Category:That is Not Love
Theme Analysis
The philosophical essence of this category makes a stark distinction between true spiritual love and the temporary, conditional affections of the material world. According to Śrīla Prabhupāda, what is commonly accepted as love in material society—such as the romantic attraction between a man and a woman, or the affection for one's family—is actually lust, as it is fundamentally driven by the desire for personal sense gratification. Furthermore, even in the realm of religion, approaching God to beg for daily bread or material benefits is classified as a business transaction rather than pure devotion. True love is unconditional, unmotivated (ahaitukī), and involves an open-hearted, active exchange of service without any secrecy or expectation of return. Because every living entity's eternal relationship is with Kṛṣṇa, misplacing this loving propensity onto temporary material objects inevitably leads to frustration. Only by completely reposing our love in the Supreme Personality of Godhead can we experience genuine satisfaction and extend true universal love to all other living beings.
- Distinguishing Lust from Love: Material affection is based on physical beauty and personal satisfaction. When these desires are frustrated, the relationship ends, proving that such worldly attraction is merely lust, not love.
- Rejecting Conditional Devotion: Approaching God or another person with a motive for profit, security, or sense gratification is a business transaction. True love for God remains steadfast regardless of whether He provides blessings or hardships.
- The Necessity of Active Service: Love cannot be an empty formality or a theoretical appreciation. It must be demonstrated through the active, practical exchange of feelings and the rendering of selfless service to the beloved.
- Transparency and Trust: A relationship tainted by secrecy and hidden motives to exploit the other's skin or money is not love. Authentic affection demands completely open-hearted dealings without any personal agenda.
- Universal Love Through Kṛṣṇa: Loving only one's immediate family or community is a limited, temporary sentiment. True, universal compassion is naturally awakened only when one's dormant love is properly directed toward Kṛṣṇa.
- Explore the synthesized essence of this category in this Vanipedia article: The Illusion of Sense Gratification - That Is Not Love.
Pages in category "That is Not Love"
The following 32 pages are in this category, out of 32 total.
E
I
- I love your skin, I love your money, or I love you for some reason. Oh, that is not love
- If I help you in the matter of for your ruination, that is not love
- If I love you and if I have got some secrecy, I don't disclose to you, that is not perfect love. I must deal with you open-hearted, you must deal with me open-hearted, then there is love
- If I love you, because you are beautiful, for my sense gratification, but I keep everything secret, that is not love. That is sense gratification, lust. These are the signs of love
- If in a moment's misunderstanding we prepare ourself to be separated, that is not . . . there is no love
- If you love only your brother or sister, that is not universal love. Universal love means you love everyone. That universal love can be developed by Krsna consciousness, not by otherwise
- If you love somebody, the intense love is that your lover is everything. That is love. Just like a mother loves her child. So she is always anxious to take care of the child. Whole attention is on the child. These are examples. These are not actually love
- If you think that "My dear God, I come to You for my daily bread, and as soon as You give me my daily bread, my business is finished with You..." No. That is also very good, but this is not love. This is business
- In the material world, lust is accepted as love. A boy is loving a girl, a girl is loving... But it is lust. That is not love
L
- Love between two persons, there must be exchange of loving feelings. These are the exchange of loving feelings. Unless the exchange loving feelings are there, that is not love. That is theoretical. That is not practical
- Love means taking and giving also. If we just take from someone and give him nothing in return, that is not love - it is exploitation. It is not that we should just continue eating without ever offering anything to Krsna
- Love means without any personal profit. If I love God for some profit, that is business; that is not love. Ahaituky apratihata. And such love of God cannot be checked by any material cause
S
- Simply appreciation of the greatness of God, that is good, in God consciousness, but that is not love
- Simply I love you and you love me, formality, but there is no service, that is not real love
- Suppose a girl loves a boy or a boy loves a girl. Both of them are actuated by sense gratification. So that is not love. That is not love. When there is question of sense gratification, that is not love
T
- That is not love. I go to somebody and flatter him to get something. Just like a shopkeeper does also like that. He flatters the customers in so many ways to sell goods so that he can make some profit. So there is no question of love
- There is no love. Or we do not know what is meant by love. Love does not mean just a boy is attracted by a girl or a girl is attracted by a . . . that is not love. That is sense attraction
- This is Vaisnava philosophy. "Krsna may be very cruel, but I cannot withdraw my love for Him." This is real love. "If Krsna benefits me, then I will love," then that is not love; that is business
W
- We always repeatedly say, sex life is lust. That is not love
- We love our beloved, our child or husband or wife. That is also not love. That is a temporary sentiment. Actual love is possible with Krsna. That is actual love
- When there is question of sense gratification, that is not love
- When we are, I mean to say, taught to love God, we are instructed that "You go to temple, go to church, and pray to God for your necessities, for your grievances." That is the beginning. But that is not pure love
- Which we are accepting as love, that is simply a desire for sense gratification. That is not love