User contributions for BhavesvariRadhika

4 May 2022

• 10:2110:21, 4 May 2022 diff hist +4,113 Omkara, or the pranava, is the seed of transcendental realization, and it is composed of the three transcendental letters a-u-m No edit summary current
• 10:2110:21, 4 May 2022 diff hist +7,747 Om namo bhagavate vasudevaya is known as the dvadasaksara-mantra. This mantra is chanted by Vaisnava devotees, and it begins with pranava, or omkara No edit summary current
• 10:2110:21, 4 May 2022 diff hist +5,762 Omkara (pranava) is the symbolic sound representation of the SPG. Om tat sad iti nirdeso brahmanas tri-vidhah smrtah: the three words om tat sat immediately invoke the Supreme Person. Therefore Krsna says that He is omkara in all the Vedic mantras No edit summary current
• 10:2010:20, 4 May 2022 diff hist +10 One who is not able to chant directly the holy name of the Lord, as recommended above, can easily chant the pranava - omkara No edit summary current
• 10:1010:10, 4 May 2022 diff hist +26,460 As far as the omkara pranava is concerned, it is considered to be the sound incarnation of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. As such, omkara is eternal, unlimited, transcendental, supreme and indestructible No edit summary current
• 10:1010:10, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,434 Because in all the hymns of the four Vedas, Sama, Yajur, Rg and Atharva, the pranava or omkara is very prominent, it is understood to be Krsna. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
• 10:1010:10, 4 May 2022 diff hist +30 If a person accepts the Vaisnava mantra or Vaisnava way of worshiping the Deity, he is allowed to chant the pranava mantra No edit summary current
• 10:0910:09, 4 May 2022 diff hist +7,230 In Bhagavad-gita Krsna says that He is pranavah sarva-vedesu, the syllable om in the Vedic mantras. In transcendental knowledge, the Lord is addressed as pranava, omkara, which is a symbolic representation of the Lord in sound No edit summary current
• 10:0810:08, 4 May 2022 diff hist +4,120 In the Bhagavad-gita, the pranava (omkara) has been accepted as the direct, literal representation of the Supreme Absolute Truth No edit summary current
• 10:0710:07, 4 May 2022 diff hist +2,914 In the material world, Brahma is the complete representation of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and transcendental sound, pranava, comes from him No edit summary current
• 10:0410:04, 4 May 2022 diff hist +88 Category:Pranava - omkara No edit summary
• 07:3907:39, 4 May 2022 diff hist +18,247 After hearing the direct interpretation, one of the sannyasis immediately declared, O Caitanya, whatever You have explained of the indirect interpretation of omkara is most useful. Only a fortunate person can accept Your interpretation as the right one No edit summary current
• 07:3907:39, 4 May 2022 diff hist +6,734 Bhagavad-gita is mostly read by almost all classes of people of the world, but unfortunately they are accepted in an independent choice of indirect interpretation. That is a deviation, and for that reason only they cannot derive the direct benefit No edit summary current
• 07:3807:38, 4 May 2022 diff hist +26,302 By accepting such a secondary word (tat tvam asi) and leaving aside the principal vibration (omkara), he (Sankara) has given up a direct interpretation of the scripture in favor of his own indirect interpretation No edit summary current
• 07:3807:38, 4 May 2022 diff hist +17,951 In this way Lord Caitanya condemned attempts at indirect interpretation of the Vedanta-sutra, and all the sannyasis present were struck with wonder by His explanation No edit summary current
• 07:3807:38, 4 May 2022 diff hist +26,145 Sripada Sankaracarya has unceremoniously obscured the Krsna consciousness described in the purusa-vedanta-sutra by manufacturing an indirect interpretation and abandoning the direct interpretation No edit summary current
• 07:3807:38, 4 May 2022 diff hist +14,588 The direct interpretation is called abhidha-vrtti, whereas the indirect interpretation is called laksana-vrtti, The indirect interpretation serves no purpose No edit summary current
• 07:3507:35, 4 May 2022 diff hist +5,174 As explained in Bhagavad-gita, it is not by any father or mother that the living entity is given his birth. The living entity is a completely separate identity from the so-called father and mother No edit summary current
• 07:3507:35, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,032 By the direction of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, everything created in the material world is transient. By a temporary arrangement, a father begets a child, or a living entity becomes the child of a so-called father No edit summary current
• 07:3507:35, 4 May 2022 diff hist +7 Due to His mystic covering, He was always accepted as an ordinary human child by His so-called father and mother and other relatives No edit summary current
• 07:3507:35, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,639 Factually, the spiritual energy, the living entity who desires to enjoy material things, is manipulated by the Supreme Lord. The so-called father and mother have nothing to do with the living entity No edit summary current
• 07:3407:34, 4 May 2022 diff hist +7 These illusions (identifying with the body and his so-called father and mother) continue as long as one is not enlightened about the situation of the living entity No edit summary current
• 07:3407:34, 4 May 2022 diff hist +4,080 The body created by the so-called father and mother actually has nothing to do with its so-called creators. Therefore the living entity flatly denied that Maharaja Citraketu and his wife were his father and mother No edit summary current
• 07:3407:34, 4 May 2022 diff hist +7,375 The gopis said, "The so-called husband, friend, son, daughter, father and mother are all simply sources of material misery. No one is made happy in this material world by having a so-called father, mother, husband, son, daughter and friend" No edit summary current
