Main public logs

Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).

• 07:01, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page In this chapter it will be also explained that out of the two knowers, one is fallible and the other is infallible. One is superior and the other is subordinate to In this chapter it will be also explained that out of the two knowers, one is fallible and the other is infallible. One is superior and the other is subordinate. BG 1972 purports
• 06:59, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page There are three Brahman conceptions: prakrti is Brahman as the field of activities, and the jiva (individual soul) is also Brahman and is trying to control material nature, & the controller of both of them is also Brahman, but He is the factual controller (content was: "#REDIRECT There are 3 Brahman conceptions: prakrti is Brahman as the field of activities, and the jiva is also Brahman and is trying to control material nature, & the controller of both of them is also Brahman, but He is the factual controller. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:59, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page There are three Brahman conceptions: prakrti is Brahman as the field of activities, and the jiva (individual soul) is also Brahman and is trying to control material nature, & the controller of both of them is also Brahman, but He is the factual controller to There are 3 Brahman conceptions: prakrti is Brahman as the field of activities, and the jiva is also Brahman and is trying to control material nature, & the controller of both of them is also Brahman, but He is the factual controller. BG 1972 purports
• 06:56, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One should not confuse the painter, the painting and the easel. This material world, which is the field of activities, is nature, and the enjoyer of nature is the living entity, and above them both is the supreme controller, the Personality of Godhead (content was: "#REDIRECT One should not confuse the painter, the painting and the easel. This material world is nature, and the enjoyer of nature is the living entity, and above them both is the supreme controller, the Personality of Godhead. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:55, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One should not confuse the painter, the painting and the easel. This material world, which is the field of activities, is nature, and the enjoyer of nature is the living entity, and above them both is the supreme controller, the Personality of Godhead to One should not confuse the painter, the painting and the easel. This material world is nature, and the enjoyer of nature is the living entity, and above them both is the supreme controller, the Personality of Godhead. BG 1972 purports
• 06:53, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One has to understand the position of prakrti, nature, and purusa, the enjoyer of the nature, and isvara, the knower who dominates or controls nature and the individual soul. One should not confuse the three in their different capacities (content was: "#REDIRECT One has to understand the position of prakrti, nature, and purusa, the enjoyer of the nature, and isvara, the knower who dominates or controls nature and the individual soul. One should not confuse the three in their different capacities. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:53, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One has to understand the position of prakrti, nature, and purusa, the enjoyer of the nature, and isvara, the knower who dominates or controls nature and the individual soul. One should not confuse the three in their different capacities to One has to understand the position of prakrti, nature, and purusa, the enjoyer of the nature, and isvara, the knower who dominates or controls nature and the individual soul. One should not confuse the three in their different capacities. BG 1972 purports
• 06:52, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page To understand both the soul and the Supersoul as one yet distinct is knowledge. One who does not understand the field of activity and the knower of activity is not in perfect knowledge (content was: "#REDIRECT To understand both the soul and the Supersoul as one yet distinct is knowledge. One who does not understand the field of activity and the knower of activity is not in perfect knowledge. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:52, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page To understand both the soul and the Supersoul as one yet distinct is knowledge. One who does not understand the field of activity and the knower of activity is not in perfect knowledge to To understand both the soul and the Supersoul as one yet distinct is knowledge. One who does not understand the field of activity and the knower of activity is not in perfect knowledge. BG 1972 purports
• 06:47, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page Perfect knowledge of the constitution of the body, the constitution of the individual soul, and the constitution of the Supersoul is known in terms of Vedic literature as jnanam. That is the opinion of Krsna (content was: "#REDIRECT Perfect knowledge of the constitution of the body, the constitution of the individual soul, and the constitution of the Supersoul is known in terms of Vedic literature as jnanam. That is the opinion of Krsna. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:47, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page Perfect knowledge of the constitution of the body, the constitution of the individual soul, and the constitution of the Supersoul is known in terms of Vedic literature as jnanam. That is the opinion of Krsna to Perfect knowledge of the constitution of the body, the constitution of the individual soul, and the constitution of the Supersoul is known in terms of Vedic literature as jnanam. That is the opinion of Krsna. BG 1972 purports
• 06:46, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The distinction between the field of activities, the owner of activities and the supreme owner of activities is described as follows (content was: "#REDIRECT The distinction between the field of activities, the owner of activities and the supreme owner of activities is described as follows. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:46, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The distinction between the field of activities, the owner of activities and the supreme owner of activities is described as follows to The distinction between the field of activities, the owner of activities and the supreme owner of activities is described as follows. BG 1972 purports
• 06:45, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page This body is called the kṣetra, and within it dwells the owner of the body and the Supreme Lord who knows both the body and the owner of the body. Therefore He is called the knower of all fields (content was: "#REDIRECT This body is called the kṣetra, and within it dwells the owner of the body and the Supreme Lord who knows both the body and the owner of the body. Therefore He is called the knower of all fields. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:45, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page This body is called the kṣetra, and within it dwells the owner of the body and the Supreme Lord who knows both the body and the owner of the body. Therefore He is called the knower of all fields to This body is called the kṣetra, and within it dwells the owner of the body and the Supreme Lord who knows both the body and the owner of the body. Therefore He is called the knower of all fields. BG 1972 purports
