Main public logs
Appearance
Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
- 15:02, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Just as sunshine is spread throughout the solar system. And just as the sun disc is covered by the glaring effulgence of the sunshine, the transcendental form of the Lord is covered by the glaring effulgence called brahmajyoti (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"just as sunshine is spread throughout the solar system. And just as the sun disc is covered by the glaring effulgence of the s...")
- 14:59, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the eternal form of sac-cid-ananda, and His effulgence is spread throughout the creation (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Supreme Personality of Godhead is the eternal form of sac-cid-ananda, and His effulgence is spread throughout the creation...")
- 14:55, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Everyone is sustained by His mercy; therefore devotional service unto Him constitutes the true religion (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Everyone is sustained by His mercy; therefore devotional service unto Him constitutes the true religion"}} {{notes|}} {{compil...")
- 14:51, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Everyone should engage in devotional service to the Supreme Lord, who is the maintainer of this whole universe (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"everyone should engage in devotional service to the Supreme Lord, who is the maintainer of this whole universe"}} {{notes|}} {...")
- 14:48, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Please remove that covering and exhibit Yourself to Your pure devotee - ISO 15 (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"O my Lord, sustainer of all that lives, Your real face is covered by Your dazzling effulgence. Please remove that covering and...")
- 14:41, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In the Hayasirsa-pancaratra it is explained that although in each and every Upanisad the Supreme Brahman is first viewed as impersonal, at the end the personal form of the Supreme Lord is accepted (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"in the Hayaśīrṣa-pañcarātra it is explained that although in each and every Upaniṣad the Supreme Brahman is first view...")
- 14:13, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page There are many similar Vedic hymns which definitely establish that the Supreme Absolute Truth is a person who is not of this material world (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"There are many similar Vedic hymns which definitely establish that the Supreme Absolute Truth is a person who is not of this m...")
- 14:09, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page By material senses He (the Absolute Truth) cannot be understood. Being the origin of all emanations, He is the supreme, the greatest, the Personality of Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"by material senses He cannot be understood. Being the origin of all emanations, He is the supreme, the greatest, the Personali...")
- 14:07, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Although He (the Absolute Truth) has no material ears, He can hear everything and anything. Having perfect senses, He knows past, future and present. Indeed, He knows everything, but no one can understand Him (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Although He has no material ears, He can hear everything and anything. Having perfect senses, He knows past, future and presen...")
- 14:01, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page He (the Absolute Truth) has no material eyes, but He does have spiritual eyes by which He can see everything and anything (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"He has no material eyes, but He does have spiritual eyes by which He can see everything and anything"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|...")
- 13:58, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In the Svetasvatara Upanisad (3.19) it is clearly explained that the Absolute Truth has no material legs and hands, but in that scripture it is indicated that He has spiritual hands by which He accepts everything offered to Him (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad (3.19) it is clearly explained that the Absolute Truth has no material legs and hands, but i...")
- 13:42, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In order to distinguish His transcendental body from ordinary material bodies, some philosophers have explained Him (the Supreme Absolute Truth) as being impersonal. In other words, material personality is denied, and spiritual personality is established (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"in order to distinguish His transcendental body from ordinary material bodies, some philosophers have explained Him as being i...")
- 08:09, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page Whenever we speak of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, we add the word sri, indicating that He is full with six opulences. This means that He is eternally a person; if He were not a person, the six opulences could not be present in fullness (content was: "#REDIRECT Whenever we speak of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, we add the word sri, indicating that He is full with six opulences. In other words, He is eternally a person; if He were not a person, the six opulences could not be present in fullness", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 08:06, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page If we say that the Supreme Absolute Truth is impersonal, we mean that His personality is not material (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"If we say that the Supreme Absolute Truth is impersonal, we mean that His personality is not material"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler...")
- 08:04, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page Whenever we speak of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, we add the word sri, indicating that He is full with six opulences. This means that He is eternally a person; if He were not a person, the six opulences could not be present in fullness to Whenever we speak of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, we add the word sri, indicating that He is full with six opulences. In other words, He is eternally a person; if He were not a person, the six opulences could not be present in fullness
- 08:01, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The conceptions of the impersonal Brahman and the localized Supersoul are contained within the understanding of the Supreme Personality of Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The conceptions of the impersonal Brahman and the localized Supersoul are contained within the understanding of the Supreme Pe...")
- 07:55, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In Bhagavad-gita (BG 10.12) Krsna is accepted by Arjuna as the Supreme Brahman (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In Bhagavad-gītā (BG 10.12) Kṛṣṇa is accepted by Arjuna as the Supreme Brahman"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}}...")
- 07:51, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Supreme Brahman is the Supreme Personality of Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the Supreme Brahman is the Supreme Personality of Godhead"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2021...")
- 07:49, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The greatest, who is full in six opulences, is the Supreme Personality of Godhead (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The greatest, who is full in six opulences, is the Supreme Personality of Godhead"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}} {{com...")
