Main public logs
Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
- 04:21, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page If it is not congenial, not favorable for spiritual advancement, then family life should be abandoned to If it is not congenial, not favorable for spiritual advancement, then family life should be abandoned. BG 1972 purports
- 04:20, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The family members can sit down morning & evening & chant together Hare Krsna. If one can mold his family life in this way to develop Krsna consciousness, following these four principles, then there is no need to change from family life to renounced life (content was: "#REDIRECT Family members can sit down morning & evening & chant Hare Krsna. If one can mold his family life in this way to develop Krsna consciousness, following these 4 principles, there is no need to change from family life to renounced life. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:20, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The family members can sit down morning & evening & chant together Hare Krsna. If one can mold his family life in this way to develop Krsna consciousness, following these four principles, then there is no need to change from family life to renounced life to Family members can sit down morning & evening & chant Hare Krsna. If one can mold his family life in this way to develop Krsna consciousness, following these 4 principles, there is no need to change from family life to renounced life. BG 1972 purports
- 04:18, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One need only chant Hare Krsna, accept the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna, have some discussion on books like Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam, and engage oneself in Deity worship. These four will make one happy (content was: "#REDIRECT One need only chant Hare Krsna, accept the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna, have some discussion on books like Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam, and engage oneself in Deity worship. These four will make one happy. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:18, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One need only chant Hare Krsna, accept the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna, have some discussion on books like Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam, and engage oneself in Deity worship. These four will make one happy to One need only chant Hare Krsna, accept the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna, have some discussion on books like Bhagavad-gita and Srimad-Bhagavatam, and engage oneself in Deity worship. These four will make one happy. BG 1972 purports
- 04:17, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The best process for making the home pleasant is Krsna consciousness. If one is in full Krsna consciousness, he can make his home very happy because this process of Krsna consciousness is very easy (content was: "#REDIRECT The best process for making the home pleasant is Krsna consciousness. If one is in full Krsna consciousness, he can make his home very happy because this process of Krsna consciousness is very easy. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:17, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The best process for making the home pleasant is Krsna consciousness. If one is in full Krsna consciousness, he can make his home very happy because this process of Krsna consciousness is very easy to The best process for making the home pleasant is Krsna consciousness. If one is in full Krsna consciousness, he can make his home very happy because this process of Krsna consciousness is very easy. BG 1972 purports
- 04:16, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page As for detachment from children, wife & home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress then one should not be attached to them. BG 1972 purport (content was: "#REDIRECT For detachment from children, wife & home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress then one should not be attached to them. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:15, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page As for detachment from children, wife & home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress then one should not be attached to them. BG 1972 purport to For detachment from children, wife & home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress then one should not be attached to them. BG 1972 purports
- 04:15, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page As for detachment from children, wife and home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress, then one should not be attached to them (content was: "#REDIRECT As for detachment from children, wife & home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress then one should not be attached to them. BG 1972 purport", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:15, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page As for detachment from children, wife and home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress, then one should not be attached to them to As for detachment from children, wife & home, it is not meant that one should have no feeling for these. They are natural objects of affection, but when they are not favorable to spiritual progress then one should not be attached to them. BG 1972 purport
- 04:12, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page Unless we have a pessimistic view of this material life, considering the distresses of birth, death, old age and disease, there is no impetus for our making advancement in spiritual life (content was: "#REDIRECT Unless we have a pessimistic view of this material life, considering the distresses of birth, death, old age and disease, there is no impetus for our making advancement in spiritual life. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:12, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page Unless we have a pessimistic view of this material life, considering the distresses of birth, death, old age and disease, there is no impetus for our making advancement in spiritual life to Unless we have a pessimistic view of this material life, considering the distresses of birth, death, old age and disease, there is no impetus for our making advancement in spiritual life. BG 1972 purports
- 04:11, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page As far as disease and old age are concerned, everyone gets practical experience. No one wants to be diseased, and no one wants to become old, but there is no avoiding these (content was: "#REDIRECT As far as disease and old age are concerned, everyone gets practical experience. No one wants to be diseased, and no one wants to become old, but there is no avoiding these. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:11, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page As far as disease and old age are concerned, everyone gets practical experience. No one wants to be diseased, and no one wants to become old, but there is no avoiding these to As far as disease and old age are concerned, everyone gets practical experience. No one wants to be diseased, and no one wants to become old, but there is no avoiding these. BG 1972 purports
- 04:11, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page At the time of death, there are all kinds of sufferings, and they are also mentioned in the authoritative scriptures. These should be discussed (content was: "#REDIRECT At the time of death, there are all kinds of sufferings, and they are also mentioned in the authoritative scriptures. These should be discussed. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:10, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page At the time of death, there are all kinds of sufferings, and they are also mentioned in the authoritative scriptures. These should be discussed to At the time of death, there are all kinds of sufferings, and they are also mentioned in the authoritative scriptures. These should be discussed. BG 1972 purports