• 06:44, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The Lord also says: "I am also the knower." This means that He is the superknower; the individual soul knows only his particular body (content was: "#REDIRECT The Lord also says: "I am also the knower." This means that He is the superknower; the individual soul knows only his particular body. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:44, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The Lord also says: "I am also the knower." This means that He is the superknower; the individual soul knows only his particular body to The Lord also says: "I am also the knower." This means that He is the superknower; the individual soul knows only his particular body. BG 1972 purports
• 06:43, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page He (God) is the original controller of the senses, just as the king is the original controller of all the activities of the state, and the citizens are secondary controllers (content was: "#REDIRECT He (the Supreme Lord) is the original controller of the senses, just as the king is the original controller of all the activities of the state, and the citizens are secondary controllers. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:43, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page He (God) is the original controller of the senses, just as the king is the original controller of all the activities of the state, and the citizens are secondary controllers to He (the Supreme Lord) is the original controller of the senses, just as the king is the original controller of all the activities of the state, and the citizens are secondary controllers. BG 1972 purports
• 06:42, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The body consists of the senses. The Supreme Lord is Hrsikesa, which means controller of the senses (content was: "#REDIRECT The body consists of the senses. The Supreme Lord is Hrsikesa, which means controller of the senses. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:42, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The body consists of the senses. The Supreme Lord is Hrsikesa, which means controller of the senses to The body consists of the senses. The Supreme Lord is Hrsikesa, which means controller of the senses. BG 1972 purports
• 06:41, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The king is the original proprietor of the kingdom, and the citizen is the secondary proprietor. Similarly, the Supreme Lord is the supreme proprietor of all bodies (content was: "#REDIRECT The king is the original proprietor of the kingdom, and the citizen is the secondary proprietor. Similarly, the Supreme Lord is the supreme proprietor of all bodies. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:41, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The king is the original proprietor of the kingdom, and the citizen is the secondary proprietor. Similarly, the Supreme Lord is the supreme proprietor of all bodies to The king is the original proprietor of the kingdom, and the citizen is the secondary proprietor. Similarly, the Supreme Lord is the supreme proprietor of all bodies. BG 1972 purports
• 06:40, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One may be the proprietor of the body individually, but the Supreme Lord is the proprietor of all bodies (content was: "#REDIRECT One may be the proprietor of the body individually, but the Supreme Lord is the proprietor of all bodies. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:40, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One may be the proprietor of the body individually, but the Supreme Lord is the proprietor of all bodies to One may be the proprietor of the body individually, but the Supreme Lord is the proprietor of all bodies. BG 1972 purports
• 06:39, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page A citizen may know everything about his patch of land, but the king knows not only his palace but all the properties possessed by the individual citizens (content was: "#REDIRECT A citizen may know everything about his patch of land, but the king knows not only his palace but all the properties possessed by the individual citizens. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:39, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page A citizen may know everything about his patch of land, but the king knows not only his palace but all the properties possessed by the individual citizens to A citizen may know everything about his patch of land, but the king knows not only his palace but all the properties possessed by the individual citizens. BG 1972 purports
• 06:39, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is present as the Supersoul in all bodies, knows everything about all bodies. He knows all the different bodies of all the various species of life (content was: "#REDIRECT The Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is present as the Supersoul in all bodies, knows everything about all bodies. He knows all the different bodies of all the various species of life. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:38, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is present as the Supersoul in all bodies, knows everything about all bodies. He knows all the different bodies of all the various species of life to The Supreme Personality of Godhead, who is present as the Supersoul in all bodies, knows everything about all bodies. He knows all the different bodies of all the various species of life. BG 1972 purports
• 06:38, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The individual may be the knower of his own body, but he is not in knowledge of other bodies (content was: "#REDIRECT The individual may be the knower of his own body, but he is not in knowledge of other bodies. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:38, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The individual may be the knower of his own body, but he is not in knowledge of other bodies to The individual may be the knower of his own body, but he is not in knowledge of other bodies. BG 1972 purports
• 06:37, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One who studies the subject matter of the field of activity and the knower of the field very minutely, in terms of this Bhagavad-gita, can attain to knowledge (content was: "#REDIRECT One who studies the subject matter of the field of activity and the knower of the field very minutely, in terms of this Bhagavad-gita, can attain to knowledge. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:37, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One who studies the subject matter of the field of activity and the knower of the field very minutely, in terms of this Bhagavad-gita, can attain to knowledge to One who studies the subject matter of the field of activity and the knower of the field very minutely, in terms of this Bhagavad-gita, can attain to knowledge. BG 1972 purports
