Main public logs
Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
- 14:26, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page It is clearly mentioned in many places in the Gita that this spiritual individuality is understood by those who are devotees of the Lord. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"that this spiritual individuality is understood by those who are devotees of the Lord"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Nirmal}} {{comp...")
- 14:23, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page The nondevotee's approach to the teachings of the Gita is something like that of a bee licking on a bottle of honey. One cannot have a taste of honey unless one opens the bottle (content was: "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The nondevotee's approach to the teachings of the Gita is something like that of a bee licking on a bottle of honey. One cannot have a taste of honey unless one opens the bottle"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Mayapur}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|26Oct12}} {{last|26Oct12}} {{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Nondevotees of God Category:Approach Category:Teachings of the...")
- 14:22, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page No bona fide access to the great literature (content was: "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"no bona fide access to the great literature"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Matea| Visnu Murti}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|18Jul08}} {{last|30Nov08}} {{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Bona Fide Category:Access Category:Great Category:Literature </div> <div class="section" id="Bhagavad-gita_As_It_Is" text="Bhagavad-gita As It Is"><h2>Bhagavad-gita As...")
- 14:09, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Individuality is maintained on spiritual grounds and is thus confirmed by great acaryas like Sri Ramanuja and others. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"individuality is maintained on spiritual grounds and is thus confirmed by great"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Nirmal}} {{complete|A...")
- 13:36, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page After condemning the bodily conception of the living entities, how was it possible for Krsna to place a conventional proposition on the body again. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"After condemning the bodily conception of the living entities, how was it possible for Kṛṣṇa to place a conventional pro...")
- 13:32, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Mayavadi argues that the plurality mentioned in this verse (BG 2.12) is conventional and that it refers to the body. But previous to this verse such a bodily conception is already condemned. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Māyāvādī argues that the plurality mentioned in this verse is conventional and that it refers to the body. But previou...")
- 13:28, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Gita is above such literature (of the common man). No mundane book compares with the Bhagavad-gita. When one accepts Krsna as an ordinary man, the Gita loses all importance. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Gītā is above such literature. No mundane book compares with the Bhagavad-gītā. When one accepts Kṛṣṇa as an ord...")
- 13:26, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page A common man with all the four defects of human frailty is unable to teach that which is worth hearing. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"A common man with all the four defects of human frailty is unable to teach that which is worth hearing"}} {{notes|}} {{compile...")
- 13:19, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Krsna has maintained spiritual individuality all along; if He is accepted as an ordinary conditioned soul in individual consciousness, then His Bhagavad-gita has no value as authoritative scripture. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Kṛṣṇa has maintained spiritual individuality all along; if He is accepted as an ordinary conditioned soul in individual...")
- 13:17, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Krsna affirms His individuality in the past and confirms His individuality in the future also. He has confirmed His individuality in many ways, and impersonal Brahman has been declared to be subordinate to Him. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Kṛṣṇa affirms His individuality in the past and confirms His individuality in the future also. He has confirmed His indi...")
- 13:13, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Mayavadi may argue that the individuality spoken of by Krsna is not spiritual, but material. Even accepting the argument that the individuality is material, then how can one distinguish Krsna's individuality? BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Māyāvādī may argue that the individuality spoken of by Kṛṣṇa is not spiritual, but material. Even accepting the...")
- 13:11, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page If individuality is not a fact, then Krsna would not have stressed it so much - even for the future. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"If individuality is not a fact, then Kṛṣṇa would not have stressed it so much—even for the future"}} {{notes|}} {{comp...")
- 13:08, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Krsna clearly says that in the future also the individuality of the Lord and others, as it is confirmed in the Upanisads, will continue eternally. This statement of Krsna is authoritative because Krsna cannot be subject to illusion. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Kṛṣṇa clearly says herein that in the future also the individuality of the Lord and others, as it is confirmed in the Up...")
- 13:05, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The theory that we only think of individuality in the conditioned state is not supported herein (BG 1.12). BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Nor is the theory that we only think of individuality in the conditioned state supported herein"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Nirma...")
- 12:59, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page The Mayavadi theory that after liberation the individual soul, separated by the covering of maya, or illusion, will merge into the impersonal Brahman and lose its individual existence is not supported herein by Lord Krsna, the supreme authority (content was: "#REDIRECT The Mayavadi theory that after liberation the individual soul, separated by the covering of maya, or illusion, will merge into the impersonal Brahman & lose its individual existence is not supported by Lord Krsna, the supreme authority. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "Nirmal" (talk))
- 12:59, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs moved page The Mayavadi theory that after liberation the individual soul, separated by the covering of maya, or illusion, will merge into the impersonal Brahman and lose its individual existence is not supported herein by Lord Krsna, the supreme authority to The Mayavadi theory that after liberation the individual soul, separated by the covering of maya, or illusion, will merge into the impersonal Brahman & lose its individual existence is not supported by Lord Krsna, the supreme authority. BG 1972 purports
- 12:57, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Their (Krsna's, Arjuna's and the assembled kings') individuality existed in the past, and their individuality will continue in the future without interruption. Therefore, there is no cause for lamentation for anyone. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Their individuality existed in the past, and their individuality will continue in the future without interruption. Therefore,...")
