visnu are different identities (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In reply to the commentary of Sankaracarya on the forty-fourth aphorism, it may be said that no pure devotees strictly followi...")