Jump to content

       

Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanimedia

Vaniquotes - the complete essence of Vedic knowledge

As we are, in our own original, constitutional position, we are not subjected to birth, death, old age and disease

From Vaniquotes
Revision as of 23:52, 28 August 2023 by Soham (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"as we are, in our own original, constitutional position, we are not subjected to birth, death, old age and disease"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|ALL}} {{first|2023-08-28T23:52:11.000Z}} {{last|2023-08-28T23:52:11.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Original Constitutional Position Category:We Are Not Category:Not Subjected Categor...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Expressions researched:
"as we are, in our own original, constitutional position, we are not subjected to birth, death, old age and disease"

Lectures

Bhagavad-gita As It Is Lectures

As we are, in our own original, constitutional position, we are not subjected to birth, death, old age and disease. Just like Kṛṣṇa is sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha (Bs. 5.1), eternal, blissful, knowledgeable, similarly, we, being part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa, we are also of the same quality. The . . . we have accepted this position of birth, death, old age and disease on account of our association with this material world.

Here, in this material world, we are put into mṛtatva, subject to birth, death, old age and disease. But there is another position, where there is no birth, death, old age and disease. So which position we should like—birth, death, old age and disease, or no birth, no death, no old age, no disease? Which one we should like? Hmm? I think we should like no birth, no death, no old age, no disease.

So that is called amṛtatva. So amṛtatvāya kalpate. Every living being is amṛta. That will be explained. Amṛta . . . as we are, in our own original, constitutional position, we are not subjected to birth, death, old age and disease. Just like Kṛṣṇa is sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha (Bs. 5.1), eternal, blissful, knowledgeable, similarly, we, being part and parcel of Kṛṣṇa, we are also of the same quality. The . . . we have accepted this position of birth, death, old age and disease on account of our association with this material world.

Now, everyone is trying not to die, everyone is trying not to become old—everyone is trying not to be dead . . . meet death. This is natural. Because, by nature, we are not subjected to these things; therefore our endeavor, our activity, is struggling how to become deathless, birthless, diseaseless. That is struggle for existence.