- 07:45, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page When we speak of the greatest we immediately refer to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the source of all emanations. Unless the greatest possesses six opulences in full, he cannot be called the greatest (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"when we speak of the greatest we immediately refer to the Supreme Personality of Godhead, the source of all emanations. Unless...")
- 07:41, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Caitanya said that all the Vedic statements of the Upanisads aim at the ultimate truth known as Brahman. The word Brahman means - the greatest (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Lord Caitanya then said that all the Vedic statements of the Upaniṣads aim at the ultimate truth known as Brahman. The word...")
- 07:36, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Mayavadi philosophers simply cover the sunlight with the cloud of misinterpretation (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The Mayavadi philosophers simply cover the sunlight with the cloud of misinterpretation"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}}...")
- 07:34, 20 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Lord Caitanya said that the Vedic statements of the Upanisads are like sunlight. Everything is clear and very distinct when it is seen in the sunlight; the statements of the Vedas are similarly clear and distinct (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Lord Caitanya said that the Vedic statements of the Upanisads are like sunlight. Everything is clear and very distinct when it...")
- 15:05, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page There is a class of men known as arya-samaja who say that they accept the original Vedas only. The motive of these people is to give their own interpretation. According to Caitanya, such interpretations are not to be accepted. They are simply not Vedic (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"there is a class of men known as ārya-samāja who say that they accept the original Vedas only and reject all other Vedic lit...")
- 14:12, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page In India there is a class of men known as arya-samaja who say that they accept the original Vedas only and reject all other Vedic literatures. The motive of these people, however, is to give their own interpretation (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"In India there is a class of men known as ārya-samāja who say that they accept the original Vedas only and reject all other...")
- 14:09, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page According to Lord Caitanya, those who try to give personal interpretations to the Vedic statements are not at all intelligent. They mislead their followers by inventing their own interpretations (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"According to Lord Caitanya, those who try to give personal interpretations to the Vedic statements are not at all intelligent....")
- 14:04, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Vedic statements cannot be accepted by our imperfect interpretations; they must be accepted as they are. If they are not accepted in this way, there is no authority in the Vedic statements (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Vedic statements cannot be accepted by our imperfect interpretations; they must be accepted as they are. If they are not accep...")
- 13:59, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page The stool and bone of any living entity are considered to be impure according to the Vedic literature, yet the same Vedic literature asserts that cow dung and conch shells are very pure (content was: "#REDIRECT The stool and bone of any living entity are considered to be impure according to Vedic literatures, yet the Vedic literatures assert that cow dung and conchshells are pure", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 13:56, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Because cow dung and conchshells are considered pure by the Vedas, they are accepted as pure by the followers of the Vedas. If we want to understand the statements by indirect interpretation, then we have to challenge the Vedic statements (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"because cow dung and conchshells are considered pure by the Vedas, they are accepted as pure by the followers of the Vedas. If...")
- 13:54, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page The stool and bone of any living entity are considered to be impure according to the Vedic literature, yet the same Vedic literature asserts that cow dung and conch shells are very pure to The stool and bone of any living entity are considered to be impure according to Vedic literatures, yet the Vedic literatures assert that cow dung and conchshells are pure
- 13:50, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs deleted page There are four kinds of understanding: (1) direct understanding (pratyaksa), (2) hypothetical understanding (anumana), (3) historical understanding (aitihya) and (4) understanding through sound (sabda) (content was: "#REDIRECT There are four kinds of understanding, called: (1) direct understanding (pratyaksa), (2) hypothetical understanding (anumana), (3) historical understanding (aitihya) and (4) understanding through sound", and the only contributor was "SharmisthaK" (talk))
- 13:47, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Understanding from the Vedic scriptures (which are the sound representations of the Absolute Truth) is the best method. The traditional Vedic students accept understanding through sound to be the best (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"understanding from the Vedic scriptures (which are the sound representations of the Absolute Truth) is the best method. The tr...")
- 13:45, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs moved page There are four kinds of understanding: (1) direct understanding (pratyaksa), (2) hypothetical understanding (anumana), (3) historical understanding (aitihya) and (4) understanding through sound (sabda) to There are four kinds of understanding, called: (1) direct understanding (pratyaksa), (2) hypothetical understanding (anumana), (3) historical understanding (aitihya) and (4) understanding through sound
- 13:39, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The direct interpretation is called abhidha-vrtti, whereas the indirect interpretation is called laksana-vrtti, The indirect interpretation serves no purpose (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"The direct interpretation is called abhidhā-vṛtti, whereas the indirect interpretation is called lakṣanā-vṛtti, The in...")
- 13:07, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Caitanya protested against misinterpretations of the Upanisads, and He rejected any explanation which did not give the direct meaning of the Upanisads (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Caitanya protested against misinterpretations of the Upanisads, and He rejected any explanation which did not give the direct...")
- 13:02, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sometimes, the Vaisnava transcendentalists think that the 108 beads represent the 108 companions of Lord Krsna in His rasa dance, and therefore 108 beads are accepted (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Sometimes on the other hand, the Vaisnava transcendentalists think that the 108 beads represent the 108 companions of Lord Krs...")