- 12:54, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page It is not that they (Krsna, Arjuna and the assembled kings) did not exist as individuals in the past, and it is not that they will not remain eternal persons. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"It is not that they did not exist as individuals in the past, and it is not that they will not remain eternal persons"}} {{not...")
- 11:22, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the supreme individual person, and Arjuna, the Lord's eternal associate, and all the kings assembled there (at the battlefield of Kuruksetra) are individual, eternal persons. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the supreme individual person, and Arjuna, the Lord's eternal associate, and all the kin...")
- 11:05, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Lord is eternally the maintainer of the individual living entities both in their conditioned as well as in their liberated situations. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the Lord is eternally the maintainer of the individual living entities both in their conditioned as well as in their liberated...")
- 10:49, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Lord says clearly that He Himself, Arjuna, and all the kings who are assembled on the battlefield (of Kuruksetra), are eternally individual beings. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Lord says clearly that He Himself, Arjuna, and all the kings who are assembled on the battlefield, are eternally individua...")
- 10:42, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The same Vedic truth given to Arjuna (in BG 2.12) is given to all persons in the world who pose themselves as very learned but factually have but a poor fund of knowledge. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The same Vedic truth given to Arjuna is given to all persons in the world who pose themselves as very learned but factually ha...")
- 10:38, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Supreme Personality of Godhead is also, by His plenary portions, alive in the heart of every living entity. Only saintly persons who can see, within and without, the same Supreme Lord, can actually attain to perfect & eternal peace. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Supreme Personality of Godhead is also, by His plenary portions, alive in the heart of every living entity. Only saintly perso...")
- 10:36, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page Supreme Personality of Godhead is also, by His plenary portions, alive in the heart of every living entity (content was: "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Supreme Personality of Godhead is also, by His plenary portions, alive in the heart of every living entity"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Mayapur}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|27Sep12}} {{last|27Sep12}} {{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Krsna Is The Supreme Personality of Godhead Category:Is Also Category:Krsna's Plenary Portions Category:Alive Category:In The...")
- 10:33, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page In the Vedas, in the Katha Upanisad as well as in the Svetasvatara Upanisad, it is said that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities (content was: "#REDIRECT In the Vedas, in the Katha Upanisad as well as in the Svetasvatara Upanisad, it is said that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "Nirmal" (talk))
- 10:33, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs moved page In the Vedas, in the Katha Upanisad as well as in the Svetasvatara Upanisad, it is said that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities to In the Vedas, in the Katha Upanisad as well as in the Svetasvatara Upanisad, it is said that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities. BG 1972 purports
- 10:32, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities, in terms of their different situations according to individual work and reaction of work. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities, in terms of their different situations ac...")
- 10:08, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page In the Vedas - in the Katha Upanisad as well as in the Svetasvatara Upanisad - it is said that the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the maintainer of innumerable living entities (content was: "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"in the Katha Upanisad as well as in the Svetasvatara Upanisad"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Bhaktavasagovinda}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|04Oct11}} {{last|04Oct11}} {{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Vedas Category:Katha Upanisad Category:As Well As Category:Svetasvatara Upanisad Category:It Is Said Category:Supreme Personality of Godhead Category:Mai...")
- 10:07, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page For him (the learned man who knows that the body is destined to be vanquished today or tomorrow) there is no cause for lamentation, regardless of the condition of the material body. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"for him there is no cause for lamentation, regardless of the condition of the material body"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Nirmal}}...")
- 10:03, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The body is born and is destined to be vanquished today or tomorrow; therefore the body is not as important as the soul. One who knows this is actually learned. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The body is born and is destined to be vanquished today or tomorrow; therefore the body is not as important as the soul. One w...")
- 10:02, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page As he (Arjuna) did not happen to be a very learned man, he was consequently lamenting for something which was unworthy of lamentation. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"As he did not happen to be a very learned man, he was consequently lamenting for something which was unworthy of lamentation"}...")
- 10:00, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Because he (Arjuna) was lacking in that knowledge (that knowledge of matter, soul and the Supreme is even more important than religious formularies), he should not have posed himself as a very learned man. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"because he was lacking in that knowledge, he should not have posed himself as a very learned man"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Nirm...")
- 09:58, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Arjuna argued that religious principles should be given more importance than politics or sociology, but he did not know that knowledge of matter, soul and the Supreme is even more important than religious formularies. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Arjuna argued that religious principles should be given more importance than politics or sociology, but he did not know that k...")
