User contributions for PoojaA
Appearance
29 July 2022
- 03:4303:43, 29 July 2022 diff hist +9,082 They are going to the naked dance club, the sex ananda. Because in the material world there is no ananda except this No edit summary current
- 03:4203:42, 29 July 2022 diff hist +6,086 These people they have no aim of life. What is the aim of human..., they do not know. So their animal propensities are being adjusted this way, that way, this way, that way. Just like they go to see naked dance No edit summary current
- 03:4203:42, 29 July 2022 diff hist +5,064 These boys, although they are young men, they will never go to cinema. They are young men; they have got all propensities. But they are so elevated, they have given up all these low propensities - going to the club, restaurant and cinema, or naked dance No edit summary current
- 03:4103:41, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,082 The animal propensity - he is seeing his wife daily naked, and still he is going to see naked dance, and paying some fees. Because they have no engagement except this animalism. Is it not? No edit summary current
- 03:4003:40, 29 July 2022 diff hist +6,161 Not at home sex, but "Let us go to the prostitute, go to the naked dance." They have no other ideas. Punah punas carvita-carvananam. These class of men cannot take to Krsna consciousness No edit summary current
- 03:4003:40, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,589 Everyone has got experience in every country. When he has no difficulty to get money, then what he will do? He will simply drink or invent some means of intoxication, naked dance No edit summary current
- 03:3503:35, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,660 Without protection of the brahmanas and the cows, there can be no human civilization and no question of happy, peaceful life. Asuras, therefore, are always interested in killing the brahmanas and cows No edit summary current
- 03:3403:34, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,421 There is no question of happy life within this material world. This is to be understood first. Very pessimistic. Those who are intelligent, they are very pessimistic. Even materially they are pessimistic No edit summary current
- 03:3303:33, 29 July 2022 diff hist +6,207 Opposing princes continued, "There is no question of distress or happiness for a person like you because neither of these conditions is everlasting. Take courage. Don't be disappointed by this temporary reversal. After all, we are not the final actors" No edit summary current
- 03:3203:32, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,126 One practices yoga in order to attain perfection on the spiritual platform. There is no question of material happiness or distress. It is transcendental No edit summary current
- 03:3103:31, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,827 Like small particles of sand, bodies come together and are separated by the force of time, and people falsely lament for unification and separation. Unless one knows this, there is no question of happiness No edit summary current
- 03:3103:31, 29 July 2022 diff hist +4,670 In this material world, everything happens under the influence of time. Consequently, for a learned person who sees how things are taking place, there is no question of being sorry or happy because of the waves of material nature No edit summary current
- 03:2603:26, 29 July 2022 diff hist +5,971 During their stay in the forest, there was some quarrel between Ramacandra and Ravana, and the latter kidnapped the Lord's wife, Sita. The quarrel ended in the vanquishing of the greatly powerful Ravana, along with all his kingdom and family No edit summary current
- 03:2603:26, 29 July 2022 diff hist +2,966 There is a Bengali proverb that it is not wise to pick up quarrel with a crocodile while living in the jurisdiction of the water. Therefore we may agree to the desire of Mr. Spellman to keep peace with him No edit summary current
- 03:2403:24, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,487 When the Pandavas were living at the palace of Virata incognito, the Kauravas picked a quarrel with King Virata and decided to take away his large number of cows. While they were taking away the cows, Arjuna fought with them incognito No edit summary current
- 03:2403:24, 29 July 2022 diff hist +4,511 There are six features of conjugal love affairs, called peacemaking, picking a quarrel, going to meet one's lover, sitting together, separation and support. Lord Krsna expanded an empire of these six features, of which He was the ruling prince No edit summary current
- 03:1903:19, 29 July 2022 diff hist +8,535 He (Visvamitra) picked a quarrel with Vasistha Muni when he was a ksatriya king and performed a great sacrifice in cooperation with Matanga Muni and thus was able to vanquish the sons of Vasistha No edit summary current
- 03:1903:19, 29 July 2022 diff hist +2,074 Bhurisrava advised the sons of Dhrtarastra not to pick any quarrel or fight with them No edit summary current
- 03:1803:18, 29 July 2022 diff hist +12,521 All of them (Somadatta, Bhurisrava and Salya) appreciated the wonderful strength of Arjuna due to his being the devotee friend of the Lord, and thus Bhurisrava advised the sons of Dhrtarastra not to pick any quarrel or fight with them No edit summary current
- 03:1503:15, 29 July 2022 diff hist +6,538 We should take advantage of the benediction given by Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu, & when by chanting the Hare Krsna mantra we are cleansed of all dirty things (CC Antya 20.12), we shall be able to understand very easily that Krsna is the only object of love No edit summary current
- 03:1403:14, 29 July 2022 diff hist +1,533 Thus Rupa Gosvami became the object of love and affection for all the devotees of the Lord, including those who came from Bengal and those who resided in Orissa No edit summary current
- 03:1203:12, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,395 The Lord becomes a subordinate object of love in such transcendental relationships (when a devotee thinks of Him as his pet son, personal friend or most dear fiance) No edit summary current
- 03:1103:11, 29 July 2022 diff hist +5,351 Madhyama-adhikari adores the Lord, considering Him the object of love; he makes friends with those who are in DS; he tries to awaken the dormant love of God in the hearts of the innocent; and he avoids the atheists, who deride the very name of the Lord No edit summary current
- 03:1003:10, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,427 Lord Caitanya prayed, "You (Krsna) can either embrace Me or crush Me under Your feet - whatever You like. You may make Me brokenhearted by not letting Me see You throughout My whole life, but You are My only object of love" No edit summary current