- 12:51, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Sometimes people inquire about the meaning of these 108 prayer beads, but because we think there are 108 Upanisads which contain full knowledge of the Absolute Truth, therefore 108 beads are accepted (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Sometimes people inquire abou the meaning of these 108 prayer beads, but because we think there are 108 Upanisads which contai...")
- 04:45, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page These 108 Upanisads contain all knowledge about the Absolute Truth (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"These 108 Upanisads contain all knowledge about the Absolute Truth"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|SharmisthaK}} {{complete|ALL}} {{f...")
- 04:39, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page According to Muktika Upanisad, there are 108 Upanisads. Among these are: (9) Chandogya, (10) Brhad-aranyaka, (11) Brahma, (12) Kaivalya, (13) Javala, (14) Svetasva, (15) Hansa, (16) Arunih, (17) Garbha, (18) Narayana, etc (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"(9) Chandogya, (10) Brhad-aranyaka, (11) Brahma, (12) Kaivalya, (13) Javala, (14) Svetasva, (15) Hansa, (16) Arunih, (17) Garb...")
- 04:31, 17 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page According to Muktika Upanisad, there are 108 Upanisads. Among these are: (1) Isa, (2) Kena, (3) Katha, (4) Prasna, (5) Mundaka, (6) Mandukya, (7) Tittiri, (8) Aitareya (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"According to Muktika Upanisad, there are 108 Upanisads. Among these are: (1) Isa, (2) Kena, (3) Katha, (4) Prasna, (5) Mundaka...")
- 17:44, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Caitanya replied to Bhattacarya, You do not elucidate the direct meaning but imagine something and consequently obscure the true meaning. I think that you have a particular doctrine which you are trying to expound through the codes of Vedanta-sutra (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"You do not elucidate the direct meaning but imagine something and consequently obscure the true meaning. I think that you have...")
- 17:27, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Caitanya replied to Bhattacarya, There is nothing really difficult about the meaning of the original Vedanta-sutra, but the way you explain Vedanta-sutra appears to obscure the real meaning (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"There is nothing really difficult about the meaning of the original Vedānta-sūtra, but the way you explain Vedānta-sūtra a...")
- 17:24, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page My dear sir (Sarvabhauma Bhattacarya), the Lord replied. As far as the Vedanta-sutra or the codes of Vedanta are concerned, I can understand the meaning quite well. However, I cannot understand your explanations (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"My dear sir," the Lord replied. "As far as the Vedānta-sūtra or the codes of Vedānta are concerned, I can understand the me...")
- 17:09, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page When Caitanya said that He was an uneducated fool and could not follow the expositions, Bhattacarya replied: If You do not follow what I am saying, why don't You inquire? Why do You simply sit silently? It appears that You do have something to say (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"When the Lord said that He was an uneducated fool and could not follow the expositions, Bhaṭṭācārya replied: "If You do...")
- 17:04, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page As far as Lord Caitanya was concerned, He said that He did not understand the explanation of Bhattacarya not because it was too difficult for His understanding but because He did not approve of the Mayavadi interpretation (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"As far as Lord Caitanya was concerned, He said that He did not understand the explanation of Bhaṭṭācārya not because it...")
- 16:55, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Lord indicated that in the Mayavadi sampradaya there are many so-called sannyasis who, even though illiterate & unintelligent, hear Vedanta-sutra from their spiritual master just as a matter of formality. Although they listen, they do not understand (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"the Lord indicated that in the Māyāvādī sampradāya there are many so-called sannyāsīs who, even though illiterate and u...")
- 16:49, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page The Lord replied to Bhattacarya, I am simply listening to you because you said that it is the duty of every sannyasi to hear Vedanta-sutra. But as far as the meaning you are conveying is concerned - I cannot understand that (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"I am simply listening to you because you said that it is the duty of every sannyāsī to hear Vedānta-sūtra. But as far as t...")
- 16:46, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page I am a fool, the Lord replied, I have no capacity to study Vedanta-sutra, but since you asked Me to hear you, I am trying to listen (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"I am a fool," the Lord replied. "I have no capacity to study Vedānta-sūtra, but since you asked Me to hear you, I am trying...")
- 16:38, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Bhattacarya said (Caitanya): You have been hearing Vedanta-sutra from me for the past week, but You have not asked any questions, nor have You indicated that I am explaining it nicely. Therefore I cannot tell whether You are understanding me or not (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"On the eighth day, Bhaṭṭācārya said: "You have been hearing Vedānta-sūtra from me for the past week, but You have not...")
- 16:28, 15 September 2021 SharmisthaK talk contribs created page Bhattacarya lectured on the Vedanta-sutra continuously for seven days, and the Lord (Caitanya) heard him without speaking a word (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Bhaṭṭācārya lectured on the Vedānta-sūtra continuously for seven days, and the Lord heard him without speaking a word"...")