- 04:10, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page It should be thoroughly understood that birth is distressful. Because we forget how much distress we have suffered within the womb of the mother, we do not make any solution to the repetition of birth and death (content was: "#REDIRECT It should be thoroughly understood that birth is distressful. Because we forget how much distress we have suffered within the womb of the mother, we do not make any solution to the repetition of birth and death. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:09, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page It should be thoroughly understood that birth is distressful. Because we forget how much distress we have suffered within the womb of the mother, we do not make any solution to the repetition of birth and death to It should be thoroughly understood that birth is distressful. Because we forget how much distress we have suffered within the womb of the mother, we do not make any solution to the repetition of birth and death. BG 1972 purports
- 04:09, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page In the Srimad-Bhagavatam the world of the unborn, the child's stay in the womb of the mother, its suffering, etc., are all very graphically described (content was: "#REDIRECT In the Srimad-Bhagavatam the world of the unborn, the child's stay in the womb of the mother, its suffering, etc., are all very graphically described. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:08, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page In the Srimad-Bhagavatam the world of the unborn, the child's stay in the womb of the mother, its suffering, etc., are all very graphically described to In the Srimad-Bhagavatam the world of the unborn, the child's stay in the womb of the mother, its suffering, etc., are all very graphically described. BG 1972 purports
- 04:08, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One should try to understand the distress of accepting birth, death, old age and disease. There are descriptions in various Vedic literatures of birth (content was: "#REDIRECT One should try to understand the distress of accepting birth, death, old age and disease. There are descriptions in various Vedic literatures of birth. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:08, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One should try to understand the distress of accepting birth, death, old age and disease. There are descriptions in various Vedic literatures of birth to One should try to understand the distress of accepting birth, death, old age and disease. There are descriptions in various Vedic literatures of birth. BG 1972 purports
- 04:07, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page There are some philosophers who say we should give up our ego, but we cannot give up our ego because ego means identity. We ought, of course, to give up the false identification with the body (content was: "#REDIRECT There are some philosophers who say we should give up our ego, but we cannot give up our ego because ego means identity. We ought, of course, to give up the false identification with the body. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:07, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page There are some philosophers who say we should give up our ego, but we cannot give up our ego because ego means identity. We ought, of course, to give up the false identification with the body to There are some philosophers who say we should give up our ego, but we cannot give up our ego because ego means identity. We ought, of course, to give up the false identification with the body. BG 1972 purports
- 04:06, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page This sense of "I am" is ego, but when the sense of "I am" is applied to this false body, it is false ego. When the sense of self is applied to reality, that is real ego (content was: "#REDIRECT This sense of "I am" is ego, but when the sense of "I am" is applied to this false body, it is false ego. When the sense of self is applied to reality, that is real ego. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:06, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page This sense of "I am" is ego, but when the sense of "I am" is applied to this false body, it is false ego. When the sense of self is applied to reality, that is real ego to This sense of "I am" is ego, but when the sense of "I am" is applied to this false body, it is false ego. When the sense of self is applied to reality, that is real ego. BG 1972 purports
- 04:05, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page In the Vedic literature, it is said: aham brahmasmi. I am Brahman, I am spirit. This "I am," the sense of self, also exists in the liberated stage of self-realization (content was: "#REDIRECT In the Vedic literature, it is said: aham brahmasmi. I am Brahman, I am spirit. This "I am," the sense of self, also exists in the liberated stage of self-realization. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:05, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page In the Vedic literature, it is said: aham brahmasmi. I am Brahman, I am spirit. This "I am," the sense of self, also exists in the liberated stage of self-realization to In the Vedic literature, it is said: aham brahmasmi. I am Brahman, I am spirit. This "I am," the sense of self, also exists in the liberated stage of self-realization. BG 1972 purports
- 04:04, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page False ego means accepting this body as oneself. When one understands that he is not his body and is spirit soul, that is real ego. Ego is there. False ego is condemned, but not real ego (content was: "#REDIRECT False ego means accepting this body as oneself. When one understands that he is not his body and is spirit soul, that is real ego. Ego is there. False ego is condemned, but not real ego. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:04, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page False ego means accepting this body as oneself. When one understands that he is not his body and is spirit soul, that is real ego. Ego is there. False ego is condemned, but not real ego to False ego means accepting this body as oneself. When one understands that he is not his body and is spirit soul, that is real ego. Ego is there. False ego is condemned, but not real ego. BG 1972 purports
- 04:03, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page Unintelligent commentators on the Gita try to divert the mind of the reader to other subjects, but there is no other subject in Bhagavad-gita but devotional service (content was: "#REDIRECT Unintelligent commentators on the Gita try to divert the mind of the reader to other subjects, but there is no other subject in Bhagavad-gita but devotional service. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:03, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page Unintelligent commentators on the Gita try to divert the mind of the reader to other subjects, but there is no other subject in Bhagavad-gita but devotional service to Unintelligent commentators on the Gita try to divert the mind of the reader to other subjects, but there is no other subject in Bhagavad-gita but devotional service. BG 1972 purports