• 07:3307:33, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,337 The so-called father and mother have nothing to do with the living entity. As a result of his own choice and karma, the living being takes different bodies through the agency of so-called fathers and mothers No edit summary current
• 07:3307:33, 4 May 2022 diff hist +5,241 The so-called relationship of father and son is an arrangement of prakrti, or nature. It has no meaning, and therefore it is called illusion No edit summary current
• 07:3307:33, 4 May 2022 diff hist +10,706 Vasudeva and Devaki, the so-called father and mother of Lord Krsna, underwent penances to get Vasudeva as their son No edit summary current
• 06:5606:56, 4 May 2022 diff hist +11 The consciousness of the individual soul is prone to be forgetful. When he is forgetful of his real nature, he obtains education and enlightenment from the superior lessons of Krsna. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
• 06:5406:54, 4 May 2022 diff hist +38 Although there is a similarity between the consciousness of the Supreme Soul and the consciousness of the individual soul, the individual soul's consciousness is limited, whereas the consciousness of the Supreme Soul is unlimited No edit summary current
• 06:5006:50, 4 May 2022 diff hist +8,386 We have personal experience of consciousness, for it is spread all over the body; in every hair follicle of our body we can feel consciousness. This is individual consciousness. Similarly, there is superconsciousness No edit summary
• 06:4906:49, 4 May 2022 diff hist +5,322 Transcendentalists who do not accept the supreme consciousness as separate from the individual consciousness are as offensive as the materialists who deny even the existence of the Lord No edit summary current
• 06:4906:49, 4 May 2022 diff hist −13 The Supersoul, which is situated in all bodies as the friend of the individual soul, is conscious of all bodies. That is the difference between supreme consciousness and individual consciousness. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
• 06:4906:49, 4 May 2022 diff hist +12,695 The subtle activities of the mind are thinking, feeling and willing. In accordance to one's consciousness, the individual is either polluted or clear No edit summary current
• 06:4906:49, 4 May 2022 diff hist +4,182 The individual consciousness is advised to dovetail with the supreme consciousness, as instructed by the Lord in Bhagavad-gita (BG 18.66): sarva-dharman parityajya mam ekam saranam vraja No edit summary current
• 06:4906:49, 4 May 2022 diff hist +4,143 The individual consciousness (Arjuna) is advised to dovetail with the supreme consciousness and thus maintain his conscious purity No edit summary current
• 06:4806:48, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,562 The impersonalists misinterpret the theory of reflection, and thus they wrongly accept the individual consciousness as the supreme consciousness No edit summary current
• 06:4706:47, 4 May 2022 diff hist +2,034 Love, that's nice. Very good. So the supreme consciousness and our individual consciousness, when they are in exchange of love, that is perfection No edit summary current
• 06:4506:45, 4 May 2022 diff hist +10,482 The Supersoul, which is situated in all bodies as the friend of the individual soul, is conscious of all bodies. That is the difference between supreme consciousness and individual consciousness No edit summary current
• 06:3606:36, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,647 Material life means enjoyment. Enjoyment is not real enjoyment. Real enjoyment is spiritual enjoyment. Spiritual enjoyment, that is with Krsna. That is not in the material world No edit summary current
• 06:3606:36, 4 May 2022 diff hist +8,255 The sense of enjoyment in the Lord is real, but such a sense in the living being is a sort of wishful desire only No edit summary current
• 06:3606:36, 4 May 2022 diff hist +8,666 This (the enjoyment in the Lord is real but in the living entity it is not) difference in consciousness is the distinction of the two identities, namely the Lord and the living being. Otherwise there is no difference between the Lord and the living being No edit summary current
• 06:2506:25, 4 May 2022 diff hist +5,607 We are seeking pleasure within this material world. That is imitation. That is not real enjoyment. But the basic principle of enjoyment is there. Here there is imitation enjoyment - love between young boy, young girl is there. So wherefrom it comes? No edit summary current
• 06:2406:24, 4 May 2022 diff hist +8 This (the yogis enjoyment is anante, endless) is because their enjoyment is in relation to the supreme enjoyer (Rama), Sri Krsna. Bhagavan Sri Krsna is the real enjoyer, and Bhagavad-gita confirms this - BG 5.29 No edit summary current
• 06:1906:19, 4 May 2022 diff hist +2,489 Foolish creatures are enamored by the beauty of matter and think that the enjoyment it offers is real, but actually that is not real enjoyment No edit summary current
• 06:1506:15, 4 May 2022 diff hist +3,853 Spiritual happiness, is ananta, unending. Foolish creatures are enamored by the beauty of matter and think that the enjoyment it offers is real, but actually that is not real enjoyment No edit summary current
• 06:1006:10, 4 May 2022 diff hist +11,194 The real enjoyment in this material world is sex. Now if we want to enjoy sex, covered with coats and pants, is that enjoyment is pleasing? No edit summary current
• 06:0706:07, 4 May 2022 diff hist +4,152 Real enjoyment means that when you are uncontaminated with this material body. Spiritual enjoyment No edit summary current
• 06:0306:03, 4 May 2022 diff hist +8,293 A glossary of some of the important words in this chapter (SB 4th Canto, Ch 28): Bhoga - Enjoyment. Herein this word refers to real enjoyment in spiritual life, Bhrtya - The servants of the body, namely the senses No edit summary
• 06:0306:03, 4 May 2022 diff hist +5,395 Real enjoyment means No edit summary current

3 May 2022

• 17:3617:36, 3 May 2022 diff hist +135 N Category:Sri Krsna Sankirtana Created page with "Category:Sri Krsna-vijaya Category:Krsna's - Umbrella Category Category:Sankirtana Category:All Categories - Vaniquotes"