- 09:54, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page Knowledge means to know matter and spirit and the controller of both (content was: "#REDIRECT As it will be explained in later chapters, it will be clear that knowledge means to know matter and spirit and the controller of both. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "Nirmal" (talk))
- 09:54, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs moved page Knowledge means to know matter and spirit and the controller of both to As it will be explained in later chapters, it will be clear that knowledge means to know matter and spirit and the controller of both. BG 1972 purports
- 09:53, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Krsna said, you (Arjuna) are talking like a learned man, but you do not know that one who is learned - one who knows what is body and what is soul - does not lament for any stage of the body, neither in the living nor in the dead condition. BG 1972 pur (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Lord said, you are talking like a learned man, but you do not know that one who is learned—one who knows what is body an...")
- 09:50, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The Lord (Krsna) at once took the position of the teacher and chastised the student (Arjuna), calling him, indirectly, a fool. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Lord at once took the position of the teacher and chastised the student, calling him, indirectly, a fool"}} {{notes|}} {{c...")
- 09:45, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The talks of Bhagavad-gita are not for any particular person, society, or community, but they are for all, and friends or enemies are equally entitled to hear them. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"So the talks of Bhagavad-gītā are not for any particular person, society, or community, but they are for all, and friends or...")
- 09:44, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page It appears that the talk between the master and the disciple (Krsna and Arjuna) was openly exchanged in the presence of both armies so that all were benefitted. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"It appears that the talk between the master and the disciple was openly exchanged in the presence of both armies so that all w...")
- 09:42, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page When He (Krsna) was accepted (by Arjuna) as the master, He at once assumed the role and talked with the disciple like the master - with gravity, as it is required. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"when He was accepted as the master, He at once assumed the role and talked with the disciple like the master—with gravity, a...")
- 09:40, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page As Lord of all, He (Krsna) is always in the superior position as the master of everyone, and yet the Lord accepts one who wishes to be a friend, a son, a lover or a devotee, or who wants Him in such a role. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"As Lord of all, He is always in the superior position as the master of everyone, and yet the Lord accepts one who wishes to be...")
- 09:38, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page As friends, both of them (Krsna and Arjuna) were on the same level, but one of them voluntarily became a student of the other. Krsna was smiling because a friend had chosen to become a disciple. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"As friends, both of them were on the same level, but one of them voluntarily became a student of the other. Kṛṣṇa was sm...")
- 09:36, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page The talk was going on between intimate friends, namely the Hrsikesa (Krsna) and the Gudakesa (Arjuna). BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The talk was going on between intimate friends, namely the Hṛṣīkeśa and the Guḍākeśa"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Nirmal...")
- 09:32, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Dhrtarastra's joy would be frustrated, since Arjuna would be enlightened by Krsna and would fight to the end. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Dhṛtarāṣṭra's joy would be frustrated, since Arjuna would be enlightened by Kṛṣṇa and would fight to the end"}} {...")
- 09:30, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page He (Arjuna) would soon be free from the false lamentation resulting from family affection and would be enlightened with perfect knowledge of self-realization, or Krsna consciousness, and would then surely fight. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"This indicated that he would soon be free from the false lamentation resulting from family affection and would be enlightened...")
- 09:26, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page Although Arjuna was, for the time being, overwhelmed with false grief due to family affection, he surrendered unto Krsna, the supreme spiritual master, as a disciple (content was: "#REDIRECT Although Arjuna was for the time being overwhelmed with false grief due to family affection, he surrendered unto Krsna, the supreme spiritual master, as a disciple. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "Nirmal" (talk))
- 09:26, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs moved page Although Arjuna was, for the time being, overwhelmed with false grief due to family affection, he surrendered unto Krsna, the supreme spiritual master, as a disciple to Although Arjuna was for the time being overwhelmed with false grief due to family affection, he surrendered unto Krsna, the supreme spiritual master, as a disciple. BG 1972 purports
- 09:24, 30 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page Dhrtarastra must have been very glad that Arjuna was not going to fight & was instead leaving the battlefield for the begging profession. But Sanjaya disappointed him again in relating that Arjuna was competent to kill his enemies. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Dhṛtarāṣṭra must have been very glad to understand that Arjuna was not going to fight and was instead leaving the battl...")
- 17:00, 29 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs deleted page If we want to curb lamentation for good, then we have to take shelter of Krsna (content was: "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"if we want to curb lamentation for good, then we have to take shelter of Krsna"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Krsnadas}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|08Dec11}} {{last|08Dec11}} {{totals_by_section|BG=1|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=0|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:If We Want Category:Curb Category:Lamentation Category:For Good Category:We Have To Category:Taking Shelter of Krsna </div> <div id="Bhagavad-gita_...")
- 17:00, 29 May 2021 Nirmal talk contribs created page If we want to curb lamentation for good, then we have to take shelter of Krsna, as Arjuna is seeking to do. So Arjuna asked Krsna to solve his problem definitely, and that is the way of Krsna consciousness. BG 1972 purports (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"if we want to curb lamentation for good, then we have to take shelter of Kṛṣṇa, as Arjuna is seeking to do. So Arjuna as...")