Jump to content

       

Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia

Vaniquotes - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge

Anything which does not speak in terms of the Vedic formula, we do not accept such knowledge as valid

From Vaniquotes
Revision as of 04:08, 28 July 2023 by Soham (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"anything which does not speak accor . . . in terms of the Vedic formula, we do not accept such knowledge as valid"}} {{notes|}...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Expressions researched:
"anything which does not speak accor . . . in terms of the Vedic formula, we do not accept such knowledge as valid"

Conversations and Morning Walks

1976 Conversations and Morning Walks

Prabhupāda: Our basic knowledge is on the Vedic principle, that whatever . . . just like we are explaining now, veda-vihito dharmaḥ. We have to understand everything from the Vedas, from this Vedic knowledge. So anything which does not speak accor . . . in terms of the Vedic formula, we do not accept such knowledge as valid. Reporter: Okay. Prabhupāda: But practically you are seeing that. But . . . Reporter: Would you accept conclusions from science that . . . only if it agreed with the Vedic scriptures? Prabhupāda: First of all is that . . . as you say science, what do you mean by science? Can you explain? Reporter: Well, what the . . . the best conclusions of the best people in science.

Prabhupāda: So far Vedic students are concerned, there are no controversies.

Rāmeśvara: But from what the modern man believes there may be some differences.

Prabhupāda: Modern man believes, that's all right, but . . .

Rāmeśvara: That's what his question is.

Prabhupāda: Our, our basic knowledge is on the Vedic principle, that whatever . . . just like we are explaining now, veda-vihito dharmaḥ. We have to understand everything from the Vedas, from this Vedic knowledge. So anything which does not speak accor . . . in terms of the Vedic formula, we do not accept such knowledge as valid.

Reporter: Okay.

Prabhupāda: But practically you are seeing that. But . . .

Reporter: Would you accept conclusions from science that . . . only if it agreed with the Vedic scriptures?

Prabhupāda: First of all is that . . . as you say science, what do you mean by science? Can you explain?

Reporter: Well, what the . . . the best conclusions of the best people in science.

Prabhupāda: Yes. That's all right, but what is the best conclusion?

Reporter: Well, rely on their opinions.

Prabhupāda: That is opinion. The opinion is changing. How you can rely? That is not fixed up. So what is this opinion? What is the value of this opinion?

Reporter: Well . . .

Prabhupāda: You give some opinion, and after some years you change it. So what is the . . . how can I rely on your opinion?

Reporter: Would Darwin's theory of evolution and other evolutionary theories . . .

Prabhupāda: Whatever it may be, if it is being changed every year or every ten years, then what is the value of this opinion? There is no value.