Category:Conclusions of a Devotee of God
Theme Analysis
The vision of a devotee is fundamentally different from that of a materialist. Śrīla Prabhupāda explains that a devotee concludes that the entire cosmic manifestation is the energy of the Lord. Consequently, they see that no one—whether a benefactor or a mischief-monger—acts independently; everyone is an instrument acting under the sanction of the Supreme. This vision provides immense peace and stability. Furthermore, the conclusions of a devotee are not sentimental. As exemplified by Prahlāda Mahārāja, the Vaiṣṇava conclusion prioritizes service to the spiritual master over direct service to the Lord. True devotion requires a solid philosophical foundation based on the teachings of the ācāryas, distinguishing the devotee from "emotional" pretenders who lack real knowledge.
- Divine Sanction: A devotee concludes that no one is directly responsible for happiness or distress; everything happens by the sanction of the Lord.
- Service to Guru: The authoritative Vaiṣṇava conclusion is that one must serve the spiritual master to please the Lord, rather than seeking direct service.
- Rejection of Sentiment: False devotees may show emotions, but true devotees base their lives on the conclusive decisions of the ācāryas and scripture.
- Practical Logic: Devotees use practical logic in their service, just as Mother Yaśodā concluded that Kṛṣṇa broke the yogurt pot based on circumstantial evidence.
- Explore the synthesized essence of this category in this Vanipedia article: Vision and Conclusions of a Devotee.
Subcategories
This category has the following 4 subcategories, out of 4 total.
D
V
Pages in category "Conclusions of a Devotee of God"
The following 20 pages are in this category, out of 20 total.
A
- A devotee already on the brahminical platform can realize Me (Lord Krsna) within his heart, and therefore he definitely concludes that the whole cosmic manifestation and its different features are effects of different energies of the Lord
- A devotee's conclusion is that no one is directly responsible for being a benefactor or mischief-monger without the sanction of the Lord; therefore he does not consider anyone to be directly responsible for such action
S
- Seeing the pot broken and Krsna not present, Yasoda definitely concluded that the breaking of the pot was the work of Krsna. There was no doubt about it
- Srila Rupa Gosvami concludes by saying that Bhakti-rasamrta-sindhu is very difficult for ordinary men to understand, yet he hopes that Lord Krsna, the eternal Supreme Personality of Godhead, will be pleased with his presentation of this book
- Srila Sukadeva Gosvami thus concludes his description of the superexalted position of Lord Krsna by glorifying Him in the following way, "O Lord Krsna, all glories unto You"
T
- The great Vaisnava philosopher Srila Baladeva Vidyabhusana has very nicely explained the materialistic conclusion in his Govinda-bhasya, a commentary on the Vedanta-sutra
- The Tattvavadi acarya replied, "What You have said is certainly factual. It is the conclusion of all the revealed scriptures of the Vaisnavas"
- The Vaisnava cult conclusion should be taken. Otherwise we cannot preach. Without becoming Vaisnava, one cannot become guru. Without becoming guru, how one can preach? These are the formulas
- Then all the devotees, headed by Svarupa Damodara Gosvami, concluded that because Haridasa had committed suicide at the confluence of the rivers Ganges and Yamuna, he must have ultimately attained shelter at the lotus feet of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu
- Thinking Him (Caitanya) to be one of the ordinary living entities, they discriminate between Gaurasundara and Sri Krsna. Such understanding is also demoniac and is against the conclusion of the acaryas. Such a conclusion is a product of Kali-yuga
- This young man, Gopala Cakravarti, became very angry upon hearing the statements of Haridasa Thakura. He immediately criticized him. "O assembly of learned scholars, just hear the conclusion of the emotional devotee"