- 03:0903:09, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,690 In Vrndavana, however, Krsna was not even known as the Paramatma because the residents of Vrndavana were pure unconventional devotees of the Lord and could think of Him only as their object of love. They did not know that He is the Personality of Godhead No edit summary current
- 03:0603:06, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,067 This complete surrender unto the Supreme Personality of Godhead is the most auspicious path for the conditioned soul because the Supreme Lord is the supreme objective of love No edit summary current
- 03:0603:06, 29 July 2022 diff hist +5,602 The object of love is Krsna, and the container of that love is the devotee of Krsna. Learned scholars call them alambana - the foundations No edit summary current
- 03:0503:05, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,236 He (Krsna) is the central object of love because He gives us all bliss, expanding Himself in so many ways according to our different situations, namely bodily, mental or spiritual No edit summary current
- 03:0303:03, 29 July 2022 diff hist +8 Every living being is related with the Supreme Lord by some sort of affectionate relation, either as servant or as friend or as parent or as an object of conjugal love No edit summary current
- 03:0103:01, 29 July 2022 diff hist +1,753 The happiness of the abode of love is in the happiness of the object of that love. This is not a relationship of desire for personal gratification No edit summary
- 03:0103:01, 29 July 2022 diff hist +1,476 Srila Rupa Gosvami and Sanatana Gosvami were the objects of love and honor for all the great stalwart devotees of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu No edit summary current
- 03:0003:00, 29 July 2022 diff hist +7,804 Because we do not find whom to love, therefore we place our love even cats and dogs. We love a dog. Anyone who has no other object to love, no children, no family, no wife - all right, keep a cat, keep a dog. But love is there No edit summary current
- 02:5802:58, 29 July 2022 diff hist +1,472 I taste the bliss to which the object of love is entitled. But the pleasure of Radha, the abode of that love, is ten million times greater No edit summary current
- 02:5802:58, 29 July 2022 diff hist +3,028 Here in this world we find that the object of love and the lover both are the cheater and the cheated in their reciprocal dealings. That is our experience No edit summary current
- 02:5702:57, 29 July 2022 diff hist +6,237 Object of love is Krsna No edit summary current
28 July 2022
- 10:3710:37, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,988 Whether Arjuna accepted the Vedic conclusion that there is an atomic soul, or whether he did not believe in the existence of the soul, he had no reason to lament. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:3610:36, 28 July 2022 diff hist +6,988 So long you come, do not come to Krsna consciousness, your, these two business will go on, lamenting and hankering. And as soon as you come to Krsna consciousness, you become joyful. There is no reason of lamenting No edit summary current
- 10:3510:35, 28 July 2022 diff hist +4,110 Whether one believes in the existence of the soul, or one does not believe in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation for loss of the body. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:3410:34, 28 July 2022 diff hist +5,620 The Vedic wisdom encourages self-realization on the basis of the nonexistence of the material body. in either case, whether one believes in the existence of the soul or one does not believe in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 10:3310:33, 28 July 2022 diff hist +4,086 Nonbelievers in the existence of the soul are called atheists by followers of Vedic wisdom. Yet even if, for argument's sake, we accept the atheistic theory, there is still no cause for lamentation. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:3210:32, 28 July 2022 diff hist +5,646 Krsna said, "You (gopis) will understand that you are always with Me and that there is no cause of lamentation in our being separated from one another" No edit summary current
- 10:3110:31, 28 July 2022 diff hist +6,342 Krsna continued, "Here also I am not the proprietor of anything, but am always penniless. There is no cause to lament for such a penniless condition; I possessed nothing in the past, so why should I lament that I do not possess anything at present" No edit summary current
- 10:2910:29, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,878 If, however, you think that the soul is perpetually born and always dies, still you have no reason to lament, O mighty-armed. BG 2.26 - 1972 No edit summary current
- 10:2810:28, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,947 If you (Arjuna) think that the soul (or the symptoms of life) is always born and dies forever, you still have no reason to lament, O mighty-armed No edit summary current
- 10:2610:26, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,871 Even if Arjuna did not believe in the existence of the soul - as in the Vaibhasika philosophy - there would still have been no cause for lamentation. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 10:2610:26, 28 July 2022 diff hist +3,981 Accepting that there are two classes of philosophers, one believing in the existence of soul and the other not believing in the existence of the soul, there is no cause for lamentation in either case. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
27 July 2022
- 02:5802:58, 27 July 2022 diff hist −9 Their (Krsna's, Arjuna's and the assembled kings') individuality existed in the past, and their individuality will continue in the future without interruption. Therefore, there is no cause for lamentation for anyone. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current
- 02:5802:58, 27 July 2022 diff hist +5,626 Nonbelievers in the existence of the soul are called atheists by followers of Vedic wisdom. Yet even if for argument's sake we accept the atheistic theory, there is still no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 02:5702:57, 27 July 2022 diff hist +4,829 Hearing the words of the dead son (of Srivasa Thakura), all the members of Srivasa Thakura’s family received transcendental knowledge. Thus there was no cause for lamentation No edit summary current
- 02:5702:57, 27 July 2022 diff hist +2,995 For a ksatriya, a military man, shooting arrows at the enemy is considered transcendental, and refraining from such a duty is demoniac. Therefore, there was no cause for Arjuna to lament. BG 1972 purports No edit summary current