• 06:36, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page Krsna says, "I am also the knower, but I am not the individual owner of the body. I am the superknower. I am present in every body as the Paramatma, or Supersoul" (content was: "#REDIRECT Krsna says, "I am also the knower, but I am not the individual owner of the body. I am the superknower. I am present in every body as the Paramatma, or Supersoul". BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:36, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page Krsna says, "I am also the knower, but I am not the individual owner of the body. I am the superknower. I am present in every body as the Paramatma, or Supersoul" to Krsna says, "I am also the knower, but I am not the individual owner of the body. I am the superknower. I am present in every body as the Paramatma, or Supersoul". BG 1972 purports
• 06:35, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page In every field of activities, in every body, there are two souls: the individual soul and the Supersoul (content was: "#REDIRECT In every field of activities, in every body, there are two souls: the individual soul and the Supersoul. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:35, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page In every field of activities, in every body, there are two souls: the individual soul and the Supersoul to In every field of activities, in every body, there are two souls: the individual soul and the Supersoul. BG 1972 purports
• 06:35, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page While discussing the subject of this body and the owner of the body, the soul and the Supersoul, we shall find three different topics of study: the Lord, the living entity, and matter (content was: "#REDIRECT While discussing the subject of this body and the owner of the body, the soul and the Supersoul, we shall find three different topics of study: the Lord, the living entity, and matter. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:34, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page While discussing the subject of this body and the owner of the body, the soul and the Supersoul, we shall find three different topics of study: the Lord, the living entity, and matter to While discussing the subject of this body and the owner of the body, the soul and the Supersoul, we shall find three different topics of study: the Lord, the living entity, and matter. BG 1972 purports
• 06:34, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One should be careful not to consider the Supreme Personality of Godhead in every body and individual soul to be the jiva. This is something like equalizing the potent and the impotent (content was: "#REDIRECT One should be careful not to consider the Supreme Personality of Godhead in every body and individual soul to be the jiva. This is something like equalizing the potent and the impotent. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:33, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One should be careful not to consider the Supreme Personality of Godhead in every body and individual soul to be the jiva. This is something like equalizing the potent and the impotent to One should be careful not to consider the Supreme Personality of Godhead in every body and individual soul to be the jiva. This is something like equalizing the potent and the impotent. BG 1972 purports
• 06:33, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One just has to understand this Bhagavad-gita directly from the description given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and all this will be clarified (content was: "#REDIRECT One just has to understand this Bhagavad-gita directly from the description given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and all this will be clarified. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:32, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One just has to understand this Bhagavad-gita directly from the description given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and all this will be clarified to One just has to understand this Bhagavad-gita directly from the description given by the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and all this will be clarified. BG 1972 purports
• 06:32, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One should also know the distinction between the individual living soul and the Supersoul, the different influences, their potentials, etc (content was: "#REDIRECT One should also know the distinction between the individual living soul and the Supersoul, the different influences, their potentials, etc. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:32, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One should also know the distinction between the individual living soul and the Supersoul, the different influences, their potentials, etc to One should also know the distinction between the individual living soul and the Supersoul, the different influences, their potentials, etc. BG 1972 purports
• 06:31, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page One has to know how this body is constituted, the materials of which this body is made, under whose control this body is working, how the changes are taking place, wherefrom the changes are coming, what the causes are, what the reasons are (content was: "#REDIRECT One has to know how this body is constituted, the materials of which this body is made, under whose control this body is working, how the changes are taking place, wherefrom the changes are coming, what the causes are. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:31, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page One has to know how this body is constituted, the materials of which this body is made, under whose control this body is working, how the changes are taking place, wherefrom the changes are coming, what the causes are, what the reasons are to One has to know how this body is constituted, the materials of which this body is made, under whose control this body is working, how the changes are taking place, wherefrom the changes are coming, what the causes are. BG 1972 purports
• 06:29, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The Lord is describing the field of activities and the knower of the field of activities in their constitutional positions (content was: "#REDIRECT The Lord is describing the field of activities and the knower of the field of activities in their constitutional positions. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
• 06:29, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The Lord is describing the field of activities and the knower of the field of activities in their constitutional positions to The Lord is describing the field of activities and the knower of the field of activities in their constitutional positions. BG 1972 purports
• 06:28, 29 June 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page This is the real picture of the Supreme Lord, as supreme knower of the field, the living entity, as subordinate knower, and the nature of the field of activities (content was: "#REDIRECT This is the real picture of the Supreme Lord, as supreme knower of the field, the living entity, as subordinate knower, and the nature of the field of activities. BG 1972 purports", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))