- 04:02, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page It is understood here that Bhagavad-gita is simply expounding the science of devotional service. Devotional service is the main and sole objective (content was: "#REDIRECT It is understood here that Bhagavad-gita is simply expounding the science of devotional service. Devotional service is the main and sole objective. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:02, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page It is understood here that Bhagavad-gita is simply expounding the science of devotional service. Devotional service is the main and sole objective to It is understood here that Bhagavad-gita is simply expounding the science of devotional service. Devotional service is the main and sole objective. BG 1972 purports
- 04:01, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page As far as the eyes are concerned, they should not be allowed to see anything but the beautiful form of Krsna. That will control the eyes. Similarly, the ears should be engaged in hearing about Krsna and the nose in smelling the flowers offered to Krsna (content was: "#REDIRECT As far as the eyes are concerned, they should not be allowed to see anything but Krsna. That will control the eyes. Similarly, the ears should be engaged in hearing about Krsna and the nose in smelling the flowers offered to Krsna. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 04:01, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page As far as the eyes are concerned, they should not be allowed to see anything but the beautiful form of Krsna. That will control the eyes. Similarly, the ears should be engaged in hearing about Krsna and the nose in smelling the flowers offered to Krsna to As far as the eyes are concerned, they should not be allowed to see anything but Krsna. That will control the eyes. Similarly, the ears should be engaged in hearing about Krsna and the nose in smelling the flowers offered to Krsna. BG 1972 purports
- 03:59, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The function of the tongue is to taste and to vibrate. Therefore, by systematic regulation, the tongue should always be engaged in tasting the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna and chanting Hare Krsna (content was: "#REDIRECT The function of the tongue is to taste and to vibrate. Therefore, by systematic regulation, the tongue should always be engaged in tasting the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna and chanting Hare Krsna. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 03:59, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The function of the tongue is to taste and to vibrate. Therefore, by systematic regulation, the tongue should always be engaged in tasting the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna and chanting Hare Krsna to The function of the tongue is to taste and to vibrate. Therefore, by systematic regulation, the tongue should always be engaged in tasting the remnants of foodstuffs offered to Krsna and chanting Hare Krsna. BG 1972 purports
- 03:58, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The most important and uncontrollable sense is the tongue. If one can control the tongue, then there is every possibility of controlling the other senses (content was: "#REDIRECT The most important and uncontrollable sense is the tongue. If one can control the tongue, then there is every possibility of controlling the other senses. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 03:58, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The most important and uncontrollable sense is the tongue. If one can control the tongue, then there is every possibility of controlling the other senses to The most important and uncontrollable sense is the tongue. If one can control the tongue, then there is every possibility of controlling the other senses. BG 1972 purports
- 03:57, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The senses should only be gratified to keep the body fit so that one can discharge his duty in advancing in spiritual life (content was: "#REDIRECT The senses should only be gratified to keep the body fit so that one can discharge his duty in advancing in spiritual life. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 03:57, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The senses should only be gratified to keep the body fit so that one can discharge his duty in advancing in spiritual life to The senses should only be gratified to keep the body fit so that one can discharge his duty in advancing in spiritual life. BG 1972 purports
- 03:56, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The senses are so strong that they are always anxious to have sense gratification. One should not cater to these demands, which are not necessary (content was: "#REDIRECT The senses are so strong that they are always anxious to have sense gratification. One should not cater to these demands, which are not necessary. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 03:56, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The senses are so strong that they are always anxious to have sense gratification. One should not cater to these demands, which are not necessary to The senses are so strong that they are always anxious to have sense gratification. One should not cater to these demands, which are not necessary. BG 1972 purports
- 03:55, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page And self-control means that one should not accept anything which is detrimental to the path of spiritual progress. One should become accustomed to this and reject anything which is against the path of spiritual progress. This is real renunciation (content was: "#REDIRECT Self-control means that one should not accept anything which is detrimental to spiritual progress. One should become accustomed to this and reject anything which is against the path of spiritual progress. This is real renunciation. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 03:55, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page And self-control means that one should not accept anything which is detrimental to the path of spiritual progress. One should become accustomed to this and reject anything which is against the path of spiritual progress. This is real renunciation to Self-control means that one should not accept anything which is detrimental to spiritual progress. One should become accustomed to this and reject anything which is against the path of spiritual progress. This is real renunciation. BG 1972 purports
- 03:54, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page Steadiness means that one should be very determined to make progress in spiritual life. Without such determination, one cannot make tangible progress (content was: "#REDIRECT Steadiness means that one should be very determined to make progress in spiritual life. Without such determination, one cannot make tangible progress. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 03:53, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page Steadiness means that one should be very determined to make progress in spiritual life. Without such determination, one cannot make tangible progress to Steadiness means that one should be very determined to make progress in spiritual life. Without such determination, one cannot make tangible progress. BG 1972 purports
- 03:52, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page There are two kinds of cleanliness: external and internal. External cleanliness means taking a bath, but for internal cleanliness, one has to think of Krsna always and chant Hare Krsna (content was: "#REDIRECT There are two kinds of cleanliness: external and internal. External cleanliness means taking a bath, but for internal cleanliness, one has to think of Krsna always and chant Hare Krsna. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))